Transarterial infusion of epirubicin and cisplatin combined with systemic infusion of 5-fluorouracil versus transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis: a retrospective analysis

Efficacy Analysis of Bronchial Arterial Chemoembolization for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective: This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of bronchial arterial chemoembolization (BACE) in the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) through a meta-analysis of single-group rate, providing evidence-based guidance for clinical treatment. Materials and Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases for relevant studies up to January 15, 2024. Inclusion criteria encompassed single-arm or multi-arm studies of nonrandomized controlled trials, observational studies, and single-arm studies in English language, focusing on NSCLC patients treated with BACE. Data extraction, quality assessment, and statistical analysis were performed following predefined protocols. Results: In total, 172 articles were initially retrieved, with 11 studies meeting the inclusion criteria. The included studies comprised 510 patients. Meta-analysis revealed significant heterogeneity among studies for median progression-free survival (PFS), median overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and disease control rate. The combined median PFS was 6.87 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.30-8.44), and the combined median OS was 13.68 months (95% CI 10.69-16.67). Subgroup analysis based on intervention measures demonstrated varying efficacy outcomes. Adverse reactions associated with BACE were generally mild, with no reports of grade 3 or higher adverse events. Conclusion: BACE emerges as a promising treatment modality for advanced NSCLC, exhibiting favorable efficacy and safety profiles.

Drug-eluting beads bronchial arterial chemoembolization vs. conventional bronchial arterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Purpose

To compare the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting bead bronchial artery chemoembolization (DEB-BACE) with conventional bronchial artery chemoembolization (cBACE) and provide a novel treatment option for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with advanced NSCLC underwent DEB-BACE or cBACE and were screened retrospectively. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary outcome indicators, while technical success rate, objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events (AEs) were the secondary ones.

Results

A total of 41 patients were enrolled in the study, 12 in the DEB-BACE group and 29 in the cBACE group, according to the treatment regimen. No patient achieved complete response. Eighteen patients achieved partial response (9 in each group), 15 patients achieved stable disease (3 in the DEB-BACE group and 12 in the cBACE group), and eight patients achieved progressive disease (all in the cBACE group) when treated for 2 months. The overall ORR and DCR were 43.9% (18/41) and 80.5% (33/41), respectively. ORR and DCR in the DEB-BACE group were 50.0% (9/12) and 100.0% (12/12), respectively, while ORR and DCR in the cBACE group were 31.0% (9/29) and 72.4% (21/29), respectively. Compared to cBACE, the ORR and DCR of DEB-BACE were significantly improved (p < 0.05). The median PFS was better in the DEB-BACE group than in the cBACE group (6.95 months vs. 3.20 months, respectively, Hazard Ratio [HR] = 0.416; p = 0.005). Furthermore, the median OS was significantly better in the DEB-BACE group than in the cBACE group (28.5 months vs. 22.5 months, respectively, HR = 0.316; p = 0.020).

Conclusion

DEB-BACE has a good safety and therapeutic profile in advanced NSCLC and is superior to cBACE. DEB-BACE can be used as an alternative treatment option for advanced NSCLC, even in elderly patients.

Correlation between Immunohistochemical Markers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells and In Vitro High-Throughput Drug Sensitivity Screening

AIM

This study analyzed the correlation between immunohistochemical markers in hepatocellular carcinoma cells and the results of in vitro high-throughput drug sensitivity screening, to provide a reference for individualized drug treatment in patients with liver cancer.

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were included in this study from December 2019 to June 2021, and their liver cancer cells were used for in vitro high-throughput drug sensitivity screening. According to the screening results, the patients were divided into relatively sensitive and insensitive groups, and the correlations between sensitivity and immunohistochemistry results were analyzed statistically.

RESULTS

Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)-positive liver cancer cells were significantly more sensitive to gemcitabine than AFP-negative cells (χ ² = 6.102, P=0.014). AFP was also positively correlated with sensitivity of liver cancer cells to three combined regimens containing oxaliplatin (L-OHP) and epirubicin (EPI) : L-OHP + EPI + irinotecan + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), L-OHP + irinotecan + EPI, and L-OHP + EPI (χ ² = 8.168, P=0.004, χ ² = 5.705, P=0.017, and χ ² = 8.275, P=0.004, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Gemcitabine and L-OHP + EPI + irinotecan + 5-FU, L-OHP + EPI, and L-OHP + irinotecan + EPI were more effective against AFP-positive compared with AFP-negative liver cancer cells according to in vitro high-throughput drug sensitivity screening. These results may guide the selection of personalized drug treatments for patients with advanced liver cancer in the future but still need further clinical studies to confirm.

Efficacy and safety of raltitrexed-based transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A multicenter real-world study

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of raltitrexed-based transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for intermediate and advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using real-world evidence.

METHODS

All eligible HCC cases were collected from multiple centers in Chongqing, China, from January 2013 to December 2018 and divided into the raltitrexed group (raltitrexed + lobaplatin + pirarubicin) and control group (lobaplatin + pirarubicin). Propensity score matching (PSM) with a 1:1 ratio was used to eliminate the imbalance of potential confounding factors between groups. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS) and the secondary end-points were progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period for patients in the raltitrexed and control groups was 8.7 and 5.9 months, respectively. After PSM, median OS was 10.0 months in the raltitrexed group and 7.0 months in the control group (p = 0.002). The 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year OS rates of the raltitrexed group were significantly higher than those of the control group (78.2% vs. 60.9%, p = 0.010; 43.5% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.030; and 17.4% vs. 2.2% p = 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis of these propensity score-matched HCC patients revealed treatment, age, tumor size, lipiodol accumulation, and the number of TACE cycles as independent predictors of OS (all p < 0.05). The disease control rate of the raltitrexed and control groups was 87.4% and 65.8%, respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Raltitrexed-based TACE can prolong the OS of patients with intermediate and advanced HCC in a real-world clinical setting, and is safe and tolerable.

Transarterial Infusion of Epirubicin and Cisplatin Combined With Systemic Infusion of 5-Flurouracil Versus Sorafenib for Hepatocellular Carcinoma With Refractoriness of Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Doxorubicin

Transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin (TACE-DOX) is an effective therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are limited options for patients with TACE refractoriness. We compared the effectiveness between sorafenib and transarterial chemolipiodolization using epirubicin and cisplatin combined with systemic infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; TACL-ECF) in patients with previous TACE-DOX refractoriness. We retrospectively analyzed 742 consecutively enrolled cohort patients who received TACE-DOX as the first-line therapy for HCC. Among the 94 patients who failed with TACE-DOX, 49 patients were treated with TACL-ECF and 45 patients were treated with sorafenib as a rescue therapy. The TACL-ECF regimen comprised transarterial infusion of epirubicin and cisplatin combined with systemic infusion of 5-FU. Of the 94 patients, 22 and 72 patients were in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stages B and C, respectively; 66% patients were classified as having Child-Pugh class A (CPC A). Overall survival (OS) after rescue therapy did not differ between the sorafenib and TACL-ECF groups (4.1 months vs 6.4 months, P = .355). Progression-free survival (PFS) did not differ between the sorafenib and TACL-ECF groups (2.8 months vs 3.5 months, P = .629). Adverse events of CTC grade 3/4 occurred more frequently in the sorafenib group than in the TACL-ECF group (P = .024). The present study showed that the OS and PFS did not differ between patients given rescue TACL-ECF therapy and those given sorafenib therapy. The TACL-ECF treatment was better tolerated than sorafenib. The TACL-ECF might be considered as an alternative therapy for the patients with TACE-DOX refractoriness, especially CPC B and sorafenib-intolerant patients.

Safety and efficacy of endovascular implantation of a portal vein stent combined with iodine-125 seed-strips followed by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with sorafenib for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the safety and efficacy of endovascular implantation of a portal vein stent combined with iodine-¹²⁵ seed-strips followed by transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with sorafenib (PVS-¹²⁵I-TACE-S) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT).

METHODS

Between January 2015 and July 2017, 18 patients with PVTT caused by HCC that were treated with PVS-¹²⁵I-TACE-S were reviewed. The technical success, complications, changes in liver function from baseline values due to subsequent endovascular implantation of a portal vein stent combined with iodine-¹²⁵ seed-strips (PVS-¹²⁵I), time-to-tumor progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were observed.

RESULTS

The technical success rate was 100%. Adverse events (AEs) were managed successfully, with no occurrence of procedure-related deaths. Liver function test values after PVS-¹²⁵I were not significantly different than baseline values (P＞0.05). The median TTP was 7.0 months (range: 4.2-9.9 months). In Vp3 PVTT, the TTP was 9.7 months (range: 8.8-10.5 months), and in Vp4 PVTT, the TTP was 4.2 months (range: 2.8-5.6 months). The median OS was 10.0 months (range: 7.0-13.1 months). In Vp3 PVTT, OS was 11.9 months (range: 9.2-14.5 months), and in Vp4 PVTT, OS was 7.2 months (range: 3.8-10.7 months).

CONCLUSIONS

PVS-¹²⁵I-TACE-S is safe for patients with HCC with PVTT and may extend the TTP and survival of patients with Vp4 PVTT.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

PVS implantation promptly restored flow in the obstructed portal vein, which can reduce the risk of hepatic failure and upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Implantation of iodine-¹²⁵ seed-strips may directly expose the portal tumor thrombus to radiation and kill cancer cells. Their combined use with TACE-S has a strong scientific rationale.

125I Irradiation Stent for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis: A Systematic Review

A systematic review was conducted to provide an overview of the efficacy and safety of ¹²⁵I irradiation stent placement for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and main portal vein tumor thrombosis (MPVTT). Six studies with 406 patients were included in the final analysis. The median overall survival for patients treated with ¹²⁵I irradiation stent placement was 10.3 months. The most common radiation-related adverse event was leukopenia. The stent-related adverse events consisted of fever, abdominal pain, hemorrhage, and anorexia. No stent or seed migration was reported. Overall, the use of an ¹²⁵I irradiation stent has the potential to act as an alternative therapy for patients with HCC with MPVTT.