Tenecteplase in wake-up ischemic stroke trial: Protocol for a randomized-controlled trial

Workload and clinical impact of MRI-based extension of reperfusion therapy time window in acute ischaemic stroke-a prospective single-centre study

Current European Stroke Organisation (ESO) guidelines recommend extended time window reperfusion therapies (4.5-9 h for thrombolysis, 6-24 h for thrombectomy) based on advanced imaging. However, the workload and clinical benefit of this strategy on a population basis are not known. To determine the caseload, treatment rates, and outcomes in the extended as compared to the standard time windows. All consecutive ischaemic stroke patients within 24 h of last known well between 1st March 2021 and 28th February 2022 were included in a prospective single-centre study. Treatment eligibility in the extended time windows or wake-up strokes recognized within 4 h was based on current ESO guideline criteria using MRI DWI-PWI or DWI-FLAIR mismatch. MRI was only available during working hours (8-20 h); otherwise, CT/CTA was used. Clinical outcome in treated patients was assessed at three months. Among the 777 admitted patients, 252 (32.4%) had MRI. The thrombolysis rate was 119/304 (39.1%) in standard and 14/231 (6.1%) in the extended time window. The thrombectomy rate was 34/386 (8.8%) in standard and 15/391 (3.8%) in the extended time window. Independent clinical outcomes (mRS ≤ 2) were not statistically different in early and late-treated patients both for thrombolysis (48% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.25) and thrombectomy (38.4% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.99). Even with a limited availability of advanced imaging extending therapeutic time windows resulted in an 11.7% increase in thrombolysis and a 44% increase in thrombectomy with comparable clinical outcomes in early and late-treated patients at the price of a twofold burden in clinical and advanced imaging screening.

Thrombolysis in wake-up stroke based on MRI mismatch

OBJECTIVES

Wake-up stroke (WUPS) patients can be selected to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) treatment based on the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) mismatch concept. However, recent studies suggest the introduction of modified MRI mismatch criteria, allowing IVT in WUPS patients with a partial mismatch.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

WUPS patients treated with IVT in the NOR-TEST trial and consecutively thereafter at Stavanger University Hospital were included in this study. Patient selection for treatment was performed based on the clinical presentation and the MRI DWI/FLAIR mismatch criteria. MRI examinations were reassessed according to the modified DWI-FLAIR mismatch criteria, allowing partial mismatch. Improvement in NIHSS and mRS at 3 months were used to analyze clinical outcome, and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) to analyze safety.

RESULTS

78 WUPS patients were treated with IVT. Only 68 of these patients were independent pre-stroke and included in the clinical analysis. When reassessing the MRI examinations, 41 (60 %) were rated as DWI/ FLAIR mismatch, 14 (21 %) as partial mismatch and 13 (19 %) as match. The results show that the patient groups had a mRS score 0-1 at 3 months measured as primary outcome to respectively 27 (65.9 %), 11 (78.6 %) and 8 (61.5 %); (P = 0.629). The mismatch group showed the best clinical improvement (3-points NIHSS reduction, p = 0.005). No ICH was seen in any of the groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study extended the mismatch concept in clinical praxis to treat WUPS patients with partial mismatch, showing the best clinical outcome in the mismatch group.

Up-to-date advance in the relationship between OSA and stroke: a narrative review

PURPOSE

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and stroke affect each other. In this review, we summarized the effect of OSA on the onset and recurrence of stroke, the prognosis, and the treatment of poststroke patients with OSA.

METHODS

Pubmed/MEDLINE were searched through May 2023 to explore the relationship between OSA and stroke. The relevant papers included OSA and stroke, OSA and recurrent stroke, and the prognosis and treatment of poststroke patients with OSA.

RESULTS

The results showed that OSA can promote the onset and recurrence of stroke and that OSA may adversely affect the prognosis of poststroke patients. The application of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and other treatments may benefit poststroke patients with OSA, though the long term effects of treatment are not well documented.

CONCLUSION

Both the onset and recurrence of stroke closely correlated with OSA, but the specific mechanisms remain unclear. Further studies should be carried out to explore effective treatments in patients with stroke and OSA.

Intravenous Tenecteplase for Acute Ischemic Stroke Within 4.5-24 Hours of Onset (ROSE-TNK): A Phase 2, Randomized, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Intravenous tenecteplase (TNK) efficacy has not been well demonstrated in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) beyond 4.5 hours after onset. This study aimed to determine the effect of intravenous TNK for AIS within 4.5 to 24 hours of onset.

METHODS

In this pilot trial, eligible AIS patients with diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)-fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch were randomly allocated to intravenous TNK (0.25 mg/kg) or standard care within 4.5-24 hours of onset. The primary endpoint was excellent functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score of 0-1). The primary safety endpoint was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

Of the randomly assigned 80 patients, the primary endpoint occurred in 52.5% (21/40) of TNK group and 50.0% (20/40) of control group, with no significant difference (unadjusted odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval 0.46-2.66; P=0.82). More early neurological improvement occurred in TNK group than in control group (11 vs. 3, P=0.03), but no significant differences were found in other secondary endpoints, such as mRS 0-2 at 90 days, shift analysis of mRS at 90 days, and change in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score at 24 hours and 7 days. There were no cases of sICH in this trial; however, asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 3 of the 40 patients (7.5%) in the TNK group.

CONCLUSION

This phase 2, randomized, multicenter study suggests that intravenous TNK within 4.5-24 hours of onset may be safe and feasible in AIS patients with a DWI-FLAIR mismatch.

Big Data in Stroke: How to Use Big Data to Make the Next Management Decision

The last decade has seen significant advances in the accumulation of medical data, the computational techniques to analyze that data, and corresponding improvements in management. Interventions such as thrombolytics and mechanical thrombectomy improve patient outcomes after stroke in selected patients; however, significant gaps remain in our ability to select patients, predict complications, and understand outcomes. Big data and the computational methods needed to analyze it can address these gaps. For example, automated analysis of neuroimaging to estimate the volume of brain tissue that is ischemic and salvageable can help triage patients for acute interventions. Data-intensive computational techniques can perform complex risk calculations that are too cumbersome to be completed by humans, resulting in more accurate and timely prediction of which patients require increased vigilance for adverse events such as treatment complications. To handle the accumulation of complex medical data, a variety of advanced computational techniques referred to as machine learning and artificial intelligence now routinely complement traditional statistical inference. In this narrative review, we explore data-intensive techniques in stroke research, how it has informed the management of stroke patients, and how current work could shape clinical practice in the future.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO) expedited recommendation on tenecteplase for acute ischaemic stroke

Within the last year, four randomised-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) have been published comparing intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with tenecteplase and alteplase in acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) patients with a non-inferiority design for three of them. An expedited recommendation process was initiated by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and conducted according to ESO standard operating procedure based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) framework. We identified three relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions, performed systematic reviews of the literature and meta-analyses, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote evidence-based recommendations. Expert consensus statements were provided if insufficient evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. For patients with AIS of <4.5 h duration who are eligible for IVT, tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg can be used as a safe and effective alternative to alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (moderate evidence, strong recommendation). For patients with AIS of <4.5 h duration who are eligible for IVT, we recommend against using tenecteplase at a dose of 0.40 mg/kg (low evidence, strong recommendation). For patients with AIS of <4.5 h duration with prehospital management with a mobile stroke unit who are eligible for IVT, we suggest tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg over alteplase 0.90 mg/kg (low evidence, weak recommendation). For patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) AIS of <4.5 h duration who are eligible for IVT, we recommend tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg over alteplase 0.9 mg/kg (moderate evidence, strong recommendation). For patients with AIS on awakening from sleep or AIS of unknown onset who are selected with non-contrast CT, we recommend against IVT with tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg (low evidence, strong recommendation). Expert consensus statements are also provided. Tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg may be favoured over alteplase 0.9 mg/kg for patients with AIS of <4.5 h duration in view of comparable safety and efficacy data and easier administration. For patients with LVO AIS of <4.5 h duration who are IVT-eligible, IVT with tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg is preferable over skipping IVT before MT, even in the setting of a direct admission to a thrombectomy-capable centre. IVT with tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg may be a reasonable alternative to alteplase 0.9 mg/kg for patients with AIS on awakening from sleep or AIS of unknown onset and who are IVT-eligible after selection with advanced imaging.

Comparative efficacy and safety of tenecteplase and alteplase in acute ischemic stroke: A pairwise and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Studies on tenecteplase have been yielding mixed results for several important outcomes at different doses, thus hampering objective guideline recommendations in acute ischemic stroke management. This meta-analysis stratifies doses in order to refine our interpretation of outcomes and quantify the benefits and harms of tenecteplase at different doses.

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library, and reference lists of the included articles were systematically searched. Several efficacy and safety outcomes were pooled and reported as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Network meta-analysis was used to find the optimal dose of tenecteplase. Meta-regression was run to investigate the impact of baseline NIHSS scores on functional outcomes and mortality.

RESULTS

Ten randomized controlled trials with a total of 4140 patients were included. 2166 (52.32%) patients were enrolled in the tenecteplase group and 1974 (47.68%) in the alteplase group. Tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg dose demonstrated significant improvement in excellent functional outcome at 3 months (RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.04-1.26), and early neurological improvement (RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.03-2.26). There was no statistically significant difference between tenecteplase and alteplase in terms of good functional outcome, intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality at any dose. Meta-regression demonstrated superior tenecteplase efficacy with increasing stroke severity, however, the results were statistically nonsignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Tenecteplase at 0.25 mg/kg dose is more efficacious and at least as safe as alteplase for stroke thrombolysis. Newer analyses need to focus on direct comparison of tenecteplase doses and whether tenecteplase is efficacious at longer needle times.

A Phase III, prospective, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of thrombolysis in imaging-eligible, late-window patients to assess the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase (TIMELESS): Rationale and design

RATIONALE

While thrombolysis is standard of care for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) within 4.5 h of symptom onset, the benefit of tenecteplase beyond this time window is less certain.

AIM

The TIMELESS trial (NCT03785678) aims to determine if treatment with tenecteplase increases the proportion of good clinical outcomes among patients with stroke due to a large vessel occlusion who present beyond 4.5 h after symptom onset.

SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES

A total of 456 patients will provide ⩾90% power to detect differences in the distribution of modified Rankin Scale scores at Day 90 at the two-sided 0.049 significance level.

METHODS AND DESIGN

TIMELESS is a Phase III, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tenecteplase with or without endovascular thrombectomy in patients with AIS and evidence of salvageable tissue via imaging who present within the 4.5- to 24-h time window with an internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) (M1/M2) occlusion.

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary efficacy objective of tenecteplase compared with placebo will be evaluated with ordinal modified Rankin Scale scores at Day 90. Safety will be evaluated via incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, incidence and severity of adverse events, and mortality rate.

DISCUSSION

Results from TIMELESS will contribute to understanding of the safety and efficacy of tenecteplase administered 4.5-24 h following symptom onset for patients with an ICA or MCA occlusion.

Safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in patients with wake-up stroke assessed by non-contrast CT (TWIST): a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Current evidence supports the use of intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase in patients with wake-up stroke selected with MRI or perfusion imaging and is recommended in clinical guidelines. However, access to advanced imaging techniques is often scarce. We aimed to determine whether thrombolytic treatment with intravenous tenecteplase given within 4·5 h of awakening improves functional outcome in patients with ischaemic wake-up stroke selected using non-contrast CT.

METHODS

TWIST was an investigator-initiated, multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial with blinded endpoint assessment, conducted at 77 hospitals in ten countries. We included patients aged 18 years or older with acute ischaemic stroke symptoms upon awakening, limb weakness, a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score of 3 or higher or aphasia, a non-contrast CT examination of the head, and the ability to receive tenecteplase within 4·5 h of awakening. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a single intravenous bolus of tenecteplase 0·25 mg per kg of bodyweight (maximum 25 mg) or control (no thrombolysis) using a central, web-based, computer-generated randomisation schedule. Trained research personnel, who conducted telephone interviews at 90 days (follow-up), were masked to treatment allocation. Clinical assessments were performed on day 1 (at baseline) and day 7 of hospital admission (or at discharge, whichever occurred first). The primary outcome was functional outcome assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days and analysed using ordinal logistic regression in the intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with EudraCT (2014-000096-80), ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03181360), and ISRCTN (10601890).

FINDINGS

From June 12, 2017, to Sept 30, 2021, 578 of the required 600 patients were enrolled (288 randomly assigned to the tenecteplase group and 290 to the control group [intention-to-treat population]). The median age of participants was 73·7 years (IQR 65·9-81·1). 332 (57%) of 578 participants were male and 246 (43%) were female. Treatment with tenecteplase was not associated with better functional outcome, according to mRS score at 90 days (adjusted OR 1·18, 95% CI 0·88-1·58; p=0·27). Mortality at 90 days did not significantly differ between treatment groups (28 [10%] patients in the tenecteplase group and 23 [8%] in the control group; adjusted HR 1·29, 95% CI 0·74-2·26; p=0·37). Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage occurred in six (2%) patients in the tenecteplase group versus three (1%) in the control group (adjusted OR 2·17, 95% CI 0·53-8·87; p=0·28), whereas any intracranial haemorrhage occurred in 33 (11%) versus 30 (10%) patients (adjusted OR 1·14, 0·67-1·94; p=0·64).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with wake-up stroke selected with non-contrast CT, treatment with tenecteplase was not associated with better functional outcome at 90 days. The number of symptomatic haemorrhages and any intracranial haemorrhages in both treatment groups was similar to findings from previous trials of wake-up stroke patients selected using advanced imaging. Current evidence does not support treatment with tenecteplase in patients selected with non-contrast CT.

FUNDING

Norwegian Clinical Research Therapy in the Specialist Health Services Programme, the Swiss Heart Foundation, the British Heart Foundation, and the Norwegian National Association for Public Health.

Replacing Alteplase with Tenecteplase: Is the Time Ripe?

Thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke has predominantly been with alteplase for over a quarter of a century. In recent years, with trials showing evidence of higher rates of successful reperfusion, similar safety profile and efficacy of tenecteplase (TNK) as compared to alteplase, TNK has now emerged as another potential choice for thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke. In this review, we will focus on these recent advances, aiming: (1) to provide a brief overview of thrombolysis in stroke; (2) to provide comparisons between alteplase and TNK for clinical, imaging, and safety outcomes; (3) to focus on key subgroups of interest to understand if there is an advantage of using TNK over alteplase or vice-versa, to review available evidence on role of TNK in intra-arterial thrombolysis, as bridging therapy and in mobile stroke units; and (4) to summarize what to expect in the near future from recently completed trials and propose areas for future research on this evolving topic. We present compelling data from several trials regarding the safety and efficacy of TNK in acute ischemic stroke along with completed yet unpublished trials that will help provide insight into these unanswered questions.

Tenecteplase in managing acute ischemic stroke: a long-term cost-utility analysis in Iran

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The advantage of tenecteplase (TNK) over alteplase (ALT) in managing acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been reported, but the cost-effectiveness of these two strategies has not received as much attention. The objective of this study was to compare TNK and ALT for the management of AIS patients in Iran in terms of cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

This study was carried out from the payer's perspective in Iran, with a lifetime horizon. A full economic evaluation model was designed as a decision tree and a Markov model. After defining different Markov states, each health state was assigned a utility value, and quality-adjusted life year (QALY) was estimated using that value. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was ultimately used for evaluating the comparative cost-effectiveness. Both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

Compared to ALT, TNK can save approximately 4333.81 USD, and is able to increase one unit of QALY while saving approximately 17,450.29 USD. So, Base-case results showed that TNK strongly dominates ALT. Moreover, the base case results were strongly confirmed by deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Base-case and sensitivity analysis showed that TNK is the dominant strategy compared to ALT for the management of AIS patients.

Tenecteplase or Alteplase: What Is the Thrombolytic Agent of the Future?

Purpose of review

Alteplase has been the thrombolytic of choice for acute ischaemic stroke for more than two decades. A thrombolytic which is easier to administer and with improved or comparable safety and efficacy is desirable. Tenecteplase has emerged as a potential successor, and its off-license use in acute ischaemic stroke has increased in recent years. We aimed to examine the evidence base for each drug and discuss their use in varying patient populations in acute ischaemic stroke.

Recent findings

Several trials comparing tenecteplase and alteplase have reported very recently with the results of the ACT trial strengthening the argument in favour of non-inferiority of tenecteplase to alteplase. Ongoing trials such as ATTEST-2 are of interest, and trials such as TASTE and TEMPO-2 will shed further light on use of tenecteplase in specific populations.

Summary

A single thrombolytic agent for all indications for thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke is desirable in streamlining workflows. Based on recent and upcoming trials, guidelines may soon recommend tenecteplase as a suitable alternative to alteplase. The use of tenecteplase in specific subgroups will depend on further recruitment to ongoing clinical trials.

Application of Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Green Channel of Acute and Hyperacute Ischemic Stroke

The purpose of this study was to observe the effects of multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the green channel of acute and hyperacute ischemic strokes, in order to better guide clinical treatment. The clinical data of 126 patients with acute and hyperacute ischemic stroke who received interventional treatment in the emergency green channel was collected retrospectively. The patients who received multimodal computed tomography (CT) were included in the CT group. Patients who underwent multimodal MRI examinations were included in the MRI group, and the door-to-needle time (DNT), neurological function, and prognosis of the two groups were compared. The result turned out that among the 126 patients included, 40 patients underwent CT examination (CT group) and 86 patients underwent MRI examination (MRI group). A comparison of general data between the CT group and the MRI group showed $P>0.05$ . The MRI group’s DNT time (61.23 ± 9.32) min was shorter than that of the CT group (87.22 ± 14.26) min, $P<0.05$ . Through comparison, the $P$ values of mRS scores and NIHSS scores in both groups were greater than 0.05. After treatment, the mRS score and NIHSS score of the MRI group was lower, with $P<0.05$ . According to the results of this study, it can be concluded that emergency multimodal MRI could shorten the DNT time of patients with acute and hyperacute ischemic stroke, reduce the degree of neurological impairment, and improve the prognosis.

Ethical Justification for Deferral of Consent in the AcT Trial for Acute Ischemic Stroke

The AcT trial (Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase) compares alteplase or tenecteplase for patients with acute ischemic stroke. All eligible patients are enrolled by deferral of consent. Although the use of deferral of consent in the AcT trial meets the requirements of Canadian policy, we sought to provide a more explicit and rigorous approach to the justification of deferral of consent organized around 3 questions. Ultimately, the approach we outline here could become the foundation for a general justification for deferral of consent.

Statistical analysis plan for the randomized controlled trial Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischaemic Stroke Trial (TWIST)

BACKGROUND

Patients with wake-up ischemic stroke are frequently excluded from thrombolytic treatment due to unknown symptom onset time and limited availability of advanced imaging modalities. The Tenecteplase in Wake-up Ischaemic Stroke Trial (TWIST) is a randomized controlled trial of intravenous tenecteplase 0.25 mg/kg and standard care versus standard care alone (no thrombolysis) in patients who wake up with acute ischemic stroke and can be treated within 4.5 h of wakening based on non-contrast CT findings.

OBJECTIVE

To publish the detailed statistical analysis plan for TWIST prior to unblinding.

METHODS

The TWIST statistical analysis plan is consistent with the Consolidating Standard of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement and provides clear and open reporting.

DISCUSSION

Publication of the statistical analysis plan serves to reduce potential trial reporting bias and clearly outlines the pre-specified analyses.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03181360 . EudraCT Number 2014-000096-80 . WHO ICRTP registry number ISRCTN10601890 .

European Stroke Organisation - European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy expedited recommendation on indication for intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion

Six randomized controlled clinical trials have assessed whether mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone is non-inferior to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus MT within 4.5 hours of symptom onset in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischaemic stroke and no contraindication to IVT. An expedited recommendation process was initiated by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and conducted with the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) according to ESO standard operating procedure based on the GRADE system. We identified two relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence and wrote evidence-based recommendations. Expert opinion was provided if insufficient evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach. For stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO directly admitted to a MT-capable centre ('mothership') within 4.5 hours of symptom onset and eligible for both treatments, we recommend IVT plus MT over MT alone (moderate evidence, strong recommendation). MT should not prevent the initiation of IVT, nor should IVT delay MT. In stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO admitted to a centre without MT facilities and eligible for IVT ≤4.5 hrs and MT, we recommend IVT followed by rapid transfer to a MT capable-centre ('drip-and-ship') in preference to omitting IVT (low evidence, strong recommendation). Expert consensus statements on ischaemic stroke on awakening from sleep are also provided. Patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke should receive IVT in addition to MT if they have no contraindications to either treatment.

European Stroke Organisation (ESO)-European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) expedited recommendation on indication for intravenous thrombolysis before mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke and anterior circulation large vessel occlusion

Six randomized controlled clinical trials have assessed whether mechanical thrombectomy (MT) alone is non-inferior to intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) plus MT within 4.5 hours of symptom onset in patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke and no contraindication to IVT. An expedited recommendation process was initiated by the European Stroke Organisation (ESO) and conducted with the European Society of Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) according to ESO standard operating procedure based on the GRADE system. We identified two relevant Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) questions, performed systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the literature, assessed the quality of the available evidence, and wrote evidence-based recommendations. Expert opinion was provided if insufficient evidence was available to provide recommendations based on the GRADE approach.For stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO directly admitted to a MT-capable center ('mothership') within 4.5 hours of symptom onset and eligible for both treatments, we recommend IVT plus MT over MT alone (moderate evidence, strong recommendation). MT should not prevent the initiation of IVT, nor should IVT delay MT. In stroke patients with anterior circulation LVO admitted to a center without MT facilities and eligible for IVT ≤4.5 hours and MT, we recommend IVT followed by rapid transfer to a MT capable-center ('drip-and-ship') in preference to omitting IVT (low evidence, strong recommendation). Expert consensus statements on ischemic stroke on awakening from sleep are also provided. Patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke should receive IVT in addition to MT if they have no contraindications to either treatment.

Risk of Aneurysm Rupture After Thrombolysis in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) are considered to be a relative contraindication for IV thrombolysis (IVT) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Currently, however, data are limited on the risk of UIA rupture after IVT. Our objective was to assess whether IVT for AIS can lead to a UIA rupture and intracranial hemorrhages (ICHs) in patients with unruptured UIAs.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort study of consecutive patients treated in a comprehensive stroke center between 2005 and 2019. We assessed radiology reports and records at the Finnish Care Register for Health Care to identify patients with UIAs among all patients with AIS treated with IVT at the center. We analyzed patient angiograms for aneurysm characteristics and other brain imaging studies for ICHs after IVT. The main outcome was in-hospital ICHs attributable to a UIA rupture after IVT. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital symptomatic ICHs (European-Australian Cooperative Acute Stroke Study [ECASS-2] criteria, i.e., NIH Stroke Scale score increase ≥4 points) and any in-hospital ICHs.

RESULTS

A total of 3,953 patients were treated with IVT during the 15-year study period. One hundred thirty-two (3.3%) of the 3,953 patients with AIS had a total of 155 UIAs (141 saccular and 14 fusiform). The mean diameter of UIAs was 4.7 ± 3.8 mm, with 18.7% being ≥7 mm and 9.7% ≥10 mm in diameter. None of the 141 saccular UIAs ruptured after IVT. Three patients (2.3%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.6%-5.8%) with large fusiform basilar artery UIAs had a fatal rupture at 27 hours, 43 hours, and 19 days after IVT. All 3 were administered anticoagulation treatments after IVT, and anticoagulation took effect during the UIA rupture. Any ICHs and symptomatic ICHs were detected in 18.9% (95% CI 12.9%-26.2%) and 8.3% (95% CI 4.4%-13.8%) of all patients with AIS, respectively.

DISCUSSION

IVT appears to be safe in patients with AIS with saccular UIAs, including larges UIAs (≥10 mm). Anticoagulation after AIS in patients with large fusiform posterior circulation UIAs may increase the risk of aneurysm rupture.