Unfavourable early outcomes of total trapeziectomy with RegJoint™ interposition: a report of 38 osteoarthritic hands in 34 patients

Primary trapeziectomy with Regjoint(TM), a poly-L/D-lactide spacer, a two-year follow-up study with new radiological assessment tool

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the potential bony erosion and the clinical and radiological results of primary trapeziectomy with RegjointTM interposition, in patients with peritrapezial arthritis. Data were recorded on twenty patients over a period of two years (January 2015-December 2016). On average 24 months, patients were reconvened for a post-operative evaluation (subjective evaluation of pain, function and patient satisfaction; clinical evaluation with strength and mobility measures; post-operative X-rays). On X-rays, 2 criteria were evaluated: the bony erosion and the shortening of the thumb column (trapezium+metacarpal height measure, ratio between first and second metacarpal bones, a new radiological assessment tool based on a trapezoid relationship gradation). In most patients, surgery relieved pain and offered good functional results, according to the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale. Following surgery, our patients showed a subjective improvement, both in terms of pain and functional results. For plain X-ray, only 3 patients showed an osteolytic lesion (maximum of 2.8 millimeters) on the first metacarpal base. A statistically significant reduction in the thumb column height was generally observed on follow-up X-rays. However, all of these radiologic changes were present without any clinical impact. We show that the RegjointTM spacer is an available alternative in the surgical treatment of peritrapezial arthritis. We did not highlight any significant associated complications, no important adverse tissue reaction or bone erosion, no pain or functional disorder. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic IV.

[Hemitrapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb]

BACKGROUND

Hemiresection arthoplasty or partial trapeziectomy of the carpometacarpal joint of the thumb is a surgical option in stages 1-3 according to Eaton-Littler classification. Preservation of the intact scaphotrapeziotrapezoidal (STT) joint and maintenance of the length of the thumb is the advantage of this technique.

TECHNIQUE

Technically, partial trapeziectomy is only slightly more complex compared to trapeziectomy with or without suspension. An interposition of autologous or allogeneic material is recommended; suspension arthroplasty is also possible in almost all common variants. Despite these theoretical advantages, this technique has not proven advantageous in practice, neither in terms of function nor in terms of time, compared to other techniques. The great advantage of partial trapeziectomy, however, is the wide range of options for revision surgery in the case of persistent complaints.

RESULTS

The risk of proximalization of the thumb due to an inadequate interposition is generally minor and is usually caused by implant sintering. This can easily be compensated for by implanting a larger graft. Persistent instabilities are the most common cause of persistence of symptoms and can usually be remedied by autologous or allogeneic suspension arthroplasty. In addition, the entire range of endoprosthetics is also possible with a previous spare resection of the trapezium and the possibility of a complete trapeziectomy remains in any case. The obvious theoretical advantages of arthroscopic hemitrapeziectomy need to be confirmed in practice in future.

Arthroplasty of the trapeziometacarpal joint with or without bioabsorbable polylactide scaffold (RegJoint™) interposition

The RegJoint™, a bioabsorbable polylactide scaffold, was introduced in 2011 for scaphometacarpal interposition following trapeziectomy for osteoarthritis. As previous clinical trials provided controversial results, we aimed to prove the non-inferiority of RegJoint™ interposition. In this retrospective study, first metacarpal suspension arthroplasty alone (SA) was compared to suspension with RegJoint™ interposition (RJ). Thirty-four patients with 37 treated thumbs (SA: 14; RJ: 23) were assessed clinically and radiologically at a mean follow-up of 5.3 ± 2.6 years (SA: 7.96; RJ: 3.73). Patient-reported outcomes were measured on three questionnaires (DASH, PRWE and PEM) and a visual analogue pain scale; there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. Clinical assessment comprised range of motion, opposition, pain, first-ray length, hand span, prominence, instability, force and sensitivity to touch. The RJ group showed significantly better palmar abduction (p = 0.026); the other outcome parameters were comparable in the 2 groups. Follow-up radiographs showed osteolysis in 2 SA hands and 3 RJ hands (p = 0.551). First-ray length had decreased by a mean 4.7 ± 2.7 mm at follow-up (SA: -3.8; RJ: -5.2; p = 0.056). No signs of adverse tissue reactions were observed. We conclude that RegJoint™ spacers do not produce more complications than suspension alone but provide no added benefit.

[Indications and Techniques for Joint Fusion of osteoarthritic Finger Joints]

The following article, by presenting patients' cases, provides an overview of arthrodesis indications and techniques of osteoarthritic finger joints.