Protocol for the MAnagement of Systolic blood pressure during Thrombectomy by Endovascular Route for acute ischemic STROKE randomized clinical trial: The MASTERSTROKE trial

Type of anesthesia for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke: A literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has been proven as the standard treatment for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). However, the ideal anesthetic strategy during EVT still remains unclear. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the optimal anesthetic modality for patients with AIS undergoing EVT based on current randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

METHODS

The databases Medline (via PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched for RCTs comparing general anesthesia (GA) and conscious sedation (CS) in AIS patients undergoing EVT. The primary outcome was a favorable functional outcome at 90 days postintervention. Data analysis was conducted using the Review Manager software (RevMan V.5.3).

RESULTS

Eight RCTs involving 1199 patients were included. There was no significant difference between GA and CS group in the rate of functional independence (risk ratio (RR) = 1.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.96 to 1.25; p = 0.17; I2 = 30%). Compared with the CS group, the GA group attained a higher successful recanalization rate (RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.08 to 1.20; p < 0.00001; I2 = 17%). In addition, patients in the GA were associated with a higher rate of hypotension (RR = 1.87, 95% CI = 1.44 to 2.41; p < 0.00001; I2 = 66%) and a higher incidence of pneumonia (RR = 1.38, 95% CI = 1.05 to 1.8; p = 0.02; I2 = 37%).

CONCLUSION

For AIS patients receiving EVT, the choice of anesthetic modality did not influence the 3-month neurological outcome while GA is superior to CS in terms of successful reperfusion rate. Moreover, the patients in the GA group were at a higher risk of developing hypotension and pneumonia. Further studies are required to provide more sufficient evidence.

The effect of anesthesia on hemodynamics and outcome of patients undergoing thrombectomy after acute ischemic stroke: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Anesthesia during thrombectomy remains a matter of debate. We retrospectively investigated the influence of intraprocedural blood pressure and type of anaesthetic agent on 3-month functional outcome and mortality in stroke patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia in a single center study.

METHODS

All patients suffering from stroke who presented between January 2019 and July 2021 at Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg Genk, Belgium and who received thrombectomy were included. Patient's characteristics and outcome data had been collected for benchmarking. Detailed perioperative data were exported from the electronic anesthesia records and clinically validated. Patients were stratified by peri-operative presence of hypotension (MAP < 65 mmHg at any time point) versus no-hypotension (MAP ≥ 65 mmHg).

RESULTS

All 98 patients received mechanical thrombectomy under general anesthesia. Thirty-six percent (n = 35) was hypotensive peri-operatively at any time point. Proportion of sevoflurane use was higher in non-hypotensive patients compared to hypotensive patients (73% (n = 45) vs. 51% (n = 18), p = 0.04). Peri-operative use of vasopressors was higher in the hypotensive group compared to non-hypotensive (88% (n = 30) vs. 63% (n = 39), p = 0.008). Proportion of patients with good functional outcome at 3 months (mRS 0-2) was higher in non-hypotensive patients compared to hypotensive patients 44% (n = 27) vs. 24% (n = 8), p < 0.05. 90-day mortality was lower in non-hypotensive patients compared to hypotensive patients 21% (n = 13) vs. 43% (n = 15), (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Patients who are hypotensive at any given time during thrombectomy under general anesthesia may have worse neurological outcome compared to non-hypotensive patients. The best anaesthetic management for mechanical thrombectomy needs to be clarified prospectively in large multicenter studies.

Effect of Individualized Versus Standardized Blood Pressure Management During Endovascular Stroke Treatment on Clinical Outcome: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Optimal blood pressure (BP) management during endovascular stroke treatment is not well established. We studied whether an individualized approach for managing BP during endovascular stroke treatment gives a better clinical outcome than an approach with standardized systolic BP targets.

METHODS

The INDIVIDUATE study (Individualized Blood Pressure Management During Endovascular Treatment of Acute Ischemic Stroke Under Procedural Sedation) is a randomized clinical trial with a prospective randomized open blinded end point (PROBE) design. Patients were recruited between October 1, 2020 and July 7, 2022 at a single center at a tertiary care university hospital. Patients were eligible, when they were suffering from acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation with occlusions of the internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of ≥8 receiving endovascular stroke treatment in procedural sedation. The intervention consists of an individualized BP management strategy, where preinterventional baseline systolic BP (SBP) values are used as intraprocedural BP targets. As a control, the standard treatment aims to maintain the intraprocedural SBP between 140 and 180 mm Hg. The main prespecified outcome is the proportion of favorable functional outcomes 90 days after stroke, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 to 2.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty patients were enrolled and included in the analysis, mean (SD) age was 77 (12) years, 142 (57%) patients were women, and mean (SD) National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score on admission was 17 (5.2). In all, 123 (49%) patients were treated with individualized and 127 (51%) with standard BP management. Mean (SD) intraprocedural SBP was similar in the individualized versus standard BP management group (157 [19] versus 154 [18] mm Hg; P=0.16). The rate of favorable functional outcome after 3 months was not significantly different between the individualized versus the standard BP management group (25% versus 24%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.41-1.61]; P=0.56).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients treated with endovascular stroke treatment due to an acute ischemic stroke of the anterior circulation, no significant difference was seen between the individualized BP management strategy, where intraprocedural SBP was targeted to baseline values, and the standardized regimen of targeting SBP between 140 and 180 mm Hg.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT04578288.

General Anesthesia Compared With Non-GA in Endovascular Thrombectomy for Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke is either performed under general anesthesia (GA) or with non-GA techniques such as conscious sedation or local anesthesia alone. Previous small meta-analyses have demonstrated superior recanalization rates and improved functional recovery with GA when compared with non-GA techniques. The publication of further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) could provide updated guidance when choosing between GA and non-GA techniques.

METHODS

A systematic search for trials in which stroke EVT patients were randomized to GA or non-GA was performed in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. A systematic review and meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. These trials included a total of 980 participants (GA, N = 487; non-GA, N = 493). GA improves recanalization by 9.0% (GA 84.6% vs non-GA 75.6%; odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% CI 1.26-2.42, p = 0.0009), and the proportion of patients with functional recovery improves by 8.4% (GA 44.6% vs non-GA 36.2%; OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.04-1.98, p = 0.03). There was no difference in hemorrhagic complications or 3-month mortality.

DISCUSSION

In patients with ischemic stroke treated with EVT, GA is associated with higher recanalization rates and improved functional recovery at 3 months compared with non-GA techniques. Conversion to GA and subsequent intention-to-treat analysis will underestimate the true therapeutic benefit. GA is established as effective in improving recanalization rates in EVT (7 Class 1 studies) with a high Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) certainty rating. GA is established as effective in improving functional recovery at 3 months in EVT (5 Class 1 studies) with a moderate GRADE certainty rating. Stroke services need to develop pathways to incorporate GA as the first choice for most EVT procedures in acute ischemic stroke with a level A recommendation for recanalization and level B recommendation for functional recovery.

End the confusion: general anaesthesia improves patient outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy

Expert physiological and pharmacological care by anaesthetists is required in all stroke endovascular thrombectomy cases. RCTs show clinical benefits in recanalisation rates and functional recovery after endovascular thrombectomy with general anaesthesia compared with sedation. Many stroke centres will require wholesale reorganisation of stroke pathways to ensure anaesthesia services are available for all cases. Anaesthetists have an integral role in improving clinical outcomes in large vessel occlusion stroke.

Effect of an individualized versus standard blood pressure management during mechanical thrombectomy for anterior ischemic stroke: the DETERMINE randomized controlled trial

Background

Hypotension and blood pressure (BP) variability during endovascular therapy (EVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to an anterior large vessel occlusion (LVO) is associated with worse outcomes. However, the optimal BP threshold during EVT is still unknown given the lack of randomized controlled evidence. We designed the DETERMINE trial to assess whether an individualized BP management during EVT could achieve better functional outcomes compared to a standard BP management.

Methods

The DETERMINE trial is a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, blinded endpoint clinical trial (PROBE design). AIS patients with a proximal anterior LVO are randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to an experimental arm in which mean arterial pressure (MAP) is maintained within 10% of the first MAP measured before EVT, or a control arm in which systolic BP (SBP) is maintained within 140–180 mm Hg until reperfusion is achieved or artery closure in case of EVT failure. The primary outcome is the rate of favorable functional outcomes, defined by a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) between 0 and 2 at 90 days. Secondary outcomes include excellent outcome and ordinal analysis of the mRS at 90 days, early neurological improvement at 24 h (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale), final infarct volume, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage rates, and all-cause mortality at 90 days. Overall, 432 patients will be included.

Discussion

DETERMINE will assess the clinical relevance of an individualized BP management before reperfusion compared to the one size fits all approach currently recommended by international guidelines.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04352296. Registered on 20th April 2020.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06538-9.