Immunoadsorption versus plasma exchange versus combination for treatment of myasthenic deterioration

Comparison of Efficacy Between Lymphoplasmapheresis and Plasma Exchange in Myasthenic Crisis

INTRODUCTION/AIMS

Lymphoplasmapheresis (LPE) is an innovative therapy that integrates traditional plasma exchange (PE) with leukapheresis. PE is widely established as a standard treatment for myasthenia gravis (MG) crisis, but the therapeutic potential of LPE in myasthenic crisis (MC) remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the efficacy of LPE versus PE in the management of MC.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study that included 86 MC patients who were treated with either LPE (n = 47) or PE (n = 39). Primary outcome indicators were total length of hospitalization, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV), and length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU). Secondary outcome indicators included quantitative myasthenia gravis (QMG) scores at 1 and 2 months following the onset of the crisis.

RESULTS

Both LPE and PE demonstrated good tolerance in the crisis treatment. Patients in the PE cohort received an average of 3.87 replacements, compared to 2.26 in the LPE cohort. Compared to PE, LPE was associated with significantly shorter durations of MV (8.50 ± 4.69 vs. 11.73 ± 4.61 days, p = 0.016) and ICU stay (11.88 ± 5.78 vs. 15.92 ± 5.54 days, p = 0.013). Functional outcomes were also better in the LPE cohort, as demonstrated by lower QMG scores at 1- and 2-months post-crisis (p < 0.05). PE and LPE effectively decreased the levels of autoantibodies against acetylcholine receptors (AChR-Ab) and inflammatory cytokines, with LPE exhibiting superior performance.

DISCUSSION

In MC, LPE may be a better choice for treatment than traditional PE.

Immunoadsorption is equally effective as plasma exchange in paediatric neuroimmunological disorders - A retrospective multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) are promising treatment option for neuroimmunological disorders. In paediatrics, the available data is limited, particularly for the use of IA. The aim of this study was to analyse the use of PE and IA in children and adolescents, with emphasis on outcome and neurological course after treatment as well as the safety of the two modalities.

METHODS

Clinical data from paediatric patients with neuroimmunological disorders treated with TA in two German university children's hospitals between 2015 and 2022 were retrospectively analysed.

RESULTS

In total, 39 patients underwent 322 sessions of TA, of which 184 were IA and 138 PE. The most common diagnosis was autoimmune encephalitis in 39 % (n = 15) of the patients. Other indications were central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disorders in 21 % (n = 8), Guillain-Barré syndrome in 18 % (n = 7), Myelin Oligodendrocyte Glycopeptide-antibody associated syndromes in 8 % (n = 3), Myasthenia gravis in 5 % (n = 2) and other neurological disorders in 10 % (n = 4). Overall, there was an improvement in 76 % of patients (81 % with IA, 70 % with PE; p = 0.41) immediately after treatment and an improvement in 88 % of patients (90 % with IA, 85 % with PE; p = 0.63) one month after treatment. Complications occurred in 13 % of all sessions (13 % with IA and 13 % with PE; p = 1). Most complications were considered as moderate.

CONCLUSION

Both, IA and PE, are effective treatment options in the therapy of neuroimmunological disorders in children and adolescents, with no major differences in terms of efficiency or safety.

Successful Emergency Management of a Dog with Ventilator-Dependent Acquired Myasthenia Gravis with Immunoadsorption

A one-year-old, female intact Samoyed, 12.5 kg, was presented with coughing for 2 weeks, progressive appendicular and axial muscle weakness, megaesophagus and labored breathing for 5 days. There was no improvement with standard treatment. Acquired myasthenia gravis was suspected and the dog was referred with increasing dyspnea. At presentation, the dog showed a severely reduced general condition, was non-ambulatory and showed abdominal and severely labored breathing. A marked hypercapnia (PvCO2 = 90.1 mmHg) was present in venous blood gas analysis. The serum anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody test was consistent with acquired myasthenia gravis (2.1 nmol/L). The dog was anesthetized with propofol and mechanically ventilated with a Hamilton C1 ventilator. Immunoadsorption was performed with the COM.TEC® and ADAsorb® platforms and a LIGASORB® adsorber to eliminate anti-acetylcholine receptor antibodies. Local anticoagulation was performed with citrate. Treatment time for immunoadsorption was 1.5 h with a blood flow of 50 mL/min. A total plasma volume of 1.2 L was processed. Further medical treatment included intravenous fluid therapy, maropitant, esomeprazole, antibiotic therapy for aspiration pneumonia and neostigmine 0.04 mg/kg intramuscularly every 6 h for treatment of acquired myasthenia gravis. Mechanical ventilation was stopped after 12 h. A percutaneous gastric feeding tube was inserted under endoscopic control on day 2 for further medical treatment and nutrition. A second treatment with immunoadsorption was performed on day 3. Again, a total plasma volume of 1.2 L was processed. Immediately after this procedure, the dog regained muscle strength and was able to stand and to walk. After 6 days, the dog was discharged from the hospital. This is the first report of immunoadsorption for emergency management of a dog with acute-fulminant acquired myasthenia gravis. Immunoadsorption may be an additional option for emergency treatment in dogs with severe signs of acquired myasthenia gravis.

Myasthenia Gravis: Novel Findings and Perspectives on Traditional to Regenerative Therapeutic Interventions

The prevalence of myasthenia gravis (MG), an autoimmune disorder, is increasing among all subsets of the population leading to an elevated economic and social burden. The pathogenesis of MG is characterized by the synthesis of autoantibodies against the acetylcholine receptor (AChR), low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 4 (LRP4), or muscle-specific kinase at the neuromuscular junction, thereby leading to muscular weakness and fatigue. Based on clinical and laboratory examinations, the research is focused on distinguishing MG from other autoimmune, genetic diseases of neuromuscular transmission. Technological advancements in machine learning, a subset of artificial intelligence (AI) have been assistive in accurate diagnosis and management. Besides, addressing the clinical needs of MG patients is critical to improving quality of life (QoL) and satisfaction. Lifestyle changes including physical exercise and traditional Chinese medicine/herbs have also been shown to exert an ameliorative impact on MG progression. To achieve enhanced therapeutic efficacy, cholinesterase inhibitors, immunosuppressive drugs, and steroids in addition to plasma exchange therapy are widely recommended. Under surgical intervention, thymectomy is the only feasible alternative to removing thymoma to overcome thymoma-associated MG. Although these conventional and current therapeutic approaches are effective, the associated adverse events and surgical complexity limit their wide application. Moreover, Restivo et al. also, to increase survival and QoL, further recent developments revealed that antibody, gene, and regenerative therapies (such as stem cells and exosomes) are currently being investigated as a safer and more efficacious alternative. Considering these above-mentioned points, we have comprehensively reviewed the recent advances in pathological etiologies of MG including COVID-19, and its therapeutic management.

Lymphoplasmapheresis versus plasma exchange in severe myasthenia gravis: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Lymphoplasmapheresis (LPE) is a new therapy developed on the basis of traditional plasma exchange (PE) in combination with leukapheresis. Currently, it remains unclear whether PE and LPE show differences in efficacy for severe MG.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 198 MG patients, 75 in the PE group and 123 in the LPE group, and the patients' Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) Clinical Classification was Class IV. The treatment outcome was the change in Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis Score (QMGS) from baseline to the end of treatment. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied for the balance of confounders between the two groups.

Results

In this study cohort, the safety profile of LPE and PE was good and no serious adverse events were observed. Based on PSM, 62 patients treated with LPE and 62 patients treated with PE were entered into a comparative efficacy analysis. In the PE group, patients underwent a total of 232 replacements, with a mean of 3.74. PE significantly improved the patients' QMGS performance, with the mean QMGS decreasing from 22.98 ± 4.03 points at baseline to 18.34 ± 5.03 points after treatment, a decrease of 4.68 ± 4.04 points (p < 0.001). A decrease of ≥3 points in QMGS was considered a significant improvement, with a treatment response rate of 67.7% in the PE group. In the LPE group, patients received a total of 117 replacements, with a mean of 1.89. The patients' mean QMGS was 23.19 ± 4.11 points at baseline and was 16.94 ± 5.78 points after treatment, a decrease of 6.26 ± 4.39 points (p < 0.001). The improvement in QMGS was more significant in patients treated with LPE compared to the PE group (p = 0.039). The treatment response rate in the LPE group was 79%, which was not significantly different compared to the PE group (p = 0.16). The LEP group had a shorter mean length of stay compared to the PE group (10.86 ± 3.96 vs. 12.14 ± 4.14 days), but the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.13). During the 2-month follow-up period, LPE may be associated with better functional outcomes for patients, with lower QMG score and relapse rate. LPE and PE were both effective in reducing the levels of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6) and AChR-Ab. Compared to PE, LPE was superior in the reduction of AChR-Ab titer.

Conclusion

In severe MG, LPE may be a more preferred treatment option than PE. It achieves treatment outcomes that are not inferior to or even better than PE with fewer replacements. This study provides further evidence to support the application of LPE as a new treatment option for MG.

Immunoadsorption versus double-dose methylprednisolone in refractory multiple sclerosis relapses

Objective

Intravenous methylprednisolone is the standard treatment for a multiple sclerosis relapse; however, this fails to improve symptoms in up to one quarter of patients. Immunoadsorption is an accepted treatment for refractory relapses, but prospective comparator-controlled studies are missing.

Methods

In this observational study, patients with steroid-refractory acute multiple sclerosis relapses receiving either six courses of tryptophan-immunoadsorption or double-dose methylprednisolone therapy were analysed. Outcomes were evaluated at discharge and three months later. Immune profiling of blood lymphocytes and proteomic analysis were performed by multi-parameter flow cytometry and Olink analysis, respectively (NCT04450030).

Results

42 patients were enrolled (methylprednisolone: 26 patients; immunoadsorption: 16 patients). For determination of the primary outcome, treatment response was stratified according to relative function system score changes (“full/best” vs. “average” vs. “worse/none”). Upon discharge, the adjusted odds ratio for any treatment response (“full/best” + ”average” vs. “worse/none”) was 10.697 favouring immunoadsorption (p = 0.005 compared to methylprednisolone). At follow-up, the adjusted odds ratio for the best treatment response (“full/best” vs. “average” + ”worse/none”) was 103.236 favouring IA patients (p = 0.001 compared to methylprednisolone). Similar results were observed regarding evoked potentials and quality of life outcomes, as well as serum neurofilament light-chain levels. Flow cytometry revealed a profound reduction of B cell subsets following immunoadsorption, which was closely correlated to clinical outcomes, whereas methylprednisolone had a minimal effect on B cell populations. Immunoadsorption treatment skewed the blood cytokine network, reduced levels of B cell-related cytokines and reduced immunoglobulin levels as well as levels of certain coagulation factors.

Interpretation

Immunoadsorption demonstrated favourable outcomes compared to double-dose methylprednisolone. Outcome differences were significant at discharge and follow-up. Further analyses identified modulation of B cell function as a potential mechanism of action for immunoadsorption, as reduction of B cell subsets correlated with clinical improvement.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12974-022-02583-y.

Total Plasma Exchange in Neuromuscular Junction Disorders—A Single-Center, Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy, Safety and Potential Diagnostic Properties in Doubtful Diagnosis

Neuromuscular junction disorders (NJDs) are a heterogeneous group of diseases including myasthenia gravis (MG). In some cases, patients are present with myasthenic symptoms without evidence of autoimmune antibodies, making diagnosis challenging. Total plasma exchange (TPE) has proven efficacy in NJDs. The objective is to describe the safety and efficacy of TPE in NJD patients with questionable disease activity or uncertain diagnosis in order to assess the diagnostic potential of TPE. We report an observational, retrospective cohort study of clinical routine data. All the data were derived from the electronic medical records of the Department of Neurology at University Hospital Essen. We searched for patients with NJDs between 1 July 2018 and 30 June 2021. Of the 303 patients who presented to the department with NJDs, 20 were treated with TPE; 9 patients did not show a measurable benefit from TPE (45%), 6 of whom were diagnosed with seronegative MG. Of these, 3 (50%) had long-standing ocular symptoms. There were decreases in the mean arterial pressure, hemoglobin, hematocrit and fibrinogen during treatment, which were not considered clinically relevant. In (seronegative) myasthenic patients, TPE may help to verify an uncertain diagnosis or to reveal possible muscle damage, allowing unnecessary therapy to be avoided.

Advances and challenges in the treatment of myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is a chronic autoimmune disease with fluctuating muscle weakness and fatigability. Standard immunomodulatory treatment may fail to achieve sufficient improvement with minimal symptom expression or remission of myasthenic symptoms, despite adequate dosing and duration of treatment. Treatment-resistant MG poses a challenge for both patients and treating neurologists and requires new therapeutic approaches. The spectrum of upcoming immunotherapies that more specifically address distinct targets of the main immunological players in MG pathogenesis includes T-cell directed monoclonal antibodies that block the intracellular cascade associated with T-cell activation, monoclonal antibodies directed against key B-cell molecules, as well as monoclonal antibodies against the fragment crystallizable neonatal receptor (FcRn), cytokines and transmigration molecules, and also drugs that inhibit distinct elements of the complement system activated by the pathogenic MG antibodies. The review gives an overview on new drugs being evaluated in still ongoing or recently finished controlled clinical trials and drugs of potential benefit in MG due to their mechanisms of action and positive effects in other autoimmune disorders. Also, the challenges associated with the new therapeutic options are discussed briefly.

Immunoadsorption and plasma exchange-Efficient treatment options for neurological autoimmune diseases

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and immunoadsorption (IA) are first or second line treatment options in patients with neurological autoimmune diseases, including multiple sclerosis, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMSOD), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (Guillain-Barré syndrome), and autoimmune encephalitis.

METHODS

In this prospective randomized controlled monocentric study, we assessed safety and efficacy of therapy with IA or TPE in patients with neurological autoimmune diseases. Treatment response was assessed using various neurological scores as well by measuring immunoglobulin and cytokine concentrations. Clinical outcome was evaluated by application of specific scores for the underlying diseases.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were analyzed. Among these, 19 patients were treated with TPE and 13 patients with IA. IA and TPE therapy showed a comparable significant treatment response. In patients with MS and NMOSD, mean EDSS before and after treatment showed a significant reduction after treatment with IA. We observed a significant reduction of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-12, lL-17, IL-6, INF-γ, and tumor necrosis factor alpha during IA treatment, whereas this reduction was not seen in patients treated with TPE.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, both IA and TPE were effective and safe procedures for treating neurological autoimmune diseases. However, there was a trend towards longer therapy response in patients treated with IA compared to TPE, possibly related to a reduction in plasma levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines seen only in the IA-treated group.

Immunoadsorption apheresis versus intravenous immunoglobulin therapy for exacerbation of myasthenia gravis

Immunoadsorption apheresis (IA) or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) is used to treat exacerbation of myasthenia gravis (MG). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between IA and IVIg for MG patients with anti-acetylcholine receptor (AChR) antibodies. We retrospectively studied 19 AChR antibody-positive generalized MG patients who underwent IA (n = 9) or IVIg treatment (n = 10). We reviewed the MG activities of daily living profile (MG-ADL) scores at baseline, 1 and 3 months after the treatment. Adverse events during the treatment period were also reviewed. The MG-ADL scores showed significantly greater improvement from the baseline in the IA group than in the IVIg group (1 month: -7 vs -3, P = .035; 3 months -9 vs -2.5, P = .016). An adverse event that led to the discontinuation of the treatment was observed in only one patient in the IVIg group (anaphylactic reaction). Our data suggest that the IA treatment is safe and more efficacious than the IVIg treatment for aggravation of anti-AChR-positive MG. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm the finding.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Evidence

Background: Patients with Myasthenia Gravis (MG) can be treated acutely with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) or intravenous immune globulin (IVIG). To date, there is no definitive understanding of which of the two treatments is more effective and safer. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature on the comparative efficacy and safety of TPE to other available treatments for MG. Methods: A systematic literature search for studies published between 1997 and 2017 was performed per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines using two database sources, MEDLINE (through the PubMed database) and Cochrane Library. Results: The search strategy resulted in 535 articles whose abstracts were reviewed. Among these, 165 full texts articles were reviewed for eligibility and 101 articles were excluded. Of the 165 articles, 64 articles were included for a systematic literature and 11 articles for a meta-analysis. Conclusions: This systematic literature review and meta-analysis of treatment options showed that there was a higher response rate with TPE than IVIG in acute MG patients and patients undergoing thymectomy. There was no difference in mortality between the two treatment options. Our findings highlight the need for additional randomized clinical trials in these patients with MG.

Protein A immunoadsorption for the treatment of refractory anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis: A single-center prospective study

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of protein A immunoadsorption (IA) for anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis resistant to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG).

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated patients with refractory anti-NMDAR encephalitis, treated with protein A IA. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, modified Rankin Score (mRS), and anti-NMDAR antibodies were documented before and after IA and at follow-up. Clinical improvement was defined as a decrease of mRS ≥1. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

Ten patients with mRS ≥3 were enrolled and treated with protein A IA; treatment was performed for an average of 5.2 times per patient. Among the nine patients with positive serum anti-NMDAR, the titer decreased in seven patients, of which two became negative. The cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) anti-NMDAR titer decreased in all patients, and one became negative. Anti-NMDAR levels were tested in two patients at follow-up and found to have declined continuously. All patients exhibited clinical improvement with a mRS decline ≥1 after IA treatment (median mRS: 5.0 [range, 3.0-5.0] vs. 4.0 [range, 2.0-4.0], p = 0.014), and the median mRS decreased to 1.0 (range, 0-3.0) at follow-up. After IA, all patients exhibited accelerated recovery. No adverse events were observed during IA treatment.

CONCLUSION

Protein A IA may be effective for treating IVMP/IVIG-resistant anti-NMDAR encephalitis and well tolerated. It is necessary to initiate larger-scale prospective controlled studies to validate the efficacy and safety of protein A IA in anti-NMDAR encephalitis.

Isovolemic filter-based therapeutic plasma-exchange with fresh frozen plasma is associated with minimal thromboelastometric changes in noncoagulopathic patients

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of isovolemic therapeutic plasma-exchange using fresh frozen plasma on coagulations parameters assessed by standard coagulation tests and rotational thromboelastometry in noncoagulopathic patients. Twenty patients who underwent isovolemic filter-based therapeutic plasma-exchange of approximately 1.5 plasma volume per session were included in the current study. Standard coagulation tests and rotational thromboelastometry (ExTEM, InTEM, FibTEM and ApTEM) were performed 30 min before and after the procedure. Isovolemic therapeutic plasma-exchange was associated with decreased fibrinogen levels (P = 0.01). Thromboelastometric assay demonstrated an increased clotting time in both ExTEM (P = 0.03) and InTEM (P = 0.01) and a decreased thrombodynamic potential index in ExTEM (P = 0.03). No significant difference in FibTEM maximum clot firmness was recorded (P = 0.41). Therapeutic plasma-exchange in noncoagulopathic patients is associated with minimal changes in thromboelastometric parameters, mainly by an increase in clotting time in both intrinsic and extrinsic pathways.

Treatment of refractory myasthenia gravis by double-filtration plasmapheresis and rituximab: A case series of nine patients and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoimmune disease mediated by circulating autoantibodies (anti-AchR, anti-MuSK, etc.). More than 20% of myasthenic patients are refractory to conventional treatments (plasma exchange, IVIg, steroids, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil). Rituximab (B-lymphocyte-depleting anti-CD20) and apheresis (double-filtration plasmapheresis [DFPP] and immunoadsorption [IA]) are interesting therapeutic alternatives.

METHODS

This monocentric pilot study included nine refractory myasthenic patients (March 2018 to May 2020) treated by DFPP and/or IA associated with rituximab (375 mg/m² ). Clinical responses were assessed using the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) score.

RESULTS

Average age of patients was 53 ± 17 years. Gender ratio (M/F) was 3:6. The combination of apheresis and rituximab reduced median MGFA score from IV to II after 12 months of follow-up. Clinical improvement assessed by MGFA score was sustained in the long-term for all patients, during an average follow-up of 14 ± 9 months, allowing them to be self-sufficient and out sick-leave. The median number of apheresis sessions was 7 (5-30). The dose of prednisolone was reduced in two patients from 40 mg/d and 30 mg/d to 7.5 mg/d and 10 mg/d, respectively. It was stopped in a patient who was taking 30 mg/d. No infectious, bleeding, or thrombosis complications were noted.

CONCLUSION

The combination of rituximab and DFPP was effective to treat refractory MG.

NMOSD acute attack: Understanding, treatment and innovative treatment prospect

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a group of severe inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system that involves the optic nerve and spinal cord. Currently the therapeutic options for an acute attack in NMOSD are limited and rarely characterized in clinical studies. This review discussed the overall characteristics of acute attack of NMOSD, related risk factor, prognosis and management. Considering the huge unmet needs and the emergence of new therapeutic targets, we also reviewed innovative treatments that might alleviate attack damage, along with the challenges to evaluate new drug for acute attack in NMOSD.

Safety and Tolerability of Plasma Exchange and Immunoadsorption in Neuroinflammatory Diseases

Plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) are frequently used for treatment of various autoimmune-mediated neurological diseases, including multiple sclerosis (MS), chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP), and Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS). Although both methods are generally regarded as well-tolerated treatment options, evidence for safety and tolerability is low for most indications and largely relies on small case series. In this study, we retrospectively analysed adverse events (AEs) and laboratory changes in 284 patients with various neurological indications who received either PE (n = 65, 113 cycles) or IA (n = 219, 435 cycles) between 2013 and 2020 in our Neurology department. One standard treatment cycle for PE as well as IA consisted of five treatments on five consecutive days. During every treatment, the 2.0-2.5-fold individual plasma volume (PV) was treated in IA, while in PE, the 0.7-fold individual PV was replaced by human albumin solution. Overall, both methods showed an excellent safety profile; no deaths of life-threatening adverse events were recorded. Severe AEs (corresponding to grade 3 on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grading scale v5.0) including three patients with sepsis, one pneumonia, and one pneumothorax were present in 5/435 IA cycles (1.1%); in the PE group, no severe AEs were recorded. Furthermore, although advantageous tolerability is generally considered the main advantage of IA over PE, we found that overall frequency of AEs (including grades 1 and 2) was higher in IA (67.1% of all cycles) compared to PE (35.4%; p < 0.001). The low incidence of AEs in PE might be caused by the lower PV exchanged during each treatment (0.7-fold) compared to previous studies which predominantly exchanged the 1.0-1.5-fold PV. In order to verify this hypothesis as well as confirming the efficacy of this lower-dosed scheme, prospective studies comparing different treatment regimens are needed.

Vision improvement in severe acute isolated optic neuritis after plasma exchange treatment in Chinese population: a prospective case series study

Background

Plasma exchange (PE) is often considered as an effective treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and several inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system. This study aimed to evaluate the visual outcomes of Chinese patients with severe acute isolated optic neuritis (ON) who received PE therapy after high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) treatment.

Methods

Thirty-seven acute isolated ON patients experiencing their first attack of severe visual impairment without neurological disability were recruited. All subjects received five cycles of double-filtration plasmapheresis. Visual acuity (VA) was documented at onset, 1 day before PE treatment, at each cycle of PE therapy and at the 1-month follow-up visit.

Results

This study included 26 female (70.3%) and 11 male (29.7%) subjects, and 18 subjects (48.6%) had bilateral involvement. The time window between onset and PE treatment was 27.3 ± 12.7 days (range: 6-53 days). Mean VA (logMAR) of the studied eyes at onset, 1-day before PE treatment/after IVMP and after the fifth PE treatment were 3.41 ± 1.50, 2.61 ± 1.64 and 1.66 ± 1.52, respectively (p < 0.001). Nineteen eyes (51.4%) showed no light perception at the onset, and 17 eyes (45.9%) improved to Snellen VA >20/800 after IVMP and PE treatments, among which five eyes (13.5%) recovered to Snellen VA 20/20 (p < 0.001). Predictors of good visual outcome included body mass index [odds ratio (OR) = 0.734, p = 0.044], serum AQP4 antibody-positive status (OR = 0.004, p = 0.001), bilaterality (OR = 0.042, p = 0.008) and time window from onset to PE therapy per 1 day (OR = 0.79, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

This study revealed that PE treatment effectively improves the visual outcomes of patients experiencing their first attack of severe acute isolated ON after high-dose IVMP treatment. Better visual outcomes can be achieved with early PE treatment.

Maternal-Autoantibody-Related (MAR) Autism: Identifying Neuronal Antigens and Approaching Prospects for Intervention

Recent studies indicate the existence of a maternal-autoantibody-related subtype of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). To date, a large number of studies have focused on describing patterns of brain-reactive serum antibodies in maternal-autoantibody-related (MAR) autism and some have described attempts to define the antigenic targets. This article describes evidence on MAR autism and the various autoantibodies that have been implicated. Among other possibilities, antibodies to neuronal surface protein Contactin Associated Protein 2 (CASPR2) have been found more frequently in mothers of children with neurodevelopmental disorders or autism, and two independent experimental studies have shown pathogenicity in mice. The N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) is another possible target for maternal antibodies as demonstrated in mice. Here, we discuss the growing evidence, discuss issues regarding biomarker definition, and summarise the therapeutic approaches that might be used to reduce or prevent the transfer of pathogenic maternal antibodies.

Autoantibodies to beta-adrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) patients - A validation study in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid from two Swedish cohorts

Myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) also known as ME/CFS (Chronic Fatigue Syndrome) or ME/SEID (Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disorder), is a disabling and often long-lasting disease that can drastically impair quality of life and physical/social functioning of the patients. Underlying pathological mechanisms are to a large extent unknown, but the presence of autoantibodies, cytokine pattern deviations and the presentation of cognitive and autonomic nervous system related symptoms provide evidence for ME being an immunological disorder with elements of autoimmunity. Increased levels of autoantibodies binding to adrenergic and muscarinic receptors in ME-patients have been reported. It is hypothesized that these autoantibodies have pathological significance and contribute to the ME-specific symptoms, however, these observations need to be validated. This study was designed to investigate potential differences in adrenergic and muscarinic receptor autoantibody levels in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples between ME patients and gender and age-matched healthy controls, and to correlate the autoantibody levels to disease severity. We collected bodyfluids and health-related questionnaires from two Swedish ME cohorts, plasma and CSF from one of the cohorts (n ​= ​24), only plasma from the second cohort (n ​= ​24) together with plasma samples (n ​= ​24) and CSF (n ​= ​6) from healthy controls. All samples were analysed for IgG autoantibodies directed against Alpha- (α1, α2) and Beta- (β1-3) adrenergic receptors and Muscarinic (M) 1-5 acetylcholine receptors using an ELISA technique. The questionnaires were used as measures of disease severity. Significant increases in autoantibody levels in ME patients compared to controls were found for M3 and M4 -receptors in both cohorts and β1, β2, M3 and M4-receptors in one cohort. No significant correlations were found between autoantibody levels and disease severity. No significant levels of autoantibodies were detected in the CSF samples. These findings support previous findings that there exists a general pattern of increased antibody levels to adrenergic and muscarinic receptors within the ME patient group. However, the role of increased adrenergic and muscarinic receptor autoantibodies in the pathogenesis of ME is still uncertain and further research is needed to evaluate the clinical significance of these findings.

Plasma Exchange or Immunoadsorption in Demyelinating Diseases: A Meta-Analysis

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory disease mainly affecting the central nervous system. In MS, abnormal immune mechanisms induce acute inflammation, demyelination, axonal loss, and the formation of central nervous system plaques. The long-term treatment involves options to modify the disease progression, whereas the treatment for the acute relapse has its focus in the administration of high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (up to 1000 mg daily) over a period of three to five days as a first step. If symptoms of the acute relapse persist, it is defined as glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive, and immunomodulation by apheresis is recommended. However, several national and international guidelines have no uniform recommendations on using plasma exchange (PE) nor immunoadsorption (IA) in this case. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted, including observational studies or randomized controlled trials that investigated the effect of PE or IA on different courses of MS and neuromyelitis optica (NMO). One thousand, three hundred and eighty-three patients were included in the evaluation. Therapy response in relapsing-remitting MS and clinically isolated syndrome was 76.6% (95%CI 63.7–89.8%) in PE- and 80.6% (95%CI 69.3–91.8%) in IA-treated patients. Based on the recent literature, PE and IA may be considered as equal treatment possibilities in patients suffering from acute, glucocorticosteroid-unresponsive MS relapses.

Myasthenic crisis demanding mechanical ventilation: A multicenter analysis of 250 cases

OBJECTIVE

To determine demographic characteristics, clinical features, treatment regimens, and outcome of myasthenic crisis (MC) requiring mechanical ventilation (MV).

METHODS

Analysis of patients who presented with MC between 2006 and 2015 in a German multicenter retrospective study.

RESULTS

We identified 250 cases in 12 participating centers. Median age at crisis was 72 years. Median duration of MV was 12 days. Prolonged ventilation (>15 days) depended on age (p = 0.0001), late-onset myasthenia gravis (MG), a high Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America Class before crisis (p = 0.0001 for IVb, odds ratio [OR] = infinite), number of comorbidities (>3 comorbidities: p = 0.002, OR 2.99), pneumonia (p = 0.0001, OR 3.13), and resuscitation (p = 0.0008, OR 9.15). MV at discharge from hospital was necessary in 20.5% of survivors. Patients with early-onset MG (p = 0.0001, OR 0.21), thymus hyperplasia (p = 0.002, OR 0), and successful noninvasive ventilation trial were more likely to be ventilated for less than 15 days. Noninvasive ventilation in 92 cases was sufficient in 38%, which was accompanied by a significantly shorter duration of ventilation (p = 0.001) and intensive care unit (ICU) stay (p = 0.01). IV immunoglobulins, plasma exchange, and immunoadsorption were more likely to be combined sequentially if the duration of MV and the stay in an ICU extended (p = 0.0503, OR 2.05). Patients who received plasma exchange or immunoadsorption as first-line therapy needed invasive ventilation significantly less often (p = 0.003). In-hospital mortality was 12%, which was significantly associated with the number of comorbidities (>3) and complications such as acute respiratory distress syndrome and resuscitation. Main cause of death was multiorgan failure, mostly due to sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Mortality and duration of MC remained comparable to previous reports despite higher age and a high disease burden in our study. Prevention and treatment of complications and specialized neurointensive care are the cornerstones in order to improve outcome.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Eighth Special Issue

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis (TA) in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor in order to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Eighth Edition, like its predecessor, continues to apply the category and grading system definitions in fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was introduced in the Fourth Edition, has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of TA in a specific disease entity or medical condition. The Eighth Edition comprises 84 fact sheets for relevant diseases and medical conditions, with 157 graded and categorized indications and/or TA modalities. The Eighth Edition of the JCA Special Issue seeks to continue to serve as a key resource that guides the utilization of TA in the treatment of human disease.

Safety and efficacy of immunoadsorption versus plasma exchange in steroid-refractory relapse of multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome: A randomised, parallel-group, controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Plasma exchange (PE) constitutes the standard therapy for steroid-refractory relapse in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome. Immunoadsorption (IA) is an alternative method of apheresis which selectively removes immunoglobulines (Ig) while preserving other plasma proteins. Although IA is regarded as a well-tolerated, low-risk procedure, high-level evidence for its efficacy is lacking. Therefore, we sought to investigate whether IA is superior to PE in patients with acute relapse of multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome who had insufficiently responded to high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (MP).

METHODS

Patients with acute relapse of multiple sclerosis or clinically isolated syndrome and without complete clinical remission of symptoms after at least one cycle of high-dose intravenous MP therapy were enrolled to our randomised, controlled, parallel-group, monocentric trial. Eligible patients were aged at least 12 years and had no clinical or laboratory signs of systemic infection. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either IA or PE. Patients in both groups received 5 treatments on 5 consecutive days. In the IA group, the 2.0-fold individual total plasma volume was processed on day 1, and the 2.5-fold on days 2-5. In the PE group, 2 liters of plasma (corresponding to the 0.69 ± 0.12-fold individual total plasma volume) were removed each day and substituted by 5% human albumin solution. Patients were followed up directly after last apheresis as well as 2 and 4 weeks after last treatment. The primary endpoint was change of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) after 4 weeks compared to baseline. Analyses of primary outcome and safety measures were done in all patients who received at least one treatment (intention-to-treat-population). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02671682.

FINDINGS

Between January 21, 2016, and October 26, 2018, 63 patients were screened for eligibility, and 61 patients were randomly assigned to receive IA (n = 31) or PE (n = 30). All randomised patients were included in the intention-to-treat-analysis. For the primary outcome, the median improvement of MSFC after 4 weeks compared to baseline was 0.385 (IQR 0.200-0.675; p < 0.001) in the IA group and 0.265 (IQR 0.100-0.408; p < 0.001) in the PE group. Improvement in the IA group was significantly larger (p = 0.034) compared to PE. Response rates after 4 weeks were 86.7% in the IA group and 76.7% in the PE group. One deep venous thrombosis occurred in each group.

INTERPRETATION

Both IA and PE were safe in patients with steroid-refractory relapse and resulted in significant improvements of the primary outcome MSFC after 4 weeks compared to baseline. IA patients showed significantly larger improvements of MSFC compared to PE patients after 4 weeks. The results indicate a potential superiority of IA compared to PE in treatment of steroid-refractory relapse in multiple sclerosis and clinically isolated syndrome, which has to be confirmed by future studies.

FUNDING

Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany.

Therapeutic Immunoadsorption and Conventional Plasma Exchange in ABO-incompatible Renal Transplant: An Exculpatory Evidence

Aim

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of immunoadsorption (IA) with conventional therapeutic plasma-exchange (cTPE) in ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplant.

Methods

Data of patients from July 2015 to June 2017 (category-I, number of patients (N) = 11; IA±cTPE) on the average length of stay (ALOS), number of cTPE/IA, antibody-titers (AT), creatinine, patient and graft survival at one year were compared retrospectively with patients in period from February 2012 to June 2015 (category-II, N = 29; cTPE only). AT of patients not decreasing to less than one fold after two cTPE were shifted for IA. For patients undergoing IA, real-time AT was done and IA stopped after target titer (TT <1:8) was achieved. Post-transplant cTPE was done if, titers rebounded to ≥1:8. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) was given after every cTPE/IA. Cost comparisons were made.

Results

In category-I, seven patients (63.63%) were shifted to IA from cTPE. The mean cTPE procedures in category I and II are 3.5 ± 2.4 and 4.8 ± 2.5, respectively (p = 0.206). The mean IA procedures in category-I are 1.6 ± 0.5. The number of patients requiring post-operative TPE was less in category-I than category-II, i.e., N = 5, 45.5% vs N = 20, 69%, respectively (p = 0.171). The expense of IA in category-I vs cTPE in category-II was statistically not significant (p = 0.422) but had significant lesser ALOS (p = 0.044). Expenses, when a patient undergoes both cTPE and IA (category-I), are significantly higher to category-II (p = 0.003). The two groups were comparable in AT, creatinine value, graft and patient survival rates at one year.

Conclusion

Contrary to the general judgment of IA being expensive than cTPE, this study shows equivalent expenditures with comparable therapeutic outcomes.

Understanding the burden of refractory myasthenia gravis

Myasthenia gravis (MG) is an autoantibody-mediated disease that compromises the acetylcholine receptors or associated structures of the postsynaptic membrane of the neuromuscular junction. This leads to impaired neuromuscular transmission and subsequent fluctuating fatigability and weakness of ocular, bulbar, and limb skeletal muscles. Over the past few decades, there have been significant advances in our understanding of the disease pathophysiology and improvements in prognosis due to intensive care medicine and immunomodulation. Despite this, an estimated 10-20% of patients with MG do not achieve an adequate response, are intolerant to conventional treatment, or require chronic treatment with intravenous immunoglobulins or plasma separation procedures. Such patients are regarded as having MG that is 'refractory' to treatment and may represent a distinct clinical subgroup. Because the majority of patients with MG have well-controlled disease, the burden of illness in the minority with refractory disease is poorly understood and may be underestimated. However, clinically these patients are liable to experience extreme fatigue, considerable disability owing to uncontrolled symptoms, and frequent myasthenic crises and hospitalizations. Both acute adverse effects and an increased risk of comorbidity from treatment regimens may contribute to reduced quality of life. As yet, little is known concerning the impact of refractory MG on mental health and health-related quality of life. This review aims to highlight the burden of disease and unmet needs in patients with refractory MG.

CSF macrophage migration inhibitory factor levels did not predict steroid treatment response after optic neuritis in patients with multiple sclerosis

Glucocorticoid (GC) refractory relapses in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) or clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), who are in potential need of treatment escalation, are a key challenge in routine clinical practice. The pro-inflammatory cytokine macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) has been shown to be an endogenous counter-regulator of GC, and potentiates autoimmune-mediated neuroinflammation. In order to evaluate whether MIF levels are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of MS patients (CSF-MIF), and whether they are higher still during a GC refractory relapse, we compared CSF-MIF concentrations of CIS/MS patients with acute optic neuritis as their first inflammatory episode (ON, n = 20), CIS/MS patients with a stable disease progression/without relapse (CIS/MS w/o, n = 18), and healthy controls (HC, n = 20) using ANOVA. Mean CSF-MIF concentrations in CIS/MS w/o patients were significantly higher than in ON patients and HCs, whereas ON patients and HCs did not differ. A subgroup analysis of the ON group revealed 10 patients to be responsive to GC-treatment (GC-ON) and 10 patients refractory under GC-treatment (rGC-ON). However, mean CSF-MIF concentrations did not differ between GC-ON and rGC-ON cases. We therefore conclude that MIF is not suitable for distinguishing GC responders from non-responders in a group of patients with acute optic neuritis, but it rather mirrors the ongoing inflammation in long-term MS disease progression.

Tryptophan immunoadsorption during pregnancy and breastfeeding in patients with acute relapse of multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica

BACKGROUND

Up to every fourth woman with multiple sclerosis (MS) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) suffers a clinically relevant relapse during pregnancy. High doses of steroids bear some serious risks, especially within the first trimester of pregnancy. Immunoadsorption (IA) is an effective and more selective treatment option in disabling MS relapse than plasma exchange. Data on the use of IA during pregnancy and breastfeeding are scarce.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter study, we analyzed the safety and efficacy of IA treatment in acute relapses during pregnancy or breastfeeding. The primary outcome parameter - change of acute relapse-related disability after IA - was assessed using Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) and visual acuity (VA) measurements for patients with optic neuritis (ON).

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients were analyzed, 23 with relapsing-remitting MS, and 1 with NMOSD. Twenty patients were treated with IA during pregnancy. Four patients received IA postnatally during the breastfeeding period. Treatment was started at a mean 22.5 [standard deviation (SD) 13.9] days after onset of relapse. Patients were treated with a series of 5.8 (mean, SD 0.7) IA treatments within 7-10 days. Sixteen patients received IA because of steroid-refractory relapse, eight were treated without preceding steroid pulse therapy. EDSS improved clinically relevant from 3.5 [median, interquartile range (IQR) 2] before IA to 2.5 (median, IQR 1.1) after IA, p < 0.001. In patients with ON, VA improved in four out of five patients. Altogether, in 83% of patients, a rapid and marked improvement of relapse-related symptoms was observed after IA with either a decrease of ⩾1 EDSS grade or improvement in VA ⩾20%. No clinically relevant side effect was reported in 138 IA treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

Tryptophan-IA was found to be effective and well tolerated in MS/NMOSD relapses, both as an escalation option after insufficient response to steroid pulse therapy and as first-line relapse treatment during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

Short-term effect of additional apheresis on visual acuity changes in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

PURPOSE

To evaluate temporal changes in visual acuity in patients with steroid-resistant optic neuritis (ON) in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) after apheresis.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study, clinical case series SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical charts of 15 eyes of 9 consecutive patients with ON in NMOSD who underwent apheresis between March 2010 and September 2017. All patients were seropositive for anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibody and resistant to steroid pulse therapy. Apheresis was performed by either simple plasma exchange or/and immune adsorption therapy.

RESULTS

Twelve eyes (80%) showed improvement with logMAR > 0.3 at 1 month after apheresis. Within 1 month after apheresis therapy, logMAR on average significantly decreased, the magnitude of change being greatest within the first week. Thereafter visual acuity became stable in 10 of the 11 eyes, until 12 months. However, two eyes (12%) showed recurrence of visual acuity reduction 3 months after the cessation of apheresis. There were a few serious complications during and after apheresis, but these were completely treatable.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional apheresis therapy rapidly improves the visual acuity of steroid-resistant seropositive AQP4 ON.

Pattern Recognition of the Multiple Sclerosis Syndrome

During recent decades, the autoimmune disease neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), once broadly classified under the umbrella of multiple sclerosis (MS), has been extended to include autoimmune inflammatory conditions of the central nervous system (CNS), which are now diagnosable with serum serological tests. These antibody-mediated inflammatory diseases of the CNS share a clinical presentation to MS. A number of practical learning points emerge in this review, which is geared toward the pattern recognition of optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, brainstem/cerebellar and hemispheric tumefactive demyelinating lesion (TDL)-associated MS, aquaporin-4-antibody and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody NMOSD, overlap syndrome, and some yet-to-be-defined/classified demyelinating disease, all unspecifically labeled under MS syndrome. The goal of this review is to increase clinicians’ awareness of the clinical nuances of the autoimmune conditions for MS and NMSOD, and to highlight highly suggestive patterns of clinical, paraclinical or imaging presentations in order to improve differentiation. With overlay in clinical manifestations between MS and NMOSD, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain, orbits and spinal cord, serology, and most importantly, high index of suspicion based on pattern recognition, will help lead to the final diagnosis.

Myasthenia gravis induced by nivolumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a case report and literature review

A 76-year-old woman who was diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer presented with left eyelid ptosis and grade 4 creatine phosphokinase elevation after the second cycle of nivolumab monotherapy. Nivolumab has demonstrated promising efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer in several trials. Dyspnea and muscle weakness developed rapidly with an acute exacerbation. She underwent plasmapheresis and intravenous immune globulin followed by treatment with low-dose prednisolone. She had gradual symptoms improvement. We diagnosed her with myasthenia gravis (MG) based on her symptoms and the detection of anti-acetylcholine receptor antibody. According to postmarketing surveillance in 15,740 Japanese patients, the total incidence rate of MG is 0.1%. We report a rare case of drug-induced MG in a patient receiving nivolumab.