Distal radius fractures

Management of isolated volar lunate facet fractures of the distal radius

Distal radius fractures are among the most common fractures treated globally. Consideration of the mechanism of injury and careful radiographic assessment contributes to appropriate management of these injuries in isolation or jointly with other fractures or injuries affecting the wrist joint. Treatment options can range from non-operative management to a variety of fixation techniques. Interest in the distal radius fractures was renewed as open reduction and monoblock volar locking plate fixation became the preferred contemporary treatment in the last few decades. Isolated volar lunate facet (VLF) fractures are uncommon. However, the stability of the entire carpus may be compromised with fractures of the volar marginal rim. Inadequately or improperly treated fractures of the VLF can lead to significant long-term complications. A critical approach to this unique fracture pattern's evaluation, management, and surgical fixation is paramount for successful and reproducible outcomes in stability and durability.

Is a Novel Fluoroscopic Intraoperative Reference System Superior to Conventional Management for Distal Radius Fracture Reduction? A Propensity-matched Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

Preoperative planning is generally performed to simulate the process of reduction as well as to determine the size and placement of implants in patients undergoing distal radius fracture surgery. We previously described a three-dimensional (3D) digital preoperative planning system for the osteosynthesis of distal radius fractures, and we have developed a novel intraoperative referencing system that superimposes preoperative planning (such as plate position and length) onto fluoroscopic images during surgery; however, its efficacy has not been evaluated compared with conventional planning and surgery.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

Does use of a novel intraoperative referencing system result in (1) better Mayo wrist scores at 3 and 6 months after surgery and (2) less loss of reduction in terms of ulnar variance, palmar tilt, and radial inclination on plain radiographs taken 1 week, 3 months, and 6 months after surgery compared with conventional preoperative planning?

METHODS

Between April 2014 and October 2021, we treated 294 patients with open reduction and volar plate fixation for distal radius fractures. Of 294 patients, 65% (191) underwent surgery using either conventional preoperative planning or a novel intraoperative referencing system. The remaining patients were excluded because they were younger than 18 years, they had some missing medical records related to the clinical outcomes, or they had a previous history of upper extremity injuries. During that time, we generally treated fractures with volar plates when there was: more than 2 mm of stepoff/gap in the articular surface, a dorsal tilt more than 15°, radial inclination less than 15°, or radial shortening more than 5 mm. Generally, we used a flexor carpi radialis approach. In some patients who had dorsal fragments, we added a dorsal approach. At that time, we were developing the new intraoperative referencing system, so it was not used consistently. To arrive at a fair assessment, we opted to perform propensity matching based on age, gender, and AO fracture type. During the period in question, 36% (69 of 191) of patients with distal radius fractures who received a volar plate were treated using our novel intraoperative referencing system, and 64% (122 of 191) had surgery using conventional preoperative planning (control group). Of those, 91% (63 of 69) of patients who were treated with the intraoperative referencing system and 89% (108 of 122) of those in the control group were available for follow-up with all imaging and Mayo wrist scores at least 6 months after surgery. After propensity matching, that left us with two groups of 39 patients, who were well matched in terms of age and fracture type; these were the study groups. We also tried to match them according to gender, but there were fewer patients in the intraoperative referencing group, and the percentage of women for each group differed: 70% (44 of 63) in the intraoperative referencing group and 76% (82 of 108) in the control group. Also, there were fewer men with C3 fractures in the control group. Therefore, 64% (25 of 39) of patients in the intraoperative referencing group were women and 77% (30 of 39) of patients in the control group were women. In the intraoperative referencing group, our novel intraoperative referencing system was used in combination with the 3D digital preoperative planning system for preoperative planning. In the control group, preoperative planning was performed manually in a conventional manner using tracing paper and implant templates or using a digital template. We compared the groups in terms of operative duration, the radiation dose used in surgery, and Mayo wrist scores at 3 and 6 months after surgery. We also compared the groups in terms of loss of reduction on ulnar variance, palmar tilt, and radial inclination on plain radiographs taken 3 months and 6 months after surgery. We considered the plain radiograph taken 1 week after surgery as a baseline. Each item was compared between the image fusion and control groups using a Welch t - test.

RESULTS

Mayo wrist scores were no different between the intraoperative referencing system and the control group at 3 months (71 ± 7 versus 72 ± 11, mean difference 1 [95% CI -3.7 to 5.7]; p = 0.07) or at 6 months after surgery (76 ± 6 versus 79 ± 11, mean difference 3 [95% CI -3.5 to 7.9]; p = 0.12). There were no differences in surgical duration or radiation doses between the intraoperative referencing and control groups. We found only a small advantage in favor of the intraoperative referencing system in terms of loss of reduction on ulnar variance (3 months after surgery: 0.2 ± 0.4 mm versus 0.6 ± 0.7 mm, mean difference 0.4 mm [95% CI 0.15 to 0.69]; p = 0.003, 6 months after surgery: 0.4 ± 0.6 mm versus 0.8 ± 0.8 mm, mean difference 0.4 mm [95% CI 0.05 to 0.73]; p = 0.02 for the intraoperative referencing system and the control group, respectively). This difference in radial shortening was so small that it was not likely to have been clinically important.

CONCLUSION

We found no clinically important advantages from the use of our novel intraoperative referencing system except a slight improvement in ulnar variance. Therefore, we recommend against its use in everyday practice at this time. However, future improvements may lead to better clinical outcomes, so we plan further investigations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Validation of radiographic assessment of radiocarpal (mal)alignment in a normal population

We measured radiocarpal alignment in 150 standard lateral radiographs of normal wrists. In 84% of the cases, the lines of the long axis of the capitate and radius did not cross within the carpus.

Automatic Segmentation and Radiologic Measurement of Distal Radius Fractures Using Deep Learning

Background

Recently, deep learning techniques have been used in medical imaging studies. We present an algorithm that measures radiologic parameters of distal radius fractures using a deep learning technique and compares the predicted parameters with those measured by an orthopedic hand surgeon.

Methods

We collected anteroposterior (AP) and lateral X-ray images of 634 wrists in 624 patients with distal radius fractures treated conservatively with a follow-up of at least 2 months. We allocated 507 AP and 507 lateral images to the training set (80% of the images were used to train the model, and 20% were utilized for validation) and 127 AP and 127 lateral images to the test set. The margins of the radius and ulna were annotated for ground truth, and the scaphoid in the lateral views was annotated in the box configuration to determine the volar side of the images. Radius segmentation was performed using attention U-Net, and the volar/dorsal side was identified using a detection and classification model based on RetinaNet. The proposed algorithm measures the radial inclination, dorsal or volar tilt, and radial height by index axes and points from the segmented radius and ulna.

Results

The segmentation model for the radius exhibited an accuracy of 99.98% and a Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 98.07% for AP images, and an accuracy of 99.75% and a DSC of 94.84% for lateral images. The segmentation model for the ulna showed an accuracy of 99.84% and a DSC of 96.48%. Based on the comparison of the radial inclinations measured by the algorithm and the manual method, the Pearson correlation coefficient was 0.952, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.975. For dorsal/volar tilt, the correlation coefficient was 0.940, and the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.968. For radial height, it was 0.768 and 0.868, respectively.

Conclusions

The deep learning-based algorithm demonstrated excellent segmentation of the distal radius and ulna in AP and lateral radiographs of the wrist with distal radius fractures and afforded automatic measurements of radiologic parameters.

Preoperative Anemia as a Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications After Open Reduction Internal Fixation of Distal Radius Fractures

Purpose

The incidence of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the United States is more than 640,000 cases per year and is projected to increase. The overall prevalence of anemia in the United States increased from 5.71% in 2005 to 6.86% in 2018. Therefore, preoperative anemia may be an important risk factor to consider before surgical fixation of a distal radius fracture. The purpose of this study was to investigate preoperative anemia and its association with short-term complications after surgical treatment of DRFs.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for all patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of DRFs between 2015 and 2020. The initial pool of patients was divided into cohorts based on preoperative hematocrit. Multivariate logistic regression, adjusted for all significantly associated patient demographics and comorbidities, was used to identify associations between preoperative anemia and postoperative complications after ORIF of DRFs.

Results

A total of 22,923 patients who underwent ORIF of DRFs were identified in National Surgical Quality Improvement Program from 2015 to 2020. Of the 12,068 patients remaining after exclusion criteria, 9,616 (79.7%) patients were included in the normal cohort, 2,238 (18.5%) patients were included in the mild anemia cohort, and 214 (1.8%) patients were included in the severe anemia cohort. Compared with the reference cohort, patients with any anemia were independently associated with higher rates of reintubation (odds ratio [OR], 6.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.29-32.80; P = .023), blood transfusion (OR, 11.83; 95% CI, 3.95-35.45; P < .001), septic shock (OR, 10.76; 95% CI, 1.19-97.02; P = .034), readmission (OR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.60-2.76; P < .001), nonhome discharge (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.84-2.68; P < .001), and mortality (OR, 2.70; 1.03-7.07; P = .043).

Conclusions

Preoperative anemia, both mild and severe, were clinically significant predictors for postoperative complications within 30-day after ORIF of DRFs. Severe anemia was associated with higher rates of blood transfusion, nonhome discharge, and mortality compared with mild anemia.

Type of study/level of evidence

Prognostic III.

Recognizing and Treating Unique Distal Radius Fracture Patterns that are Prone to Displacement

An unstable distal radius fracture is one that is not capable of resisting displacement after initial closed reduction. The challenge in managing distal radius fractures is identifying which fractures are prone to displacement. Currently, there are no standard criteria for assessing the stability of distal radius fractures. The fracture pattern and patient characteristics should be taken into consideration when treating distal radius fractures. This article discusses how to recognize and manage distal radius fractures that are prone to displacement.

Risk Factors for the Incidence of the Volar Lunate Facet Fragments in Distal Radius Fractures

Background  The volar lip of the distal radius is the key structure for wrist joint stability. Rigid fixation of the volar lunate facet (VLF) fragment is difficult because of its unique anatomy, and a high rate of postoperative displacement was demonstrated. Purposes  The aim of the study is to identify risk factors for VLF in distal radius fractures (DRFs) and to reconsider the important point for primary fixation. Patients and Methods  One hundred fifty-five patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for an DRF were included and classified into one of the following two groups: VLF(+)or VLF(-). Demographic data, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), laterality, trauma mechanism, and AO Foundation/Orthopaedic Trauma Association (AO/OTA) classification were recorded. Several parameters were investigated using wrist radiographs of the uninjured side and computed tomography scans of the injured side. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the risk factors for VLF. Results  There were 25 patients in the VLF(+) group and 130 patients in the VLF(-) group. The incidence of VLF was 16.1%. The VLF(+) group tended to have a higher BMI and higher energy trauma mechanism. The odds ratio for the sigmoid notch angle (SNA), volar tilt (VT), and lunate facet curvature radius (LFCR) were 0.84, 1.32, and 0.70, respectively, with multivariate analysis, which was significant. A smaller SNA, larger VT, and smaller LFCR are potential risk factors for VLF. Conclusion  Over-reduction of the VT at primary fixation should be avoided because it could place an excess burden on the VLF and cause subsequent postoperative fixation failure and volar carpal subluxation. Level of Evidence  IV.

What Is the Effect of Resident Involvement on Short-Term Outcomes after Distal Radius Fracture Surgery?

Background: The objective of this study was to assess whether resident involvement in distal radius fracture open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) affect 30-day postoperative complication, hospital readmission, reoperation and operative time. Methods: A retrospective study was performed using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database by querying the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for distal radius fracture ORIF from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2014. A final cohort of 5,693 adult patients who underwent distal radius fracture ORIF during the study period were included. Baseline patient demographics and comorbidities, intraoperative factors, including operative time and 30-day postoperative outcomes, including complications, readmission and reoperations, were collected. Bivariate statistical analyses were performed to identify variable associated with complication, readmission, reoperation and operative time. The significance level was adjusted using a Bonferroni correction as multiple comparisons were performed. Results: In this study of 5,693 patients who underwent distal radius fracture ORIF, 66 patients had a complication, 85 patients were readmitted and 61 patients underwent reoperation within 30 days of surgery. Resident involvement in the surgery was not associated with 30-day postoperative complication, readmission or reoperation, but was associated with longer operative time. Moreover, 30-day postoperative complication was associated with older age, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), hypertension and bleeding disorder. Thirty-day readmission was associated with older age, ASA classification, diabetes mellitus, COPD, hypertension, bleeding disorder and functional status. Thirty-day reoperation was associated with higher body mass index (BMI). Longer operative time was associated with younger age, male sex and the absence of bleeding disorder. Conclusions: Resident involvement in distal radius fracture ORIF is associated with longer operative time, but no difference in rates of episode-of-care adverse events. Patients may be reassured that resident involvement in distal radius fracture ORIF does not negatively impact short-term outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Arthroscopic Management of Distal Radius Fractures and Malunions

Articular congruity is the most important prognostic factor when dealing with a distal intra-articular radius fracture or the correction of intra-articular malunion. This article details our approach with tips and tricks for effectively managing these complex injuries with the aid of dry arthroscopy.

Pulp-to-palm distance after plate fixation of a distal radius fracture corresponds to functional outcome

INTRODUCTION

Several factors can influence the outcome after a distal radius fracture (DRF). The aim of this study was to assess whether postoperative pulp-to-palm (PTP) distance correlated with functional outcomes after plate fixation of DRF.

MATERIALS & METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effects of plate fixation in patients with type-C fractures. Subjects (N = 135) were divided into 2 groups based on PTP distance (equal to or higher than 0 cm) at 4 weeks postoperatively. Outcome measures were collected prospectively at 3, 6 and 12 months and included Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores, wrist range of motion (ROM), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, and hand grip strength.

RESULTS

Overall, at 3 and 6 months patients with PTP > 0 cm had significantly worse outcomes (PRWE, QuickDASH, wrist ROM) than those with PTP =0 cm. At 12 months, QuickDASH and wrist ROM were still significantly worse. In the volar-plating subgroup, patients with PTP > 0 cm had significantly worse wrist ROM and grip strength at 3 months, but no significant differences were found in subsequent follow-ups. In the combined-plating group, patients with PTP > 0 cm had significantly worse QuickDASH, wrist ROM and grip strength at 3 months. At 6 and 12 months, wrist ROM was still significantly worse.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of PTP distance appears to be useful to identify patients likely to have worse outcome after plating of a DRF. This could be a tool to improve the allocation of hand rehabilitation resources.

The Effects of Novel Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy Device on Acute Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled, Randomized Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

this pilot study aimed at determining whether the application of a novel new method of generating pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF), the Fracture Healing Patch (FHP), accelerates the healing of acute distal radius fractures (DRF) when compared to a sham treatment.

METHODS

41 patients with DRFs treated with cast immobilization were included. Patients were allocated to a PEMF group (n = 20) or a control (sham) group (n = 21). All patients were assessed with regard to functional and radiological outcomes (X-rays and CT scans) at 2, 4, 6 and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

fractures treated with active PEMF demonstrated significantly higher extent of union at 4 weeks as assessed by CT (76% vs. 58%, p = 0.02). SF12 mean physical score was significantly higher in PEMF treated group (47 vs. 36, p = 0.005). Time to cast removal was significantly shorter in PEMF treated patients, 33 ± 5.9 days in PEMF vs. 39.8 ± 7.4 days in sham group (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

early addition of PEMF treatment may accelerate bone healing which could lead to a shorter cast immobilization, thus allowing an earlier return to daily life activities and work. There were no complications related to the PEMF device (FHP).

Effectiveness and Safety of Different Treatment Modalities for Patients Older Than 60 Years with Distal Radius Fracture: A Network Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical effectiveness and complications of different treatment modalities for elderly patients with distal radius fracture (DRF).

METHODS

We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Eight databases were searched. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies were RCTs that compared different treatment modalities (surgical or nonoperative) in patients older than 60 years with displaced or unstable intra-articular and/or extra-articular DRFs.

RESULTS

Twenty-three RCTs met the eligibility criteria (2020 patients). For indirect comparisons, the main findings of the NMA were in volar locking plate (VLP) versus cast immobilization, with the mean differences for the patient-rated wrist evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire at -4.45 points (p < 0.05) and grip strength at 6.11% (p < 0.05). Additionally, VLP showed a lower risk ratio (RR) of minor complications than dorsal plate fixation (RR: 0.02) and bridging external fixation (RR: 0.25). Conversely, VLP and dorsal plate fixation showed higher rates of major complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with other treatment modalities, VLP showed statistically significant differences for some functional outcomes; however, most differences were not clinically relevant. For complications, although most differences were not statistically significant, VLP was the treatment modality that reported the lowest rate of minor and overall complications but also showed one of the highest rates of major complications in these patients. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42022315562.

Anterior locking plate versus non-operative treatment in different age groups with distal radial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis compared anterior locking plate and non-operative treatment for distal radial fractures and assessed if the age of the patients is associated with the treatment effect. We searched the MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases and included 12 studies with 1366 patients. Compared with non-operative care, anterior locking plate treatment does not seem to provide clinically important benefits in mean DASH score, mean pain or their mean quality of life at 12 to 24 months if the patients' ages are not considered (moderate to low certainty evidence). However, the younger the patients, the larger the benefit for surgery. Meta-regression with the DASH score suggested that while people over 70 likely experience no clinically relevant benefit from surgery, the mean effects cannot be generalized to people under 60. The evidence regarding the risk of adverse events is too uncertain to make firm conclusions.

Role of Pronator Quadratus Repair in Volar Locking Plate Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures

Distal radius fractures are the most common type of upper extremity fractures, and their incidence is increasing. There has been a rise in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures, primarily with volar locking plate fixation. Although this procedure is commonly done among orthopaedic surgeons, the role of pronator quadratus repair after fixation remains controversial. The pronator quadratus serves as a secondary forearm pronator and a dynamic stabilizer of the distal radioulnar joint. Aside from a functional role, repair of the pronator quadratus has been proposed to serve as a biologic barrier between the volar locking plate and the flexor tendons to minimize tendon irritation. In this narrative review, we discuss the current treatment trends, the surgical approach for volar locking plate treatment of distal radius fractures, and the anatomy and function of the pronator quadratus. We discuss the case for and against the repair of the pronator quadratus, both for function and prevention of flexor tendon irritation and rupture. The preponderance of high-level evidence demonstrates no benefit to pronator quadratus repair for pain relief or function. The current evidence does not conclusively support or refute pronator quadratus repair as a biologic barrier from the flexor tendons.

Treatment of distal radius fractures using a cemented K-wire frame

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study included an alternative treatment for types A2, A3, and B1 distal radius fractures using percutaneous fixation with a cemented K-wire frame.

METHODS

From January 2017 to January 2020, 78 patients with distal radius fractures were treated with percutaneous internal fixation using a cemented K-wire frame. There were 47 male patients and 31 female patients. The fractures were classified into types A2 (n = 10), A3 (n = 46), and B1 (n = 22). X-rays were taken immediately after surgery and after the bone had healed. Wrist function was assessed using the Mayo Wrist Score (90-100, excellent; 80-90, good; 60-80, satisfactory; < 60, poor). Patient satisfaction was assessed using the 10-cm visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Neither fixation failure nor K-wire migration was found (P > 0.05). Osteomyelitis was not observed in this series. All patients achieved bone healing after a mean of 4.5 weeks (range, 4 to 8 weeks). Follow-up lasted a mean of 27 months (range, 24 to 33 months). The mean score of wrist function was 97 (range, 91 to 100). Among them, 66 results were excellent and 12 results were good. The mean patient satisfaction was 10 cm (range, 8 to 10 cm).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous fixation with cemented K-wire frame is a safe and preferred choice for the treatment of types A2, A3, and B1 distal radius fractures. The frame provides support to prevent wire migration. The fixation technique is a minimally invasive procedure that is easy to perform.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study, Level IVa.