Treating bilateral congenital radioulnar synostosis using the reverse Sauvé-Kapandji procedure

Post-traumatic radioulnar synostosis: a retrospective case series of 10 patients in Kuwait

BACKGROUND

The development of radioulnar synostosis due to post-traumatic injuries of the elbow or forearm can lead to debilitating outcomes. Several treatment options are available to hinder the progression and prevent recurrence. We used a combination of these treatments in a series of patients and observed the outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of 10 patients with post-traumatic radioulnar synostosis (9 men and 1 woman) who required surgical intervention in a tertiary orthopedic center. All of these patients were subjected to the same treatment combination (preoperative radiotherapy, tissue interposition after heterotopic ossification resection, and adjuvant indomethacin postoperatively). Improvement in range of motion (flexion, extension, and rotation) and the Mayo score was assessed and compared preoperatively and postoperatively via statistical analysis.

RESULTS

In comparison to the patients' preoperative state, which ranged from poor to fair, all 10 patients reported excellent Mayo scores after intervention with the triple therapy combination, with a mean Mayo score of 36 ± 10.2 points. Flexion, extension, and rotation improved by mean values of 55.2° ± 38.7°, 50.2° ± 34.0°, and 47.9° ± 40.0°, respectively. There was 1 complication that has subsided on follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The triple therapy combination was found to provide good functional and prophylactic results preventing recurrence.

Corrective derotation osteotomies to treat congenital radioulnar synostosis in children: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The primary objective of this review is to estimate the rotational correction after corrective derotation osteotomies (CDO) for congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS). The secondary objective of this review is to identify the complications with CDO in CRUS.

METHODS

We included studies in the English literature from electronic bibliographic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), CINAHL, Directory of Open access journals (DOAJ), EMBASE, MEDLINE, ProQuest, PubMed, and Scopus up to December 2020 that determined the effects of CDO in CRUS for two or more cases with a mean follow-up of 1 year or more. We used the National Institutes of health quality assessment tool for case series (interventional) and Modified Coleman methodology Score for assessment of risk of bias in the included studies.

RESULTS

We pooled 383 forearms (318 participants) from 23 studies with mean age of 6.28 ± 1.75 years. The mean pronation deformity was 72.83 ± 15.64° from 22 studies. The CDO derotated forearm to 10.4 ± 5.90° of mean pronation in 12 studies and 13.47 ± 9.51° of mean supination in nine studies. One study corrected the forearms to a neutral position. The mean derotation from CDO was 73.13 ± 16.54° (35° supination to 130° pronation). The overall mean difference was - 68.26° [95% CI - 86.87, - 49.66] of correction favoring supination. There were eight transient nerve palsies and six compartment syndromes from synostosis site osteotomies (four studies).

DISCUSSION

We had poor-quality studies at a high risk of bias on the described tools of assessment. We could estimate the directional effect of CDO in CRUS favoring correction from pronation to supination; however, due to the heterogeneity among studies, we cannot comment on the most efficient and least harmful CDO techniques. The single bone osteotomies seem to be efficient, simple, and reportedly low on complications but need evaluation. We cannot define the indications for correction and expected improvement in functional outcomes from osteotomy techniques.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-021-00582-4.

Unusual presentation of congenital radioulnar synostosis with osteoporosis, fragility fracture and nonunion: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Congenital radioulnar synostosis (CRUS) is a rare deformity of the upper extremity. It is characterized by loss of rotation of the involved forearm and functional limitations in daily activities. No studies on CRUS with osteoporosis have been reported to date, and osteoporosis is usually recognized as an important dimension of genetic disorder in children. We discuss the possible relationship among this disorder, osteoporosis and fracture nonunion, investigate the strict surgical indications and recommended treatments.

CASE SUMMARY

A 14-year-old male patient with bilateral CRUS with osteoporosis, fragility fracture and nonunion of fractures in ulna and radius presented our institution for further treatment, complaining of limitation in rotation. The bone mineral density of the hip and lumbar spine was 0.687 g/cm² and 0.705 g/cm², respectively, and the Z-score for both was -2.1, which revealed osteoporosis and a high risk of fracture. Tow serum bone turnover markers indicated an imbalance of bone metabolism. Reoperation for ulna fracture with autogenous bone grafting and a postoperative physiotherapy program were adopted rather than the separation of pathological synostosis. Radiological examination, observational posture assessment and limb function scale were evaluated before and 1 year after surgery. At 1 year, the fracture nonunion had almost recovered, forearm movement function on the fracture side was restored, and function on the healthy side was significantly improved compared with that before rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Surgical indications for CRUS vary from person to person. Surgery should not be the first choice of treatment, and physiotherapy is not inferior to surgical treatment.