Faecal biomarkers for screening small bowel inflammation in patients with Crohn's disease: a prospective study

Clinical Value of Detecting Fecal Calprotectin by Using Colloidal Gold Assay in Screening or Diagnosing Crohn's Disease

Background

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease, and its incidence is gradually increasing. Thus, the use of a simple and convenient examination method to detect CD in the natural population as early as possible is crucial. This study is aimed at using the colloidal gold semiquantitative assay to detect fecal calprotectin (FCP) and determine whether it is helpful in screening or diagnosing CD.

Methods

Using a prospectively maintained database, 59 patients with CD were analyzed using FCP measurement. Subsequently, 76 patients and 89 healthy individuals were assigned to the gastrointestinal dysfunction and control groups, respectively. To aid in the screening or diagnosis of CD, the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine the diagnostic efficacy of FCP thresholds. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were presented with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Patients with CD showed significantly higher FCP levels. Compared with the healthy population, when the FCP level cut-off was 15 μg/g and 60 μg/g, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CD diagnosis were 98.3% (CI, 95.0%-100%) and 78.0% (CI, 67.4-88.6%), 84.3% (CI, 76.7%-91.8%) and 98.9% (CI, 96.7%-100%), 80.6% (CI, 71.5%-89.7%) and 97.9% (CI, 93.7%-100%), and 98.7% (CI, 96.2%-100%) and 87.1% (CI, 80.6%-93.6%), respectively. The AUCs were 0.969 (CI, 0.941-0.997). Compared with the gastrointestinal dysfunction group, using the same FCP level cut-off, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for CD diagnosis were 98.3% (CI, 95.0%-100%) and 78.0% (CI, 67.4%-88.6%), 71.1% (CI, 60.9%-81.3%) and 89.5% (CI, 82.3%-96.7%), 72.5% (CI, 62.7%-82.3%) and 85.2% (CI, 75.7%-94.7%), and 98.1% (CI, 94.5%-100%) and 84.0% (CI, 76.0%-92.0%), respectively. The AUCs were 0.908 (CI, 0.856-0.960).

Conclusion

Detecting FCP by using the colloidal gold semiquantitative assay can be effective in screening and adjunct diagnosing of CD.

Leucine-Rich Alpha-2 Glycoprotein Is a Reliable Serum Biomarker for Evaluating Clinical and Endoscopic Disease Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein (LRG) is a novel serum biomarker for inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This prospective study aimed to compare the value of LRG with C-reactive protein (CRP) and fecal calprotectin for evaluating clinical and endoscopic disease activity in patients with IBD.

METHODS

At entry, clinical and endoscopic disease activity was assessed in 267 patients with IBD (ulcerative colitis [UC] 203; Crohn's disease [CD] 64), and the levels of LRG, CRP and fecal calprotectin were measured. The accuracy of the biomarkers for the detection of clinical and endoscopic disease activity was determined by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein showed a significant relationship with the clinical and endoscopic severity in both UC and CD (both diseases, P < .0001). In the clinical assessment of UC, the accuracy of LRG was significantly higher than that of CRP (0.73 vs 0.63; P < .001). In the endoscopic assessment of UC, the accuracy of LRG was significantly higher than that of CRP (P = .01), but it was significantly lower than that of fecal calprotectin (P = .009; LRG, 0.80; CRP, 0.72; fecal calprotectin, 0.91). In the clinical and endoscopic assessment of CD, the accuracy was not significantly different between the biomarkers (clinical activity: LRG, 0.71; CRP, 0.64; fecal calprotectin, 0.66; in endoscopic activity: LRG, 0.79; CRP, 0.78; fecal calprotectin, 0.81).

CONCLUSIONS

Leucine-rich alpha-2 glycoprotein is a reliable serum biomarker for the assessment of clinical and endoscopic disease activity in patients with IBD. It can be an alternative to CRP for the assessment of UC.

Saudi Arabia consensus guidance for the diagnosis and management of adults with inflammatory bowel disease

Optimal management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) relies on a clear understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This article provides concise guidelines for the management of IBD in adults, based on the most up-to-date information at the time of writing and will be regularly updated. These guidelines were developed by the Saudi Ministry of Health in collaboration with the Saudi Gastroenterology Association and the Saudi Society of Clinical Pharmacy. After an extensive literature review, 78 evidence-and expert opinion-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease in adults were proposed and further refined by a voting process. The consensus guidelines include the finally agreed on statements with their level of evidence covering different aspects of IBD diagnosis and treatment.

The Evaluation of Transmural Healing by Low-dose Computed Tomography Enterography in Patients with Crohn's Disease

Objective Transmural healing (TH) has been attracting attention as a new therapeutic target for Crohn's disease, but there are few clinical data on TH in Japan. We introduced low-dose computed tomography enterography (CTE) as a monitoring method for Crohn's disease and retrospectively investigated the accuracy of evaluating TH by CTE. Methods Among Crohn's disease patients who underwent low-dose CTE at our hospital from January 2009 to March 2021, 122 patients who underwent colonoscopy or balloon endoscopy within 2 weeks were included. Results of radiological and endoscopic examinations were reviewed independently by radiologists and gastrointestinal endoscopists, respectively. The concordance rate of the diagnosis between CTE and endoscopy was evaluated. Results Twenty-six patients (21.3%) achieved TH, and the kappa index was 0.743. On comparing the TH and non-TH groups, the Crohn's disease activity index (p=0.02), endoscopic healing rate (p<0.001), serum albumin (p=0.043), and serum C-reactive protein level (p=0.018) showed significant differences. Among the 122 patients, 69 (56.5%) showed concordance between the diagnosis of CTE and endoscopy, and 22 (18.0%) achieved both TH and endoscopic healing. Conclusion This study provides real-world data on Crohn's disease evaluated with low-dose CTE in Japan. The TH criterion used in this study has a high kappa coefficient and can be used reproducibly in many institutions.

Faecal calprotectin increases the diagnostic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease - a multicenter retrospective cohort study

AIM OF THE STUDY

Diagnosing small bowel pathology is challenging, and the diagnostic yield of small bowel capsule endoscopy is highly variable. Faecal calprotectin is a non-invasive intestinal inflammation marker that could be used as a selection tool to identify patients who might benefit from small bowel capsule endoscopy and increase its diagnostic yield. This study aimed to investigate the value of faecal calprotectin in detecting small bowel lesions in an unselected patient population.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent small bowel capsule endoscopy at the University Hospital Basel and the University Medical Clinic Cantonal Hospital Baselland, Switzerland, between 2010 and 2018. Patients without faecal calprotectin testing were excluded from the analysis. The primary endpoint was the presence of a clinically significant small bowel finding.

RESULTS

Patients with positive faecal calprotectin results were more likely to have small bowel findings (66.7% vs 39.4%; P = 0.007). The optimal faecal calprotectin cut-off to identify clinically significant small bowel lesions was 63 μg/g with 78.3% (95% confidence interval: 66.7-87.9) sensitivity, 47.9% (33.3-62.8) specificity, 1.50 (1.1-2.0) positive and 0.45 (0.3-0.8) negative likelihood ratios, 68.4% (61.6-74.4) positive and 60.5% (47.3-72.4) negative predictive values, and 65.0% overall accuracy. Faecal calprotectin performed best in patients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease, with 66.7% (48.2-82.0) sensitivity, 70.6% (44.0-89.7) specificity, 2.27 (1.0-4.9) positive and 0.47 (0.3-0.8) negative likelihood ratios, 81.5% (67.0-90.5) positive and 54.5% (39.7-68.6) negative predictive values, and 71.4% overall accuracy.

CONCLUSION

Faecal calprotectin testing increases the diagnostic yield of small bowel capsule endoscopy and may help identify patients at risk of small bowel disease.

Combined Use of Fecal Biomarkers in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Oncostatin M and Calprotectin

Background

Fecal biomarkers have emerged as one of the most useful tools for clinical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Oncostatin M (OSM), like fecal calprotectin (FC), is highly expressed in the inflamed intestinal mucosa which may have potential usefulness. We aimed to evaluate the additional utility of these two fecal biomarkers for IBD diagnosis, activity, and prediction of infliximab response over FC alone.

Methods

In group 1, 236 IBD patients (145 Crohn’s disease, 91 ulcerative colitis), 50 disease controls, and 32 healthy controls were recruited for IBD diagnosis and activity. In group 2, baseline stool samples were collected from 62 patients to predict infliximab response at week 28 and 52. The performance of fecal biomarkers for IBD management was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

Fecal OSM and FC levels were increased in IBD patients and were positively correlated with clinical and endoscopic activity. Their combination showed a better ability for disease diagnosis (AUC = 0.93) and slightly improved the capability to identify mucosal healing (AUC = 0.923). Baseline OSM and FC levels were elevated in non-responders at week 28 and 52. The AUCs of OSM, FC, and their combination to predict therapeutic response were 0.763, 0.834, and 0.859 at week 28, 0.638, 0.661, and 0.704 at week 52, respectively. Combined use of fecal and blood biomarkers improved predictive accuracy with an AUC of 0.919 at week 28 and 0.887 at week 52.

Conclusion

In addition to FC, OSM is a novel fecal biomarker, and their combination is more beneficial for disease diagnosis and prediction of infliximab response but not for disease activity in IBD patients. Further larger-scale studies are required to confirm our findings.

Capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease: when and how

Capsule endoscopy (CE) is emerging as an important investigation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); common types include the standard small bowel CE and colon CE. More recently, the pan-enteric CE was developed to assess the large and small bowel in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD). Emerging indications include noninvasive assessment for mucosal healing (both in the small bowel and the colon) and detection of postoperative recurrence in patients with CD. Given the increasing adoption, several CE scoring systems have been specifically developed for IBD. The greatest concern with performing CE, particularly in CD, is capsule retention, but this can be overcome by performing cross-sectional imaging such as magnetic resonance enterography and using patency capsules before performing the procedure. The development of software for automated detection of mucosal abnormalities typically seen in IBD may further increase its adoption.

Improved monitoring of inflammatory activity in patients with ulcerative colitis by combination of faecal tests for haemoglobin and calprotectin

Faecal calprotectin (FC) tests and faecal immunological tests (FIT) for haemoglobin have been used to monitor disease activity in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) but used alone they have some limitation concerning the predictive ability. We aimed to test if an FC test used in combination with FIT could improve the predictive ability. Consecutive out-patients with UC (n = 93) who were admitted for colonoscopy completed a single faecal sample before the start of bowel preparation. A quantitative CALPRO^® calprotectin ELISA test and a qualitative FIT (cut-off < 40 ng/mL) were analyzed. An estimated Mayo score and a score of histological inflammation was performed blinded to the result of the faecal tests. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value and positive predictive value for endoscopic inflammation (Mayo score > 1) was for FIT 85%, 83%, 96%, 57% and for FC > 186 µg/g 73%, 87%, 87%, 54%. Corresponding results for FIT*FC > 186 µg/g (at least one test positive) were 92%, 69%, 97%, 43%. For detecting moderate/severe histological inflammation the results were for FIT 69%, 79%, 92%, 43%, for FC > 75 µg/g 95%, 62%, 98%, 41%, and for FIT*FC > 75 µg/g 100%, 60%, 100%, 36%. None of the markers alone or in combination were useful to predict deep remission (Mayo score = 0 and no histological inflammation). We conclude that using the combination of an FC test and FIT shows minor improvement in predictive ability for inflammatory activity and remission in patients with UC.

Systematic review: outcomes and adverse events from randomised trials in Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

The suitability of disease activity indices has been challenged, with growing interest in objective measures of inflammation.

AIM

To undertake a systematic review of efficacy and safety outcomes in placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Cochrane Library were searched until November 2015, for RCTs of adult Crohn's disease patients treated with medical or surgical therapies. Data on efficacy and safety outcomes, end-point definitions, and measurement instruments were extracted and stratified by publication date (pre-2009 and 2009 onwards).

RESULTS

One hundred and eighty-one RCTs (110 induction and 71 maintenance) were identified, including 23 850 patients. About 92.3% reported clinical efficacy endpoints. The Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) dominated, defining clinical response or remission in 63.5% of trials (35 definitions of response or remission). CDAI < 150 was the commonest endpoint, but reporting reduced between periods (46.4%-41.1%), whilst use of CDAI100 increased (16.8%-30.4%). Fistula studies most commonly reported fistula closure (9, 90.0%). Reporting of biomarker, endoscopy and histology endpoints increased overall (33.3%-40.6%, 14.4%-30.4% and 3.2%-12.5%, respectively), but were heterogeneous and rarely reported in fistula trials. Patient-reported outcome measures were reported in 41.4% of trials and safety endpoints in 35.4%. Many of the common adverse events relate to disease exacerbation or treatment failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Trial endpoints vary across studies, over time and are distinct in fistula studies. Despite growth in reporting of objective measures of inflammation and in patient-reported outcome measures, there is a lack of standardisation. This confirms the need for a core outcome set for comparative effectiveness research in Crohn's disease.