The subacromial spacer system for irreparable posterosuperior rotator cuff tears: A retrospective study of 47 patients with a two-year follow-up

Subacromial balloon spacer massive rotator cuff tear treatment systematic review and meta-analysis: Patient selection and physical therapy may be keys to outcome success

PURPOSE

Subacromial balloon spacer implantation (SBSI) efficacy for massive rotator cuff tear treatment was evaluated based on perceived shoulder function, active shoulder mobility, pain, complications and research study methodological quality. The purpose was to better discern the efficacy of this device from both surgical and rehabilitative perspectives to improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases were searched (1 January 2010 to 1 June 2024) using 'balloon spacer', 'subacromial spacer', 'subacromial balloon spacer', 'shoulder spacer' and 'inspace' terms. Pre-surgery (baseline), 12-month (12-m) and 24-month (24-m) post-SBSI mean changes were compared using one-way ANOVA and Scheffe post hoc tests, and comparative study effect sizes were calculated (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

This review consists of 27 studies with 894 patients (67.8 ± 5 years of age) and 29.4 ± 17-month follow-up. Modified Coleman Methodology Scores (MCMS) revealed fair overall quality (mean = 61.4 ± 11). Constant-Murley scores improved from 34.8 ± 6 (baseline), to 64.2 ± 9 (12-m) and 67.9 ± 8 (24-m) (12-m, 24-m > baseline, p < 0.001). ASES scores improved from 35.1 ± 14 (baseline), to 83.3 ± 7 (12-m) and 81.8 ± 5 (24-m)(12-m, 24-m > baseline, p < 0.001). VAS pain scores improved from 6.6 ± 1 (baseline), to 2.6 ± 1 (12-m) and 2.0 ± 1 (24-m) (12-m, 24-m < baseline, p < 0.001). Flexion increased from 108.5 ± 25° (baseline), to 128.5 ± 30° (12-m) and 151.2 ± 14° (24-m) (24-m > 12-m, baseline, p = 0.01). Abduction increased from 97.7 ± 24° (baseline) to 116.3 ± 23° (12-m) and 142.3 ± 15° (24-m) (24-m > 12-m, baseline, p = 0.02). External rotation (ER) in adduction changed from 33.1 ± 7° (baseline) to 32.5 ± 4° (12-m) and 53.9 ± 9° (24-m)(24-m > 12-m, baseline, p = 0.01). ER at 90° abduction increased from 56.3 ± 3° (baseline) to 83.5 ± 5° (12-m) and 77.1 ± 4° (24-m) (24-m, 12-m > baseline, p = 0.01). Comparison studies, however, displayed insignificant results with small effect sizes.

CONCLUSION

Despite overall fair MCMS scores, at 24-m post-SBSI, shoulder function improved and pain decreased. More rigorous comparative studies, however, revealed insignificant findings. Patients with the potential to re-establish the essential glenohumeral joint force couple that depresses the humeral head on the glenoid fossa and who comply with physical therapy may be more likely to achieve success following SBSI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Subacromial Balloon Placement Demonstrates No Advantage Over Debridement in the Treatment of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Dual-Armed Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Over 1000 Patients

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the placement of a subacromial balloon (SAB) spacer has emerged as a treatment option for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs); however, there is significant controversy regarding its utility in comparison with other surgical interventions.

PURPOSE

To compare outcomes after SAB spacer placement versus arthroscopic debridement for MIRCTs.

STUDY DESIGN

Dual-armed systematic review and meta-analysis (level IV evidence).

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), Scopus, and CINAHL Complete databases for articles published before May 7, 2022, was conducted to identify patients with MIRCTs undergoing the 2 procedures. For the SAB arm, 14 of 449 studies were considered eligible for inclusion, while 14 of 272 studies were considered eligible for inclusion in the debridement arm.

RESULTS

In total, 528 patients were eligible for inclusion in the SAB arm and 479 patients in the debridement arm, and 69.9% of patients undergoing SAB placement also underwent concomitant debridement. Decreases in the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score and increases in the Constant score were found to be significantly larger after debridement (-0.7 points [P < .001] and +5.5 points [P < .001], respectively), although the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the VAS was not achieved after either procedure. Both SAB placement and debridement significantly improved range of motion in forward flexion/forward elevation, internal and external rotation, and abduction (P < .001). Rates of general complication were higher after debridement versus SAB placement (5.2% ± 5.6% vs 3.5% ± 6.3%, respectively; P < .001); however, there were no significant differences between SAB placement and debridement in rates of persistent symptoms requiring a reintervention (3.3% ± 6.2% vs 3.8% ± 7.3%, respectively; P = .252) or reoperation rates (5.1% ± 7.6% vs 4.8% ± 8.4%, respectively; P = .552). The mean time to conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty was 11.0 versus 25.4 months, respectively, for the SAB versus debridement arm.

CONCLUSION

While SAB placement was associated with acceptable postoperative outcomes in the treatment of MIRCTs, there was no clear benefit over debridement alone. Shorter operative times coupled with better postoperative outcomes and longer times to conversion to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty rendered debridement a more attractive option. While there may be a role for SAB placement in poor surgical candidates, there is burgeoning evidence to support debridement alone without SAB placement for the treatment of MIRCTs.

Subacromial Balloon Spacer Does Not Reduce the Retear Rate for Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A Comparative Study

PURPOSE

To determine whether a subacromial spacer decreases the recurrent rotator cuff tear rate in arthroscopically managed massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) with 1 year of follow-up.

METHODS

We selected all patients who met the following criteria: (1) an MRCT excluding Collin type A, (2) Goutallier stage equal or less than 2, and (3) complete arthroscopic repair of the MRCT. Patients were allocated into 2 groups: A (without subacromial spacer) or B (with subacromial spacer) for a prospective evaluation 1 year after surgery. The primary outcome was the retear rate, determined with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) according to the classification of Sugaya. Secondary outcome measures were the functional outcomes using visual analog score, Shoulder Subjective Value, and Constant-Murley Score. Preoperative rotator cuff characteristics such as number of tendons involved and the tear retraction also were evaluated. Patient-related data such as sex, age, laterality, history of smoking, and diabetes mellitus were analyzed.

RESULTS

In total, 31 patients were included in group A and 33 in group B. Preoperatively, only 2 differences were found between both groups: a significant (but not clinical) greater Constant score in group A (P = .034) and a slightly greater retraction of the supraspinatus in group B (P = .0025). The overall retear rate between the 2 groups was similar regarding the number of patients (P = .746) and the total number of tendons involved in the recurrent tear (P = .112). At 1-year follow-up, no differences were found in VAS (P = .397), SSV (P = .309), and Constant score (P = .105).

CONCLUSIONS

In reparable massive rotator cuff tears (excluding Collin type A), the augmentation of repair with a subacromial spacer did not significantly reduce the number of patients with recurrent rotator cuff tears identified by MRI. It was also ineffective in reducing the number of re-ruptured tendons in these patients. No patient-reported or clinically significant findings were noted in Constant, SSV, and VAS scores at 1-year postoperative follow-up. Patients with MRI findings of a healed rotator cuff (Sugaya 1-3) had better clinical outcomes compared with those without.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Subacromial Balloon Spacer Implantation Is a Promising Alternative for Patients With Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of the existing literature on subacromial balloon spacers for the treatment of massive irreparable rotator cuff tears, in an effort to inform surgeons of the procedure's clinical effectiveness.

METHODS

The PubMed, Scopus, and Ovid EMBASE databases were queried to identify studies evaluating the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes of patients indicated for subacromial balloon spacer implantation. The following datapoints were extracted: study demographics, patient baseline characteristics, and postoperative outcomes of interest. Outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at the longest available follow-up period.

RESULTS

A total 766 patients were included among 22 included studies, with an average follow-up of 27.54 months. Improvements were seen for all clinical and patient-reported outcomes: forward elevation (ranging from 9.20 to 90.00° improvement), external rotation (ranging from 2.00 to 22.00°), abduction (ranging from 14.00 to 95.00°), Total Constant Score (ranging from 7.70 to 50.00), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ranging from 24.60 to 59.84), Oxford Shoulder Score (ranging from 7.20 to 22.20), and pain score (ranging from 3.57 to 6.50). Minimal differences were seen in acromiohumeral interval (ranging from -2.00 to 1.27). Reoperation and complication rates ranged from 0% to 33% and 0% to 19.64%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term results of subacromial balloon spacers for management of massive rotator cuff tears demonstrate clinically relevant improvements in shoulder range of motion and substantial improvements in patient-reported outcome measures. Of note, minimal change in acromiohumeral interval was seen on postoperative radiography, and wide variations in complication and reoperation rates were reported across studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, systematic review of Level I-IV studies.

High Rate of Clinically Meaningful Achievement in Outcomes After Subacromial Balloon Spacer Implantation for Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Subacromial balloon spacers have been introduced as a potential treatment option for patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. However, it is important to comprehensively assess the clinical efficacy of this procedure in the context of an increasing amount of contemporary literature.

PURPOSE

To perform a systematic review of the contemporary literature to understand the propensity for clinically meaningful improvements after subacromial balloon spacer implantation for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

The PubMed, Ovid/MEDLINE, and Cochrane databases were queried in July 2022 for data pertaining to studies reporting clinically significant outcomes after subacromial balloon spacer implantation. Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation was used to quantify the pooled rate of clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes as evaluated using the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS), and substantial clinical benefit (SCB). Qualitative analysis was performed when data were variably presented to avoid misleading reporting.

RESULTS

There were 10 studies included, all of which reported MCID achievement. The overall pooled rate of MCID achievement for the Constant-Murley score was 83% (95% CI, 71%-93%; range, 40%-98%), with 6 of 8 studies reporting rates equal to or exceeding 85%. One study reported a 98% rate of PASS achievement for the Constant-Murley score at 3-year follow-up. The rate of MCID achievement for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score ranged between 83% and 87.5%. The rate of PASS achievement for the ASES score was 56% at 2-year follow-up, while the rate of SCB achievement for the ASES score was 83% and 82% at 1- and 2-year follow-up, respectively. At 1-year follow-up, 74% and 78% of patients achieved the MCID for the Numeric Rating Scale and Oxford Shoulder Score, respectively. At 3 years, 69% of patients achieved the MCID for the Numeric Rating Scale and 87% achieved it for the Oxford Shoulder Score.

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent isolated subacromial balloon spacer implantation for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears demonstrated a high rate of clinically significant improvement in outcomes at short- to mid-term follow-up. A paucity of literature exists to appropriately define and evaluate the rates of achieving the PASS and SCB after subacromial balloon spacer implantation, necessitating further study.

Outcomes of subacromial balloon spacer implantation for irreparable rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears remains a topic of considerable debate among orthopedic surgeons. Currently, there is little consensus regarding the gold-standard treatment; however, an emerging option involves the use of a biodegradable subacromial spacer. The purpose of this study, therefore, was to systematically review and synthesize the current literature reporting on the clinical outcomes following implantation of a subacromial balloon spacer (SABS) for the treatment of patients with irreparable rotator cuff tears.

METHODS

A systematic review of the PubMed Central, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases from inception through December 2022 was performed. Clinical outcome studies reporting on functional and clinical outcomes, as well as postoperative complications, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 127 studies were initially identified, of which 28 were deemed eligible for inclusion in our review. Of these studies, 17 reported adequate preoperative and postoperative data (mean and a measure of variance) and thus were included in the meta-analysis. Among the included studies, a total of 894 shoulders (886 patients) were included; the mean age was 67.4 years (range, 61.7-76.2 years). The average follow-up period was 30.4 months (range, 12-56 months). All postoperative patient-reported outcomes improved significantly from baseline, including the Constant score (mean difference, 33.53; P < .001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (mean difference, 40.38; P < .001), Oxford Shoulder Score (mean difference, 12.05; P = .004), and visual analog scale pain score or Numeric Pain Rating Scale score (mean difference, -3.79; P < .001). Forward elevation (mean difference, 24°; P < .001), abduction (mean difference, 52°; P = .02), and external rotation (mean difference, 15°; P < .001) improved. Device-related complications occurred at a rate of 3.6%, the most common of which were balloon migration (1.0%) and synovitis (0.6%). Ultimately, 5% of patients required salvage reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

CONCLUSION

Short-term outcomes suggest that SABS implantation can be a safe and effective treatment and appears to be associated with early improvements in postoperative pain and function. Clinical heterogeneity, use of concomitant procedures, and variations in patient selection limit our ability to conclusively interpret the available evidence. We do not yet know the potential therapeutic value of SABS implantation relative to other currently accepted treatment strategies, the length of symptomatic improvement that can be expected, or the long-term implications of SABS use on the outcomes of further salvage procedures.

InSpace Balloon for the Management of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

The best course of action for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears (MIRCTs) is not universally agreed upon. Numerous surgical techniques have been discussed. The implantation of a biodegradable spacer into the subacromial area has been documented since 2012 by several authors. The implantation method is touted as being simpler, repeatable, and less invasive than other solutions that are now available. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis, being the first of its kind, was to evaluate the literature to see the efficacy of InSpace balloon (ISB) implantation in the management of MIRCTs.

Methods

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, and with 2 researchers assessing and analyzing each study separately, an extensive electronic search of the literature was conducted in the PubMed database from 1961 until July 27, 2022.

Results

Fourteen studies were included in this systematic review and three in the meta-analysis. Eleven out of fourteen studies favored ISB use for MIRCTs, while only three were against its use. All spacers were arthroscopically implanted in the subacromial space. Three studies were included in the meta-analysis. The differences in the compared outcomes were statistically insignificant.

Conclusions

A controversy about the use of ISB remains in patients with MIRCTs. Both good and bad outcomes were reported. However, the majority of patients had good clinical outcomes across several grading scales, radiographic evidence of improved impingement, and self-report that they would redo the procedure in hindsight. To draw more solid conclusions and have statistically significant results in the meta-analysis, more randomized controlled trials and comparative studies comparing this device to other treatments are needed.

Subacromial Balloon Spacer Versus Partial Rotator Cuff Repair in the Treatment of Massive Irreparable Rotator Cuff Tears: Facility Personnel Allocation and Procedural Cost Analysis

Background The subacromial balloon is a novel technology that has shown promise in managing a select patient population with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears. The purpose of this study was to quantify the true facility cost difference between subacromial balloon placement (SBP) and partial rotator cuff repair (PCR). Methodology A prospective cohort of patients with massive irreparable rotator cuff tears randomized to SBP versus PCR between 2015 and 2018 was retrospectively reviewed. Demographic variables, medical comorbidities, and range-of-motion (ROM) outcomes for all patients were recorded. True facility costs with respect to personnel were calculated using a time-driven activity based-costing (TDABC) algorithm and were classified into personnel costs and supply costs. Results Seven patients were treated with PCR compared to nine treated with SBP. No significant differences were observed with respect to demographic characteristics. Postoperative mean external rotation was 37° in SBP patients significantly higher than that of PCR patients at 8° (P = 0.023). Personnel time and cost differences while in the operating room (OR) were significantly less for the SBP ($605.58) compared to PCR ($1362.76) (P < 0.001). Implant costs were higher for SBP when compared to PCR, whereas disposable equipment costs were higher for PCR when compared to SBP. The total mean true facility cost was $7658.00 for SBP, significantly higher than that of PCR at $3429.00 (P < 0.001). Conclusions Despite the substantial reduction in personnel costs seen with SBP, the true facility cost of SBP was significantly higher than that of PCR. As this novel technology is used more ubiquitously and its price is negotiated down, the cost savings seen in personnel and OR time will become more significant. Future prospective cost analyses should follow up on the changes in implant costs and account for potential anesthesia cost savings.

Rice-Body Synovitis, Foreign Body Reaction, and Rotator Cuff Failure After Subacromial Balloon Spacer Augmentation of a Rotator Cuff Repair: A Case Report

CASE

A 66-year-old woman presented with shoulder pain and weakness 4 months after augmentation of a rotator cuff repair with a Stryker InSpace subacromial balloon spacer. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a failed rotator cuff repair, large effusion with rice bodies, synovitis, axillary lymphadenopathy, loose anchors, and erosive changes to the greater tuberosity. Arthroscopy revealed balloon fragmentation surrounded by diffusely hyperemic synovium without repairable cuff tissue. Final cultures proved negative for infection. Histologic evaluation revealed ulcerated synovium with diffuse chronic and focal acute inflammation.

CONCLUSION

Despite promising early results, augmentation of a rotator cuff repair with a subacromial balloon spacer introduces a risk of inflammatory reaction that may mimic a deep infection and compromise rotator cuff healing.

Early Treatment of Shoulder Pathology Is Necessary but Not Enough Is Being Performed

Delayed treatment of shoulder instability results in bone loss requiring more-complicated surgery, in turn resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Similarly, delayed treatment of repairable rotator cuff tears results in irreparable tears requiring more-complicated surgery and resulting in less-optimal outcomes. Delayed treatment of shoulder pathology is a problem. Solutions include education and research investigation.