Post-operative rehabilitation following traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: A systematic scoping review

Rehabilitation following shoulder arthroscopic stabilisation surgery: A survey of UK practice

Background

Optimal rehabilitation following arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation for traumatic anterior instability is unknown. The purpose of this study was to establish current UK practice for this patient group.

Methods

A self-administered online questionnaire was developed and distributed to UK surgeons and physiotherapists.

Results

138 responses were received. Routine immobilisation was reported in 79.7% of responses with a cross-body sling being the preferred position (63.4%). Duration of immobilisation and timescales to initiate movement were highly variable. Return to light work was advised when patients felt able (25.4%) or after 6 weeks (26.1%). 58.7% recommended waiting for 12 weeks to return to manual work. 56% recommended non-contact sport could be resumed after 12 weeks. For contact sport, recommendations varied from 6 weeks (3.8%) to 6 months (5.8%). Psychological readiness was the most frequently cited criteria for return to play (58.6%). Factors such as hyperlaxity (40.6%), age (32.6%) and kinesiophobia (28.3%) were not considered as relevant as reported quality of surgical fixation (50%).

Conclusion

There is no clear consensus regarding optimal post-operative rehabilitation following arthroscopic shoulder stabilisation. Further work is required to establish high value, personalised pathways for this patient group.

Positioning efficacy and comfort profile of shoulder support braces: A randomized repeated-measures study using three-dimensional kinematic analysis

BACKGROUND

Shoulder bracing is very common in musculoskeletal rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, the positioning efficacy of shoulder support braces was investigated by analyzing their three-dimensional kinematic properties, as well as their perceived comfort was investigated with user ratings.

STUDY DESIGN

A randomized repeated-measures study.

METHODS

Seventeen asymptomatic participants were included. Scapular, humeral, and thoracic kinematics for all participants were measured using an electromagnetic tracking device in 6 experiments in randomized order: no brace, neutral brace, abduction brace, internal rotation brace, 15-degree external rotation brace (ER15-B), and 30-degree external rotation brace (ER30-B). Also, comfort ratings were obtained during each session.

RESULTS

Internal rotation brace achieved a mean of 29.34° of humerothoracic internal rotation while providing increased scapular internal rotation and upward rotation ( p < 0.05). Abduction brace achieved a mean of 45.39° of humerothoracic and 39.58° of glenohumeral elevation coupled with increased scapular upward rotation, posterior tilt, and humeral internal rotation ( p < 0.05). 30-Degree external rotation brace achieved a mean of 33.25° of glenohumeral external rotation and resulted in increased scapular external rotation, upward rotation, posterior tilt, and humeral external rotation ( p < 0.05). Abduction brace, internal rotation brace, ER15-B, and ER30-B moved the thoracic spine into a more axial rotation in the contralateral direction. Internal rotation brace, ER15-B, and ER30-B were rated more uncomfortable when compared with the no brace condition, with no significant differences observed among the braces.

CONCLUSIONS

The positioning efficacy was enhanced when an abduction pillow and external rotation wedge were applied. Selection of commercially available shoulder support braces should involve consideration of whether it can achieve the desired position and orientation as well as its comfort profile.