Efficacy, safety and mechanism of action of modified-release prednisone in rheumatoid arthritis

The role of glucocorticoids in increasing cardiovascular risk

Introduction

Different studies provide conflicting evidence regarding the potential for glucocorticoids (GCs) to increase the risk of cardiovascular diseases. This study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the correlation between GCs and cardiovascular risk, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), death from any cause, coronary heart disease (CHD), heart failure (HF), and stroke.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive search in PubMed and Embase (from inception to June 1, 2022). Studies that reported relative risk (RR) estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations of interest were included.

Results

A total of 43 studies with 15,572,512 subjects were included. Patients taking GCs had a higher risk of MACE (RR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.15-1.40), CHD (RR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.11-1.41), and HF (RR = 1.92, 95% CI: 1.51-2.45). The MACE risk increased by 10% (95% CI: 6%-15%) for each additional gram of GCs cumulative dose or by 63% (95% CI: 46%-83%) for an additional 10 μg daily dose. The subgroup analysis suggested that not inhaled GCs and current GCs use were associated with increasing MACE risk. Similarly, GCs were linked to an increase in absolute MACE risk of 13.94 (95% CI: 10.29-17.58) cases per 1,000 person-years.

Conclusions

Administration of GCs is possibly related with increased risk for MACE, CHD, and HF but not increased all-cause death or stroke. Furthermore, it seems that the risk of MACE increased with increasing cumulative or daily dose of GCs.

The efficacy of systemic glucocorticosteroids for pain in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis

Objectives

Glucocorticosteroids (GCs) are recommended to suppress inflammation in people with active RA. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the effects of systemic GCs on RA pain.

Methods

A systematic literature review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in RA comparing systemic GCs to inactive treatment. Three databases were and spontaneous pain and evoked pain outcomes were extracted. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) and mean differences were meta-analysed. Heterogeneity (I², tau statistics) and bias (funnel plot, Egger’s test) were assessed. Subgroup analyses investigated sources of variation. This study was pre-registered (PROSPERO CRD42019111562).

Results

A total of 18 903 titles, 880 abstracts and 226 full texts were assessed. Thirty-three RCTs suitable for the meta-analysis included 3123 participants. Pain scores (spontaneous pain) decreased in participants treated with oral GCs; SMD = −0.65 (15 studies, 95% CI −0.82, −0.49, P <0.001) with significant heterogeneity (I² = 56%, P =0.0002). Efficacy displayed time-related decreases after GC initiation. Mean difference visual analogue scale pain was −15 mm (95% CI −20, −9) greater improvement in GC than control at ≤3 months, −8 mm (95% CI −12, −3) at >3–6 months and −7 mm (95% CI −13, 0) at >6 months. Similar findings were obtained when evoked pain outcomes were examined. Data from five RCTs suggested improvement also in fatigue during GC treatment.

Conclusion

Oral GCs are analgesic in RA. The benefit is greatest shortly after initiation and GCs might not achieve clinically important pain relief beyond 3 months. Treatments other than anti-inflammatory GCs should be considered to reduce the long-term burden of pain in RA.

Liposomal Delivery Improves the Efficacy of Prednisolone to Attenuate Renal Inflammation in a Mouse Model of Acute Renal Allograft Rejection

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Background.

Systemic exposure to high-dose corticosteroids effectively combats acute rejection after kidney transplantation, but at the cost of substantial side effects. In this study, a murine acute renal allograft rejection model was used to investigate whether liposomal-encapsulated prednisolone (LP) facilitates local exposure to enhance its therapeutic effect.

Methods.

Male BalbC recipients received renal allografts from male C57BL/6J donors. Recipients were injected daily with 5 mg/kg cyclosporine A and received either 10 mg/kg prednisolone (P), or LP intravenously on day 0, 3, and 6, or no additional treatment. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was performed on day 6 to study allograft perfusion and organs were retrieved on day 7 for further analysis.

Results.

Staining of polyethylene-glycol-labeled liposomes and high performance liquid chromatography analysis revealed accumulation in the LP treated allograft. LP treatment induced the expression of glucocorticoid responsive gene Fkbp5 in the allograft. Flow-cytometry of allografts revealed liposome presence in CD45⁺ cells, and reduced numbers of F4/80⁺ macrophages, and CD3⁺ T-lymphocytes upon LP treatment. Banff scoring showed reduced interstitial inflammation and tubulitis and fMRI analysis revealed improved allograft perfusion in LP versus NA mice.

Conclusions.

Liposomal delivery of prednisolone improved renal bio-availability, increased perfusion and reduced cellular infiltrate in the allograft, when compared with conventional prednisolone. Clinical studies should reveal if treatment with LP results in improved efficacy and reduced side effects in patients with renal allograft rejection.

Extra-adrenal glucocorticoid synthesis at epithelial barriers

Epithelial barriers play an important role in the exchange of nutrients, gases, and other signals between our body and the outside world. However, they protect it also from invasion by potential pathogens. Defective epithelial barriers and associated overshooting immune responses are the basis of many different inflammatory disorders of the skin, the lung, and the intestinal mucosa. The anti-inflammatory activity of glucocorticoids has been efficiently used for the treatment of these diseases. Interestingly, epithelia in these tissues are also a rich source of endogenous glucocorticoids, suggesting that local glucocorticoid synthesis is part of a tissue-specific regulatory circuit. In this review, we summarize current knowledge about the extra-adrenal glucocorticoid synthesis at the epithelial barriers of the intestine, lung and the skin, and discuss their relevance in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases and as therapeutic targets.

Dissonance between physicians’ and patients’ perspectives on managing impaired morning function in Asian patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Objectives

To estimate the prevalence of impaired morning function (IMF) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to understand physicians’ and patients’ perceptions on the impact of IMF and treatment in selected Asian countries.

Methods

A survey on the impact of IMF was conducted in Asia on rheumatologists and patients with moderate-to-severe RA who experienced IMF for ≥3 mornings a week. Participants underwent comprehensive face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires.

Results

Sixty physicians and 300 patients from Hong Kong, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, and Taiwan were surveyed. Rheumatologists estimated that two-thirds of patients with RA experienced IMF and believed that the prevalence of IMF increased with RA severity (present in 42%, 73%, and 87% of patients with mild, moderate, and severe disease, respectively). Patients’ survey revealed that, on an average, patients with RA experienced IMF 5 days a week for 2 h each day. Thirty-eight percent of patients with RA considered a reduction in morning stiffness as an important treatment goal, but this was agreed by only 3% of rheumatologists. Only 22% of rheumatologists modified the treatment regimen specifically for IMF. Physicians considered prednisolone and other glucocorticoids (GCs) to be the most effective medication for the treatment of IMF. Fifty-one percent of patients with RA did not find their current medication effective in relieving IMF, and as a result, they reported negative emotions such as frustration, defeat, and anger, and 56% had missed work because of this symptom.

Conclusions

IMF is prevalent in RA and significantly affects patients’ quality of life (QoL). A higher proportion of patients compared to physicians view the reduction of morning stiffness as an important goal. More should be done to address the dissonance between physicians’ and patients’ views on IMF.

Glucocorticoids in the management of systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis

Glucocorticoids have been the mainstay of treatment for many years in systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA), causing important side effects and some difficulties in the management of this disease. Until the introduction of biologic agents, oral glucocorticoids were used to control fever and other systemic features for several months or even years if systemic manifestations persisted. Nowadays, clinicians have valid alternatives that have revolutionized the natural history of sJIA. Biologic agents, such as the interleukin-1 inhibitors anakinra and the more recent canakinumab, or the interleukin-6 inhibitor tocilizumab, have improved the prognosis of this debilitating disease. Glucocorticoids still have to be considered at the onset of disease when a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy fails or when there are life-threatening complications such as severe anemia or pericarditis, or macrophage activation syndrome. Local (intra-articular) triamcinolone hexacetonide is the treatment of choice for arthritis limited to one joint or a few joints in patients without systemic activity. To date, there is still great heterogeneity in the management of sJIA patients, but in recent years there have been attempts to design algorithms and treatment protocols for glucocorticoids, disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, and biologic agents. This review provides an overview of the current knowledge of glucocorticoid therapy in sJIA, comments on recently published recommendations, and gives practical support to the clinician for management of this disease.

Interactions among Low Dose of Methotrexate and Drugs Used in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Methotrexate (MTX) is a nonbiological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug that has shown both a good control of clinical disease and a good safety. Usually drug-drug interactions (DDIs) represent the most limiting factor during the clinical management of any disease, in particular when several drugs are coadministered to treat the same disease. In this paper, we report the interactions among MTX and the other drugs commonly used in the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Using Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane libraries, and Reference lists, we searched for the articles published until June 30, 2012, and we reported the most common DDIs between MTX and antirheumatic drugs. In particular, clinically relevant DDIs have been described during the treatment with MTX and NSAIDs, for example, diclofenac, indomethacin, or COX-2 inhibitors, and between MTX and prednisone or immunosuppressant drugs (e.g., leflunomide and cyclosporine). Finally, an increase in the risk of infections has been recorded during the combination treatment with MTX plus antitumor necrosis factor-α agents. In conclusion, during the treatment with MTX, DDIs play an important role in both the development of ADRs and therapeutic failure.