1
|
Liadi Y, Campbell T, Dike P, Harlemon M, Elliott B, Odero-Marah V. Prostate cancer metastasis and health disparities: a systematic review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:183-191. [PMID: 37046071 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00667-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Accepted: 04/03/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa), one of the most prevalent malignancies affecting men, significantly contributes to increased mortality rates worldwide. While the causative death is due to advanced metastatic disease, this occurrence disproportionately impacts men of African descent compared to men of European descent. In this review, we describe potential mechanisms underlying PCa metastases disparities and current treatments for metastatic disease among these populations, differences in treatment outcomes, and survival rates, in hopes of highlighting a need to address disparities in PCa metastases. METHODS We reviewed existing literature using databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, and Science Direct using the following keywords: "prostate cancer metastases", "metastatic prostate cancer disparity", "metastatic prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment", "prostate cancer genetic differences and mechanisms", "genetic differences and prostate tumor microenvironment", and "men of African descent and access to clinical treatments". The inclusion criteria for literature usage were original research articles and review articles. RESULTS Studies indicate unique genetic signatures and molecular mechanisms such as Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), inflammation, and growth hormone signaling involved in metastatic PCa disparities. Clinical studies also demonstrate differences in treatment outcomes that are race-specific, for example, patients of African descent have a better response to enzalutamide and immunotherapy yet have less access to these drugs as compared to patients of European descent. CONCLUSIONS Growing evidence suggests a connection between a patient's genetic profile, the prostate tumor microenvironment, and social determinants of health that contribute to the aggressiveness of metastatic disease and treatment outcomes. With several potential pathways highlighted, the limitations in current diagnostic and therapeutic applications that target disparity in PCa metastases warrant rigorous research attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuf Liadi
- Department of Biology, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, 21251, USA
| | - Taaliah Campbell
- Department of Biology, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, 21251, USA
- Center for Cancer Research and Therapeutic Development, Department of Biological Sciences, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA
| | - Precious Dike
- Department of Biology, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, 21251, USA
| | - Maxine Harlemon
- Department of Biology, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, 21251, USA
- Center for Cancer Research and Therapeutic Development, Department of Biological Sciences, Clark Atlanta University, Atlanta, GA, 30314, USA
| | - Bethtrice Elliott
- Center for Urban Health Disparities Research and Innovation, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, 21251, USA
| | - Valerie Odero-Marah
- Department of Biology, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, 21251, USA.
- Center for Urban Health Disparities Research and Innovation, Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD, 21251, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hettle R, Mihai A, Lang SH, Tatman S, Swift SL. Real-world outcomes for first line next-generation hormonal agents in metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review. Future Oncol 2023; 19:2425-2443. [PMID: 37681288 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2023-0377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim: This review aims to summarize published evidence on the real-world (RW) outcomes of abiraterone or enzalutamide in first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Materials & methods: Studies reporting on RW effectiveness, safety, economic and/or health-related quality of life outcomes were identified by systematic literature review (2011-2021, incl. Embase®, MEDLINE®) and presented in a qualitative synthesis. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I or the Molinier checklist. Results: 88 studies (n = 83,427 patients) were included. Median progression-free (40 studies) and overall survival (38 studies) ranged from 3.7 to 20.9 months and 9.8 to 45 months, respectively. Survival, safety and economic outcomes were similar across individual treatments, while limited health-related quality of life evidence suggested improvements with abiraterone. Risk of bias was moderate to high. Conclusion: RW outcomes in first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer remain poor despite treatment, highlighting an unmet need for new regimens. This review was supported by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Hettle
- Payer Simulation & Analytics, Oncology Market Access and Pricing, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 8PA, UK
| | - Adela Mihai
- Health Economics & Payer Evidence, Oncology Market Access and Pricing, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, CB2 8PA, UK
| | - Shona H Lang
- Mtech Access, York, North Yorkshire, YO10 5NY, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Androgen Annihilation Versus Advanced Androgen Blockage as First Line Treatment for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2022; 179:103801. [PMID: 36031173 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recent advances in the treatments of metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), patients' prognosis remains suboptimal and novel treatment combinations are under scrutiny. On this matter, the recent ACIS trial tested the role of abiraterone plus apalutamide (androgen annihilation) in addition to androgen deprivation therapy, versus abiraterone plus androgen deprivation therapy. Herein, we performed a meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) among patients who received androgen annihilation versus advanced androgen blockage (abiraterone or enzalutamide), in addition to conventional androgen deprivation therapy. METHODS A comprehensive search for all published phase III randomized control trials on first line mCRPC that evaluated advanced androgen blockage (COU-AA-302, PREVAIL) or androgen annihilation (ACIS) was conducted PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to 31/12/2021. We reconstructed survival data from published Kaplan-Meier curves on overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) and meta-analyzed androgen annihilation versus advanced androgen blockage (grouping together abiraterone and enzalutamide) versus androgen deprivation therapy. The outcomes of interest were assessed using difference in restricted mean survival time (ΔRMST) at different time points. RESULTS Three trials were included involving 3787 patients. Overall, patients receiving androgen annihilation exhibited similar OS compared to advanced androgen blockage: ΔRMST at 36 months of -0.2 (95%CI: -1.1, 0.8, p=0.8). At 36 months, relatively to ADT alone, patients receiving androgen annihilation or advanced androgen blockage exhibited longer OS: ΔRMST of 1.6 (95%CI: 0.6, 2.7, p=0.002) and 1.8 months (95%CI: 1.1, 2.5, p<0.001), respectively. Patients receiving androgen annihilation exhibited better PFS compared to advanced androgen blockage: ΔRMST at 36 months of 2.4 months (95%CI: 1.0, 3.8, p=0.001). CONCLUSION We found no OS benefit for patients with mCRPC treated with androgen annihilation compared to advanced androgen blockage. This might be ascribed to an increased rate of other cause mortality that might determine the absence of an OS benefit or to the efficacy of second line therapies. Optimal treatment sequence and patient selection for androgen annihilation remain open points. However, a PFS benefit was found in case of combination therapy, whose clinical meaning is not yet clear.
Collapse
|
4
|
Galli L, Chiuri VE, Di Lorenzo G, Pisconti S, Rossetti S, Sirotova Z, Muto A, Petrioli R, De Tursi M, Sbrana A, Francolini G, Ardizzoia A, Scavelli C, Satta F, Quadrini S, Airoldi M, D'Aniello C, Bonetti A, Conforti S, Aieta M, Beccaglia P, Maestri A, Fratino L. First-line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: the real-world Italian cohort of the Prostate Cancer Registry. TUMORI JOURNAL 2022; 109:224-232. [PMID: 35400269 PMCID: PMC10070548 DOI: 10.1177/03008916221079662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the availability of multiple treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), new real-world data on disease management and drugs' performance are needed. METHODS We described characteristics, management and clinical outcomes of patients receiving first-line mCRPC treatment within the Italian cohort of the real-world, prospective, international Prostate Cancer Registry. Patients were enrolled consecutively (2013-2016) in 32 Italian sites and followed for 3 years. RESULTS 238 patients were included: 157 received first-line abiraterone acetate plus prednisone ("abiraterone" thereafter) and 70 first-line docetaxel; 11 patients receiving other treatments were not considered. Compared with docetaxel-treated patients, those receiving abiraterone were significantly older (age ⩾75: 63.7% vs 38.6%), less frequently had a Gleason score >8 (48.2% vs 67.6%, p<0.005) at initial diagnosis, and more frequently an ECOG score ⩾1 (52.7% vs 36.2%, p<0.05) and comorbidities (76.4% vs 57.1%, p<0.05) at baseline; they reported a lower analgesic use (15.3% vs 30%, p<0.005). In the abiraterone group (median follow-up 22.1 months), median time to progression (TTP) and progression-free survival (PFS) were, respectively, 14.4 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 10.6-18.0) and 13.0 months (95% CI, 9.1-16.8); median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and 3-year OS was 59.1%. In the docetaxel treatment group (median follow-up 25.3 months), median TTP, PFS and OS were, respectively, 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.1-10.3), 8.2 months (95% CI, 5.8-10.3) and 33.2 months (95% CI, 19.2-not estimable). CONCLUSION This investigation provided valuable information on the overall mCRPC treatment pattern and the effectiveness of first-line abiraterone and docetaxel in a population representative of everyday practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Galli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Sabrina Rossetti
- Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Zuzana Sirotova
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Aosta Regional Hospital, Aosta, Italy
| | - Andrea Muto
- Division of Medical Oncology, "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | - Roberto Petrioli
- Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese, Siena, Italy
| | - Michele De Tursi
- Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences and Center for Advanced Studies and Technology (CAST), G. D'Annunzio University, Chieti, Italy
| | - Andrea Sbrana
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Surgical, Medical and Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giulio Francolini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | - Antonio Ardizzoia
- Oncology Department, Ospedale Alessandro Manzoni-ASST Lecco, Lecco, Italy
| | - Claudio Scavelli
- Medical Oncology Unit, S. Cuore di Gesù Hospital, Gallipoli (LE), Italy
| | - Francesco Satta
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Ospedale San Pietro, Fatebenefratelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Quadrini
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Ospedale "SS Trinità" - ASL Frosinone, Sora, Italy
| | - Mario Airoldi
- Oncology Unit 2, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Carmine D'Aniello
- Division of Medical Oncology, AORN Azienda dei Colli, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| | - Andrea Bonetti
- Department of Oncology, Mater Salutis Hospital - Az. ULSS 9 Scaligera, Legnago, Italy
| | | | - Michele Aieta
- Department of Onco-Hematology, Division of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico della Basilicata IRCCS, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | | | - Antonio Maestri
- Medical Oncology Department, Santa Maria della Scaletta Hospital, Imola, Italy
| | - Lucia Fratino
- Medical Oncology Unit, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO) IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Procopio G, Chiuri V, Giordano M, Alitto A, Maisano R, Bordonaro R, Cinieri S, Rossetti S, De Placido S, Airoldi M, Galli L, Gasparro D, Ludovico G, Guglielmini P, Carella C, Nova P, Aglietta M, Schips L, Beccaglia P, Sciarra A, Livi L, Santini D, Procopio G, Chiuri V, Mantini G, Roberto Bordonaro RM, Cinieri S, Rossetti S, De Placido S, Airoldi M, Galli L, Gasparro D, Ludovico GM, Guglielmini PF, Santini D, Naglieri E, Fagnani D, Aglietta M, Livi L, Schips L, Passalacqua R, Fiore M, D'Angelillo RM, Ceresoli GL, Magrini S, Rondonotti D, Mirone V, Ferriero MC, Sciarra A, Acquati M, Boccardo F, Scagliotti GV, Mencoboni M, De Giorgi U, Micheletti G, Lanzetta G, Sartori D, Carlini P, Soto Parra HJ, Battaglia M, Uricchio F, Bernardo A, De Lisa A, Carrieri G, Ardizzoia A, Aieta M, Pisconti S, Marchetti P, Paiar F. Real-world experience of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: long-term results of the prospective ABItude study. ESMO Open 2022; 7:100431. [PMID: 35405438 PMCID: PMC9058899 DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Limited real-world data exist on the effectiveness and safety of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (abiraterone hereafter) in the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) naive to chemotherapy. Most of the few available studies had a retrospective design and included a small number of patients. In the interim analysis of the ABItude study, abiraterone showed good clinical effectiveness and safety profile in the chemotherapy-naive setting over a median follow-up of 18 months. Patients and methods We evaluated clinical and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone as for clinical practice in the Italian, observational, prospective, multicentric ABItude study. mCRPC patients were enrolled at abiraterone start (February 2016-June 2017) and followed up for 3 years; clinical endpoints and PROs, including quality of life (QoL) and pain, were prospectively collected. Kaplan–Meier curves were estimated. Results Of the 481 patients enrolled, 454 were assessable for final study analyses. At abiraterone start, the median age was 77 years, with 58.6% elderly patients and 69% having at least one comorbidity (57.5% cardiovascular diseases). Visceral metastases were present in 8.4% of patients. Over a median follow-up of 24.8 months, median progression-free survival (any progression reported by the investigators), time to abiraterone discontinuation, and overall survival were, respectively, 17.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 14.1-19.4 months], 16.0 months (95% CI 13.1-18.2 months), and 37.3 months (95% CI 36.5 months-not estimable); 64.2% of patients achieved ≥50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen. QoL assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Prostate, the European Quality of Life 5 Dimensions 3 Level, and European Quality of Life Visual Analog Scale remained stable during treatment. Median time to pain progression according to Brief Pain Inventory data was 31.1 months (95% CI 24.8 months-not estimable). Sixty-two patients (13.1%) had at least one adverse drug reaction (ADR) and 8 (1.7%) one serious ADR. Conclusion With longer follow-up, abiraterone therapy remains safe, well tolerated, and active in a large unselected population. A prospective real-life study of abiraterone acetate in mCRPC patients. In 481 chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients (median follow-up: 25 months), abiraterone plus prednisone was effective and safe. QoL, measured with various tools, remained stable during treatment with abiraterone plus prednisone. The median time to pain progression was 31.1 months.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sciarra A, Gentilucci A, Cattarino S, Salsiccia S, Mariotti G. Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 73:863-865. [PMID: 35144373 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.21.04814-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|