Intraoperative nerve monitoring during total shoulder arthroplasty surgery

Utilization of intraoperative neuromonitoring during the Woodward procedure for treatment of Sprengel deformity

BACKGROUND

Brachial plexus injury (BPI) leading to palsy of the upper extremities is the most serious complication of the Woodward procedure for treatment of Sprengel deformity. Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) is widely used for detecting emerging spinal cord or peripheral nerve injury during spinal and shoulder surgery. However, to date, its utilization in pediatric patients with Sprengel deformity is limited. Furthermore, it remains unclear whether IONM can help prevent BPI during surgery. The purpose of the current study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of IONM for early identification and prevention of nerve injury during the Woodward procedure.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who underwent the Woodward procedure for Sprengel deformity at our institution between January 2017 and January 2020. IONM, including somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs), was performed in all patients. Detailed IONM data were collected and analyzed. Preoperative and postoperative cosmetic appearance (according to the Cavendish classification), shoulder joint abduction function, and radiologic evaluation of the scapula were reviewed. Surgical complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (19 girls, 27 boys) were included (mean age, 5.1 ± 2.1 years). Both SEP and MEP (amplitude of the abductor pollicis) were successfully performed (100%). MEP alerts occurred in 3 patients (6.5%). After scapula position adjustment, signals recovered in 2 patients and remained unchanged in 1 patient-this patient exhibited postoperative motor deficits that resolved completely by 4 months recovery. The SEP amplitudes decreased in all 3 patients but did not reach the warning criteria. Forty patients were classified as grade III and 6 as grade IV in the Cavendish classification, whereas 35 patients were classified as grade II and 11 as grade III in the Rigault scale. The preoperative Cavendish grade was III (III, IV) and the postoperative Cavendish grade was I (I, II) (χ² = 88.098, P < .001). The preoperative Rigault grade was II (II, III) and the postoperative Rigault grade was I (I, II) (χ² = 62.133, P < .001). The mean arc of shoulder joint abduction improved from 99° ± 8° to 167° ± 7° (t = -45.871, P < .001) after surgery. Except for temporary motor deficits detected in 1 patient, no other postoperative complications were observed through the time of final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

IONM during the Woodward procedure for Sprengel deformity is feasible and effective in detecting intraoperative neurologic changes and may be effective in preventing BPI associated with surgery.

Incidence of peripheral nerve injury in revision total shoulder arthroplasty: an intraoperative nerve monitoring study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of nerve injuries in revision total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is not well defined in the literature and may be higher than that in primary procedures, with 1 study reporting a complication rate of 50% for shoulder revisions. Given that continuous intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) can be an effective tool in diagnosing evolving neurologic dysfunction and preventing postoperative injuries, the purpose of this study was to report on IONM data and nerve injury rates in a series of revision TSAs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort review of consecutive patients who underwent revision TSA was performed from January 2016 to March 2020. Indications for revision included infection (n = 7); failed total arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty secondary to pain, dysfunction, and/or loose components (n = 36); and periprosthetic fracture (n = 1). Of the shoulders, 32 underwent revision to a reverse TSA, 6 underwent revision to an anatomic TSA, and 6 underwent spacer placement. IONM data included transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials (MEPs), somatosensory evoked potentials, and free-run electromyography. The motor alert threshold was set at ≥80% signal attenuation in any peripheral nerve. Patients were screened for neurologic deficits immediately following surgery, prior to administration of an interscalene nerve block, and during the first 2 postoperative visits. Additional data collection included surgical indication, sex, laterality, age at surgery, procedure performed, body mass index, history of tobacco use, Charlson Comorbidity Index, medical history, and preoperative range of motion.

RESULTS

A total of 44 shoulders in 38 patients were included, with a mean age of 63.2 years (standard deviation, 13.0 years). Of the procedures, 22.4% (n = 10) had an MEP alert, with 8 isolated to a single nerve (7 axillary and 1 radial) and 1 isolated to the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves. Only 1 patient experienced a major brachial plexus alert involving axillary, musculocutaneous, radial, ulnar, and median nerve MEP alerts, as well as ulnar and median nerve somatosensory evoked potential alerts. Age, sex, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and preoperative range of motion were not found to be significantly different between cases in which an MEP alert occurred and cases with no MEP alerts. In the postoperative period, no minor or major nerve injuries were found whereas distal peripheral neuropathy developed in 4 patients (9.1%).

CONCLUSION

Among 44 surgical procedures, no patients (0%) had a major or minor nerve injury postoperatively and 4 patients (9.1%) complained of distal peripheral neuropathy postoperatively. In this study, we have shown that through the use of IONM, the rate of minor and major nerve injuries can be minimized in revision shoulder arthroplasty.

Identifying the axillary nerve during shoulder surgery: an anatomic study using advanced imaging

Background

The axillary nerve (AXN) is one of the more commonly injured nerves during shoulder surgery. Prior anatomic studies of the AXN in adults were performed using cadaveric specimens with small sample sizes. Our research observes a larger cohort of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies in order to gain a more representative sample of the course of the AXN and aid surgeons intraoperatively.

Methods

High-resolution 3T MRI studies performed at our institution from January 2010 to June 2019 were reviewed. Four blinded reviewers with musculoskeletal radiology or orthopedic surgery training measured the distance of the AXN to the surgical neck of the humerus (SNH), the lateral tip of the acromion (LTA), and the inferior glenoid rim (IGR). Intraclass correlation coefficient was calculated to assess reliability between reviewers. The nerve location was assessed relative to rotator cuff tear status.

Results

A total of 257 shoulder MRIs were included. Intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent at 0.80 for the SNH, 0.90 for the LTA, and 0.94 for the IGR. All intraobserver reliabilities were above 0.80. The mean distance from the AXN to SNH was 1.7 cm (range, 0.7-3.1 cm; interquartile range, 1.38-2.00) and that from the AXN to IGR was 1.6 cm (range, 0.6-2.6 cm; interquartile range, 1.33-1.88). The mean AXN to LTA distance was 7.1 cm, with a range of 5.2-9.0 cm across patient heights; there was a large effect size related to the LTA to AXN distance and patient height with a correlation of r = 0.603 (P < .001). Rotator cuff pathology appears to affect nerve location by increasing the distance between the AXN and SNH (P = .027).

Discussion/Conclusion

The AXN is vulnerable to injury during both open and arthroscopic shoulder procedures. This injury can be either a result of direct trauma to the nerve or secondary to traction placed on the nerve with reconstructive procedures that distalize the humerus. Our study demonstrates that the AXN can be found as little as 5.6 mm from the IGR and 6.9 mm from the SNH. In addition, we illustrate the relationship between patient height and the LTA to AXN distance and complete rotator cuff tears and the SNH to AXN distance. Our study is the first to demonstrate the nerve's proximity to important surgical landmarks of the shoulder using a large sample size of high-resolution images in living human shoulders.

Neuropraxia: An Underappreciated Morbidity of Liver Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Peripheral nerve injuries can be devastating complications of surgery, potentially resulting in severe functional disability and decreased quality of life. Long surgeries with considerable tissue manipulation, for example, liver transplantation, may present increased risk; however, neuropraxia in transplantation has not been well investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of all adult patients undergoing liver transplantation at a large academic center between January 2013 and December 2015. Descriptive analyses, logistic regressions, and forward selection procedures were used to determine the odds of developing neuropraxia and associated factors.

RESULTS

Of the 283 liver recipients, the mean age was 55.8 y, 35.1% were female, 65.6% were Caucasian, 8.9% were African American, 16.7% were Hispanic, and mean model for end-stage liver disease sodium score at transplant was 24.2 ± 10.9. The underlying etiology was alcohol (26.2%), hepatitis C (34.8%), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (13.1%), and other (14.2%). The incidence of neuropraxia after liver transplantation was 8.3% (n = 25), with 60% (n = 16) upper extremities, 82% left sided, and 84% male. There was no difference in age, race, body mass index, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, or smoking in those with neuropraxia versus those without. In multivariate analysis, neuropraxia was significantly associated with male gender, lower model for end-stage liver disease score, and longer duration of surgery (P < 0.05). Symptoms lasted median 5 d, with a wide range up to 187 d. Neuropraxia-specific treatment (physical therapy or medications) was required in 32% (n = 9).

CONCLUSIONS

Peripheral nerve injuries are an unexplored complication of liver transplantation. Although transient, a high number (8.2%) of patients developed neuropraxia, negatively affecting their ability for recovery. Exploration of mechanisms for minimizing risk and intraoperative detection and prevention should be considered to mitigate this complication.

Multimodality Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) During Shoulder Surgeries

Introduction: The purpose of this study is to identify the advancing role of Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) in detecting and preventing nerve injuries during shoulder surgery procedures. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of IONM data from ten shoulder procedures. The patients consisted of nine females and one male with ages ranging from 67 to 81 years (median: 74 years). IONM modalities utilized were bilateral Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SSEP), Transcranial Motor Evoked Potentials (TCeMEP), ipsilateral Electromyogram (EMG) from upper extremity muscles and Train of four (TOF) recordings. Results: A decrease in signals was noted in three patients (30%). Only upper SSEP amplitude decreased in one patient; both upper extremity SSEP and TCeMEP decreased in two patients. Only one patient had poor baseline radial nerve SSEP that improved during the surgery. We performed spontaneous EMG (s-EMG) in all ten patients and successfully recorded triggered (t-EMG) in seven patients (71.4%). In one patient, SSEP and TCeMEP did not improve, and the patient woke up with deficits. Conclusions: In this small series, we were able to identify real-time impending nerve injury. The use of IONM alerted and may have prevented intraoperative nerve injury in 30% of the patients in this series. In one patient, SSEP and TCeMEP did not recover even after the intervention due to severe blood loss. The patient woke up with sensory and motor deficits. The utilization of multimodality IONM can be helpful due to signal changes, therefore minimizing the frequency of nerve injury and deficits.

Incidence of clinically evident isolated axillary nerve injury in 869 primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasties without routine identification of the axillary nerve

Background

It has been suggested that, during primary shoulder arthroplasty, surgeons should identify the axillary nerve through direct visualization, palpation, or the “tug test” to prevent iatrogenic nerve injury. Our goal was to document the rate of isolated axillary nerve injury (IANI) in patients who had undergone primary anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) without routine identification of the axillary nerve.

Methods

Data on 869 cases of primary shoulder arthroplasty (338 TSAs and 531 RTSAs) performed by 1 surgeon between 2003 and 2017 were reviewed. Neither the tug test nor identification of the axillary nerve through palpation or visualization was used in any case. The primary outcome was new IANI documented within 3 months after arthroplasty. The frequency of IANI was summarized using point estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Six cases met the criteria for IANI. The overall incidence of IANI was 0.7% (95% CI, 0.3%-1.4%). The incidence of IANI was 0.3% (95% CI, 0%-1.6%) after TSA and 0.9% (95% CI, 0.3%-2.1%) after RTSA. All IANIs were cases of neurapraxia, and all patients had experienced complete neurologic recovery at last follow-up.

Conclusion

Complete, permanent IANI resulting from direct surgical trauma during primary shoulder arthroplasty can be avoided without using the tug test or routine identification of the nerve. A low incidence of partial temporary IANI can be expected, which may be related to indirect traction injuries.

Intraoperative complications during revision shoulder arthroplasty: a study using the National Joint Registry dataset

BACKGROUND

The surgical options for revision shoulder arthroplasty and the number of procedures performed are increasing. However, little is known about the risk factors for intraoperative complications associated with this complex surgery.

METHODS

The National Joint Registry (NJR) is a surgeon reported database recording information on major joint replacements including revision shoulder arthroplasty. Using multivariable binary logistic regression modelling, we analyzed 1445 revision shoulder arthroplasties reported to the NJR between April 2012 and 2015.

RESULTS

The risk of developing a complication during revision surgery was greater than primary arthroplasty (5% versus 2.5%). An intraoperative fracture was the most common complication occurring in 50 (3.5%) cases. Nerve injuries were recorded for two (0.1%) patients and vascular injuries for one (0.1%) patient. The incidence of intraoperative fractures was higher in females than males (relative risk = 3.25; p = 0.005). Periprosthetic fracture as an indication for revision carried the highest risk for any complication (relative risk = 3.00, p = 0.06).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest registry study to date investigating the incidence and risk factors for intraoperative complications during revision shoulder arthroplasty. Females have over three times the risk of intraoperative fractures compared to males. This study will help inform surgeons to accurately counsel patients.