Two young women with chronic daily headache and cognitive impairment: why we need to ask about headache in the postpartum period

Research process, recap, and prediction of Chiari malformation based on bicentennial history of nomenclature and terms misuse

There is an absent systematic analysis or review that has been conducted to clarify the topic of nomenclature history and terms misuse about Chiari malformations (CMs). We reviewed all reports on terms coined for CMs for rational use and provided their etymology and future development. All literature on the nomenclature of CMs was retrieved and extracted into core terms. Subsequently, keyword analysis, preceding and predicting (2023-2025) compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of each core term, was calculated using a mathematical formula and autoregressive integrated moving average model in Python. Totally 64,527 CM term usage was identified. Of these, 57 original terms were collected and then extracted into 24 core-terms. Seventeen terms have their own featured author keywords, while seven terms are homologous. The preceding CAGR of 24 terms showed significant growth in use for 18 terms, while 13, three, three, and five terms may show sustained growth, remain stable, decline, and rare in usage, respectively, in the future. Previously, owing to intricate nomenclature, Chiari terms were frequently misused, and numerous seemingly novel but worthless even improper terms have emerged. For a very basic neuropathological phenomenon tonsillar herniation by multiple etiology, a mechanism-based nosology seems to be more conducive to future communication than an umbrella eponym. However, a good nomenclature also should encapsulate all characteristics of this condition, but this is lacking in current CM research, as the pathophysiological mechanisms are not elucidated for the majority of CMs.

Chronic headaches related to post-dural puncture headaches: a scoping review

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-recognised complication of neuraxial procedures. Although it is generally considered to be self-limiting, there is mounting evidence suggesting an association between PDPH and chronic headaches. In this review, chronic headache after dural puncture was defined as the reporting of persistent headaches more than 1 month after the index dural puncture. This scoping review aims to: (1) review the relationship between PDPH and chronic headaches, (2) explore the pathophysiology of chronic headache arising from a dural puncture, and (3) make recommendations about the follow-up and treatment of these patients. The pooled relative risk of chronic headache from 15 863 patients reported in 12 cohort studies in patients with an accidental dural puncture compared with those without accidental dural puncture were 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.9), 2.5 (95% CI, 2.0-3.2), and 3.6 (95% CI, 1.9-7.1) at 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. We also identified 20 case reports of 49 patients who developed chronic headache after a dural puncture. Epidural blood patch and fibrin glue injection and surgery have been used to treat chronic postural headaches. Overall, the level of evidence is low for all reported outcomes (aetiology, intervention and outcome) by virtue of the type of studies available (cohort and case reports) and significant risk of bias in the cohort studies. Based on findings from this review, we recommend that the risk of chronic headache is included in the informed consent discussion for all neuraxial procedures. Patients with PDPH should be closely followed up after hospital discharge.

Long-term morbidities following unintentional dural puncture in obstetric patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association of unintentional dural puncture (UDP) and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) with the risk of chronic headache, backache, neckache and depression. We also investigated if epidural blood patch (EBP) is associated with reduced risk of these morbidities.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

PATIENTS

Pregnant women who experienced UDP and/or PDPH versus those who had uneventful neuraxial procedures, and women who received EBP versus those who did not.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS

Primary outcomes were headache, backache, and neckache lasting ≥12 months, and depression ≥1 month. Secondary outcomes included chronic headache, backache, and neckache persisting ≥1 and ≥ 6 months, and the effects of EBP on those outcomes at ≥1 and ≥ 12 months. Subgroup analyses of prospective studies and sensitivity analyses of primary outcomes excluding poor quality studies were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve studies compared 6541 women with UDP and/or PDPH versus 1,004,510 with uncomplicated neuraxial procedures. Eight studies compared EBP (n = 3610) with no EBP (n = 3154). UDP and/or PDPH were associated with increased risk of headache (RR 3.95; 95%CI 2.13 to 7.34; I2 42%), backache (RR 2.72; 95%CI 2.04 to 3.62; I2 1%), and neckache (RR 8.09; 95%CI 1.03 to 63.35) persisting ≥12 months, and depression (RR 3.12; 95%CI 1.44 to 6.77; I2 90%) lasting ≥1 month. Results were consistent in analyses at ≥1 and ≥ 6 months, subgroup analyses of prospective studies, and after exclusion of one poor-quality study from our primary outcome. EBP was not associated with significant reduction in the risk of long-term morbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

UDP and/or PDPH were associated with increased risk of chronic headache, backache, neckache, and depression. EBP was not associated with a significant reduction in those risks, but this conclusion is limited by the heterogeneity of current data and lack of information on the success of EBP in relieving acute PDPH symptoms.

The Relationship between the Phases of the Menstrual Cycle on the Incidence and Severity of Headache after Spinal Anesthesia

Introduction  Headache after spinal anesthesia is a common complication, which is caused after dural puncture due to discharge of cerebrospinal fluid and reduction in the volume and pressure. Studies have shown that a variety of factors are involved including needle shape, needle size, patient's sex, age, duration of surgery, history of spinal anesthesia, and history of headaches. One possible factor is the phase of the menstrual cycle. Many studies have investigated the effect of the menstrual cycle on factors such as postoperative nausea, vomiting, propofol injection pain, and sore throat after intubation. Also, many studies have investigated the effect of different phases of the menstrual cycle on migraine headaches. Therefore, we decided to investigate the effect of different phases of the menstrual cycle on headache after spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods  To determine the relationship between headache after spinal anesthesia and menstrual cycle, the study included all the patients undergoing spinal anesthesia in Shohada Ashayer and Asalian Hospitals of Khorramabad. This cohort study included 279 patients, and data collection tool was a questionnaire. The data from the questionnaire included age, menstrual phase, surgical procedures, pain location, pain intensity, history of spinal anesthesia, history of headache, and headache after spinal anesthesia. Results  There was no statistically significant difference between the location of headache, the history of spinal anesthesia, the location of headache, the history of headache, and menstrual phase. Conclusion  Considering the high incidence of postdural puncture headache in follicular phase, it is recommended that patients with a high risk of headaches undergo spinal anesthesia and surgery in the luteal phase.