Arthroscopic dorsal capsulodesis for isolated lunotriquetral interosseous ligament injuries

Comparing Open and Arthroscopic Grafting for Scaphoid Nonunion: Is There Truly a Noticeable Difference?

BACKGROUND

Scaphoid nonunion remains a challenging injury with no clear consensus on treatment. Surgical options, such as bone grafting procedures, are available for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions. While open grafting provides direct visualization, it is theoretically believed to lead to several problems due to the complex ligamentous structure responsible for wrist stability and challenges in the vascular supply of the scaphoid. On the other hand, despite its technical challenges, arthroscopic grafting is thought to avoid complications by preserving surrounding tissues.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Do patients undergoing bone grafting via arthroscopy for scaphoid nonunion report better function than patients undergoing an open procedure? (2) Do patients undergoing bone grafting via arthroscopy for scaphoid nonunion demonstrate better objective outcomes, such as ROM, extremity strength, and bony union?

METHODS

Between January 2012 and January 2022, we operated on 141 patients with scaphoid nonunion. The following patients were excluded from this study: 33 patients with scaphoid nonunion advanced collapse and arthritis, 18 patients with proximal pole fractures, 5 patients with previous surgeries, 16 patients with avascular necrosis, and 8 patients with the radius used as a graft source. In total, 28 patients underwent open grafting, and 33 patients underwent arthroscopic grafting; for both groups, the iliac crest was used as the graft source. Two patients with nonunion were observed in each treatment group, and they were excluded from the study. Results from the remaining 26 patients treated with open grafting and 31 patients treated with arthroscopic grafting (totaling 57 patients) were analyzed. The decision to treat patients with open or arthroscopic methods was not based on a particular reason. In our clinic, we initially preferred open grafting for treating nonunion of the scaphoid. Subsequently, we began to prefer arthroscopic methods for the treatment of these injuries. Twenty patients in the arthroscopic group had additional ligamentous injuries, which were simultaneously treated arthroscopically. All patients in both groups had at least 1 year of follow-up, but 48% of patients treated arthroscopically and 42% of those treated with open approaches were lost before 2 years of follow-up. The remaining patients had follow-up periods longer than 24 months. Our primary analysis was performed at 1 year, and we did a secondary analysis at 2 years. We compared the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), QuickDASH, and VAS scores of the patients. We also compared ROM and grip and pinch strength in patients' contralateral wrists. We used predefined, evidence-based thresholds for the minimum clinically important differences for these outcome measures.

RESULTS

According to the 1-year functional analysis, we found no clinically important difference between the open surgery group and the arthroscopic surgery group in terms of PRWE score (median [IQR] 19 [25] versus 8 [9], difference of medians 11; p = 0.001), QuickDASH (median 14 [23] versus 7 [11], difference of medians 7; p = 0.004), and VAS scores (median 2 [2] versus 1 [1], difference of medians 1; p = 0.02). At 1 year, there were no differences in objective measurements, including grip strength (median 81 [16] versus 85 [14], difference of medians 4; p = 0.60), pinch strength (median 82 [18] versus 81 [15], difference of medians 1; p = 0.85), and ROM (flexion-extension median 83 [22] versus 85 [13], difference of medians 2; p = 0.74; radial deviation-ulnar deviation median 80 [36] versus 85 [14], difference of medians 5; p = 0.61). In the 2-year analysis, no clinically important difference was observed in terms of PRWE score, and no differences were found in terms of QuickDASH, VAS, strength tests, and ROM between the open and arthroscopic groups. No difference was observed in the union rates between the open group and the arthroscopic group (93% [26 of 28] versus 94% [31 of 33], OR 1.19 [95% CI 0.16 to 9.06]; p = 0.86).

CONCLUSION

In comparing open surgical procedures with arthroscopic techniques for the treatment of scaphoid nonunions, the present study revealed no differences in functional outcomes and objective measures such as ROM and strength tests at both the 1-year and 2-year follow-up visits. Although technically more challenging, arthroscopy provides a potential advantage, such as addressing concomitant ligament injuries simultaneously. However, patients did not perceive a difference between the two surgical methods. In future studies, investigating long-term outcomes in a larger population will contribute to better elucidating this issue.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Arthroscopic Volar Capsuloligamentous Reattachment and Reinforcement to Bone

Background:  Injuries of the volar ligaments of the wrist are not uncommon, but their arthroscopic treatment presents a significant challenge. The objective of this paper is to introduce a technique for reattaching (in acute injuries) or reinforcing (in chronic injuries) various volar wrist ligaments to the bone, using standard wrist arthroscopic dorsal and volar portals. Methods:  There are three common steps for all the arthroscopic volar capsuloligamentous reattachments or reinforcements Step 1 - Volar Portal Establishment: volar radial, volar ulnar and volar central portals are used depending on which structure needs to be reattached or reinforced. Step 2 - Anchor Placement: the anchor is positioned at the site where the ligament has been detached. Step 3 - Capsuloligamentous Suture and Knotting: a knot pusher is introduced inside the joint from the dorsal portal and advanced inside the volar portal where the threads of the anchor are located. The knot pusher is loaded with the threads and retrieved to the dorsal portal. A 16G Abbocath, loaded with a loop is used to pierce the volar ligaments. The loop of the Abbocath is captured from the dorsal portal and loaded with the threads. Both threads are taken to the volar portal and knotted after releasing the traction. This way the knot is placed out of the wrist and the ligaments are reattached or reinforced to the bone. Result:  This technique has been used to reinforce and reattach the scapholunate and lunotriquetral ligaments and to reattach the radiocarpal ligaments and the Poirier space. Since this procedure has been performed in various conditions and in conjunction with other ligament treatments (such as perilunate injuries, carpal bone fractures, distal radius fractures, and reinforcement or reattachment of the dorsal portions of intrinsic ligaments), specific results are not presented. Conclusions:  The described technique enables the reattachment and reinforcement of most volar ligaments to the bone using standard wrist arthroscopic portals. It can be performed in conjunction with the treatment of the dorsal portion of intrinsic ligaments or other wrist injuries.

Outcomes Following Surgical Interventions for Isolated Lunotriquetral Interosseous Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review

Ulnar-sided wrist pain can be attributed to various bony and ligamentous structures. The purpose of this review is to compare outcomes following surgical interventions for isolated lunotriquetral (LT) interosseous ligament injuries in adults. We assessed 202 procedures from 9 retrospective case series studies of low to moderate quality based on the Structured Effectiveness Quality Evaluation Scale. The comparative outcomes (ie, range of motion, pain, strength, quality of life, complications, return to work, and patient satisfaction) were aggregated and categorized under arthrodesis, capsulodesis, ligament repairs and reconstruction, and ulna shortening osteotomy procedures. Although the comparison of outcomes was largely inconclusive due to the heterogeneity and the omission of preoperative characteristic data, we did observe higher complications and reoperation rates post LT arthrodesis. It is recommended that all outcomes be standardized and presented uniformly with best practices developed to better characterize the injury's severity and integrity in future studies.

Arthroscopic Dorsal Ligamentocapsulodesis in the Management of Combined Tears of Scapholunate and Lunotriquetral Ligaments: Surgical Technique and Preliminary Clinical Results

Introduction  The literature is scarce regarding the management of combined tears of scapholunate (SL) and lunotriquetral (LT) ligaments. This study aimed to evaluate our preliminary results with the arthroscopic dorsal ligamentocapsulodesis in managing such cases. Materials and Methods  Forty-two patients (13 females, 29 males; mean age = 31; age range = 18-51 years) who underwent arthroscopic dorsal ligamentocapsulodesis due to the combined tears of SL and LT ligaments were retrospectively reviewed. The mean follow-up was 38 (range = 24-55) months. The Modified Mayo Wrist Score, the visual analogue scale (VAS), and grip strength were assessed preoperatively and at the final follow-up examination. Results  The mean Modified Mayo Wrist Score significantly improved from 49 (range = 25-70) preoperatively to 82 (range = 60-100) at the final follow-up ( p  = 0.000). The mean VAS significantly decreased from 6.33 to 1.6 ( p  = 0.000). The mean hand grip strength significantly improved from 31 (range = 19-41) kg to 44 (range = 25-60) kg at the final follow-up examination ( p  < 0.001). No major complications were encountered. Conclusion  Arthroscopic dorsal ligamentocapsulodesis seems to be a safe and effective surgical technique in the management of this rare combined injury pattern. Level of Evidence  This is a Level IV, retrospective case series study.

The role of arthroscopy in the diagnosis of concomitant soft tissue injuries in scaphoid fractures and the effect of concomitant soft tissue injuries and fracture comminution on outcomes: A case-control study

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the role of arthroscopy in the diagnosis of concomitant injuries, to investigate the relationship between comminution and concomitant injuries, and to analyze the effect of concomitant injuries on functional outcomes in acute and subacute scaphoid fracture.

Patients and methods

Between January 2011 and September 2018. A total of 32 acute scaphoid fracture patients (29 males, 3 females; mean age: 30±12 years; range, 18 to 65 years) were retrospectively analyzed. None of them had an obvious ligament injury in the radiological assessment. Functional outcomes were compared between concomitant and non-concomitant injuries and between comminuted and non-comminuted injuries. The percentage of range of motion (ROM), grip, and pinch strength were recorded according to the contralateral extremity to detect the restriction rate. The Mayo Wrist Score (MWS), the Turkish version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) and Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaires were used to evaluate the functional results. Subjective pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The relationship between concomitant injuries and comminution was investigated.

Results

There were 13 patients with comminuted fractures. Concomitant injuries were diagnosed in 17 patients. The presence of concomitant injuries was higher in comminuted fractures than in non-comminuted fractures. There was no significant difference between the groups in ROMs. The final follow-up Q-DASH, PRWE, MWS, and VAS scores and the pinch strength of non-comminuted fractures were found to be statistically better than those of comminuted fractures. There were statistically worse Q-DASH, PRWE, MWS, and VAS scores in patients with concomitant injuries.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic scaphoid fracture surgery allows the diagnosis and treatment of concomitant lesions. The functional outcomes of concomitant lesions and comminuted fractures seem to be worse than those of others, while the ROM is comparable.