Noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy using cell-free DNA - New implications for maternal health

Advancements of non-invasive prenatal testing: the role of obstetricians

Since its debut in 2011, Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) has continually demonstrated its effectiveness in detecting an expanding number of diseases. NIPT offers a less invasive approach to prenatal chromosomal disease screening, providing prospective parents with vital information to better prepare for their potential pregnancy outcomes. NIPT was primarily designed for screening trisomy 13, 18, and 21. However, its scope has since broadened to encompass microdeletions and autosomal dominant monogenic diseases. Conversely, the normalization of NIPT can have unintended consequences. Some patients opt for NIPT without any medical indications, driven by a desire to remain cautious. This over-screening for chromosomal abnormalities can exacerbate pregnancy-related anxiety, as individuals might feel pressured into taking the test unnecessarily. While NIPT can be highly successful when conducted correctly, it is not infallible, and obstetricians play a crucial role in managing patient expectations. This includes providing genetic counseling to individuals with relevant genetic information regarding their personal and family histories. In the context of NIPT, a bioinformatics analysis is performed on a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sample extracted from the mother's placenta to determine the fetal fraction (FF). This FF measurement is vital for quality control and ensuring statistical confidence in the test results. Raising awareness among clinicians about the significance of FF enhances patient care and alleviate concerns about the possibility of failed NIPT. This paper aims to explore the ongoing debates and more specifically the significance and pitfalls of NIPT on a psychosocial and ethical scale, all while highlighting the importance of genetic counseling.

Association between cell-free DNA fetal fraction and pregnant character: a retrospective cohort study of 27,793 maternal plasmas

To determine the association between cell-free DNA fetal fraction (cffDNA) and various prenatal characters to better guide the clinical application of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS), a retrospective cohort study of 27,793 women with singleton pregnancies was conducted. Results indicated that no significant difference on cffDNA between trisomy/sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA) and non-trisomy groups was found. However, the fetal fraction (FF) in the T18 and T13 subgroups were significantly lower than that in the non-trisomy group, while the FF in the T21 group was significantly higher than the non-trisomy group. Pearson's correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between √FF and gestational week in the T21, SCA, and non-trisomy groups. A negative correlation between maternal age and √FF in T21 and non-trisomy cases was found, but a positive correlation in SCA group. Compared to the decreasing trend in FF in the T21 group, no significant difference was observed in the SCA group. The √FF level was negatively correlated to maternal BMI in T21 and non-trisomy group, while a positive correlation in SCA group. FF was close related to the result of NIPS and related maternal factors. Though NIPS has increased accuracy, the complexity still should be recognized especially in clinical practice.

Non-intuitive trends of fetal fraction development related to gestational age and fetal gender, and their practical implications for non-invasive prenatal testing

Discovery of fetal cell-free DNA fragments in maternal blood revolutionized prenatal diagnostics. Although non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is already a matured screening test with high specificity and sensitivity, the accurate estimation of the proportion of fetal fragments, called fetal fraction, is crucial to avoid false-negative results. In this study, we collected 6999 samples from women undergoing NIPT testing with a single male fetus to demonstrate the influence of fetal fraction by the maternal and fetal characteristics. We show several fetal fraction discrepancies that contradict the generally presented conventional view. At first, the fetal fraction is not consistently rising with the maturity of the fetus due to a drop in 15 weeks of maturation. Secondly, the male samples have a lower fetal fraction than female fetuses, arguably due to the smaller gonosomal chromosomes. Finally, we discuss not only the possible reasons why this inconsistency exists but we also outline why these differences have not yet been identified and published. We demonstrate two non-intuitive trends to better comprehend the fetal fraction development and more precise selection of patients with sufficient fetal fraction for accurate testing.

Follow-up in Patients With Non-invasive Prenatal Screening Failures: A Reflection on the Choice of Further Prenatal Diagnosis

Background

Our aim was to provide a theoretical basis for clinicians to conduct genetic counseling and choose further prenatal diagnosis methods for pregnant women who failed non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS).

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on pregnant women who had failed NIPS tests.

Results

Among the 123,291 samples, 394 pregnant women did not obtain valid results due to test failures. A total of 378 pregnant women were available for follow-up, while 16 patients were lost to follow-up. Of these 378, 135 pregnant women chose further prenatal diagnosis through amniocentesis, and one case of dysplasia was recalled for postpartum chromosome testing. The incidence rate of congenital chromosomal abnormalities in those who failed the NIPS was 3.97% (15/378), which was higher than that of the chromosomal abnormalities in the common population (1.8%). Among the pregnant women who received prenatal diagnosis, the positive rates of chromosomal abnormalities in the chromosomal microarray analysis/copy number variation sequencing (CMA/CNV-seq) group and in the karyotyping group were 15.28 and 4.76%, respectively.

Conclusion

Prenatal diagnosis should be strongly recommended in posttest genetic counseling for pregnant women with NIPS failures. Further, high-resolution detection methods should be recommended for additional prenatal diagnoses.

Not all low fetal fraction cell-free DNA screening failures are at increased risk for aneuploidy

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate cell-free DNA (cfDNA) redraws and pregnancy outcomes following low fetal fraction (FF) cfDNA failures, as it has been suggested that a failed cfDNA screen due to insufficient FF carries increased risk for fetal aneuploidy.

METHODS

Here >200,000 consecutive samples were reviewed and >1,100 patients were identified with a failed cfDNA due to low FF using genome-wide massively parallel sequencing. Redraw results following the initial low FF failure were analyzed, as well as pregnancy outcomes for patients with repeated low FF failure on redraw.

RESULTS

Upon redraw 84.2% of samples yielded a reportable result with no enrichment of aneuploidy observed (p = 0.332). Higher maternal weights and multifetal pregnancy rates were observed in samples with insufficient FF. In patients with repeated low FF failure on redraw, almost all pregnancies resulted in apparently healthy liveborns.

CONCLUSION

Insufficient FF was not an indicator of aneuploidy risk or adverse pregnancy outcomes in this study. Caution should be taken in generalizing aneuploidy risk to all low FF cfDNA failures. Redrawing may be an appropriate next step, as proceeding directly with diagnostic testing for aneuploidy may be unwarranted for most patients.

Hemolysis and Fetal Fraction in Cell-Free DNA Blood Collection Tubes for Noninvasive Prenatal Testing

BACKGROUND

Lysis of maternal white blood cells in prenatal cell-free DNA (cfDNA) test samples increases the level of maternal DNA and consequently decreases fetal fraction.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine whether hemolysis, traditionally used as a marker for cell lysis, is correlated with a decrease in fetal fraction in maternal blood samples collected in specialized cfDNA tubes for noninvasive prenatal testing.

METHODS

In the first part of the study, blood from pregnant women was collected into three Roche Cell-Free DNA Collection Tubes. These replicate specimens from the same subject were evaluated for a visual difference in hemoglobin level as a measure of hemolysis. The specimens were then processed with the Harmony^® prenatal test to measure fetal fraction using polymorphic digital analysis of selected regions (DANSR) assays. In a second part of the study, clinical laboratory samples with hemoglobin levels of ≥ 500 mg/dL were tracked through the laboratory and their fetal fraction compared with that of concurrently processed samples with lower hemoglobin levels.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in fetal fraction in 339 paired samples, with a difference in hemoglobin levels ranging from 0 to 1000 mg/dL. There was strong correlation in fetal fraction between tubes, regardless of the differences in hemoglobin concentration. The fetal fraction distribution in 203 tracked clinical samples with hemoglobin levels ≥ 500 mg/dL was statistically equivalent to the distribution in a concurrent series of 12,705 samples.

CONCLUSION

Hemolysis in maternal blood samples collected in specialized cfDNA tubes does not correlate with a decrease in fetal fraction; therefore, it should not be a cause for rejection of samples submitted for prenatal cfDNA testing.

ADIPS 2020 guideline for pre-existing diabetes and pregnancy

This is the full version of the Australasian Diabetes in Pregnancy Society (ADIPS) 2020 guideline for pre-existing diabetes and pregnancy. The guideline encompasses the management of women with pre-existing type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes in relation to pregnancy, including preconception, antepartum, intrapartum and postpartum care. The management of women with monogenic diabetes or cystic fibrosis-related diabetes in relation to pregnancy is also discussed.

Discordant fetal sex on NIPT and ultrasound

Prenatal diagnosis of sex discordance is a relatively new phenomenon. Prior to cell-free DNA testing, the diagnosis of a disorder of sexual differentiation was serendipitous, either through identification of ambiguous genitalia at the midtrimester morphology ultrasound or discovery of genotype-phenotype discordance in cases where preimplantation genetic diagnosis or invasive prenatal testing had occurred. The widespread integration of cfDNA testing into modern antenatal screening has made sex chromosome assessment possible from 10 weeks of gestation, and discordant fetal sex is now more commonly diagnosed prenatally, with a prevalence of approximately 1 in 1500-2000 pregnancies. Early detection of phenotype-genotype sex discordance is important as it may indicate an underlying genetic, chromosomal or biochemical condition and it also allows for time-critical postnatal treatment. The aim of this article is to review cfDNA and ultrasound diagnosis of fetal sex, identify possible causes of phenotype-genotype discordance and provide a systematic approach for clinicians when counseling and managing couples in this circumstance.

The effect of maternal body mass index and gestational age on circulating trophoblast yield in cell-based noninvasive prenatal testing

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effects of maternal body mass index (BMI) and gestational age (GA) on the number of single circulating trophoblasts (SCT).

METHODS

Maternal blood was collected in 20 to 40 mL. All singleton pregnant women at any gestation were recruited. Trophoblasts were recovered by immunomagnetic enrichment and stained for cytokeratin and CD45. Candidate trophoblasts were identified by fluorescence microscopy.

RESULTS

Blood samples were collected from 425 singleton pregnancies from April 2018 to December 2019. At least one candidate cell was identified in 88% (373/425). There was an inverse correlation between trophoblasts yield and increasing BMI (r = -0.19, P < .001). The mean ± SD number of trophoblasts/mL was 0.12  ± 0.22 in the underweight group (n = 5), 0.23 ± 0.25 in the normal weight (n = 169), 0.18 ± 0.19 in the overweight (n = 114), and 0.13 ± 0.15 in the obese (n = 109). Significantly more cells were identified in the normal weight than those in the obese (P = .001). In addition, the mean ± SD number of cells/mL was 0.21  ± 0.21 at GA of 10 to 14 weeks (n = 260), 0.14 ± 0.23 at GA ≥15 (n = 102) and 0.12 ± 0.12 at GA <10 (n = 63); P < .001.

CONCLUSION

The lower number of SCT was identified from the samples of women with a high BMI. Cell recovery for SCT testing seems optimal at GA of 10 to 14 weeks, but earlier and later testing is still possible.

Applying high-throughput sequencing to identify and evaluate foetal chromosomal deletion and duplication

The present study aimed to estimate the clinical performance of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) based on high-throughput sequencing method for the detection of foetal chromosomal deletions and duplications. A total of 6348 pregnant women receiving NIPT using high-throughput sequencing method were included in our study. They all conceived naturally, without twins, triplets or multiple births. Individuals showing abnormalities in NIPT received invasive ultrasound-guided amniocentesis for chromosomal karyotype and microarray analysis at 18-24 weeks of pregnancy. Detection results of foetal chromosomal deletions and duplications were compared between high-throughput sequencing method and chromosomal karyotype and microarray analysis. Thirty-eight individuals were identified to show 51 chromosomal deletions/duplications via high-throughput sequencing method. In subsequent chromosomal karyotype and microarray analysis, 34 subchromosomal deletions/duplications were identified in 26 pregnant women. The observed deletions and duplications ranged from 1.05 to 17.98 Mb. Detection accuracy for these deletions and duplications was 66.7%. Twenty-one deletions and duplications were found to be correlated with the known abnormalities. NIPT based on high-throughput sequencing technique is able to identify foetal chromosomal deletions and duplications, but its sensitivity and specificity were not explored. Further progress should be made to reduce false-positive results.

Factors affecting cell-free DNA fetal fraction: statistical analysis of 13,661 maternal plasmas for non-invasive prenatal screening

Background

The identification of cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) facilitated non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS) through analysis of cffDNA in maternal plasma. However, challenges regarding its clinical implementation become apparent. Factors affecting fetal fraction should be clarified to guide its clinical application.

Results

A total of 13,661 pregnant subjects with singleton pregnancies who undertook NIPS were included in the study. Relationship of gestational age, maternal BMI, and maternal age with the cffDNA fetal fraction in maternal plasmas for NIPS was investigated. Compared with 13 weeks (12.74%) and 14–18 weeks group (12.73%), the fetal fraction in gestational ages of 19–23 weeks, 24–28 weeks, and more than 29 weeks groups significantly increased to 13.11%, 16.14%, and 21.17%, respectively (P < 0.01). Compared with fetal fraction of 14.54% in the maternal BMI group of < 18.5 kg/m², the percentage of fetal fraction in the group of 18.5–24.9 kg/m² (13.37%), 25–29.9 kg/m² (12.20%), 30–34.9 kg/m² (11.32%), and 35–39.9 kg/m² (11.57%) decreased significantly (P < 0.01). Compared with the fetal fraction of 14.38% in the group of 18–24 years old, the fetal fraction in the maternal age group of 25–29 years old group (13.98%) (P < 0.05), 30–34 years old group (13.18%) (P < 0.01), 35–39 years old group (12.34%) (P < 0.01), and ≥ 40 years old (11.90%) group (P < 0.01) decreased significantly.

Conclusions

The percentage of fetal fraction significantly increased with increase of gestational age. Decreased fetal fraction with increasing maternal BMI was found. Maternal age was also negatively related to the fetal fraction.

Could high levels of cell-free DNA in maternal blood be associated with maternal health and perinatal outcomes?

The aim of this study was to evaluate the maternal and foetal factors affect higher cell-free DNA (cfDNA) levels and to investigate a possible relationship between high cfDNA levels and adverse perinatal outcomes. From a total of 4594 women who underwent non-invasive prenatal testing from January 2016 to March 2018 in our hospital, 112 women had high levels of cfDNA, which was not appropriate for testing. Maternal characteristics and perinatal outcomes were compared between patients with high levels of cfDNA and normal levels of cfDNA. Patients with high levels of cfDNA had greater risks than patients with normal cfDNA levels of pregnancy complications but no statistically significant difference was found. Patients with high cfDNA levels had higher foetal death rates with a statistically significant difference (9.8% versus 1.8%, p = .024). An increase in foetal death could be expected in patients with increased cfDNA levels; therefore, these patients should be carefully followed up during pregnancy.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat's already known about this topic? Most studies about cfDNA levels are focussed on the foetal fraction. There are new arguments about maternal health and cfDNA. It is known that autoimmune diseases as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and maternal obesity increase cell turnover. There are also clinical studies suggesting a relationship between low molecular weight heparin therapy and the amount of cfDNA.What do the results of this study add? This is the first study evaluating the maternal and foetal biological factors affecting cfDNA concentrations and investigating the possible relationship between high cfDNA levels and adverse perinatal outcomes in patients with high levels of cfDNA compared to patients with normal levels of cfDNA. In the present study, it was found that an increase in foetal death could be expected in patients with higher cfDNA levels.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? If potential effects and underlying causes of increased cfDNA could be explained, cfDNA might be used as a biomarker for adverse perinatal outcomes.

Fetal sex discordance between noninvasive prenatal screening results and sonography: A single institution's experience and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

With the increasing availability of noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) and high-resolution ultrasound, more cases of sex discordance are being identified in routine clinical practice. This can be a source of much concern for families and clinicians. Knowledge about the limitations of NIPS and reasons for discordant results are critical for counseling parents.

AIMS

Here, we present three cases from a single tertiary care referral center. We also review the literature to address potential limitations of NIPS in correctly identifying fetal sex chromosomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After Institutional Review Board approval, cases of discordant fetal sex were identified using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. In addition, departmental counseling database and cytogenetics laboratory logbooks were reviewed.

RESULTS

In our first case, a 37-year-old G4 P2012 underwent NIPS at 11 weeks gestation and Monosomy X (associated with Turner syndrome) was identified. Morphological sonographic assessment at 20 weeks gestation was consistent with a female fetus following an amniocentesis at 16 weeks that revealed normal 46, XX karyotype. During the third trimester, the patient was diagnosed with Stage IV invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Postnatal follow-up of the neonate was consistent with a phenotypic female. In the second case, a 22-year-old G2 P1001 obese female underwent NIPS at 14 weeks gestation and normal 46, XY karyotype was identified. Morphological sonographic assessment at 20 weeks was not consistent with a male fetus. The patient declined invasive testing. Postnatally, the karyotype was 46, XX and the neonate was phenotypically female. The reason for the discordant results was not identified. In the third case, a 25-year-old G1 P0 obese female underwent NIPS at 13 weeks gestation and normal 46, XY karyotype was identified. Morphological sonographic assessment at 20 weeks was indeterminate; however, follow-up at 24 weeks was consistent with a female fetus. The patient declined invasive prenatal testing. Postnatally, the karyotype was 46, XX, and the neonate was phenotypically female with uterus present on ultrasound. The reason for the discordant results was not identified.

DISCUSSION

Our cases demonstrate possible limitations of NIPS in correctly identifying sex chromosomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Providers and patients need to be aware of these limitations, and invasive diagnostic prenatal testing should be offered in cases of discordance between NIPS and sonographic sex assessment.

Liquid Biopsy as a Tool for Differentiation of Leiomyomas and Sarcomas of Corpus Uteri

Utilization of liquid biopsy in the management of cancerous diseases is becoming more attractive. This method can overcome typical limitations of tissue biopsies, especially invasiveness, no repeatability, and the inability to monitor responses to medication during treatment as well as condition during follow-up. Liquid biopsy also provides greater possibility of early prediction of cancer presence. Corpus uteri mesenchymal tumors are comprised of benign variants, which are mostly leiomyomas, but also a heterogenous group of malignant sarcomas. Pre-surgical differentiation between these tumors is very difficult and the final description of tumor characteristics usually requires excision and histological examination. The leiomyomas and malignant leiomyosarcomas are especially difficult to distinguish and can, therefore, be easily misdiagnosed. Because of the very aggressive character of sarcomas, liquid biopsy based on early diagnosis and differentiation of these tumors would be extremely helpful. Moreover, after excision of the tumor, liquid biopsy can contribute to an increased knowledge of sarcoma behavior at the molecular level, especially on the formation of metastases which is still not well understood. In this review, we summarize the most important knowledge of mesenchymal uterine tumors, the possibilities and benefits of liquid biopsy utilization, the types of molecules and cells that can be analyzed with this approach, and the possibility of their isolation and capture. Finally, we review the typical abnormalities of leiomyomas and sarcomas that can be searched and analyzed in liquid biopsy samples with the final aim to pre-surgically differentiate between benign and malignant mesenchymal tumors.

Different methylation levels in the KLF4, ATF3 and DLEC1 genes in the myometrium and in corpus uteri mesenchymal tumours as assessed by MS-HRM

Mesenchymal tumours of the corpus uteri comprise common benign lesions - leiomyomas and very rare malignant variants - sarcomas. It can be difficult to distinguish between the particular types of mesenchymal tumours pre-surgically. Primarily, leiomyomas and the very aggressive leiomyosarcomas can be easily misdiagnosed when using only imaging devices. Therefore, a reliable non-invasive marker for these tumour types would provide greater certitude for patients that the lesion remains benign. Our collection comprises 76 native leiomyomas, an equal number of healthy myometrium samples and 49 FFPE samples of various types of sarcomas. The methylation level was assessed by MS-HRM method and we observed differences in the methylation level between healthy, benign and (semi)malignant tissues in the KLF4 and DLEC1 genes. The mean methylation levels of leiomyomas compared to myometrium and leiomyosarcomas were 70.7% vs. 6.5% vs. 39.6 % (KLF4) and 66.1% vs. 14.08% vs. 37.5% (DLEC1). The ATF3 gene was differentially methylated in leiomyomatous and myometrial tissues with 98.1% compared to 76.6%. The AUC values of the predictive logistic regression model for discrimination between leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas based on methylation levels were 0.7829 (KLF4) and 0.7719 (DLEC1). Finally, our results suggest that there should be distinct models for the methylation events in benign leiomyomas and sarcomas, and that the KLF4 and DLEC1 genes can be considered potential methylation biomarkers for uterine leiomyomas.

Guidelines for the Preanalytical Conditions for Analyzing Circulating Cell-Free DNA

Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) isolated from blood has been identified as a potential biomarker in numerous fields, and has been the object of intensive research over the past decade, although its original discovery dates back 60 years. While it is already used routinely in commercial and clinical practice in oncology and prenatal testing, other potential applications have emerged, including for diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, organ transplantation, autoimmune diseases, sepsis, trauma, and sport management. As with the discovery and development of any biomarker, preanalytical requirements and documentation are as important as analytical requirements. Except for the case of noninvasive prenatal testing and prenatal diagnosis, the implementation of cfDNA in a clinical setting remains limited because of the lack of standardization of cfDNA analysis. In particular, only a few attempts have been made to collect and pool scientific data on the relevant preanalytical factors, and no standard operating procedure has yet been set. For this report, we have performed a thorough and systematic search via MEDLINE® for relevant preanalytical variables and patient factors. These form the basis of the guidelines we propose for analyzing nuclear cfDNA.

Prenatal cell-free DNA screening for fetal aneuploidy in pregnant women at average or high risk: Results from a large US clinical laboratory

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the performance of a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) prenatal screening assay for trisomies 21, 18, and 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCAs) among a population of pregnant women that included both those at average and high risk.

METHODS

Specimen collection, cfDNA extraction, massively parallel sequencing, and bioinformatics analysis were conducted per laboratory protocol. Assay results, concordance with pregnancy outcomes, and performance characteristics were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total 75,658 specimens from 72,176 individual pregnant women were received. Technical reasons accounted for 288 (0.4% of all received samples) tests not performed. In the final analysis cohort (N = 69,794), 13% of pregnancies were considered at average risk and 87% at high risk. Mean gestational age at specimen collection was 15.1 weeks. Of the 69,794 unique pregnancies, 1,359 (1.9%) had positive test results. Among the results with confirmed outcomes, PPV for trisomies 21, 18, and 13 was 98.1%, 88.2%, and 59.3%, respectively; the PPV was 69.0% for SCAs and 75.0% for microdeletions. Overall, PPV was 87.2%, sensitivity was 97.9%, and specificity was 99.9%.

CONCLUSION

This cfDNA prenatal screening assay provides highly accurate discrimination between affected and unaffected pregnancies among a population of pregnant women at average and high risk for fetal genetic abnormalities.

Update in non-invasive prenatal testing

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has revolutionized the approach to prenatal diagnosis and, to date, it is the most superior screening method for the common autosomal aneuploidies, mostly trisomy 21. This screening is having a significant population-wide impact on the uptake of conventional screening and diagnostic testing. In recent years, emerging genomic technologies, largely based around next generation sequencing, have expanded the analyses to the sub-chromosomal aneuploidies. However, further clinical validation studies are needed to better characterize this technology. These tests bring advantage through providing a higher diagnostic yield, without risks of miscarriage than previously available diagnostic test, but also raise the question of harms related to an increase in uncertain and unknown results. In view of the revolution brought about by the NIPT, numerous scientific societies have published recommendations regarding the appropriate application of cell-free DNA screening in pregnancy. In this review, we discuss the progress that has been made to date in NIPT.