Evaluation of influence of the UPOINT-guided multimodal therapy in men with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome on dynamic values NIH-CPSI: a prospective, controlled, comparative study

Trends in experimental autoimmune prostatitis: insights into pathogenesis, therapeutic strategies, and redefinition

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPSS) is a debilitating condition characterized by prostate inflammation, pain and urinary symptoms. The immune system's response to self-antigens is a contributing factor to CP/CPSS. In this review, we examine the use of experimental autoimmune prostatitis (EAP) in rodents to model salient features of autoimmune mediated CP/CPSS. By exploring etiological factors, immunological mechanisms, and emerging therapeutic strategies, our aim is to enhance our understanding of CP/CPSS pathogenesis and promote the development of strategies to test innovative interventions using the EAP pre-clinical model.

Efficacy Analysis of Physical Therapy in Treating Chronic Prostatitis: Unblocking Obstructed Glandular Ducts Could Be a Novel Treatment Strategy

Objective

This study investigates the efficacy of physical therapy in treating chronic prostatitis grounded on the glandular duct blockage theory.

Methods

The study includes patients who were diagnosed and treated for chronic prostatitis between November 2022 and July 2023 at Renhui clinic in Jiangmen, Guangdong and Renhui frontline clinic in Shenzhen Guangdong. The recorded data includes the frequency of physical therapies including prostate massages, rectal probe high-frequency vibration treatment, and low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT). Post-treatment urine sediment was collected for microscopic examination, and the scores of each patient on the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) and the Premature Ejaculation Diagnostic Tool (PEDT) were recorded pre- and post-treatment in order to calculate the effectiveness rate.

Results

The study involved a total of 48 patients, of which 26 were diagnosed with premature ejaculation. On average, each patient received 2.1 prostate massages, underwent 4.1 rectal probe high-frequency vibration treatments, and 8.3 Li-ESWT sessions. Following treatment, the initial microscopic examination of the urine sediment revealed aged white blood cell clusters, prostate calculi clusters, and inactive sperm clusters, all appearing in the shape of glandular tubes. The mean NIH-CPSI scores pre- and post-treatment were 27.2±6.9 and 18.0±6.6, respectively, indicating an effectiveness rate of 81.3%. The average PEDT scores pre- and post-treatment were 14.5±3.5 and 10.5±4.2, respectively, with an effectiveness rate of 53.8%.

Conclusion

Unblocking obstructed glandular ducts might provide a novel therapeutic strategy for treating chronic prostatitis.

Evidence for a causal effect of major depressive disorder, anxiety on prostatitis risk: A univariate and multivariate Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have shown an association between major depressive disorder (MDD), anxiety, and prostatitis. However, the causal relationship between MDD, anxiety, and prostatitis remains controversial. Therefore, we aimed to use two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) to assess the causal effects of MDD and anxiety on prostatitis.

METHODS

We conducted univariable and multivariable MR analyses using summary statistics from publicly available genome-wide association studies to estimate the causal relationships between MDD, anxiety, and prostatitis risk. In the main MR analysis, the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was used, while secondary methods included the weighted median, weighted mode, MR-Egger regression, and MR pleiotropy residual and outlier (MR-PRESSO) tests to detect and correct for the presence of pleiotropy.

RESULTS

MDD had 97 independent instrumental variables (IVs) and anxiety had 15 IVs. Univariable MR analysis showed that genetically determined MDD had a detrimental causal effect on prostatitis (IVW: odds ratio [OR] = 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.12-1.92, p = 0.005), while no causal relationship was found between anxiety and prostatitis (IVW: OR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.02-2.82, p = 0.26). More convincingly, after adjusting for confounding factors such as body mass index, alcohol consumption, and smoking, the genetic liability for MDD remained associated with prostatitis risk, with no strong evidence of anxiety affecting prostatitis incidence.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the notion that MDD has a detrimental effect on prostatitis risk, and strategies focused on addressing MDD may be one of the cornerstones for treating prostatitis. The potential preventive value of treating MDD for prostatitis should be further investigated in future research.

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation combined with levofloxacin and tamsulosin for patients with chronic prostatitis: clinical efficacy and changes in serum factors

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) combined with levofloxacin (0.1 g, twice daily) and tamsulosin (0.2 mg, once daily) on clinical efficacy and serum factors in patients with chronic prostatitis (CP).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 105 patients with CP who received treatment at Hangzhou Lin'an District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from February 2020 to December 2022. Among them, 47 patients received levofloxacin and tamsulosin were included in a drug group (DG), and 58 patients received additional TENS therapy (frequency: 1/4/1 Hz+80/120/80 Hz; pulse width: 270/230/270 μs+120/80/120 μs; waveform: square and continuous waveforms) were included in a joint group (JG). The changes in the National Institutes of Health chronic prostatitis symptom index (NIH-CPSI), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), and the levels of inflammatory and pain-causing factors were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. The clinical efficacy was compared between the two groups after treatment. Moreover, the incidence of adverse reactions was compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After treatment, the scores of NIH-CPSI and IPSS, and the levels of IL-6, CRP, TNF-α, IL-1β, 5-hydroxytryptamine, substance P, and dynorphin in the JG were obviously lower than those in the DG (P<0.001). The clinical response rate in the DG was obviously lower than that in the JG (P=0.006, Table 2). There was no difference in total incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P=0.801).

CONCLUSION

Compared to medication alone (levofloxacin and tamsulosin), the combination of TENS with levofloxacin and tamsulosin can reduce the levels of inflammatory and pain-causing factors in patients, and improve the efficacy. Importantly, it has been observed that this combination therapy does not lead to an increase in adverse reactions and is considered to be safe for patients.

Barriers in chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) management: perspectives from health practitioners

OBJECTIVES

Chronic prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome (CP/CPPS) is a complex condition which causes a significant burden on the diagnosed individuals. Assessment and management are perplexing, often resulting in unsatisfactory outcomes. Existing research has only focused on patients' perspectives of pain experiences, but scant evidence is available to understand the barriers that undermine effective pain management. Using an exploratory approach, this study examined these barriers from practitioners' perspectives.

METHODS

Twelve semi-structured interviews were conducted with practitioners across disciplines who have experience in chronic pelvic pain management in males. Practitioners expressed their views and experiences in supporting men with CP/CPPS and what barriers they perceived when providing treatment for patients. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis supported by NVivo software.

RESULTS

Five broad and interrelated themes were identified: (1) Where to Start, (2) Insufficient Resources, (3) Prioritisation, (4) Training and Confident Practice and (5) Constraints in Help-Seeking.

CONCLUSIONS

Practitioners value multimodal management using a biopsychosocial approach; however, practical challenges prevent practitioners from choosing and applying this approach in clinical practice. The findings also identified some unique challenges faced by men with CP/CPPS consistent with previous evidence from patient perspective. Refining terminology, developing specific resources, and increasing psychosocial treatment options are urgently needed.

Chronic Primary Pelvic Pain Syndrome in Men

BACKGROUND

Chronic primary pelvic pain syndrome in men (CPPPSm) can be associated with urogenital pain, urinary symptoms, sexual dysfunction, and emotional disturbance. Its clinical heterogeneity and incompletely understood pathogenesis make it more difficult to treat. This article is intended to familiarize the reader with basic aspects of the manifestations, pathophysiology, diagnostic evaluation, differential diagnosis, and treatment of this condition.

METHODS

This article is based on relevant publications retrieved by a selective search of the literature, including the current guidelines of the European Association of Urology. The features of this disease pertaining to urology, psychosomatic medicine, and pain medicine are illuminated from an interdisciplinary perspective.

RESULTS

Chronic pelvic pain appears to arise through a complex interaction of inflammatory, infectious, neurological, musculoskeletal, and psychosomatic factors. A comprehensive diagnostic work-up should be carried out to evaluate and exclude the numerous differential diagnoses. Treatment strategies are based on the clinical phenotype. Randomized controlled trials have shown that significant relief can be achieved with a variety of drugs and non-pharmacological treatments, selected according to the manifestations of the condition in the individual case. Attention must be paid to treatment-specific adverse effects.

CONCLUSION

The management of patients with CPPPSm should consist of a comprehensive differential diagnostic evaluation and an individually oriented treatment strategy.

Manual Therapy Intervention in Men With Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome or Chronic Prostatitis: An Exploratory Prospective Case-Series

Purpose

Chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CPPS) is permanent pelvic pain of unknown etiology. Current theories suggest a multifactorial origin for CPPS, including urinary pathologies, psychosocial factors, prostate inflammation, infection, central sensitization of the nervous system, and muscular contractures or fibrosis. As there are no defined treatment protocols for CPPS, a multimodal approach is recommended. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a manual therapy treatment protocol on pain, urinary symptoms, and overall quality of life.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-three men aged 47.36 ± 10.11 years were recruited consecutively by urologists practicing at two hospitals. All men presented prostatic tenderness with no other positive clinical history, urine cultures, or echography studies. Patients underwent six manual therapy sessions (three during the first week and three every two weeks after that) performed by a single osteopath or physiotherapist. The intervention protocol addressed the treatment of muscle structures, fascial mechanics, vascularization, innervation, emotional factors, and the need for information. The questionnaires used to evaluate outcomes included the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), the International Prostate Symptoms Score (IPSS), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Data were evaluated using Chi-squared or paired difference tests by an external researcher.

Results

The mean NIH-CPSI scores recorded for our study cohort decreased by 7.69 points (30.92%; p<0.0005; 95% CI 4.02-10.52). IPSS measurements decreased by 3.20 points (22.18%; p=0.009; 95% CI 1.00-6.09), although the item addressing quality of life decreased by 1.67 points only (31.99%; p<0.0005; 95% CI 0.94-2.33). The VAS score also decreased by 2.20 points (38.6%; p<0.0005; 95% CI 1.45-2.73). Changes in HADS scores were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Based on patient responses, this case series revealed that manual therapy improved urinary symptoms, pain, and quality of life.

A physiatrist's understanding and application of the current literature on chronic pelvic pain: a narrative review

Understanding the complex, multifactorial nature of chronic pelvic pain can help physicians determine the pain's etiology and thus refer specialists to include in the multidisciplinary treatment required.

Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a highly prevalent condition which is underdiagnosed and poorly understood. The purpose of this review is to outline the various aspects of the nature of CPP, including its etiologies, clinical presentation, and nonoperative treatment options. For data collection, a PubMed search was conducted using indexing terms such as chronic pelvic pain and pelvic pain. Literature reviews and studies focusing on etiologies, clinical presentation, and/or the diagnosis of CPP were compiled for review by a team of 3 physiatrists. Studies investigating conservative treatments, medications, and interventional procedures for CPP and related conditions with comparable etiologies were also included. Of the 502 articles retrieved, 116 were deemed suitable by the team for this study. Although CPP is a complex, multifaceted condition, a particular susceptibility to nociceptive stimuli was demonstrated as an underlying theme in its evolution. There are many treatment options currently used; however, more robust evidence, such as randomized controlled trials, are needed before creating comprehensive guidelines for treating CPP.

Using the UPOINT system to manage men with chronic pelvic pain syndrome

OBJECTIVE

: To outline our approach for the evaluation and management of patients with chronic prostatitis and chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) based on our interpretation and application of currently available evidence.

METHODS

: CP/CPPS in men is a medical condition that plagues both the patient and the practitioner, as it is widely believed to be poorly understood and difficult to treat. While pelvic pain is typically the predominant symptom, many men may exhibit voiding symptoms, sexual dysfunction and psychiatric complaints. Still, most studies of CP/CPPS management have evaluated singular treatments, without focussing on individual patients' clinical phenotypes. This is a clinically practical mini-review based on the authors' interpretation and application of currently available evidence related to management of CP/CPPS.

RESULTS

: Patient evaluation should consist of history and physical examination (with focus on the genitourinary and digital rectal examination), laboratory tests (including urine analysis and urine culture with consideration of pre- and post-prostate massage urine cultures), post-void residual, and questionnaires including the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptoms Index, which helps assess symptom severity and treatment response. Once CP/CPPS is diagnosed, the UPOINT phenotype system, which classifies patients into six domains: Urinary, Psychosocial, Organ Specific, Infectious, Neurological/systemic and Tenderness of skeletal muscles, is used to guide treatment. Each domain is characterised by specific complaints and thus is responsive to distinct treatments. As patients may be grouped into multiple domains, each patient's overall multimodal treatment can vary.

CONCLUSION

: Using the UPOINT phenotype system is a holistic approach that can yield significant benefits for patients with CP/CPPS.

Neuromodulation for Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Single-Institution Experience With a Collaborative Team

BACKGROUND

Secondary to the complex care, involved specialty providers, and various etiologies, chronic pelvic pain patients do not receive holistic care.

OBJECTIVE

To compare our general and neuromodulation cohorts based on referrals, diagnosis, and therapy and describe our neuromodulation patients.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary team was established at our center. The intake coordinator assessed demographics and facilitated care of enrolled patients. Outcomes were compared using minimal clinical important difference of current Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) between patients with neuropathic pain who received neuromodulation and those who did not. The neuromodulation cohort completed outcome metrics at baseline and recent follow-up, including NRS score (best, worst, and current), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Beck Depression Inventory, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale.

RESULTS

Over 7 yr, 233 patients were referred to our consortium and 153 were enrolled. A total of 55 patients had neuropathic pain and 44 of those were managed medically. Eleven underwent neuromodulation. A total of 45.5% patients of the neuromodulation cohort were classified as responders by minimal clinically important difference compared to 26.6% responders in the control cohort at most recent follow-up (median 25 and 33 mo, respectively). Outcome measures revealed improvement in NRS at worst (P = .007) and best (P = .025), ODI (P = .014), and Pain Catastrophizing Scale Rumination (P = .043).

CONCLUSION

Eleven percent of patients were offered neuromodulation. There were more responders in the neuromodulation cohort than the conservatively managed neuropathic pain cohort. Neuromodulation patients showed significant improvement at 29 mo in NRS best and worst pain, disability, and rumination. We share our algorithm for patient management.

Effectiveness of psychological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS) is one of the most common diseases in urology, which 50% of men are infected at some point in their lives. Type III CP/CPPS is the most complex and controversial of all types of prostatitis, the highest incidence rate, uncertain efficacy, the long-term treatment that affects the patient's psychopathic symptoms, increases the psychological burden of patients. Psychological intervention for patients with CP/CPPS, which is difficult to treat with drugs and physics, can effectively improve clinical efficacy and improve the psychological condition. The researchers found a high prevalence of psychosocial problems and catastrophic distress in CP/CPPS patients, such as serious mental disorders, especially depression, anxiety and stress, and the high incidence of pain-devastating illness. In this study, we will evaluate psychological interventions as an effective way to relieve chronic prostatitis.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The databases of English databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) and Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Biology Medicine Database, Wanfang Database, VIP Database) will be retrieved. The search strategy that will be run in the PubMed and tailored to the other database when necessary is presented in this article. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 11.0 will be used for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. This protocol reported under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols (PRISMA-P) statement, and we will report the systematic review by following the PRISMA statement.

RESULTS

The study is a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis without results, and data analysis will be carried out after the protocol. We will share our findings in the third quarter of 2021.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review will provide more evidence to assess whether psychological is an effective intervention for patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Besides, the results will be published in a public issue journal and offer the urologists help to make clinical decisions.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Formal ethical approval is not required in this protocol. We will collect and analyze data based on published research. Since this research does not involve patients, personal privacy will not be affected. The results of this review will be distributed to peer-reviewed journals or submitted to relevant conferences.

PROTOCOL REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY202080021.