Surface replacing arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint using the CapFlex-PIP implant: a prospective study with 5-year outcomes

Proximal interphalangeal surface replacement in patients with severe longitudinal joint axis deviation

We compared the 2 year outcomes after proximal interphalangeal joint surface replacement in 68 joints with severe (>15°) preoperative longitudinal axis deviation and 50 joints without (<5°) preoperative deviation. Patients in both groups had a mean preoperative brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score of 47 and had similar 2 year scores of 72 (95% CI 68-77) (severe deviation) and 70 (95% CI 65-76) (no deviation). Pain, proximal interphalangeal joint range of motion, grip strength and complications did not differ between the groups at 2 years. Ninety per cent of the severely deviated joints had a deviation of less than 15° at follow-up. The revision rates were 5.9% and 1.8% for deviated and non-deviated joints, respectively. We recommend a surface replacing implant to correct severe preoperative axis deviations of the proximal interphalangeal joint, but the risk of revision surgery needs to be considered.Level of evidence: IV.

Combined Distal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis With Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty or Arthrodesis: Technical Considerations

Combined distal interphalangeal joint (DIP) arthrodesis with proximal interphalangeal joint (PIP) arthroplasty or arthrodesis presents unique challenges. Although less common than isolated surgery for the DIP and PIP joints, with an aging population, combined DIP and PIP procedures are an increasingly encountered occurrence. Anatomical and morphological studies have provided length and width measurement standards for the middle and distal phalanges, allowing for planning to assess the compatibility of strategies. Besides reviewing anatomical studies to provide length and width guidelines for hardware placement, we will also discuss optimal hardware combinations for combined surgical intervention in the DIP and PIP joints. Conflict may exist between hardware used for the DIP arthrodesis and implants used for the PIP arthroplasty. As an example, if K-wires are used for DIP arthrodesis, any intervention in the PIP joint will be compatible. However, if headless screws are used for DIP arthrodesis, these should ideally not reach proximal to the midpoint of the middle phalanx. Other techniques, such as single or multiple oblique screws, and tension bands are compatible with PIP arthroplasty. Hence, options for management of the PIP joint are dependent on the technique used for DIP arthrodesis.

Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty: current trends and evidence-based practice

Arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) has evolved since its inception over 60 years ago. This review examines the indications for surgery, highlights the differences in current arthroplasty designs, variances in surgical techniques, clinical controversies, current implant outcomes data and salvage options for the failed implant. Overall, PIPJ implant arthroplasty is a good and reliable option for symptomatic PIPJ degenerative, post-traumatic or inflammatory arthritis given the proper clinical setting. If current techniques for implantation and rehabilitation are followed, predictable pain relief and satisfactory function can be anticipated. The purpose of this review article is to examine the current evidence-based indications for PIPJ arthroplasty and examine the reported, implant-specific outcomes of this procedure. Various techniques and rehabilitation strategies will also be outlined.

Prosthetic arthroplasty of the proximal interphalangeal joint using a surface replacing implant (CapFlex-PIP): 3-year outcomes

Level of evidence: IV.

Surface replacing arthroplasty of a post-traumatic stiff and deviated proximal interphalangeal joint in an adolescent

This case report describes the 4-year outcomes of proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty in a 14-year-old girl with a stiff joint after trauma. At follow-up, active range of motion was 35°, she was pain-free and satisfied with the outcome. Implant arthroplasty seems to be a valuable option for young patients with persistent post-traumatic stiff and deviated PIP joints to-at least temporarily-increase quality of life.

Preoperative Thresholds of Pain and Function to Achieve a Minimal Important Change and Patient Acceptable Symptom State After Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty

PURPOSE

There is ongoing discussion about the level of symptoms patients with proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint osteoarthritis should have to undergo surgery. The aims of our study were to determine the minimal important change (MIC) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) for PIP joint range of motion (ROM), and define clinically relevant thresholds of preoperative pain and function at which patients have the greatest chance to achieve a MIC and PASS in these outcomes 1 year after PIP arthroplasty.

METHODS

We analyzed registry data that included patients with PIP joint osteoarthritis who underwent an arthroplasty for this condition and had a 1-year follow-up. Patients indicated pain on a numeric rating scale (0-10) and completed the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ). Active total PIP ROM was measured. The preoperative thresholds, predictive of achieving the MIC and PASS for each outcome measure of pain, function, and ROM, were determined using receiver operating characteristics curves.

RESULTS

We included 196 patients who experienced a relevant improvement in ROM (= MIC) when there was an increase by ≥8° compared with the ROM preoperatively. Patients were satisfied with their postoperative ROM (= PASS) if they achieved PIP mobility of at least 66°. Pain at rest and during activities was predictive for achieving a MIC but not a PASS. Due to an insufficient area under the curve for the brief MHQ and ROM, their baseline values cannot predict the postoperative achievement of MIC or PASS. We suggest that patients with preoperative pain at rest ≥4.5 or pain during activities ≥5.5 have the greatest chance of achieving a subjectively relevant change 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

The determined thresholds may support surgeons in the preoperative process of deciding for or against a surgical intervention and explain the probability of achieving sufficient postoperative symptom relief for the patient.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic I.

A Hemi-Hemi-Hamate Osteochondral Graft: A Modified Hemi-Hamate Technique for a Unicondylar Defect

Articular comminuted fracture dislocations of the base of the middle phalanx represent a major challenge for the surgeon. The treatment goal is a nonpainful, stable, and functional proximal interphalangeal joint, which is achieved through concentric joint reduction and restoration of joint stability. Fracture pattern rarely results in sagittal bone loss involving the entire ulnar or radial pilon of the base of the second phalanx. In these cases, the choice of treatment can be particularly challenging as the loss of a pillar of the articular base causes angular deviation at the joint level, thus causing the loss of finger joint flexion and overlap of the adjacent finger. We present a novel nonvascularized osteochondral graft, which we named hemi-hemi-hamate osteochondral graft, a modified version of the traditional hemi-hamate arthroplasty, that is suitable for the reconstruction of bone loss involving the whole anteroposterior hemiarticular surface of the base of the P2.

Pyrolytic Carbon Hemiarthroplasty for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthritis, Long-Term Follow-Up

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term clinical, subjective, and radiographic results of pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthritis at a single institution.

METHODS

Patients treated with a pyrolytic carbon hemiarthroplasty between 2005 and 2015 were contacted for a clinical follow-up visit. Patients were assessed before surgery, one year after surgery, and again after a mean of 11 years (range: 6-16 years). Objective outcomes were assessed with grip strength, pinch strength, and range of motion (ROM). Subjective outcomes were assessed by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (performance and satisfaction), and Visual Analog Scale pain scores at rest and during activity. Radiographic assessments were completed according to Sweets and Stern as modified by Wagner et al.

RESULTS

A total of 68 fingers in 52 patients underwent PIPJ hemiarthroplasty. Thirty-six arthroplasties in 29 patients were available for the long-term follow-up, five patients had died, and the remaining cases were contacted by phone. Three cases were lost to follow-up. Preoperative diagnoses included 41 fingers with osteoarthritis or posttraumatic arthritis, and 27 fingers with inflammatory arthritis. Eight cases had undergone revision at the time of follow-up, and the 10-year implant survival was 72%. The revisions were performed after a mean of two years after surgery. Three patients had undergone soft-tissue procedures. Visual Analog Scale pain scores, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores, and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure scores improved significantly compared with that before surgery. Grip strength and pinch grip remained unchanged. However, PIPJ ROM deteriorated significantly one year after surgery, when compared with that before surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty of the PIPJ has an acceptable long-term implant survival, and the significant improvement in pain scores and patient-reported outcomes is maintained over time. Pyrocarbon hemiarthroplasty could be a viable option in the management of PIPJ arthritis. Patients should be advised that PIPJ ROM deteriorates over time.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Does distal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis affect proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty outcomes in the same finger?

The purpose of this study was to analyse the 1-year outcomes after combining a surface replacing proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty and a distal interphalangeal screw arthrodesis and to compare the combined surgery with proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty alone. To obtain two groups with similar baseline data from our prospective registry, propensity score matching was used to match 23 fingers with the combined operations with 115 fingers with proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty alone. One year after surgery, the mean ranges of motion were 60° (95% CI: 53° to 67°) in the combined group and 63° (95% CI: 60° to 66°) in the control group and did not differ significantly. Grip strength, the brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire and pain also did not differ between the groups 1 year after surgery. All the proximal interphalangeal implants in patients treated with a distal interphalangeal screw arthrodesis remained in situ. Combining proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with distal interphalangeal arthrodesis leads to 1-year outcomes that are similar to those achieved by proximal interphalangeal joint replacement alone.Level of evidence: III.

Reported Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

Purpose: There is a lack of scientific consensus on the best arthroplasty implant option for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) arthritis, due to diversity in outcome reporting and measurement methods. The development of a standardized core outcome set (COS) and standard outcome measures could mitigate this issue. This study catalogs the reported outcomes and outcome measures found in PIPJ arthroplasty studies, which can be used in the first step of developing a COS. Methods: A database search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science (January 1, 2010, to March 10, 2021) was performed to retrieve studies that reported outcomes of the 3 most common primary PIPJ arthroplasty implants: silicone, pyrocarbon, and metal-polyethylene. The primary objectives of this study include reported outcomes and outcome measures. Secondary objectives include clinimetric properties of outcome measures, study design, and implant types. Results: Fifty articles met inclusion criteria. Of the included studies, 41 (82%) were case series, 8 (16%) were cohort studies, and 1 (2%) was a randomized control trial. Thirty-three unique outcomes were identified. Fifteen (46%) outcomes were clinician-reported and 26 (79%) were patient-reported. Eighteen unique outcome measures were identified. Of the outcome measures, 15 (83%) were patient-reported, 1 (6%) was clinician-reported, and 2 (11%) were reported by both patients and clinicians. Conclusions: Substantial heterogeneity was found in reported outcomes and outcome measures across studies evaluating PIPJ arthroplasty, impeding knowledge translation. The development of a COS for PIPJ arthroplasty is necessary to help compare and pool data across studies, and advance scientific knowledge.

Korrektur von Fingerdeformitäten

Deformitäten der Langfinger sind neben „Rheumaknoten“ die auffälligsten Veränderungen einer bestehenden Rheumatoiden Arthritis. Die Therapie beinhaltet neben der medikamentösen Einstellung der Patienten konservative Maßnahmen, in deren Mittelpunkt die Ergotherapie steht. Neben konservativen und interventionellen Versorgungen sollte die Synovialektomie zu einem frühen Zeitpunkt erwogen werden, um die Gelenke langfristig zu schützen. Bei fortgeschrittenen Deformitäten müssen periartikuläre Strukturen in der Operation adressiert werden, um Funktionsdefizite so gering wie möglich zu halten. Gleichzeitig ist auf Grund der Dynamik der Grunderkrankung immer mit einer Progredienz und erneuten Operationen zu rechnen. Eine einzelne für ein Gelenk spezifische operative Maßnahme existiert nicht, vielmehr gilt es die verschiedenen Möglichkeiten und erforderliche Alternativen in der Planung zu berücksichtigen, um diese in der Operation entsprechend dem Ziel durchführen zu können.

Proximal interphalangeal joint prosthetic arthroplasty

Surgical treatment of the painful proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint has evolved considerably over the past century. If arthrodesis has long been the gold standard and remains so for some, prosthesis would meet patient demand: mobility and indolence. Faced with a demanding patient, the surgeon must decide the indication, the type of prosthesis, the approach, the post-operative follow-up, etc. The history of the development of PIP prostheses demonstrates the complexity of the treatment of the destroyed PIP: appearance of prostheses, evolution and sometimes disappearance from the market for commercial reasons or related to complications. The main objective of this conference is to identify the main indications for prosthetic arthroplasties and to describe the various prostheses available on the market.

Osteoarthritis in the Upper Extremity

Osteoarthritis is a common cause of morbidity in an increasingly aging population. Although the weight-bearing joints of the leg and foot are frequently affected by osteoarthritis, degenerative changes in the joints of the upper extremity are likewise common and can be both particularly debilitating for affected individuals and uniquely challenging for the health care providers managing it. The present review seeks to overview the epidemiology, anatomy, diagnosis, and management of osteoarthritis in the joints of the shoulder, elbow, and hand with the intent of providing accessible and relevant information to the range of medical professionals involved in patient care.

Radiological positioning of a proximal interphalangeal joint resurfacing implant: Reliability and functional outcomes correlation

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to define radiological measurements for quantifying the position of a surface replacing implant (CapFlex-PIP) in the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, to test the reliability of these measurements, and to explore whether implant position influences patient-reported and clinical outcomes one year after surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We developed 7 radiographic measurements to quantify the position of the proximal and distal implant components. Two independent surgeons analyzed the 1-year postoperative radiographs of 63 fingers documented in our registry. Inter-rater reliability of these measurements was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Correlations between the radiographic measurements and PIP range of motion (ROM), the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), and pain were determined using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Radiographic measurements of patients with the worst and best postoperative ROM were compared using the Mann-Whitney-U test.

RESULTS

Inter-rater reliability was only good for 1 measurement (ICC = 0.89), but poor to moderate for the other measurements (ICC ranging from 0.34 to 0.69). These measurements neither correlated with ROM, brief MHQ nor pain based on correlation coefficients ranging from 0.00 to 0.31. There were no relevant differences in the radiographic measurements between patients with the worst and best ROM.

CONCLUSION

The position of the CapFlex-PIP implant could not be reliably quantified on plain radiographs. The lack of correlations between implant position and postoperative outcomes can be attributed either to the unreliable measurements or the actual lack of influence of the implant position on pain and function.

Thumb Interphalangeal Joint Arthroplasty With a Surface Replacing Implant: Two-Year Results

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the 2-year clinical and patient-reported outcomes of thumb interphalangeal (IP) joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

In this prospective pilot study, we included patients who received a surface replacing implant at the thumb IP joint. Patients rated their pain at rest on a numeric rating scale (0-10) and completed the brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire. The range of motion of the IP joint was also measured. If the patient acceptable symptom state was inadequate (i.e., pain at rest ≤ 1.5), the reasons for the remaining symptoms were descriptively presented.

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients who underwent arthroplasty, 1 withdrew participation and 1 was considered for arthrodesis because of a dislocated implant. Therefore, the study included 11 patients with a median age of 67 years. The median pain at rest decreased from 6 preoperatively to 0 at 2 years, and the preoperative brief Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire score increased from 38 to 58 at follow-up. The total range of motion of the IP joint was 45° at 2 years. Patient acceptable symptom state was not achieved in 4 patients including a heavy manual worker and a patient with severe systemic lupus erythematosus.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the inconsistency of the results, we conclude that thumb IP joint arthroplasty with a surface replacing implant is rarely indicated; it could be an alternative in patients who place great importance on precision tasks. For patients who either have high demands for a powerful pinch grip, the high physical demands of a manual job, or rheumatoid disease, IP joint arthrodesis should be preferred.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

[Differential therapeutic Approaches in the prosthetic Arthroplasty of Finger Joints]

Degenerative changes of the finger joints often lead to various surgical treatments such as arthrodesis or artificial joint replacement. There are a lot of surgical approaches for surgeons to choose from. The different approaches with their characteristic advantages and disadvantages during surgery and for the postoperative treatment should be selected and applied based on patient-, implant- and aftercare-specific indications. This article presents a short review of possible approaches and associated surgical techniques for finger joint replacement.

Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with the Tactys® prosthesis: Clinical and radiological outcomes at a mean 3.1 years' follow-up

Preliminary results with the Tactys® modular gliding prosthesis for proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) replacement were encouraging, with notable improvement in clinical and functional scores at 1 and 2 years' follow-up. However, a recent study found a trend for deterioration over time. We wanted to check this by analyzing medium-term outcomes. Sixty-four arthroplasties were performed in 48 patients in single facility between January 2015 and January 2020. Clinical, functional, and radiographic outcomes were analyzed at short- and medium-term follow-up for 15 of these arthroplasties. Mean follow-up of the 48 patients was 3.1 years. Pain significantly decreased on the numeric rating scale (p < 0.01) and the functional QuickDASH score improved from 67.3 to 55.9 (p < 0.01). Grip and pinch strengths were lower in the operated than in the contralateral hand (p = 0.04 and p = 0.6, respectively). PIPJ active range of motion (ROM) in flexion/extension improved from 44° to 49.4° (p = 0.17). 70% of the 48 patients were satisfied. Fifteen arthroplasties were analyzed at 17 and 61 months' follow-up. Pain relief continued. ROM decreased from 57° to 46° (p < 0.05) and the functional QuickDASH score deteriorated from 25.8 to 54.7 (p < 0.01). Both grip and pinch strength increased, with a significant difference in pinch (p = 0.003). The main complication was swan-neck deformity (46%), with a mean 11 months' onset. Our results confirmed the deterioration trend observed over time in the functional results of the Tactys® prosthesis despite, good patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.