Efficacy and tolerability of dimethyl fumarate in White-, African- and Hispanic- Americans with multiple sclerosis

Clinical characteristics and disease burden of African, Caribbean, and Black people with multiple sclerosis in Toronto, Canada

BACKGROUND

Different racial and ethnic groups have demonstrated heterogeneity in the clinical course of multiple sclerosis(MS).

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to evaluate disease characteristics in African, Caribbean, and Black people with MS(ACB-MS) followed at a single centre in Toronto, Canada.

METHODS

ACB-MS were compared with age- and sex-matched people with MS (pwMS) of European descent(EUR-MS) identified through the clinic registry.

RESULTS

344 PwMS were included(n = 172 ACB-MS, n = 172 EUR-MS; mean age 43 years, 68 % female). Baseline mean Expanded disability status scale (EDSS) scores (ACB-MS 2.3 ± 2.3 vs. EUR-MS 2.2 ± 2.0, p = 0.38) and subsequent clinical and radiological measures of disease activity were similar between groups, including annualized relapse rate (ARR)(ACB-MS 0.47 ± 0.47 vs. EUR-MS 0.41 ± 0.34, p = 0.2) and most recent EDSS (ACB-MS 2.7 ± 2.2 vs. EUR-MS 2.3 ± 2.1, p = 0.10). However, the proportion of MRI brain demonstrating new disease activity was higher(37% vs. 26 %, p < 0.05) and disability progression greater in ACB-MS vs. EUR-MS(43% vs. 33 %,p < 0.05) but measures of disease severity including MS Severity Score(3.17 vs. 2.58, p = 0.3) and Progression Index(PI) (0.27 vs. 0.30, p = 0.5) were comparable.

CONCLUSION

Disability progression was seen more commonly in ACB-MS, though clinical disease activity and severity were generally comparable between ACB-MS and EUR-MS patients in Toronto, Canada. These findings partially differ from prior studies demonstrating more overtly aggressive MS disease courses in Black and African American PwMS, necessitating further studies to understand how structural determinants of health drive these disparities.

Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of diroximel fumarate in a cohort of Black patients with multiple sclerosis from the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) has not been well studied in racial and ethnic minorities, as these populations are typically underrepresented in clinical trials. Black or African Americans comprise ∼13 % of the US population, yet are represented by as little as 5 % in clinical trials. Differences in disease course and progression have been reported between races and ethnicities, so there is a need to understand the safety and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in Black patients, to inform evidence-based approaches to treatment in this population.

METHODS

EVOLVE-MS-1 (NCT0234307) was an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 study assessing the long-term safety, tolerability, and efficacy of diroximel fumarate (DRF) over 96 weeks in adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Patients were either newly initiated to DRF or rolled over from completing EVOLVE-MS-2 (NCT03093324). In this post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 EVOLVE-MS-1 study, we evaluate the safety and exploratory efficacy outcomes for DRF in Black and non-Black patient subgroups.

RESULTS

Of 1057 patients enrolled, 72 (6.8 %) were Black. In Black vs non-Black patients, mean age was 42 vs 43 years and 75 % vs 72 % were female, respectively. In both groups, median (range) duration of DRF exposure was 1.8 (0.0-2.0) years and mean Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) was 2.7. The most common prior DMTs for both Black vs non-Black patients were interferons (47 % vs 37 %) and glatiramer acetate (36 % vs 24 %). DRF treatment was discontinued in 33 (46 %) Black and 224 (23 %) non-Black patients; most common reasons for discontinuation were withdrawal by patient (n = 11, 15.3 %), adverse events (AEs; n = 7, 9.7 %), and lost to follow-up (n = 7, 9.7 %) in Black patients; AEs (8.2 %) and withdrawal by patient (7.0 %) in non-Black patients. AEs were reported in 90 % Black and 89 % non-Black patients; most AEs were mild or moderate in both groups. Gastrointestinal (GI) AEs were reported in 36 % Black and 32 % non-Black patients; no Black patients discontinued due to GI AEs, vs 7 (0.7 %) non-Black patients. The most commonly reported AE was flushing (18 % Black and 28 % non-Black patients). No AEs of lymphopenia were reported in Black patients compared with 13 % of non-Black patients. Mean absolute lymphocyte count declined from baseline to week 48 by 15 % in Black patients and 29 % in non-Black patients, then plateaued and remained above the lower limit of normal (LLN; 0.91 × 109/L). Adjusted annualized relapse rate (95 % confidence interval) was reduced by 78.2 % (54.6 - 89.5; p < 0.0001) in Black patients, from 12 months before to 96 weeks after DRF treatment; similar to 81.7 % (78.5 - 84.5 %; p < 0.0001) reduction in non-Black patients. Mean number of patients free from confirmed disability progression was 93.4 % by week 48, then 86.2 % vs 90.4 % by week 96 in Black vs non-Black patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This study presents the first analysis of safety and efficacy of DRF in Black patients. Relapse rates remained low in Black patients on DRF, consistent with non-Black patients, and there were no new safety signals identified in the Black patient subgroup in EVOLVE-MS-1. Together, these outcomes support DRF as an effective treatment option in Black patients with RRMS.

The Evolving Role of Monomethyl Fumarate Treatment as Pharmacotherapy for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple sclerosis is the most common autoimmune disease affecting the central nervous system (CNS) worldwide. Multiple sclerosis involves inflammatory demyelination of nerve fibers in the CNS, often presenting with recurrent episodes of focal sensory or motor deficits associated with the region of the CNS affected. The prevalence of this disease has increased rapidly over the last decade. Despite the approval of many new pharmaceutical therapies in the past 20 years, there remains a growing need for alternative therapies to manage the course of this disease. Treatments are separated into two main categories: management of acute flare versus long-term prevention of flares via disease-modifying therapy. Primary drug therapies for acute flare include corticosteroids to limit inflammation and symptomatic management, depending on symptoms. Several different drugs have been recently approved for use in modifying the course of the disease, including a group of medications known as fumarates (e.g., dimethyl fumarate, diroximel fumarate, monomethyl fumarate) that have been shown to be efficacious and relatively safe. In the present investigation, we review available evidence focused on monomethyl fumarate, also known as Bafiertam®, along with bioequivalent fumarates for the long-term treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Ethnic disparities in the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neuroinflammatory disorder which affects 2.8 million people world-wide. A growing body of evidence shows ethnic disparities in MS. This review aims to evaluate differences, based upon ethnic background, in the incidence, prevalence, disease course, and efficacy of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) among people with MS (PwMS).

METHOD

Ethnicities were classified as White, Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Middle Eastern and North African (MENA). A literature search was conducted using the PubMed search engine to identify articles on MS and ethnicity that were published in the English language between 01/01/2005 and 31/05/2022.

RESULTS

101 studies met all inclusion criteria. Although the incidence and prevalence of MS varied among ethnicities, findings were inconsistent and depended on the continent of the study. Ethnicity may have an impact on the disease course. PwMS from Black, Hispanic, and MENA, but not Asian ethnicities, appeared to accumulate physical disability at a faster rate than those from White ethnicity. Although there was a lack of studies evaluating the relative safety and efficacy of DMTs among various ethnicities, interferon-beta was found to be less efficacious in PwMS from Black ethnicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies, with more uniform definitions of ethnicity are required to comprehensively understand ethnic disparities in MS, in particular to identify underlying causes, to facilitate the delivery of personalised medical care and avoid inequity.

Discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate in multiple sclerosis - a nationwide study

BACKGROUND

Adherence is a prerequisite for the efficacy of any drug, and previous studies have shown that non-adherence is associated with disease activity and increased health care cost in multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of this study was to investigate rates and reasons for discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) among people with MS on a national level and differences between clinics in Denmark.

METHODS

This was a nationwide, registry and population study of patients treated with DMF. We calculated standard residuals (SR) demonstrate differences between clinics. For survival analysis regarding discontinuation rates and discontinuation due to specific AEs we used log-rank test Cox-proportional hazards and plotted Kaplan-Meier graphics.

RESULTS

We included 2,448 people with MS, treated with DMF from 2013 to 2020. Average treatment duration was 26 months (5,382 treatment years). 49.2 % of patients who initiated treatment with DMF (n = 1205) were continuously treated. Reasons for discontinuation were adverse events (54.5 %, n = 656), active disease (26.1 %, n = 315), pregnancy (9.4 %, n = 113) or other reasons (13.2 %, n = 159). We compared SR to the mean regarding reasons for discontinuation and found significant differences between sites regarding gastrointestinal adverse events, flushing and lymphopenia. Discontinuation due to all adverse events, flushing and lymphopenia were more frequent in female than male patients.

CONCLUSION

In this population-based study, we found major differences between the MS clinics in rates and reason for discontinuation of DMF. Our results suggest that management strategies during DMF treatment can reduce discontinuation rates.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness After 5 Years of Dimethyl Fumarate Treatment in Black and Hispanic Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in ESTEEM

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) clinical trials have included low numbers of patients from racial and ethnic minority populations; therefore, it is uncertain whether differences exist in response to disease-modifying therapies. We evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) treatment over 5 years in four patient cohorts: Black, non-Black, Hispanic, and non-Hispanic people with relapsing-remitting MS.

METHODS

ESTEEM is an ongoing, 5-year, multinational, prospective study evaluating the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMF in people with MS. The analysis included patients newly prescribed DMF in routine practice at 393 sites globally.

RESULTS

Overall, 5251 patients were analyzed (220 Black, 5031 non-Black; 105 Hispanic, 5146 non-Hispanic). Median (min-max) months of follow-up was 32 (0-72) for Black, 29 (1-77) for Hispanic, and 41 (0-85) for both the non-Black and non-Hispanic populations. In total, 39 (18%) Black and 29 (28%) Hispanic patients reported adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation versus 1126 (22%) non-Black and 1136 (22%) non-Hispanic patients; gastrointestinal disorders were the most common in all subgroups. Median lymphocyte counts decreased by 37% in Black, 40% in non-Black, 10% in Hispanic, and 39% in non-Hispanic patients in the first year, then remained stable and above the lower limit of normal in most patients. Annualized relapse rates (ARRs) (95% confidence intervals) up to 5 years were 0.054 (0.038-0.078) for Black, 0.077 (0.072-0.081) for non-Black, 0.069 (0.043-0.112) for Hispanic, and 0.076 (0.072-0.081) for non-Hispanic populations, representing reductions of 91-92% compared with ARR 12 months before study entry (all p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The safety profile of DMF in these subgroups was consistent with the overall ESTEEM population. Relapse rates remained low in Black and Hispanic patients, and consistent with non-Black and non-Hispanic patients. These data demonstrate a comparable real-world treatment benefit of DMF in Black and Hispanic patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02047097.

Dimethyl Fumarate and Intestine: From Main Suspect to Potential Ally against Gut Disorders

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a well-characterized molecule that exhibits immuno-modulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties and that is currently approved for the treatment of psoriasis and multiple sclerosis. Due to its Nrf2-dependent and independent mechanisms of action, DMF has a therapeutic potential much broader than expected. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the state-of-the-art and future perspectives regarding the potential repurposing of DMF in the context of chronic inflammatory diseases of the intestine, such as inflammatory bowel disorders (i.e., Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) and celiac disease. DMF's mechanisms of action, as well as an exhaustive analysis of the in vitro/in vivo evidence of its beneficial effects on the intestine and the gut microbiota, together with observational studies on multiple sclerosis patients, are here reported. Based on the collected evidence, we highlight the new potential applications of this molecule in the context of inflammatory and immune-mediated intestinal diseases.

The Challenge of Dimethyl Fumarate Repurposing in Eye Pathologies

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is a small molecule currently approved and used in the treatment of psoriasis and multiple sclerosis due to its immuno-modulatory, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant properties. As an Nrf2 activator through Keap1 protein inhibition, DMF unveils a potential therapeutical use that is much broader than expected so far. In this comprehensive review we discuss the state-of-art and future perspectives regarding the potential repositioning of this molecule in the panorama of eye pathologies, including Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD). The DMF's mechanism of action, an extensive analysis of the in vitro and in vivo evidence of its beneficial effects, together with a search of the current clinical trials, are here reported. Altogether, this evidence gives an overview of the new potential applications of this molecule in the context of ophthalmological diseases characterized by inflammation and oxidative stress, with a special focus on AMD, for which our gene-disease (KEAP1-AMD) database search, followed by a protein-protein interaction analysis, further supports the rationale of DMF use. The necessity to find a topical route of DMF administration to the eye is also discussed. In conclusion, the challenge of DMF repurposing in eye pathologies is feasible and worth scientific attention and well-focused research efforts.

Racial and ethnic disparities in treatment response and tolerability in multiple sclerosis: A comparative study

BACKGROUND

Inter-individual response and tolerability profiles associated with available disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) are an important aspect of the therapeutic decision-making process in multiple sclerosis (MS). In the absence of racially diverse clinical studies, the possible effect of race and ethnicity on treatment outcome remains uncertain. This study aims to compare disease outcome among Hispanic, Black, and White patients with MS, and assess the impact of race/ethnicity on long-term outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective review of electronic medical records was performed on a multiethnic cohort of MS patients treated in a large academic center. Sociodemographic characteristics, treatment regimens, and disability outcomes were compared between the three groups.

RESULTS

A total of 300 age- and gender-matched MS patients (100 Hispanic, 100 Black, and 100 White) were included in the study. When assessing the overall survival of MS patients without ambulatory disability 5 years from diagnosis, Hispanics and Blacks attained lower survival times compared to Whites (survival time ratio [STR] 0.17, p = 0.004; and 0.14, p = 0.002, respectively). Black patients had the highest rate of disease progression and treatment-limiting adverse events despite similar sociodemographic profiles and DMT exposure relative to Hispanics and Whites.

CONCLUSION

Racial/ethnic disparities in treatment outcome create an unmet need to identify tailored, multifaceted approaches to therapy selection in MS.

Monomethyl Fumarate (MMF, Bafiertam) for the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis (MS)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent neurologic autoimmune disorder affecting two million people worldwide. Symptoms include gait abnormalities, perception and sensory losses, cranial nerve pathologies, pain, cognitive dysfunction, and emotional aberrancies. Traditional therapy includes corticosteroids for the suppression of relapses and injectable interferons. Recently, several modern therapies-including antibody therapy and oral agents-were approved as disease-modifying agents. Monomethyl fumarate (MMF, Bafiertam) is a recent addition to the arsenal available in the fight against MS and appears to be well-tolerated, safe, and effective. In this paper, we review the evidence available regarding the use of monomethyl fumarate (Bafiertam) in the treatment of relapsing-remitting MS.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Hispanic or Latino Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: 3-Year Results from ESTEEM

INTRODUCTION

Compared with the non-Hispanic/non-Latino population, Hispanic/Latino patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are reported to exhibit greater disease severity. Geographical location and genetics play a role in differences observed across Hispanic/Latino subpopulations. We evaluated real-world safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) on MS disease activity in Hispanic/Latino patients.

METHODS

ESTEEM is an ongoing, 5-year, multinational, prospective study evaluating long-term safety and effectiveness of DMF in patients with MS. This interim analysis included patients newly prescribed DMF in routine practice at 394 sites globally.

RESULTS

Overall, 4986 non-Hispanic/non-Latino and 98 Hispanic/Latino patients were analyzed; median (range) follow-up was 18 (2-37) months. Unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARRs) for 12 months before DMF initiation versus 36 months post DMF initiation, respectively, were: non-Hispanic/non-Latino patients, 0.82 (95% CI 0.80-0.84) versus 0.10 (95% CI 0.09-0.10), 88% lower ARR (P < 0.0001); Hispanic/Latino patients, 0.80 (95% CI 0.65-1.00) versus 0.09 (95% CI 0.06-0.14), 89% lower ARR (P < 0.0001). In total, 28 (29%) Hispanic/Latino patients reported adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation; gastrointestinal (GI) disorders (n = 10, 10%) were the most common, consistent with the non-Hispanic/non-Latino population (8%). Median lymphocyte counts decreased by approximately 24% in the first year (vs 36% decrease in non-Hispanic/non-Latino patients) then remained stable and above the lower limit of normal in most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Relapse rates remained low in Hispanic/Latino patients, consistent with non-Hispanic/non-Latino patients. The safety profile of DMF in Hispanic/Latino patients was consistent with safety findings from the non-Hispanic/non-Latino ESTEEM population, demonstrating the real-world treatment benefit of DMF in the Hispanic/Latino patient cohort.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Dimethyl Fumarate in Black or African American Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: 3-Year Results from ESTEEM

INTRODUCTION

Black or African American (black/AA) patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) are reported to exhibit greater disease severity compared with non-black or non-AA patients. Whether differences exist in response to MS disease-modifying therapies remains uncertain, as MS clinical trials have included low numbers of non-white patients. We evaluated real-world safety and effectiveness of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) on MS disease activity in black/AA patients.

METHODS

ESTEEM is an ongoing, 5-year, multinational, prospective study evaluating long-term safety and effectiveness of DMF in patients with MS. This interim analysis included patients newly prescribed DMF in routine practice at 394 sites globally.

RESULTS

Overall, 4897 non-black/non-AA and 187 black/AA patients were analyzed; median (range) follow-up 18 (2-37) months. Unadjusted annualized relapse rates (ARRs) for 12 months before DMF initiation versus 36 months post DMF initiation, respectively, were: non-black/non-AA patients, 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.85) versus 0.10 (95% CI 0.09-0.10), 88% lower ARR (P < 0.0001); black/AA patients, 0.68 (95% CI 0.58-0.80) versus 0.07 (95% CI 0.05-0.10), 90% lower ARR (P < 0.0001). In total, 35 (19%) black/AA patients reported adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation; gastrointestinal disorders were most common (7%), consistent with non-black/non-AA patients (8%). Median lymphocyte counts decreased by 22% in the first year (vs 36% in non-black/non-AA patients), then remained stable and above lower limit of normal in most patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Relapse rates remained low in black/AA patients, consistent with non-black/non-AA patients. The safety profile of DMF in black/AA patients was consistent with that in the non-black/non-AA ESTEEM population, although lymphocyte decrease was less pronounced in black/AA patients.

Safety of dimethyl fumarate for multiple sclerosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The safety profile of dimethyl fumarate (DMF) for multiple sclerosis (MS) is not fully understood.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature for adverse events (AE) associated with DMF for MS.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and clinicaltrials.gov for articles published from database inception to May/2019. Studies (observational and randomized controlled trials (RCTs)) reporting AEs, serious AEs (SAE), or discontinuation due to AEs were included. We summarized the proportion of DMF-exposed patients affected and calculated the risk ratios (RR) and number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the DMF relative to placebo-exposed participants. RCT findings were pooled via meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Twenty-one observational studies, 4 RCTs, 1 RCT extension study, and 2 open-label studies were included, totalling 12,380 MS patients on DMF followed for an average of 19.8 months. Compared to placebo, DMF-exposed patients had a higher risk of grade III/IV lymphopenia (NNTH = 28.8;95%CI:20.2-50.5), pruritus (NNTH = 22.1;95%CI:14.0-52.3), flushing (NNTH = 3.7;95%CI:3.3-4.1), gastrointestinal related events (NNTH = 5.7;95%CI:3.5-15.7), nausea (NNTH = 23.4;95%CI:14.9-54.7), diarrhea (NNTH = 21.2;95%CI:13.6-47.6), and abdominal pain (NNTH = 19.2;95%CI:12.9-37.9). Patients discontinued DMF because of GI symptoms (498/5619;8.9%), lymphopenia (163/4003;4.1%), and flushing (173/4779;3.6%). From pooled analyses of 4 RCTs, AE risks were higher in the DMF versus placebo groups (RR = 1.37;95%CI:1.27-1.48), but SAEs were similar (RR = 1.01;95%CI:0.77-1.33).

CONCLUSION

Over the short-term, DMF was associated with a higher risk of AEs. The NNTH included 4 for flushing, 6 for gastrointestinal complaints, and 29 for severe or life-threatening (grade III/IV) lymphopenia. The longer-term safety of DMF, including consequences of lymphopenia remain unknown.

Real-world adherence to, and persistence with, once- and twice-daily oral disease-modifying drugs in patients with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) is associated with poorer clinical outcomes, including higher rates of relapse and disease progression, and higher medical resource use. A systematic review and quantification of adherence and persistence with oral DMDs would help clarify the extent of nonadherence and nonpersistence in patients with MS to help prescribers make informed treatment plans and optimize patient care. The objectives were to: 1) conduct a systematic literature review to assess the availability and variability of oral DMD adherence and/or persistence rates across 'real-world' data sources; and 2) conduct meta-analyses of the rates of adherence and persistence for once- and twice-daily oral DMDs in patients with MS using real-world data.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies published between January 2010 and April 2018 in the PubMed database was performed. Only studies assessing once- and twice-daily oral DMDs were available for inclusion in the analysis. Study quality was evaluated using a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, a tool for assessing quality of observational studies. The random effects model evaluated pooled summary estimates of nonadherence.

RESULTS

From 510 abstracts, 31 studies comprising 16,398 patients with MS treated with daily oral DMDs were included. Overall 1-year mean medication possession ratio (MPR; n = 4 studies) was 83.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] 74.5-92.1%) and proportion of days covered (PDC; n = 4 studies) was 76.5% (95% CI 72.0-81.1%). Pooled 1-year MPR ≥80% adherence (n = 6) was 78.5% (95% CI 63.5-88.5%) and PDC ≥80% (n = 5 studies) was 71.8% (95% CI 59.1-81.9%). Pooled 1-year discontinuation (n = 20) was 25.4% (95% CI 21.6-29.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately one in five patients with MS do not adhere to, and one in four discontinue, daily oral DMDs before 1 year. Opportunities to improve adherence and ultimately patient outcomes, such as patient education, medication support/reminders, simplified dosing regimens, and reducing administration or monitoring requirements, remain. Implementation of efforts to improve adherence are essential to improving care of patients with MS.

Efficacy and Safety of Alemtuzumab in Patients of African Descent with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: 8-Year Follow-up of CARE-MS I and II (TOPAZ Study)

INTRODUCTION

Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients of African descent have increased risk for disease progression and may be less responsive to disease-modifying therapy.

METHODS

Patients in the CARE-MS studies received alemtuzumab 12 mg/day [initial alemtuzumab treatment (IAT); baseline: 5 days; 12 months later: 3 days] or subcutaneous interferon beta-1a (SC IFNB-1a) 3 ×/week. Core study outcomes were compared between treatment groups. In the extension study CAMMS03409, SC IFNB-1a-treated patients switched to alemtuzumab [delayed alemtuzumab treatment (DAT)]. Data from IAT and DAT arms were pooled to assess outcomes through 6 years post alemtuzumab initiation; IAT patients had an additional 2 years of follow-up in TOPAZ.

RESULTS

Of 1200 CARE-MS patients, 43 (4%) were of African descent (35 IAT; 8 DAT) and received alemtuzumab in the 2-year core and/or 6-year extension; 29 (67%) remained on study at the time of analysis (24 IAT patients completed year 8 post alemtuzumab; 5 DAT patients completed year 6 post alemtuzumab). In year 2, annualized relapse rate (ARR; 0.09 versus 0.42), percentage of patients with improved Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS; 18% versus 11%), 6-month confirmed disability improvement (CDI; 28% versus 13%), no evidence of disease activity (55% versus 13%), and cumulative brain volume loss (BVL; - 0.55% versus - 1.32%) favored alemtuzumab versus SC IFNB-1a. Alemtuzumab remained efficacious at year 6 (pooled IAT/DAT) and at year 8 (IAT only) post alemtuzumab (ARR: 0.15 and 0.30; improved EDSS: 17% and 25%; CDI: 47% and 55%; BVL: - 1.14% and - 0.70%, respectively). No safety signals were unique to this population.

CONCLUSIONS

Alemtuzumab was efficacious in a small cohort of relapsing-remitting MS patients of African descent over 8 years. Safety was consistent with the overall CARE-MS population, although the small sample size may have prevented the detection of known low-frequency adverse events. CLINICALTRIALS.

GOV REGISTRATION NUMBERS

CARE-MS I, II, extension, TOPAZ: NCT00530348, NCT00548405, NCT00930553, NCT02255656.

FUNDING

Sanofi (Cambridge, MA, USA) and Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals (Leverkusen, Germany).

Real-life persistence and tolerability with dimethyl fumarate

BACKGROUND

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) has been registered for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Differences in tolerability between multiple sclerosis clinics in patients treated with DMF has not been examined.

AIM

We examined real-world tolerability to DMF, and also compared adherence data between two MS clinics.

METHODS

Adverse events (AE), discontinuation rates, and causes of discontinuation were investigated.

RESULTS

253 patients participated in this retrospective study. In the total cohort, 27.7% of the patients discontinued DMF. Higher rate of discontinuation was associated with higher number of previous disease modifying treatments (p < 0.001). Reasons for discontinuation were primarily flushing (15%) and gastrointestinal AEs (51%). Grade III lymphopenia was detected only in 6 cases (2.4%). We observed differences between the two clinics: discontinuation because of AEs was different (Odds ratio 6.13, 95% CI: 3.0-12.7, p < 0.001), the mean treatment duration also differed (305.3 ± 186.3 vs 140.5 ± 114.4 days, p < 0.001), and dissimilarities in adherence were mainly related to flushing, gastrointestinal AEs, and consideration of lymphopenia (p < 0.0001). Better adherence was associated with prospectively planned management of gastrointestinal AEs and flushing.

CONCLUSION

Adherence in real-life was similar to pivotal trials. Differences in discontinuation rates at two MS clinics underline importance of AE management.

Relapse outcomes, safety, and treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and initiated on subcutaneous interferon β-1a or dimethyl fumarate: a real-world study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate real-world treatment patterns, safety, and relapse outcomes of subcutaneous (sc) interferon (IFN) β-1a (Rebif) vs dimethyl fumarate (DMF; Tecfidera), to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS).

METHODS

A US retrospective chart review of 450 randomly selected adults newly diagnosed with RRMS who received sc IFN β-1a (n = 143) or DMF (n = 307) was conducted. Patients were either (a) treatment-naïve, initiating first-line treatment with sc IFN β-1a or DMF, or (b) previously treated, switching to sc IFN β-1a or DMF. Two years' follow-up data were captured. Patient characteristics, persistence, and adverse events between treatment groups were compared using t-tests or Chi-square tests. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare time to, and risk of non-persistence. Annualized Relapse Rates (ARR) were calculated using a robust variance Poisson model adjusting for covariates. Propensity scores were used to address possible selection bias.

RESULTS

One hundred and twelve patients became non-persistent, most commonly due to an adverse event (n = 37). No difference was observed in time to overall non-persistence between sc IFN β-1a and DMF patients. Among treatment-naïve patients, those receiving DMF had 2.4-times the risk (HR = 2.439, 95% CI = 1.007-5.917, p = .0483) of experiencing a discontinuation than patients receiving sc IFN β-1a. Non-persistent patients receiving DMF had 2.3-times the risk (HR = 2.311, 95% CI = 1.350-3.958, p = .0023) of experiencing an adverse event at a given time point than patients prescribed sc IFN β-1a. No differences in relapse risk or ARR between sc IFN β-1a- and DMF-treated patients were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

sc IFN β-1a-treated patients had comparable persistence and relapse outcomes, and better safety outcomes vs DMF-treated patients across 2 years.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Delayed-release Dimethyl Fumarate in Black, Hispanic, and Asian Patients with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Post Hoc Integrated Analysis of DEFINE and CONFIRM

Introduction

Clinical course and treatment response may vary according to race/ethnicity in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. Delayed-release dimethyl fumarate (DMF; also known as gastro-resistant DMF) demonstrated significant efficacy and a favorable benefit–risk profile in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) patients in the 2-year phase III DEFINE/CONFIRM studies.

Methods

In this post hoc analysis of integrated data from DEFINE/CONFIRM, we assessed clinical efficacy and safety/tolerability in black, Hispanic, and Asian patients treated with DMF 240 mg twice daily (approved dosage) or placebo. Eligible patients were 18–55 years of age with an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 0–5.0. In the integrated intention-to-treat population, 769 and 771 patients were treated with DMF or placebo, respectively, of whom 10 and 19 were black, 31 and 23 were Hispanic, and 66 and 70 were Asian.

Results

In the black, Hispanic, and Asian subgroups, DMF was associated with lower annualized relapse rates at 2 years compared with placebo [rate ratio (95% confidence interval (CI)), 0.05 (0.00–1.07); 0.31 (0.10–0.95); and 0.64 (0.30–1.34), respectively]. The percentage of black, Hispanic, and Asian patients with 12-week confirmed disability progression was lower with DMF (43%, 8%, and 20%, respectively) compared with placebo [57%, 30%, and 25%, respectively; hazard ratio (95% CI), 0.53 (0.02–1.39); 0.17 (0.00–0.60); and 0.71 (0.32–1.58), respectively]. The safety/tolerability profile of DMF was generally consistent with that in the overall population of DEFINE/CONFIRM. The incidence of adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation in black, Hispanic, and Asian patients was 2/10, 2/31, and 3/66, respectively, with DMF, and 2/19, 1/23, and 8/70, respectively, with placebo.

Conclusion

DMF may be an efficacious treatment with a favorable benefit–risk profile in black, Hispanic, and Asian patients with RRMS. Further clinical studies are needed to characterize differences in MS presentation and treatment outcomes across ethnic and racial groups.

Funding

Biogen.

Trial Registration

DEFINE: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00420212; CONFIRM ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00451451.