Riociguat, sildenafil and inhaled nitric oxide reduces pulmonary vascular resistance and improves right ventricular function in a porcine model of acute pulmonary embolism

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary vasodilators as add-on to current treatment strategies in acute pulmonary embolism may improve right ventricular unloading and hence improve patient outcome. We aimed to investigate whether stimulation of the nitric oxide (NO)-soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC)-cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) pathway with riociguat, sildenafil or inhaled NO causes pulmonary vasodilation and improves right ventricular function in a porcine model of acute intermediate risk pulmonary embolism.

METHODS

Two large autologous blood clots were administered to the pulmonary circulation of 28 pigs (60 kg). Animals were randomized to four increasing, clinically equivalent doses of riociguat (n=6), sildenafil (n=6), inhaled NO (n=6) or vehicle (n=6). Sham animals (n=4) did not receive pulmonary embolism or treatment. Haemodynamic responses were evaluated at baseline, after pulmonary embolism and after each dose using invasive pressure measurements, transoesophageal echocardiography, respiratory parameters and blood analysis.

RESULTS

Pulmonary embolism caused a three-fold increase in pulmonary vascular resistance compared with baseline (pulmonary embolism: 352±29 vs. baseline: 107±6 dynes, p<0.0001). All treatments lowered pulmonary vascular resistance compared with vehicle (riociguat: -158±35, sildenafil: -224±35, inhaled NO: -156±35 dynes, p<0.0001). Sildenafil, but neither inhaled NO nor riociguat, caused a decrease in systemic vascular resistance (sildenafil 678±41 vs. vehicle 1081±93 dynes, p=0.02) and increased cardiac output (sildenafil 8.8±0.8 vs. vehicle: 5.9±0.2 L/min, p<0.001). Systemic blood pressure was unaltered in all treatment groups.

CONCLUSION

Stimulation of the NO-sGC-cGMP pathway by riociguat, sildenafil and inhaled NO reduces pulmonary vascular resistance in a porcine model of acute pulmonary embolism without lowering systemic blood pressure.

Pulmonary vasodilation in acute pulmonary embolism - a systematic review

Acute pulmonary embolism is the third most common cause of cardiovascular death. Pulmonary embolism increases right ventricular afterload, which causes right ventricular failure, circulatory collapse and death. Most treatments focus on removal of the mechanical obstruction caused by the embolism, but pulmonary vasoconstriction is a significant contributor to the increased right ventricular afterload and is often left untreated. Pulmonary thromboembolism causes mechanical obstruction of the pulmonary vasculature coupled with a complex interaction between humoral factors from the activated platelets, endothelial effects, reflexes and hypoxia to cause pulmonary vasoconstriction that worsens right ventricular afterload. Vasoconstrictors include serotonin, thromboxane, prostaglandins and endothelins, counterbalanced by vasodilators such as nitric oxide and prostacyclins. Exogenous administration of pulmonary vasodilators in acute pulmonary embolism seems attractive but all come with a risk of systemic vasodilation or worsening of pulmonary ventilation-perfusion mismatch. In animal models of acute pulmonary embolism, modulators of the nitric oxide-cyclic guanosine monophosphate-protein kinase G pathway, endothelin pathway and prostaglandin pathway have been investigated. But only a small number of clinical case reports and prospective clinical trials exist. The aim of this review is to give an overview of the causes of pulmonary embolism-induced pulmonary vasoconstriction and of experimental and human investigations of pulmonary vasodilation in acute pulmonary embolism.

Management dilemmas in acute pulmonary embolism

Background

Physicians treating acute pulmonary embolism (PE) are faced with difficult management decisions while specific guidance from recent guidelines may be absent.

Methods

Fourteen clinical dilemmas were identified by physicians and haematologists with specific interests in acute and chronic PE. Current evidence was reviewed and a practical approach suggested.

Results

Management dilemmas discussed include: sub-massive PE, PE following recent stroke or surgery, thrombolysis dosing and use in cardiac arrest, surgical or catheter-based therapy, failure to respond to initial thrombolysis, PE in pregnancy, right atrial thrombus, role of caval filter insertion, incidental and sub-segmental PE, differentiating acute from chronic PE, early discharge and novel oral anticoagulants.

Conclusion

The suggested approaches are based on a review of the available evidence and guidelines and on our clinical experience. Management in an individual patient requires clinical assessment of risks and benefits and also depends on local availability of therapeutic interventions.