Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum in the management of Peyronie's disease: a review of the evidence

The Discontinuation Rate With Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum for Peyronie's Disease in a High-volume Practice Is Unexpectedly High: Identifying Opportunities for Patient Care Improvement

OBJECTIVE

To elucidate reasons for premature discontinuation of Collagenase Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injections for the treatment of penile curvature associated with Peyronie's disease.

METHODS

A database of men who underwent CCH injections at a single institution was queried to identify men who completed fewer than 8 injections. Chart review was conducted to identify reasons for treatment discontinuation. When this could not be identified, patients were contacted first via the online patient portal and next by phone.

RESULTS

Of 406 patients who underwent CCH treatment, 133 did not complete 8 injections (32.8%). The most common reasons for discontinuation were satisfactory curve reduction (27%), unsatisfactory curve reduction (21%), bothersome side effect (15%), and pursuit of surgery (12%). Other less common reasons included other health concerns, pausing treatment due to the COVID-19 pandemic, high cost, transferring care elsewhere, and lack of awareness that more injections were indicated.

CONCLUSION

We present the largest series of patients to date dedicated to evaluation of CCH discontinuation. We find that up to 1/3 of patients who begin CCH injections will not complete the full treatment course. Understanding the reasons for discontinuation can help providers better stratify patients for CCH treatment vs other modalities. In addition, as previous studies indicate curvature improvements are equally likely to be seen in the final four injections as the first four, our data points to the potential impact of improved patient education for individuals who discontinue due to unsatisfactory curve reduction.

A Consistent Lack of Consistency in Defining the Acute and Chronic Phases of Peyronie's Disease: A Review of the Contemporary Literature

INTRODUCTION

Treatment recommendations for Peyronie's Disease (PD) differ based on whether a patient is in the acute/active versus chronic/stable phase of the disease, yet there are no agreed upon criteria for defining these clinical entities.

OBJECTIVES

To review the criteria used to define acute and chronic phase PD in modern PD intervention studies.

METHODS

We performed a search engine review to identify indexed publications for PD intervention studies and review articles / meta-analyses from the year 2011-2020. Outcomes results were catalogued and summarized across articles. As a result of the substantial heterogeneity of outcome measures and follow-up intervals, meta-analytic techniques were not applied to the data analysis.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 104 studies that met inclusion criteria and had available information for review (n = 79 primary intervention studies; n = 25 review articles/meta-analyses/guidelines). Among the queried studies, we were unable to identify a consensus with respect to the criteria used to define acute and chronic phases of PD. 33% of primary intervention studies did not specifically define their criteria for acute and chronic phase PD, despite referencing these populations as part of the inclusion criteria in many instances. Studies used heterogenous criteria including total symptom duration, duration of "stable" symptoms, and presence/absence of pain.

CONCLUSION

Due to varying definitions across the literature, we were unable to create a standardized definition of acute and chronic phase Peyronie's in terms of time. Our findings emphasize the need for greater consensus in defining the treatment cohorts with future studies that assess treatment for men with PD.