Effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in bio-naïve Crohn's disease patients: a multicentre observational retrospective study

Clinical use of biologics for Crohn's disease in adults: lessons learned from real-world studies

INTRODUCTION

The therapeutic armamentarium for managing Crohn's disease (CD) has expanded significantly in recent decades. Several biologics with three different mechanisms of action [anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, anti-integrin α4β7, and anti-IL 12/23] are currently available to manage CD.

AREA COVERED

This narrative review aims to summarize the most significant efficacy and safety data on the use of infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA), vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) for the treatment of CD obtained from studies conducted in the real world (RW), compared to the results of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

EXPERT OPINION

RW studies reported that biologic agents included in this analysis have higher remission rates and lower adverse event rates than findings from RCTs for treating patients with CD. All biological agents have proven effective and safe in RW studies, even when using biosimilars or switching to subcutaneous administration of the molecules for which they are available. Finally, anti-TNF-α agents, particularly IFX, have a higher rate of adverse events (AEs) than VDZ and UST. Therefore, patients at higher risk of AEs may benefit from other biologics than anti-TNF-α. However, further long-term RW studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Defining Biological Remission in Crohn's Disease: Interest, Challenges and Future Directions

In Crohn's disease, the treat-to-target strategy has been greatly encouraged and has become a standard of care. In this context, defining the target [remission] constitutes a major stake and is fuelling the literature. Currently, clinical remission [symptom control] is no longer the only objective of treatments since it does not allow to closely control inflammation-induced tissue damage. The introduction of endoscopic remission as a therapeutic target clearly represented progress but this examination remains invasive, costly, not well accepted by patients and does not allow tight control of disease activity. More fundamentally, morphological techniques [e.g. endoscopy, histology, ultrasonography] are limited since they do not evaluate the biological activity of the disease but only its consequences. Besides, emerging evidence suggests that biological signs of disease activity could better guide treatment decisions than clinical parameters. In this context, we stress the necessity to define a novel treatment target: biological remission. Based on our previous work, we propose a conceptual definition of biological remission which goes beyond the classical normalization of inflammatory markers [C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin]: absence of biological signs associated with the risk of short-term relapse and mid-/long-term relapse. The risk of short-term relapse seems essentially to be characterized by a persistent inflammatory state while the risk of mid-/long-term relapse implies a more heterogeneous biology. We discuss the value of our proposal [guiding treatment maintenance, escalation or de-escalation] but also the fact that its clinical implementation would require overcoming major challenges. Finally, future directions are proposed to better define biological remission.

Intravenous ustekinumab maintenance treatment in patients with loss of response to subcutaneous dosing

Background

Ustekinumab (UST) is indicated for the treatment of Crohn's disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Despite having shown clinical effectiveness in the real world, some patients may lose response over time or need a higher dose to achieve it. In this context, UST intravenous (IV) maintenance has been proposed.

Objectives

The primary endpoint of our study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of maintenance IV UST treatment in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) patients who present with partial response or loss of response to subcutaneous (SC) UST.

Design

We performed a monocentric observational retrospective study including patients with active IBD on maintenance treatment with IV UST.

Methods

The clinical response and remission was analyzed at week 12, defined as either Harvey-Bradshaw Index ⩽ 4 for CD or partial Mayo Score ⩽ 2 for UC. The reduction of objective markers of disease activity, fecal calprotectin, and C-reactive protein was evaluated. Moreover, UST trough levels were measured pre- and post-UST IV maintenance and any adverse events were assessed.

Results

We included 23 patients. Clinical remission at week 12 was achieved by 43.5% of the patients. The proportion of patients in clinical response after 12 weeks on UST IV maintenance was 82.6%. After a median follow-up of 9.3 months all patients remained on IV UST maintenance. No adverse events were recorded in any patient for the duration of the study.

Conclusions

IV UST maintenance treatment was able to recapture response in most of the patients who had lost response to SC maintenance.