Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and mortality risk in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation. Insights from the nationwide START registry

BACKGROUND

Arterial hypertension is the most common cardiovascular comorbidity in atrial fibrillation (AF). Few studies investigated management strategies of hypertension in AF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included 5769 AF patients on oral anticoagulants from the nationwide ongoing Italian START registry. We investigated the prescription of antihypertensive drugs and mortality risk. Subgroup analyses according to sex and major cardiovascular comorbidities were performed.

RESULTS

Mean age was 80.8 years, 46.1% were women; 80.3% of patients were hypertensive. Furosemide (30.1%) was the most frequent diuretic followed by hydrochlorothiazide (15.4%) and potassium canrenoate (7.9%). 61.1% received β-blockers: 34.2% bisoprolol, 6.2% atenolol. Additionally, 36.9% were on angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I): ramipril (20.9%), enalapril (5.3%) and perindopril (2.8%); 31.7% were on angiotensin receptors blockers (ARBs): valsartan (7.6%) and irbesartan (6.4%). Amlodipine and lercanidipine were prescribed in 14.0% and 2.3%, respectively. ACE-I (p < 0.001), α-blockers (p = 0.020) and Dihydropyridines calcium channel blockers (p = 0.004) were more common in men, while ARBs (p = 0.008), thiazide diuretics (p < 0.001) and β-blockers (p < 0.001) in women. During 22.61 ± 17.1 months, 512 patients died. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that ACE-I (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.758, 95% Confidence Interval [95%CI] 0.612-0.940, p = 0.012) and ARBs (HR 0.623, 95%CI 0.487-0.796, p < 0.001) inversely associated with mortality. ACE-I/ARBs inversely associated with mortality in both sexes and in patients with diabetes. This associastion was evident for ACE-I in patients with previous cardiovascular disease, and for ARBs in HF.

CONCLUSION

A lower mortality risk was found in AF patients on ACE-I/ARBs. Different prescription patterns of antihypertensive drugs between men and women do exist.

Sacubitril/valsartan reduces susceptibility to atrial fibrillation by improving atrial remodeling in spontaneously hypertensive rats

AIM

Sacubitril/valsartan (Sac/Val, LCZ696), the world's first angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi), has been widely used in the treatment of heart failure. However, the use of Sac/Val in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), especially AF with hypertension, has been less reported. We investigated the effect of Sac/Val on atrial remodeling and hypertension-related AF.

METHODS

The AF induction rate and electrophysiological characteristics of spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs) treated with Sac/Val or Val were detected by rapid atrial pacing and electrical mapping/optical mapping. The whole-cell patch-clamp and western blot were used to observe electrical/structural remodeling of atrial myocytes/tissue of rats and atrium-derived HL-1 cells cultured under 40 mmHg in vitro.

RESULTS

Sac/Val was superior to Val in reducing blood pressure, myocardial hypertrophy and susceptibility of AF in SHRs. The shorten action potentials duration (APD), decreased L type calcium channel current (I_Ca,L) and Cav1.2, increased ultrarapid delayed rectified potassium current (I_kur) and Kv1.5 in atrial myocytes/tissue of SHRs could be better improved by Sac/Val, as well as the levels of atrial fibrosis. While the protein expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme-1 (ACE-1), angiotensin, angiotensin II type I AT1 receptor (AT1R) and neprilysin (NEP) were increased, which could be more effective ameliorated by Sac/Val than Val. Furthermore, Val + Sacubitrilat (LBQ657) (an active NEP inhibitor) was also superior to LBQ657 or Val in improving the electrical and structural remodeling of HL-1 cells through inhibiting NEP.

CONCLUSION

Sac/Val can improve atrial structural and electrical remodeling induced by hypertension and reduce the AF susceptibility by inhibiting RAS and NEP. The above effects of Sac/Val were superior to Val alone.

PU.1 inhibition attenuates atrial fibrosis and atrial fibrillation vulnerability induced by angiotensin-II by reducing TGF-β1/Smads pathway activation

Fibrosis serves a critical role in driving atrial remodelling‐mediated atrial fibrillation (AF). Abnormal levels of the transcription factor PU.1, a key regulator of fibrosis, are associated with cardiac injury and dysfunction following acute viral myocarditis. However, the role of PU.1 in atrial fibrosis and vulnerability to AF remain unclear. Here, an in vivo atrial fibrosis model was developed by the continuous infusion of C57 mice with subcutaneous Ang‐II, while the in vitro model comprised atrial fibroblasts that were isolated and cultured. The expression of PU.1 was significantly up‐regulated in the Ang‐II‐induced group compared with the sham/control group in vivo and in vitro. Moreover, protein expression along the TGF‐β1/Smads pathway and the proliferation and differentiation of atrial fibroblasts induced by Ang‐II were significantly higher in the Ang‐II‐induced group than in the sham/control group. These effects were attenuated by exposure to DB1976, a PU.1 inhibitor, both in vivo and in vitro. Importantly, in vitro treatment with small interfering RNA against Smad3 (key protein of TGF‐β1/Smads signalling pathway) diminished these Ang‐II‐mediated effects, and the si‐Smad3‐mediated effects were, in turn, antagonized by the addition of a PU.1‐overexpression adenoviral vector. Finally, PU.1 inhibition reduced the atrial fibrosis induced by Ang‐II and attenuated vulnerability to AF, at least in part through the TGF‐β1/Smads pathway. Overall, the study implicates PU.1 as a potential therapeutic target to inhibit Ang‐II‐induced atrial fibrosis and vulnerability to AF.

Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors Prognostic Benefit in Older Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

OBJECTIVES

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARB) have shown antiarrhythmic effects that are useful as part of the upstream therapy for atrial fibrillation (AF), both for primary and secondary prevention. Nevertheless, the potential prognosis value of these drugs in terms of mortality and major cardiovascular events is unclear, especially in older population with AF. Scientific evidence is scarce in this population and shows contradictory results. The aim of this study was to assess the potential benefit of ACEi and ARB in terms of mortality and major cardiovascular outcomes (hospitalization for heart failure, acute myocardial infarction and stroke) in older patients with AF, based on a real-world data analysis.

DESIGN

Observational: analysis of a retrospective registry.

SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS

The study included 9365 patients of 75 years or older diagnosed with AF, from CardioCHUVI-AF_75 registry: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04364516. Date of registration: November 26, 2018.

METHODS

We performed propensity score matching techniques to obtain 2 comparable groups of 3601 patients with and without ACEi or ARB treatment. We compared survival and cardiovascular outcomes in both groups of patients using Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We did not find significant differences in terms of survival between using or not using ACEi or ARB for the older population (hazard ratio for mortality: 0.959, 95% confidence interval 0.872-1.054). There were no significant differences regarding cardiovascular major events between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Treatment with ACEi or ARB did not improve outcomes in terms of survival and cardiovascular events in older patients with AF. These results should prompt the conduct of randomized clinical trials specifically in the older AF patient population to robustly address this issue.

The crucial role of activin A/ALK4 pathway in the pathogenesis of Ang-II-induced atrial fibrosis and vulnerability to atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrosis, the hallmark of structural remodeling associated with atrial fibrillation (AF), is characterized by abnormal proliferation of atrial fibroblasts and excessive deposition of extracellular matrix. Transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1)/activin receptor-like kinase 5 (ALK5)/Smad2/3/4 pathway has been reported to be involved in the process. Recent studies have implicated both activin A and its specific downstream component activin receptor-like kinase 4 (ALK4) in stimulating fibrosis in non-cardiac organs. We recently reported that ALK4 haplodeficiency attenuated the pressure overload- and myocardial infarction-induced ventricular fibrosis. However, the role of activin A/ALK4 in the pathogenesis of atrial fibrosis and vulnerability to AF remains unknown. Our study provided experimental and clinical evidence for the involvement of activin A and ALK4 in the pathophysiology of atrial fibrosis and AF. Patients with AF had higher activin A and ALK4 expression in atriums as compared to individuals devoid of AF. After angiotensin-II (Ang-II) stimulation which mimicked atrial fibrosis progression, ALK4-deficient mice showed lower expression of ALK4 in atriums, reduced activation of atrial fibroblasts, blunted atrial enlargement and atrial fibrosis, and further reduced AF vulnerability upon right atrial electrophysiological studies as compared to wild-type littermates. Moreover, we found that apart from the well-known TGF-β1/ALK5 pathway, the activation of activin A/ALK4/smad2/3 pathway played an important role in the pathogenesis of Ang-II-mediated atrial fibrosis and inducibility of AF, suggesting that targeting ALK4 might be a potential therapy for atrial fibrosis and AF.

Effect of ramipril/hydrochlorothiazide and ramipril/canrenone combination on atrial fibrillation recurrence in hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients with and without cardiac autonomic neuropathy

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the effect of ramipril/canrenone versus ramipril/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) combination on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in type 2 diabetic hypertensives with and without cardiac autonomic neuropathy (CAN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 289 hypertensive type 2 diabetic patients, 95 with CAN, in sinus rhythm but with at least two episodes of AF in the previous 6 months were randomized to ramipril 5 mg plus canrenone 50 mg (titrated to 10/100 mg) or to ramipril 5 mg plus HCTZ 12.5 mg (titrated to 10/25 mg) or to amlodipine 5 mg (titrated to 10 mg) for 1 year. Clinic blood pressure (BP) and a 24-h ECG were evaluated monthly. Patients were asked to report any episode of symptomatic AF and to perform an ECG as early as possible. Serum procollagen type I carboxy-terminal peptide (PIP) and carboxy-terminal telopeptide of collagen type I (CITP) were evaluated before and after each treatment period.

RESULTS

Blood pressure was similarly and significantly reduced by all treatments. A total of 51% of patients with amlodipine had a recurrence of AF, as did 31% of patients with ramipril/HCTZ (p < 0.05 vs. amlodipine) and 13% of patients with ramipril/canrenone (p < 0.01 vs. amlodipine and p < 0.05 vs. ramipril/HCTZ). A similar trend was found in diabetic patients with CAN. Both combinations reduced PIP and increased CITP, but the effects of ramipril/canrenone were significantly more marked.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that in type 2 diabetic hypertensives, ramipril/canrenone treatment was more effective than ramipril/HCTZ in reducing AF recurrence. This could be related to the greater improvement in cardiac fibrosis.

The three integrated phases of left atrial macrophysiology and their interactions

Our understanding of the left atrium is growing, although there are many aspects that are still poorly understood. The left atrium size as an imaging biomarker has been consistently shown to be a powerful predictor of outcomes and of different cardiovascular disorders, such as, but not limited to, atrial fibrillation, congestive heart failure, mitral regurgitation and stroke. Left atrial function has been conventionally divided into three integrated phases: reservoir, conduit and booster-pump. The highly dynamic left atrium and its response to the stretch and secretion of atrial neuropeptides leaves the left atrium far from being a simple transport chamber. The aim of this review is to provide an understanding of the left atrial physiology and its relation to disorders within the heart.

Circulating and local renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system express differently in atrial fibrillation patients with different types of mitral valvular disease

Mitral valvular disease is strongly related to atrial fibrillation (AF), but the different types of mitral valvular disease have a different prevalence of AF. In this study we explored the expressions of the circulating and local renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) in order to determine the relationship between circulating and local RAAS expressions and its effects on AF in different types of mitral valvular disease patients. Our study group consisted of 24 mitral valvular disease patients scheduled for mitral valve replacement surgery. Peripheral blood samples and left atrial appendage tissue samples were obtained from all patients. Radioimmunoassay was performed to assess the expression levels of circulating and local renin, angiotensin II and aldosterone. In mitral valvular diseases, linear correlation analyses were done for local and circulating renin, angiotensin II and aldosterone; the p values were 0.979, 0.518 and 0.125, respectively. Expression levels of local angiotensin II, circulating angiotensin II and local aldosterone were significantly increased in the AF group compared with sinus rhythm; the p values were 0.023, 0.042 and 0.035, respectively. In mitral stenosis patients, AF was primarily associated with local angiotensin II (p=0.010), as well as being associated with circulating angiotensin II (p=0.038). In mitral regurgitation patients, AF was only significantly associated with local angiotensin II (p=0.038). Circulating and local RAAS expressions are associated with AF in mitral valvular disease patients. The levels of circulating and local RAAS expressions were different in AF patients with different types of mitral valvular diseases. The differentiation of circulating and local RAAS expression levels in AF patients between different types of mitral valvular disease can potentially improve the specific pharmacological interventions outcomes for these patients.

Effect of telmisartan on paroxysmal atrial fibrillation recurrence in hypertensive patients with normal or increased left atrial size

BACKGROUND

Hypertension is the most prevalent and potentially modifiable risk factor for atrial fibrillation (AF). In a previous secondary prevention study, the authors observed that the angiotensin II receptor blocker telmisartan was more effective than the calcium channel blocker amlodipine in preventing AF relapse in hypertensive patients with normal atrial size.

HYPOTHESIS

Telmisartan may be more effective than amlodipine in preventing AF recurrence in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal AF and normal or increased left atrial dimension (LAD).

METHODS

The authors assigned 378 mild hypertensive outpatients in sinus rhythm, but with ≥2 episodes of AF in the previous 6 months, to 1 of 2 groups. Group 1 comprised patients with LAD <40 mm in females and <45 mm in males. Group 2 comprised patients with LAD >40 mm and <45 mm in females and >45 mm and <50 mm in males. In both groups, patients were randomly treated with telmisartan or amlodipine for 1 year.

RESULTS

Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were similarly reduced by telmisartan and amlodipine in both groups. The AF recurrence rate was significantly lower in the telmisartan-treated patients than in the amlodipine-treated patients in both group 1 (12 vs 39, P < 0.01) and group 2 (40 vs 59, P < 0.05). Under telmisartan, the AF recurrence rate was significantly lower in group 1 than in group 2 (12.9% vs 42.1%, P < 0.05). Time to a first AF relapse was significantly longer with telmisartan than with amlodipine in both group 1 (176 ± 94 days vs 74 ± 61 days, P < 0.05) and group 2 (119 ± 65 days vs 38 ± 35 days, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Telmisartan was more effective than amlodipine in preventing AF recurrences in hypertensive patients with paroxysmal AF.

Left atrial function: physiology, assessment, and clinical implications

The interest in the left atrium (LA) has resurged over the recent years. In the early 1980s, multiple studies were conducted to determine the normal values of LA size. Over the past decade, LA size as an imaging biomarker has been consistently shown to be a powerful predictor of outcomes, including major public health problems such as atrial fibrillation, heart failure, stroke, and death. More recently, functional assessment of the LA has been shown to be, at least as, if not more robust, a marker of cardiovascular outcomes. Current available data suggest that the combined evaluation of LA size and LA function will augment prognostication. The aim of this review is to provide a critical appraisal of current echocardiographic techniques for the assessment of LA function and the implications of such assessment for prediction and disease prevention.