Factors affecting women's decision between uterine-preserving versus hysterectomy-based surgery for pelvic organ prolapse

Education level is associated with the occurrence and timing of hysterectomy: A cohort study of Canadian women

INTRODUCTION

Hysterectomy is a common surgery with discernible practice variations that could be influenced by socioeconomic factors. We examined the association between level of educational attainment and the occurrence and timing of hysterectomy in Canadian women.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of 30 496 females in the Alberta's Tomorrow Project (2000-2015) followed approximately every 4 years using self-report questionnaires. Educational attainment was defined as high school diploma or less, college degree, university degree (reference group), and postgraduate degree. We used logistic regression analyzing hysterectomy occurrence at any time and before menopause, separately, and flexible parametric survival models analyzing hysterectomy timing with age as the time scale. Multivariable models controlled for race/ethnicity, rural/urban residence, parity, oral contraceptive use, and smoking.

RESULTS

Overall, 39.1% of females reported a high school diploma or less, 28.9% reported a college degree, 23.5% reported a university degree, and 8.5% reported a postgraduate degree. A graded association was observed between lower education and higher odds of hysterectomy (high school or less: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.68, 95% CI 1.55-1.82; college degree: AOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.45-1.72); results were similar for premenopausal hysterectomy. A graded association between lower education and earlier timing of hysterectomy was also observed up to approximately age 60 (e.g., at age 40: high school or less adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 1.61, 95% CI 1.49-1.75; college degree AHR 1.53, 95% CI 1.40-1.67).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with lower levels of education were more likely to experience hysterectomy, including hysterectomy before menopause and at younger ages.

Vaginal Hysterectomy and Pelvic Organ Prolapse: History and Recent Developments

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Vaginal hysterectomy (VH) was described as far back as 120 CE. However, it was not till the mid-1900s when reconstructive procedures were introduced to mitigate the risk of, or treat, pelvic organ prolapse in relation to VH. Furthermore, routine hysterectomy, particularly VH, has long been advocated in prolapse surgery. However, this indication is now questionable.

METHODS

Literature review to provide an overview of current evidence and experts' opinion regarding the relationship between VH and pelvic organ prolapse. The review presents a historical perspective on the role of VH in the management of pelvic organ prolapse, the current debate on the usefulness of the procedure in this context, a practical guide on operative techniques used during VH and the impact of recent surgical developments on its use.

RESULTS

Vaginal hysterectomy is a well-established technique that is still superior to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease, although more surgically challenging. However, it is possible that some contemporary techniques, such as vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, may overcome some of these challenges, and hence increase the number of hysterectomies performed via the vaginal route. Although patients should be counselled about uterine-sparing reconstructive surgery, vaginal hysterectomy continues to be a major surgical procedure in reconstructive pelvic floor surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Therefore, it is prudent to continue to train residents in vaginal surgical skills to ensure that they continue to provide safe, cost-effective, and comprehensive patient care.

Attitudes Toward Hysterectomy in Saudi Arabian Women Undergoing Evaluation for Uterovaginal Prolapse: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

 Hysterectomy is an effective management approach for uterovaginal prolapse. However, the decision to undergo hysterectomy is a complex matter, influenced not only by medical factors but also cultural beliefs, societal norms, and individual attitudes. In Saudi Arabia, a nation with its distinctive cultural and social norms, the understanding of women's attitudes toward hysterectomy is of utmost importance. Unfortunately, such related attitudes have not been explored.

OBJECTIVE

This first-ever study aimed to investigate the attitudes toward hysterectomy among Saudi Arabian women undergoing evaluation for uterovaginal prolapse, by exploring the factors influencing their decision-making process and treatment choices, with a particular focus on the potential impact of cultural beliefs and societal norms.

METHODS

A survey was conducted among 404 women referred for uterovaginal prolapse evaluation. The participants completed a self-administered questionnaire, which included demographic information, perceptions on hysterectomy's impact on well-being, and factors affecting decision-making.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation of participants was 51.07 ± 11.1 years. Most participants were currently married (n=327, 81%), were unemployed (n=309, 76.5%), and had an "excellent" self-rated general health status (n=138, 34%). Current prolapse management methods included Kegel exercises (n=103, 25.5%), pessary use (n=32, 8%), physical therapy (n=12, 3%), planned surgery (n=75, 18.5%), and no specific treatment (n=182, 45%). Overall, the study revealed diverse findings on the potential perceived impact of hysterectomy on different aspects of well-being. Notably, for pain symptoms, 152 participants (38%) reported potential improvement, while 123 participants (30%) predicted worsening, and 129 participants (32%) anticipated no change. Moreover, the study unveiled insights into the factors influencing patients' decision-making between hysterectomy and uterine-sparing procedures. Remarkably, 97 respondents (24%) considered the doctor's opinion to be "very Important," while 91 respondents (22%) rated the impact on surgical complication risk as "very important." Furthermore, the desire to preserve all healthy organs was deemed "very important" by 106 respondents (26%). The resources of information women depended on when making a decision to undergo hysterectomy varied and included a second opinion from another physician (n=68, 17%), social media (n=81, 20%), opinion from spouse/partner (21%), second opinion from female family members (n=99, 25%), and opinion from friends (n=70, 17%). Regarding preferences for decision-making, the responses varied substantially. Overall, 65 participants (16%) indicated a preference for their doctor to make the decision entirely, 81 participants (20%) preferred shared decision-making with their doctor, 89 participants (22%) wanted their doctor to make the decision after considering their input, 77 participants (19%) wished to make the final decision after discussing it with their doctor, and 93 participants (23%) expressed a preference for independently making the final decision. Lastly, correlations between women's responses and some demographic factors were identified.

CONCLUSION

This pioneering study provides valuable insights into Saudi Arabian women's attitudes toward hysterectomy, emphasizing the need for patient-centered care and culturally sensitive approaches in managing uterovaginal prolapse.