Thiopurine S-methyltransferase genetic polymorphisms in adult patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in the Latvian population

A bioinformatics approach to the identification of novel deleterious mutations of human TPMT through validated screening and molecular dynamics

Polymorphisms of Thiopurine S-methyltransferase (TPMT) are known to be associated with leukemia, inflammatory bowel diseases, and more. The objective of the present study was to identify novel deleterious missense SNPs of TPMT through a comprehensive in silico protocol. The initial SNP screening protocol used to identify deleterious SNPs from the pool of all TPMT SNPs in the dbSNP database yielded an accuracy of 83.33% in identifying extremely dangerous variants. Five novel deleterious missense SNPs (W33G, W78R, V89E, W150G, and L182P) of TPMT were identified through the aforementioned screening protocol. These 5 SNPs were then subjected to conservation analysis, interaction analysis, oncogenic and phenotypic analysis, structural analysis, PTM analysis, and molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) analysis to further assess and analyze their deleterious nature. Oncogenic analysis revealed that all five SNPs are oncogenic. MDS analysis revealed that all SNPs are deleterious due to the alterations they cause in the binding energy of the wild-type protein. Plasticity-induced instability caused by most of the mutations as indicated by the MDS results has been hypothesized to be the reason for this alteration. While in vivo or in vitro protocols are more conclusive, they are often more challenging and expensive. Hence, future research endeavors targeted at TPMT polymorphisms and/or their consequences in relevant disease progressions or treatments, through in vitro or in vivo means can give a higher priority to these SNPs rather than considering the massive pool of all SNPs of TPMT.

Genotype-Guided Prescription of Azathioprine Reduces the Incidence of Adverse Drug Reactions in TPMT Intermediate Metabolizers to a Similar Incidence as Normal Metabolizers

Introduction

Thiopurine drugs are purine nucleoside analogues used for treatment of different immune-related conditions. To date, different studies highlighted the importance of thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) genotyping in patients who initiate treatment with thiopurines to make an adequate dose adjustment. We aimed to investigate the influence of TPMT phenotype, concomitant treatments, and demographic characteristics on the incidence of adverse reactions (ADRs) in patients who start treatment with azathioprine (AZA).

Methods

This was an observational and retrospective study. The study population comprised 109 patients who started treatment with AZA following routine TPMT genotyping before June 2019 and who were routinely followed up at Hospital Universitario de La Princesa. The incidence of ADRs and treatment duration were evaluated according to TPMT phenotype.

Results

Forty-five men and 64 women were recruited, with a mean age of 67.6 ± 18.5. The medical specialty with the most requests was dermatology (45.9%) and the most frequent disease for which genotyping was requested was bullous pemphigoid (27.5%). All patients were normal metabolizers (NM), except for eight intermediate metabolizers (IM) (7.3%); no poor metabolizers (PM) were found. The initial azathioprine dose was subtherapeutic in both groups (103.2 ± 45.4 mg in NMs and 75 ± 32.3 mg in IMs), increasing during the first months of treatment, especially in NMs (120.3 ± 41.3 vs. 78.6 ± 30.4 mg in IMs, p = 0.011). Most patients (73.4%) received corticosteroids to keep the disease under control; and for 41.2% of NMs, physicians were able to reduce the dose at 6 months post treatment. No IMs completed 6 months of treatment. Hepatotoxicity, gastric intolerance, and blood disorders were the most common ADRs. The incidence of ADRs in the sample was 28.4% (n = 31) with a similar trend between IMs (37.5%) and NMs (27.8%). Patients undergoing concomitant treatment with allopurinol were associated with a higher incidence of ADRs (n = 4, 100% vs. n = 105, 20%; p = 0.002).

Conclusion

TPMT genotyping before AZA prescription reduces ADR incidence in IMs to a similar level as NMs in the Spanish population. However, it is important to note no IMs completed 6 months of treatment, suggesting that there may be some differences in drug tolerability according to phenotype. In addition, most NMs are treated with subtherapeutic doses, are poorly followed up, and thus suffer avoidable ADRs. Finally, concomitant therapies that inhibit the xanthine oxidase enzyme (XDH), such as allopurinol, predispose to ADRs. Therefore, pharmacogenetic testing should be integrated as an additional clinical tool, in such a way that each patient receives personalized, precision treatment, where all factors influencing drug response are considered.