Effect of distance to specialist care for the diagnosis and disease outcome of inflammatory bowel disease in the Swiss inflammatory bowel disease cohort study

Evaluating Distance Bias in Chronic Rhinosinusitis Outcomes

Importance

The distance traveled by patients for medical care is associated with patient outcomes (ie, distance bias) and is a limitation in outcomes research. However, to date, distance bias has not been examined in rhinologic studies.

Objective

To evaluate the association of distance traveled by a cohort of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with baseline disease severity and treatment outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A total of 505 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis were prospectively enrolled in a multi-institutional, cross-sectional study in academic tertiary care centers between April 2011 and January 2020. Participants self-selected continued appropriate medical therapy or endoscopic sinus surgery. The 22-item Sinonasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 6-D (SF-6D) health utility value scores were recorded at enrollment and follow-up. Data on the distances traveled by patients to the medical centers, based on residence zip codes, and medical comorbid conditions were collected.

Exposures

Distance traveled by patient to obtain rhinologic care.

Main Outcomes and Measures

SNOT-22 and SF-6D scores. Scores for SNOT-22 range from 0 to 110; and for SF-6D, from 0.0 to 1.0. Higher SNOT-22 total scores indicate worse overall symptom severity. Higher SF-6D scores indicate better overall health utility; 1.0 represents perfect health and 0.0 represents death.

Results

The median age for the 505 participants was 56.0 years (IQR, 41.0-64.0 years), 261 were men (51.7%), 457 were White (90.5%), and 13 were Hispanic or Latino (2.6%). These categories were collected according to criteria described and required by the National Institutes of Health and therefore do not equal the entire cohort. Patients traveled a median distance of 31.6 miles (50.6 km) (IQR, 12.2-114.5 miles [19.5-183.2 km]). Baseline (r = 0.00; 95% CI, 0.00-0.18) and posttreatment (r = 0.01; 95% CI, -0.07 to 0.10) SNOT-22 scores, as well as baseline (r = -0.12; 95% CI, -0.21 to -0.04) and posttreatment (r = 0.07; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.16) SF-6D scores, were not associated with distance. There was no clinically meaningful correlation between distance traveled and mean comorbidity burden. Nevertheless, patients with a history of endoscopic sinus surgery were more likely to travel longer distances to obtain care (Cliff delta = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.19-0.38).

Conclusions and Relevance

Although this cross-sectional study found that some patients appear more willing to travel longer distances for chronic rhinosinusitis care, results suggest that distance traveled to academic tertiary care centers was not associated with disease severity, outcomes, or comorbidity burden. These findings argue for greater generalizability of study results across various cohorts independent of distance traveled to obtain rhinologic care.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02720653.

Diagnostic Delay of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Is Significantly Higher in Public versus Private Health Care System in Mexican Patients

Introduction

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) characterized by a fluctuating course with periods of clinical activity and remission. No previous studies have demonstrated the frequency of delay at diagnosis and its associated factors in Mexico and Latin America. The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic delay of IBD in the last 4 decades in 2 different health care systems (public vs. private) and its associated factors.

Methods

This is a cohort study that included 1,056 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of IBD from public and private health care systems. The diagnostic delay was defined as time >1 year from the onset of symptoms to the confirmed diagnosis for patients with UC and 2 years for patients with CD. Statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS v.24 program. A value of p ≤ 0.05 was taken as significant.

Results

The delay at diagnosis decreased significantly by 24.9% in the last 4 decades. The factors associated with the diagnostic delay were proctitis in UC, clinical course >2 relapses per year and IBD surgeries for CD. We found a delay at diagnosis in 35.2% of IBD patients in the public versus 16.9% in the private health care system (p = 0.00001).

Conclusions

We found a significant diagnosis delay of IBD in 35.2% from the public health care system versus 16.9% in the private health care system.