Utility of 'baseline' electrodiagnostic studies for carpal tunnel release

Self-Reported Improvement After Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients with Motor Axonal Loss

PURPOSE

Electrodiagnostic studies can identify evidence of sensory and motor axonal loss (AL) in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) patients. However, the impact of sensory and motor AL on outcomes following carpal tunnel release (CTR) remains unclear. We hypothesize that patients with no evidence of sensory and motor AL will experience greater improvement following CTR compared to those with evidence of AL.

METHODS

Patients undergoing open and endoscopic CTR by four fellowship-trained orthopedic hand surgeons were identified. Sensory and motor AL were identified using preoperative electromyography and nerve conduction studies. Patients completed the following before surgery and 3-month postoperative patient-reported outcomes: Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Upper Extremity (UE) and Pain Interference (PI) as well as Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH [QD]). Preoperative and postoperative scores, changes in scores, and rates of achieving the minimally clinically important difference (MCID) were compared between patients with and without sensory and motor AL.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-five patients were included. Of these, 91 exhibited sensory AL and 98 exhibited motor AL. Demographic matched analysis of patients with and without sensory AL showed no differences in before surgery, after surgery, difference, or proportion meeting MCID for UE, PI, or QD. Matched analysis revealed no difference in preoperative PROMs between patients with and without motor AL. Patients with motor AL had increased postoperative UE (better function), decreased postoperative PI (less PI) and QD (less disability), increased changes in PI and QD, as well as a greater proportion meeting MCID for QD compared to those without motor AL.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in post-CTR improvement between patients with and without sensory AL. However, contrary to our hypothesis, motor AL patients experienced greater postoperative improvement according to QD. These findings suggest surgery should be recommended for severe CTS patients with evidence of AL. These results can better inform physicians and patients as they discuss expectations of CTR outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognosis II.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Electrodiagnostic Severity is Not Associated with PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity

Background: The primary objective of this study was to determine the association between preoperative electrodiagnostic study (EDS) parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments in patients with EDS-confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: A retrospective study of 45 patients with EDS-confirmed CTS was conducted. Patients completed the PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Explanatory variables included EDS disease severity (mild, moderate and severe), sensory peak latency, sensory amplitude, motor latency, motor amplitude, the presence of nonrecordable sensory latency and the presence of nonrecordable sensory amplitude. Explanatory variables also included patient-related factors, such as age, sex and diabetes mellitus. Associations between variables were assessed using simple linear regression, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test. Results: In our cohort, the EDS severity was mild in 38%, moderate in 42% and severe in 20% of patients. The mean PROMIS Upper Extremity score was 44.4, the mean PROMIS Pain Interference score was 53.5 and the mean PROMIS Pain Intensity score was 49.9. Bivariate analysis demonstrated no association between EDS severity overall or any EDS parameter individually and PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Diabetes mellitus was associated with poorer PROMIS Upper Extremity scores. Conclusions: EDS severity is not associated with PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Carpal tunnel release is commonly indicated for pain and dysfunction, but validated measures of pain and dysfunction do not correlate with EDS severity. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).

Clinic Study Completion Rate in Orthopedic Surgery

Purpose

The primary aim of this study is to determine the rate of completion of clinic-based study orders. Secondarily, we attempt to determine factors associated with study incompletion.

Methods

This retrospective study included 591 clinic-based studies that were ordered for 510 patients at the time of clinical evaluation at a single medical center between April 8, 2018 and August 22, 2019. Inclusion criteria were studies ordered in a hand clinic for consecutive adult patients to be completed after the visit. Exclusion criteria included pediatric patients and routine radiographs obtained prior to the visit. Invasive studies were defined as studies with a significant procedural component, such as aspirations, injections and electromyography/nerve conduction (electrodiagnostic) studies (EDS). Blood tests and imaging were considered noninvasive. Patient demographics and study completion rates were collected through chart reviews. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed, and P <.05 was considered significant.

Results

The overall clinic-based study completion rate was 94.2%, with the highest incompletion rates seen in invasive studies (8.3%, n = 34) compared to noninvasive studies (3.3%, n = 10). Within the invasive study category, EDS had the highest rate of incompletion (11.4%) and contributed to the majority of incompletions in the invasive cohort (20/24). The median time to study completion was 7 days (interquartile range [IQR] 2-21). Race, gender, English as primary language, marriage status, insurance type, and distance from facility were similar between completed and noncompleted studies.

Conclusion

Study completion rates were similar between all patients regardless of race, gender, and other social economic variables. Invasive studies, particularly EDS, had higher rates of incompletion and can be barriers to patients receiving additional care.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic III.

Influence of Electrodiagnostic Studies on Surgery for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single Urban Institution

Background: This study aimed to clarify the influence of preoperative electrodiagnostic (EDX) utilisation and its severity on surgically treated patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: This retrospective study analysed the data of patients who underwent CTS surgery at our facility from 2012 to 2022. Data regarding age, sex, affected side, diabetes mellitus, rheumatoid arthritis, haemodialysis and insurance type were collected, along with the following clinical information: utilisation of EDX, steroid injection, number of items of preoperative physical examination and history taking, intervals between symptom onset and the initial visit and between the initial visit and surgery, type of surgical procedure and surgery categorisation (primary or revision). EDX data (EDX severity, interval between EDX and surgery and concomitant nerve lesions) were also investigated. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the influence of EDX utilisation and severity on clinical parameters. Results: Of the 343 hands enrolled in our study, 304 (89%) underwent preoperative EDX assessment. EDX severity was classified as normal, mild, moderate or severe in 6 (2%), 18 (6%), 102 (34%) and 178 hands (58%), respectively. After the univariate and multivariable analyses, more items of preoperative physical examination and history taking were associated with non-EDX utilisation, whereas younger age, female sex and steroid injection were associated with milder EDX. Conclusions: Increased number of items of preoperative physical examination and history taking or steroid injection were independently associated with non-EDX utilisation or milder EDX, respectively, suggesting that when thorough clinical evaluation is conducted, hand surgeons may be less likely to request for EDX before surgery. Moreover, their treatment recommendation may be influenced by EDX severity. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).

Revision of Carpal Tunnel Surgery

Carpal tunnel release is one of the most commonly performed upper extremity procedures. The majority of patients experience significant improvement or resolution of their symptoms. However, a small but important subset of patients will experience the failure of their initial surgery. These patients can be grouped into persistent, recurrent, and new symptom categories. The approach to these patients starts with a thorough clinical examination and is supplemented with electrodiagnostic studies. The step-wise surgical management of revision carpal tunnel surgery consists of the proximal exploration of the median nerve, Guyon’s release with neurolysis, the rerelease of the transverse retinaculum, evaluation of the nerve injury, treatment of secondary sites of compression, and potential ancillary procedures. The approach and management of failed carpal tunnel release are reviewed in this article.

Electrodiagnostic Studies in the Surgical Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome-A Systematic Review

The aim of our paper was to provide comprehensive data on the role of electrodiagnostic (EDX) studies in the surgical treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). An extensive search was conducted through the major electronic database to identify eligible articles. Data extracted included grade of CTS based on neurophysiological testing, preoperative data of EDX studies, time of complete or partial resolution after surgery, postoperative Boston carpal tunnel questionnaire (CTQ) scores, age, sex, intraoperative and postoperative data of EDX studies, time to complete or partial resolution of symptoms, and number of patients without postsurgical improvement. Our main findings revealed that that electrodiagnostic testing is still a powerful tool for diagnosis of CTS. Moreover, it can also detect other pathologies. EDX testing provides a quantitative measure of the physiological function of the median nerve, which may be used to guide surgical treatment. Thirdly, when the outcome of surgery is unsatisfactory, NCS can assist in determining the reason for failure.

Outcomes of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Unrecordable Preoperative Nerve Conduction Potentials at a Minimum of 5 Years

Background: The aim of this study is to assess the outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in a cohort of patients with preoperatively unrecordable median nerve sensory and motor potentials in comparison with historical controls at minimum 5-year follow-up. Methods: We retrospectively identified 1297 patients who underwent CTR at a tertiary care referral center from July 2008 to June 2013. After exclusion criteria and review of available preoperative nerve conduction studies, 24 patients who underwent CTR with preoperative unrecordable sensory and motor nerve potentials were identified. Fifteen living, mentally capable patients were contacted by telephone for follow-up. Our primary outcome measure was the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTQ). Secondary outcome measures included Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, pain on a 0 to 10 Likert scale, and satisfaction on a 0 to 10 Likert scale. Results: Our response rate was 80% (12 out of 15) of eligible patients. Mean follow-up was 6.9 years in our study (range, 5.4-9.5 years). The mean BCTQ symptom score was 1.4, and the mean BCTQ functional score was 1.8. Mean DASH score was 15.2. On average, patient-reported pain was 0.3 and satisfaction was 8.3. No difference was found in outcomes of CTR in patients with end-stage carpal tunnel syndrome compared with historical means. Conclusions: Patients with end-stage carpal tunnel syndrome do not have worse long-term patient-reported outcomes after CTR compared with the general population. Unrecordable nerve potentials are not a contraindication for CTR.

Platelet-rich plasma in non-operative management of mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome - A systematic review & meta-analysis of short-term outcomes

Background

To perform an updated systematic review with meta-analysis on trials focusing on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), nerve conduction studies (NCS) result and cross sectional area (CSA) measurements of those who underwent PRP injection for mild to moderate CTS, versus a control.

Conclusion

This study indicates that there may be a potential role for the use of PRP in the non-operative management of mild to moderate CTS results in improvements in pain scores, functional outcomes as well as CSA measurements of the MN at short-term follow-up. However, PRP does not result in improvements in NCS.

Level of evidence

II; Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis of Prospective Trials;

Applying Evidence to Inform Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Care

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is one of the most common problems treated by hand surgeons. As our understanding of the condition has improved and focus on quality and evidence-based care has evolved, management of CTS has shifted as well. Although for many patients the diagnosis and treatment plan are relatively straightforward, understanding how to decide what diagnostics are appropriate, how to avoid complications especially in high-risk patients, and even which surgical option to offer remains a challenge. As CTS research efforts broaden and available evidence grows, understanding the different research findings in order to implement the evidence into practice is critical for all surgeons. In this article, we approach commonly encountered challenges in CTS management and take a methodological viewpoint to guide evidence-based practice.

Outcome of carpal tunnel decompression with pre-surgical diagnosis determined on general practitioner assessment and nerve conduction study

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome is key to successful treatment. At our center a treatment pathway was recently established for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Within this pathway patients are assessed by their community practitioner. Patients who fail to improve with conservative treatment and have a positive nerve conduction study are put forward for surgery without a specialist assessment. Recent literature has shown nerve conduction study may produce a high rate of false-positive results when used to diagnose carpal tunnel syndrome. The aim of this study was to retrospectively review outcomes of carpal tunnel decompression surgery in patients whose diagnoses was based on a community practitioner assessment and positive nerve conduction study.

METHODS

All patients who had carpal tunnel release surgery between August 1, 2017 and August 31, 2018 at our center were screened for eligibility. Data from hospital records and a standardized telephone questionnaire was used to assess surgical outcome.

RESULTS

The final study population included 128 operated hands. The mean follow up time after surgery was 9.6 months. We found 79% of patients reported significant improvement of their symptoms following carpal tunnel release. The overall complication rate was 2.3%.

CONCLUSION

This study has demonstrated good outcomes from carpal tunnel decompressive surgery are possible in a cohort of patients whose diagnosis was made on the basis of a positive nerve conduction study and community practitioner assessment.

Which Decisions For Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Distal Radius Fractures Should Be Shared?

PURPOSE

To evaluate, from the surgeon's perspective, the importance, feasibility, and appropriateness of sharing decisions during an episode of care of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) or distal radius fracture in patients aged greater than 65 years.

METHODS

A consortium of 9 fellowship-trained hand/upper-limb surgeons used the RAND Corporation/University of California Los Angeles Delphi Appropriateness method to evaluate the importance, feasibility, and appropriateness of sharing 27 decisions for CTS and 28 decisions for distal radius fractures in patients aged greater than 65 years. Panelists rated each measure on a scale of 1 (definitely not important/feasible/appropriate) to 9 (definitely important/feasible/appropriate) in 2 voting rounds with an intervening face-to-face discussion. Panelist agreement and disagreement were assessed using predetermined criteria.

RESULTS

Panelists achieved agreement on 16 decisions (29%) as important, 43 (78%) as feasible, and 17 (31%) as appropriate for sharing with patients. Twelve decisions met all 3 of these criteria and were therefore considered important, feasible, and appropriate to share with patients. Examples in CTS included decisions to perform extra confirmatory diagnostic testing, to have surgery, and to perform a steroid injection into the carpal tunnel. Examples in distal radius fracture management included the decision to have surgery, type of pain medication prescribed after surgery, and whether to remove the implant. The remaining 43 decisions did not reach consensus on the importance, feasibility, and appropriateness of sharing with patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a validated consensus-building approach, we identified 12 decisions made during an episode of care for CTS or distal radius fracture that were important, feasible, and appropriate to share with patients from the surgeon's perspective. These decisions merit inclusion in shared decision-making models (eg, preoperative patient preference elicitation tools or decision aids) to align patient preferences with care decisions.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Understanding which aspects of care are important, feasible, and appropriate to share with patients may improve patient-centered care by aligning patient preferences with care decisions.

Evaluation and Management of Unsuccessful Carpal Tunnel Release

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) is a routine and effective surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. Dissatisfied patients after CTR are uncommon but present diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This article discusses the most common reasons for unsuccessful CTR, the appropriate ensuing workup, and current evidence regarding revision surgery. The authors' preferred treatment algorithm for the surgical management of the unsuccessful CTR is presented.