Risk factors for Barrett's esophagus in young adults who underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy in a health examination center

Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma With and Without Gastroesophageal Reflux: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Although gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms are an essential criterion for Barrett's esophagus (BE) screening in most gastroenterology society guidelines, a significant proportion of BE and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) cases do not endorse them. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to study the prevalence of BE/EAC in those with and without GERD.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted through 5 major databases for studies reporting prevalence of BE/EAC in patients with and without GERD. Pooled proportions and odds ratios (ORs) of BE, long-segment BE, short-segment BE, dysplasia, and EAC in patients with and without GERD were synthesized.

RESULTS

Forty-three articles (12,883 patients with GERD; 51,350 patients without GERD) were included in the final analysis. BE prevalence was 7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8%-8.5%) and 2.2% (95% CI, 1.6%-3%) among individuals with and without GERD, respectively. EAC prevalence was 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-1%) and 0.1% (95% CI, 0%-0.2%) in those with and without GERD, respectively. The overall risks for BE (OR, 2.91; 95% CI, 2.06-4.11) and long-segment BE (OR,4.17; 95% CI, 1.78-9.77) were higher in patients with GERD, but the risk for short-segment BE (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 0.89-3.52) did not differ between the two groups. In 9 population-based high-quality studies (2244 patients with GERD; 3724 patients without GERD), BE prevalence in patients without GERD was 4.9% (95% CI, 2.6%-9%). BE prevalence was highest in North American studies (10.6% [GERD] and 4.8% [non-GERD]).

CONCLUSIONS

BE prevalence in those without GERD is substantial, particularly in large high-quality population-based studies. These data are important to factor in future BE/EAC early detection guidelines.

Intestinal metaplasia in follow-up endoscopies among Asian patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus: Regression, sampling error, and associated factors

BACKGROUND

The percentage of and factors associated with the regression of Barrett's esophagus (BE) or its characteristic intestinal metaplasia (IM) remain unclear, and conflicting results have been reported because of diverse regression and sampling error definitions. Thus, we investigated the rates of IM regression, sampling error, and associated factors.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with proven short-segment BE with IM who underwent two follow-up endoscopies with biopsies of Barrett's mucosa were retrospectively analyzed. Additional Alcian blue and MUC2 staining were done on the biopsy specimens without IM in hematoxylin-eosin staining. Only patients with negative hematoxylin-eosin, Alcian blue, and MUC2 staining for IM in both follow-up endoscopies were considered to have true regression. When all three stains were negative for IM in the first, but positive in the second follow-up endoscopy, we considered IM persisting and declared sampling error.

RESULTS

Among the 18 patients without IM at the first follow-up endoscopy, only five (11.9%) were judged to have true regression. Prolonged proton-pump inhibitor use was significantly associated with regression. Limited experience of the endoscopist, and insufficient biopsy number were significantly related to sampling error. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed the best cut-off value of the biopsy number/maximal-length (cm) ratio to predict sampling error was 2.25.

CONCLUSION

In our patients with short-segment BE, 11.9% experienced regression of IM. Prolonged proton-pump inhibitors treatment was associated with regression. An insufficient biopsy number was related to a missed IM, which may be eliminated by maintaining biopsy number/maximal-length (cm) ratio ≥2.25.

Veterans with multiple risk factors for Barrett's esophagus are infrequently evaluated with upper endoscopy

Recent guidelines recommend screening for patients with chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease who have three or more additional risk factors for Barrett's esophagus (BE). Failure to screen high-risk individuals represents a missed opportunity in esophageal adenocarcinoma prevention and early detection. We aimed to determine the frequency of upper endoscopy and prevalence of BE and esophageal cancer in a cohort of United States veterans who possessed four or more risk factors for BE. All patients at VA New York Harbor Healthcare System with at least four risk factors for BE between 2012 and 2017 were identified. Procedure records were reviewed for upper endoscopies performed between January 2012 and December 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk factors associated with undergoing endoscopy and factors associated with BE and esophageal cancer. 4505 patients with at least four risk factors for BE were included. 828 patients (18.4%) underwent upper endoscopy, of which 42 (5.1%) were diagnosed with BE and 11 (1.3%) with esophageal cancer (10 adenocarcinoma; 1 squamous cell carcinoma). Among individuals who underwent upper endoscopy, risk factors associated with undergoing endoscopy included obesity (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.41-2.30; P < 0.001) and chronic reflux (OR, 3.86; 95% CI, 3.04-4.90; P < 0.001). There were no individual risk factors associated with BE or BE/esophageal cancer. In this retrospective analysis of patients with 4 or more risk factors for BE, fewer than one-fifth of patients underwent upper endoscopy, supporting the need for efforts aimed at improving BE screening rates.

Metabolic syndrome is associated with higher rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) seriously lowers the quality of life of patients, and its prevalence has gradually increased in recent years. Some studies have showed that metabolic syndrome (MetS) is related to GERD, but the results remain controversial. This study explored the relationship between MetS and GERD through systematic retrieval and analysis of published studies.

METHODS

Retrieve related research from PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Including cohort studies that compare the prevalence of GERD between patients with MetS and patients without, and case-control studies or cross-sectional studies that compare the prevalence of MetS between patients with GERD and patients without. In addition to analyzing the relationship between MetS and GERD, individual metabolic components are also analyzed. Use a random effects model (DerSimmonian and Laird) to merge the odd ratio (OR). Cochran's Q test and Higgins' I-squared statistic were performed to assess heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by Egger's test.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 103,048 patients from 15 studies were included. The combined results suggest that MetS is a risk factor of GERD (OR: 1.66, 95%CI: 1.38-1.99). Among the individual metabolic components, abdominal obesity (OR: 1.42, 95%CI: 1.22-1.64), hypertriglyceridemia (OR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.27-1.78), hyperglycemia (OR: 1.31, 95%CI: 1.07-1.61), and hypertension (OR: 1.19, 95%CI: 1.07-1.33) are risk factors of GERD.

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

MetS is a risk factor of GERD, and among the abnormal metabolic components that establish the diagnosis of MetS, abdominal obesity, hypertriglyceridemia, hyperglycemia, and hypertension are risk factors of GERD.

Risk factors of erosive esophagitis and barrett's esophagus in patients with reflux symptoms

Background: Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition. Erosive esophagitis (EE) and Barrett’s esophagus (BE) are the two important complications of GERD. We aimed to study the prevalence of EE and BE in a group of Patients with reflux symptoms who were referred for endoscopy. The relationship between reflux symptoms and endoscopic findings was also examined.

Methods: We enrolled 139 consecutive patients with characteristic symptoms of GERD. Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients including duration and severity of reflux symptoms, were recorded. Endoscopic findings of EE were identified and classified according to the Los Angeles classification, while BE was confirmed by histopathology examination. The Fisher’s exact test and the two-sample 𝑡-test were used to test the association of esophageal lesions (BE and/or EE) with the patients' clinical and endoscopic data.

Results: Forty seven and 13 patients were found to have EE and BE, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that older age (p=0.001) and hiatal hernia (p=0.004) was significantly related risk factors for erosive esophagitis and BE. While an increase in BMI (p=0.004) was related to EE, patients with BE were more likely to have severe reflux symptoms than others (p=0.002).

Conclusion: In patients with GERD, the presence of hiatal hernia may be strong risk factor for erosive esophagitis and BE, as does older age. For Barrett’s esophagus, severe reflux symptoms are more likely.

The relationship between metabolic syndrome and increased risk of Barrett's esophagus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and Barrett's esophagus (BE) is still a challenging issue, and inconsistent results have been reported in different studies. Therefore, this study was conducted to determine the relationship between MetS and BE.

METHODS

In this study, we followed the MOOSE protocol and results were reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. All study steps were performed independently by two authors. If necessary, the dispute was resolved by consultation with a third author. The search strategy is designed to find published studies. Comprehensive search was done in the following databases until July 2019: Cochrane Library, PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL, EBSCO, and Google Scholar search engine. All analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software Ver.2, while p-value lower than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In 14 studies with a sample size of 108,416, MetS significantly increased the risk of BE (OR = 1.354; 95% CI: 1.145-1.600; P < 0.001; Heterogeneity: I2 = 81.95%; P < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis by omitting one study showed that overall estimates are still robust. Subgroup analysis was significant for continent (P < 0.001) and MetS diagnostic criteria (P = 0.043), but was not significant for variables of study type (P = 0.899), study setting (P = 0.115), control groups (P = 0.671) and quality of studies (P = 0.603). The Begg (P = 0.912) and Egger's (P = 0.094) tests were not significant; therefore, the publication bias did not play a role in the results.

CONCLUSION

MetS increases the risk of BE compared to control groups. The results of this study can help health practitioners by identifying a treatable risk factor for the most important risk factor for esophageal carcinoma (ie, BE). Future studies should examine whether treatment for MetS reduces the risk of BE.