Update on the role of naldemedine in opioid-induced constipation in patients with chronic noncancer pain

Safety of Naldemedine for Opioid-Induced Constipation - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Naldemedine is a peripheral acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat opioid-induced constipation. Concerns about side effects like opioid withdrawal prevent its widespread use, especially for cancer patients. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate existing safety data of naldemedine treating opioid-induced constipation following the PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed and the Cochrane Library on April 16th 2024 to identify studies evaluating naldemedine treatment among patients with opioid-induced constipation. Our analysis found no differences between groups comparing naldemedine therapy with placebo-control for treatment-emergent adverse events (OR = 1.06; 95%-CI: 0.91-1.24), serious adverse events (OR = 1.02; 95%-CI: 0.76-1.38). We found no increased risk for opioid withdrawal, while an increased risk for gastrointestinal disorders (OR = 2.08; 95%-CI: 1.72-2.51), particularly higher incidences of diarrhea (OR = 2.44; 95%-CI: 1.81-3.29) and abdominal pain (OR = 3.31; 95%-CI: 2.16-5.06) were found. In the cancer subgroup, treatment-emergent and serious adverse events were more frequent. However, no increased risk for opioid withdrawal was observed. This analysis confirms naldemedine's overall safety in treating opioid-induced constipation, with manageable gastrointestinal side effects. However, the higher adverse events in cancer patients require further investigation to ensure safe use in this population.

Emerging therapies for opioid-induced constipation: what can we expect?

INTRODUCTION

The rise in opioid use for managing chronic and oncologic pain has led to a significant increase in opioid-induced constipation (OIC) that impacts patient quality of life and pain management.

AREAS COVERED

In this study, emerging therapies for OIC were criticized for refining advancements and novel treatment options. Key topics included the efficacy of peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) such as methylnaltrexone, naloxegol, and naldemedine, which specifically target opioid-induced gut dysfunction. Other treatment options, including intestinal secretagogues like lubiprostone and linaclotide, selective 5-HT receptor agonists such as prucalopride, and emerging adjunctive therapies like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and electroacupuncture were mentioned. Current guidelines from the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and the European consensus were criticized.

EXPERT OPINION

Experts stress the importance of a stepwise approach to managing OIC, considering patient-specific factors and the efficacy of various treatments. While PAMORAs have demonstrated effectiveness in improving bowel function, their high cost and lack of extensive head-to-head comparisons with traditional laxatives are significant concerns. Emerging therapies and adjunctive treatments offer promising results but require further validation through rigorous studies. Future research should focus on long-term outcomes, cost-effectiveness, and comparative effectiveness to better address the complex needs of patients with OIC and refine treatment protocols.

IUPHAR review - Data-driven computational drug repurposing approaches for opioid use disorder

Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) is a chronic and relapsing condition characterized by the misuse of opioid drugs, causing significant morbidity and mortality in the United States. Existing medications for OUD are limited, and there is an immediate need to discover treatments with enhanced safety and efficacy. Drug repurposing aims to find new indications for existing medications, offering a time-saving and cost-efficient alternative strategy to traditional drug discovery. Computational approaches have been developed to further facilitate the drug repurposing process. In this paper, we reviewed state-of-the-art data-driven computational drug repurposing approaches for OUD and discussed their advantages and potential challenges. We also highlighted promising repurposed candidate drugs for OUD that were identified by computational drug repurposing techniques and reviewed studies supporting their potential mechanisms of action in treating OUD.

Peripherally-active mu-opioid receptor antagonists for constipation in critically ill patients receiving opioids: A case-series and a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature

BACKGROUND

Constipation is frequent in critically ill patients, and potentially related to adverse outcomes. Peripherally-active mu-opioid receptor antagonists (PAMORAs) are approved for opioid-induced constipation, but information on their efficacy and safety in critically ill patients is limited. We present a single-center, retrospective, case-series of the use of naldemedine for opioid-associated constipation, and we systematically reviewed the use of PAMORAs in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Case-series included consecutive mechanically-ventilated patients; constipation was defined as absence of bowel movements for >3 days. Naldemedine was administered after failure of the local laxation protocol. Systematic review: PubMed was searched for studies of PAMORAs to treat opioid-induced constipation in adult critically ill patients.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

time to laxation, and number of patients laxating at the shortest follow-up.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

gastric residual volumes and adverse events.

KEY RESULTS

A total of 13 patients were included in the case-series; the most common diagnosis was COVID-19 ARDS. Patients had their first bowel movement 1 [0;2] day after naldemedine. Daily gastric residual volume was 725 [405;1805] before vs. 250 [45;1090] mL after naldemedine, p = 0.0078. Systematic review identified nine studies (two RCTs, one prospective case-series, three retrospective case-series and three case-reports). Outcomes were similar between groups, with a trend toward a lower gastric residual volume in PAMORAs group.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In a highly-selected case-series of patients with refractory, opioid-associated constipation, naldemedine was safe and associated to reduced gastric residuals and promoting laxation. In the systematic review and meta-analysis, the use of PAMORAs (mainly methylnaltrexone) was safe and associated with a reduced intolerance to enteral feeding but no difference in the time to laxation.

An update on the use of pharmacotherapy for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction

INTRODUCTION

With the growing rate of aging and the incidence of chronic diseases, there has been an upsurge in opioid prescription and abuse worldwide. This has been associated with increased reports of opioid-related adverse events, particularly opioid-induced bowel dysfunction (OIBD), calling for a rational clinical management strategy.

AREAS COVERED

Through searching PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, English literature was gathered as of 1 January 2017. Furthermore, the USFDA, EMA, TGA, Clinicaltrials.Gov, WHO-ICTRP databases, and the latest guidelines were reviewed to extract ongoing clinical studies and provide an evidence-based expert opinion with detailed information on efficacy, safety, approval status, and pharmacokinetics of the currently used medications.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite the significant burden of OIBD, the clinical development of agents lags behind disease progress. Although in most places, management of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is initiated by lifestyle modifications followed by laxatives, opioid antagonists, and secretagogue agents, there are still major conflicts among global guidelines. The fundamental reason is the lack of head-to-head clinical trials providing inter- and intragroup comparisons between PAMORAs, laxatives, and secretagogue agents. These investigations must be accompanied by further valid biopharmaceutical and economic evaluations, paving the way for rational clinical judgment in each context.

Targeting human thymidylate synthase: Ensemble-based virtual screening for drug repositioning and the role of water

A drug repositioning computational approach was carried to search inhibitors for human thymidylate synthase. An ensemble-based virtual screening of FDA-approved drugs showed the drugs Imatinib, Lumacaftor and Naldemedine to be likely candidates for repurposing. The role of water in the drug-receptor interactions was revealed by the application of an extended AutoDock scoring function that included the water forcefield. The binding affinity scores when hydrated ligands were docked were improved in the drugs considered. Further binding free energy calculations based on the Molecular Mechanics Poisson-Boltzmann Surface Area method revealed that Imatinib, Lumacaftor and Naldemedine scored -130.7 ± 28.1, -210.6 ± 29.9 and -238.0 ± 25.4 kJ/mol, respectively, showing good binding affinity for the candidates considered. Overall, the analysis of the molecular dynamics trajectory of the receptor-drug complexes revealed stable structures for Imatinib, Lumacaftor and Naldemedine, for the entire simulation time.