Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning combined with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial (SERIC-IVT) Study design and protocol

The potential mechanism and clinical application value of remote ischemic conditioning in stroke

Some studies have confirmed the neuroprotective effect of remote ischemic conditioning against stroke. Although numerous animal researches have shown that the neuroprotective effect of remote ischemic conditioning may be related to neuroinflammation, cellular immunity, apoptosis, and autophagy, the exact underlying molecular mechanisms are unclear. This review summarizes the current status of different types of remote ischemic conditioning methods in animal and clinical studies and analyzes their commonalities and differences in neuroprotective mechanisms and signaling pathways. Remote ischemic conditioning has emerged as a potential therapeutic approach for improving stroke-induced brain injury owing to its simplicity, non-invasiveness, safety, and patient tolerability. Different forms of remote ischemic conditioning exhibit distinct intervention patterns, timing, and application range. Mechanistically, remote ischemic conditioning can exert neuroprotective effects by activating the Notch1/phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathway, improving cerebral perfusion, suppressing neuroinflammation, inhibiting cell apoptosis, activating autophagy, and promoting neural regeneration. While remote ischemic conditioning has shown potential in improving stroke outcomes, its full clinical translation has not yet been achieved.

Multi-Target and Multi-Phase Adjunctive Cerebral Protection for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Reperfusion Era

Stroke remains the leading cause of death and disability in some countries, predominantly attributed to acute ischemic stroke (AIS). While intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy are widely acknowledged as effective treatments for AIS, boasting a high recanalization rate, there is a significant discrepancy between the success of revascularization and the mediocre clinical outcomes observed among patients with AIS. It is now increasingly understood that the implementation of effective cerebral protection strategies, serving as adjunctive treatments to reperfusion, can potentially improve the outcomes of AIS patients following recanalization therapy. Herein, we reviewed several promising cerebral protective methods that have the potential to slow down infarct growth and protect ischemic penumbra. We dissect the underlying reasons for the mismatch between high recanalization rates and moderate prognosis and introduce a novel concept of "multi-target and multi-phase adjunctive cerebral protection" to guide our search for neuroprotective agents that can be administered alongside recanalization therapy.

Remote ischemic conditioning after stroke: Research progress in clinical study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Stroke is a leading cause of global morbidity and mortality, indicating the necessity and urgency of effective prevention and treatment. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a convenient, simple, non-intrusive, and effective method that can be easily added to the treatment regime of stroke patients. Animal experiments and clinical trials have proved the neuroprotective effects of RIC on brain injury including (examples of neuroprotective effects). This neuroprotection is achieved by raising brain tolerance to ischemia, increasing local cerebral blood perfusion, promoting collateral circulations, neural regeneration, and reducing the incidence of hematomas in brain tissue. This current paper will summarize the studies within the last 2 years for the comprehensive understanding of the use of RIC in the treatment of stroke.

METHODS

This paper summarizes the clinical research progress of RIC on stroke (ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke (HS)). This paper is a systematic review of research published on registered clinical trials using RIC in stroke from inception through November 2022. Four major databases (PUBMED, WEB OF SCIENCE, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies were identified meeting our criteria. Of these studies, 14 were in patients with acute ischemic stroke with onset times ranging from 6 h to 14 days, seven were in patients with intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy, 10 were in patients with intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis, six on patients with vascular cognitive impairment, three on patients with moyamoya disease, and eight on patients with HS. Of the 48 studies, 42 were completed and six are ongoing.

CONCLUSIONS

RIC is safe, feasible, and effective in the treatment of stroke. Large-scale research is still required to explore the optimal treatment options and mechanisms of RIC in the future to develop a breakthrough in stroke prevention and treatment.

Safety and efficacy of remote ischemic conditioning combined with endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation: A multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled clinical trial (SERIC-EVT): Study protocol

RATIONALE/AIM

Many patients undergoing successful recanalization after endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) do not have a good outcome; additional neuroprotection might benefit this group. Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) stimulates endogenous protective mechanisms and may have a neuroprotective in acute brain ischemia. The safety and efficacy of RIC combined with endovascular thrombectomy (SERIC-EVT) trial is investigating the safety and efficacy of RIC for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who underwent EVT due to large vessel occlusion of the anterior circulation.

METHODS

SERIC-EVT is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled, and blinded endpoint clinical trial. Patients are recruited from 10 hospitals in Jilin Province, Northeast China. Patients with anterior circulation AIS undergoing EVT due to large vessel occlusion are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to RIC or sham-RIC. Participants will receive standard medical treatment and an inflation pressure of 200 mmHg (RIC group) or 60 mmHg (sham-RIC group) twice daily for seven consecutive days.

STUDY OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 on day 90. Secondary outcome measures include the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Barthel Index, and mRS scores obtained at 24 h, 7 days, 30 ± 3 days, and 90 ± 3 days post-EVT, recanalization rate, expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage post-EVT. Mortality and all adverse events, including skin changes and pain scores, within the first 90 days will be used as safety outcome measures.

SAMPLE SIZE ESTIMATES

Based on previous studies, we estimate a 14% difference in functional independence (the mRS ⩽2) between RIC and sham-RIC groups. Considering a significance level of 5% and power of 80%, and one-fifth of patients lost to follow up, the planned sample size is 498 patients (249 per group).

DISCUSSION

RIC might be a strategy that improves 3-month clinical outcomes in AIS patients who have undergone EVT due to large vessel occlusion of anterior circulation. SERIC-EVT will determine whether this is the case.