1
|
Caporali R, Kadakia A, Howell O, Patel J, Milligan J, Strengholt S, Barlow S, Taylor PC. A Real-World Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Upadacitinib, Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors, and Other Advanced Therapies After Switching from an Initial Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor. Adv Ther 2024; 41:3706-3721. [PMID: 39110310 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02948-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study compared the clinical effectiveness of switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to upadacitinib (TNFi-UPA), another TNFi (TNFi-TNFi), or an advanced therapy with another mechanism of action (TNFi-other MOA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS Data were drawn from the Adelphi RA Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey administered to rheumatologists and their consulting patients in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the UK, Japan, Canada, and the USA from May 2021 to January 2022. Patients who switched treatment from an initial TNFi were stratified by subsequent therapy of interest: TNFi-UPA, TNFi-TNFi, or TNFi-other MOA. Physician-reported clinical outcomes including disease activity (with formal DAS28 scoring available for 29% of patients) categorized as remission, low/moderate/high disease activity, as well as pain were recorded at initiation of current treatment and ≥ 6 months from treatment switch. Fatigue and treatment adherence were measured ≥ 6 months from treatment switch. Inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment compared outcomes by subsequent class of therapy: TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-TNFi, or TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-other MOA. RESULTS Of 503 patients who switched from their first TNFi, 261 were in TNFi-UPA, 128 in TNFi-TNFi, and 114 in TNFi-other MOA groups. At the time of switch, most patients had moderate/high disease activity (TNFi-UPA: 73%; TNFi-TNFi: 52%; TNFi-other MOA: 60%). After adjustment for differences in characteristics at point of switch, patients in TNFi-UPA group (n = 261) were significantly more likely to achieve physician-reported remission (67.7% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.0015), no pain (55.7% vs. 25.4%; p = 0.0007), and complete adherence (60.0% vs. 34.2%; p = 0.0049) compared with patients in TNFi-TNFi group (n = 121). Similar findings were observed for TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-other MOA groups (n = 111). CONCLUSION Patients who switched from TNFi to UPA had significantly better clinical outcomes of remission, no pain, and complete adherence than those who cycled TNFi or switched to another MOA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Caporali
- Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Rheumatology and Medical Sciences, ASST Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Aditi Kadakia
- AbbVie Inc., 1 N. Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA.
| | | | - Jayesh Patel
- AbbVie Inc., 1 N. Waukegan Road, North Chicago, IL, 60064, USA
| | | | | | | | - Peter C Taylor
- Nuffield Department of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McInnes IB, Mease PJ, Tanaka Y, Gossec L, Husni ME, Kristensen LE, Warren RB, Ink B, Bajracharya R, Coarse J, Gottlieb AB. Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis With or Without Methotrexate: 52-Week Results From Two Phase 3 Studies. ACR Open Rheumatol 2024. [PMID: 39077886 DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2024] [Revised: 07/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to assess 52-week efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) with or without concomitant methotrexate (+/-MTX) treatment at baseline. METHODS We conducted a post hoc analysis of patients in BE OPTIMAL (NCT03895203; biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug [bDMARD]-naïve), BE COMPLETE (NCT03896581; prior inadequate response or intolerance to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors [TNFi-IR]), and the BE VITAL open-label extension (NCT04009499) study. Patients were randomized to one of the following treatment groups: bimekizumab 160 mg every four weeks, placebo, or a reference drug (adalimumab 40 mg every two weeks; BE OPTIMAL only). From Week 16, placebo-randomized patients received bimekizumab. Missing data were imputed using non-responder imputation, multiple imputation, or worst-category imputation. RESULTS Through Week 52, similar proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) response criteria for both +MTX and -MTX (BE OPTIMAL: 54.4% +MTX, 54.7% -MTX; BE COMPLETE: 56.3% +MTX, 48.0% -MTX). Similar proportions of bimekizumab-treated patients achieved complete skin clearance (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 100% [PASI100] response) and minimal disease activity in both +MTX and -MTX groups. Similar trends were seen in placebo/bimekizumab-treated patients. Through Week 52, the proportion of bimekizumab-treated patients with ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event were similar between the +MTX and -MTX groups (BE OPTIMAL 325 of 410 [79.3%] vs 230 of 292 [78.8%], BE COMPLETE 105 of 168 [62.5%] vs 138 of 220 [62.7%]). The safety profile was comparable between subgroups and consistent with the prior safety profile of bimekizumab. CONCLUSION Treatment with bimekizumab demonstrated consistent, sustained efficacy to 52 weeks in bDMARD-naïve and TNFi-IR patients with PsA and was well tolerated, irrespective of concomitant MTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iain B McInnes
- College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Philip J Mease
- Swedish Medical Center/Providence St. Joseph Health and University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Japan, Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Laure Gossec
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique and AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | | | - Lars Erik Kristensen
- The Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg, Denmark
| | - Richard B Warren
- Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust and NIHR Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Vollenhoven RF, Hall S, Wells AF, Meerwein S, Song Y, Tanjinatus O, Fleischmann R. Long-term sustainability of response to upadacitinib among patients with active rheumatoid arthritis refractory to biological treatments: results up to 5 years from SELECT-BEYOND. RMD Open 2024; 10:e004037. [PMID: 39053948 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2023-004037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the long-term sustainability of response to the Janus kinase inhibitor upadacitinib among patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response or intolerance to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD-IR) in the SELECT-BEYOND phase 3 trial. METHODS Patients on background conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) were treated once daily with upadacitinib 15 mg or placebo. Patients who completed the week 24 visit could enter a long-term extension of up to 5 years. The sustainability of response was assessed based on achievement of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and Disease Activity Score 28-joint count using C-reactive protein (DAS28 (CRP)) targets and evaluated up to week 260 in all patients receiving the approved upadacitinib 15 mg dose, including those randomised to upadacitinib 15 mg and those who switched from placebo to upadacitinib 15 mg at week 12. RESULTS In this bDMARD-IR population, 45% (n=104/229) and 79% (n=172/219) of patients treated with upadacitinib 15 mg plus background csDMARD(s) achieved CDAI remission or CDAI low disease activity (LDA) at any point during the 5-year study, respectively. Of those who achieved CDAI remission/LDA, 25%/43% maintained their initial response through 240 weeks of follow-up after first achieving response. Most patients who lost remission or LDA were able to recapture that response by the cut-off date. Similar overall results were observed for SDAI and DAS28 (CRP). No strong predictors of response were identified. CONCLUSIONS Over three-quarters of bDMARD-IR patients achieved CDAI LDA with upadacitinib, and almost half of those maintained LDA through 240 weeks of follow-up. Remission was achieved by nearly half of all patients and maintained in approximately a quarter of those achieving remission. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02706847.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Stephen Hall
- Rheumatology, Emeritus Research and Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Alvin F Wells
- Aurora Rheumatology and Immunotherapy Center, Franklin, Wisconsin, USA
| | | | | | | | - Roy Fleischmann
- Metroplex Clinical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fleischmann R, Blanco R, Van den Bosch F, Bessette L, Song Y, Penn SK, McDearmon-Blondell E, Khan N, Chan K, Mysler E. Long-term Efficacy and Safety Following Switch Between Upadacitinib and Adalimumab in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis: 5-Year Data from SELECT-COMPARE. Rheumatol Ther 2024; 11:599-615. [PMID: 38498140 PMCID: PMC11111435 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-024-00658-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to describe the long-term efficacy and safety of upadacitinib and adalimumab through 228 weeks following immediate switch to the alternate therapy with a different mechanism of action (MoA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) not achieving treatment goals with their initial randomized therapy in the ongoing phase 3 SELECT-COMPARE study. METHODS Patients with non-response or incomplete response to initially prescribed upadacitinib 15 mg once daily or adalimumab 40 mg every other week were switched to the alternate therapy by week 26. Efficacy was evaluated through 228 weeks post-switch using validated outcome measures, including Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) low disease activity (LDA; ≤ 10)/remission (≤ 2.8); 28-joint Disease Activity Score based on C-reactive protein ≤ 3.2/< 2.6; ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria; and change from baseline in ACR core components. Data are reported as observed. Safety was assessed by treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) through week 264. RESULTS Of patients initially randomized to upadacitinib and adalimumab, 38.7% and 48.6%, respectively, switched to the alternate therapy by week 26. Clinically relevant improvements in all efficacy measures were observed through 228 weeks post-switch and were generally similar between groups, with small numeric differences mostly in favor of switching to upadacitinib. CDAI remission was achieved by 32.7% and 28.6% of initial non-responders, and 27.5% and 27.3% of incomplete responders, while CDAI LDA was achieved by 76.9% and 72.9% of non-responders, and 72.5% and 72.7% of incomplete responders switching to upadacitinib and to adalimumab, respectively. TEAE rates were similar between groups, although herpes zoster infection, lymphopenia, and creatine phosphokinase elevation were more frequent when switching to upadacitinib. No new safety signals were identified. CONCLUSION Switching to a different MoA may provide long-term benefit to patients with RA not achieving treatment goals with their initial therapy, with acceptable safety profiles. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02629159.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roy Fleischmann
- Metroplex Clinical Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 8144 Walnut Hill Lane, Suite 810, Dallas, TX, 75231, USA.
| | - Ricardo Blanco
- Rheumatology Division, Hospital University Marqués de Valdecilla, Immunopathology Group, IDIVAL, Santander, Spain
| | - Filip Van den Bosch
- VIB-UGent Center for Inflammation Research, Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Eduardo Mysler
- Organizacion Medica de Investigación, Rheumatology, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hart RJ, Hassan F, Alulis S, Patterson KW, Barthelmes JN, Boer JH, Lee D. Modelling Treatment Sequences in Immunology: Optimizing Patient Outcomes. Adv Ther 2024; 41:2010-2027. [PMID: 38554238 PMCID: PMC11052888 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02766-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/01/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For some immune-mediated disorders, despite the range of therapies available there is limited evidence on which treatment sequences are best for patients and healthcare systems. We investigated how their selection can impact outcomes in an Italian setting. METHODS A 3-year state-transition treatment-sequencing model calculated potential effectiveness improvements and budget reallocation considerations associated with implementing optimal sequences in ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Crohn's disease (CD), non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (NR-AxSpA), plaque psoriasis (PsO), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and ulcerative colitis (UC). Sequences included three biological or disease-modifying treatments, followed by best supportive care. Disease-specific response measures were selected on the basis of clinical relevance, data availability, and data quality. Efficacy was differentiated between biologic-naïve and experienced populations, where possible, using published network meta-analyses and real-world data. All possible treatment sequences, based on reimbursement as of December 2022 in Italy (analyses' base country), were simulated. RESULTS Sequences with the best outcomes consistently employed the most efficacious therapies earlier in the treatment pathway. Improvements to prescribing practice are possible in all diseases; however, most notable was UC, where the per-patient 3-year average treatment failure was 37.3% higher than optimal. The results focused on the three most crowded and prevalent immunological sub-condition diseases in dermatology, rheumatology, and gastroenterology: PsO, RA, and UC, respectively. By prescribing from within the top 20% of the most efficacious sequences, the model found a 15.1% reduction in treatment failures, with a 1.59% increase in drug costs. CONCLUSIONS Prescribing more efficacious treatments earlier provides a greater opportunity to improve patient outcomes and minimizes treatment failures.
Collapse
|
6
|
Caporali R, Conti F, Iannone F. Management of patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases after treatment failure with a first tumour necrosis factor inhibitor: A narrative review. Mod Rheumatol 2023; 34:11-26. [PMID: 37022142 DOI: 10.1093/mr/road033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
The emergence of biologics with different modes of action (MoAs) and therapeutic targets has changed treatment patterns in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. While tumour necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) are often utilized as the first biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug, some patients may not respond adequately (primary failure), fail to sustain response over time (secondary failure), or experience intolerable adverse events. Whether these patients would benefit more from cycling to a different TNFi or switching to a biologic with a different MoA is still unclear. We discuss here treatment outcomes of TNFi cycling versus MoA switching after treatment failure with a first TNFi in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases, focusing specifically on rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Treatment guidelines for these patients are ambiguous and, at times, contradictory in their recommendations. However, this is due to a lack of high-quality head-to-head data to definitively support cycling between TNFis after failure to a first-line TNFi over switching to a different MoA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Caporali
- Department of Clinical Science and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Department of Rheumatology, ASST Pini-CTO, Milan, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Conti
- Rheumatology Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Anesthesiology and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Florenzo Iannone
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO), University of Bari, Section of Rheumatology, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hecquet S, Combier A, Steelandt A, Pons M, Wendling D, Molto A, Miceli-Richard C, Allanore Y, Avouac J. Characteristics of patients with difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis in a French single-centre hospital. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2023; 62:3866-3874. [PMID: 36961324 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kead143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the features of difficult-to-treat rheumatoid arthritis (D2TRA) patients using two different definitions according to the previous failure of targeted therapies. METHODS We stratified consecutive RA patients treated at Cochin Hospital into two groups, a D2TRA group and a non-D2TRA group, according to two definitions of D2TRA. Both definitions defined D2TRA as RAs failing at least two targeted therapies, with a different mechanism of action for the EULAR-D2TRA definition or without prejudging the mechanism of action and for the Alternative D2TRA definition. RESULTS We included 320 consecutive RA patients. We identified 76 EULAR-D2TRA and 244 non-DTRA patients, and 120 Alternative D2TRA and 200 non-DTRA patients. Compared with non-D2TRA, D2TRA patients from both definitions were more likely to have lower socioeconomic level, positive rheumatoid factor, interstitial lung disease, higher DAS28-CRP and were more likely to respond to rituximab and Janus kinase inhibitors. Although EULAR and Alternative D2TRA patients displayed similar clinical and biological features, they were characterized by different therapeutic profiles. We observed fewer patients receiving methotrexate in the Alternative D2TRA group (53% vs 64%, P = 0.046). Patients with Alternative D2TRA not fulfilling the EULAR definition (n = 44) had all received two successive first-line TNF inhibitors, a monoclonal antibody and a soluble receptor, and were comparable to EULAR-D2TRA patients with regards to all other characteristics. CONCLUSION Low socioeconomic status, diabetes, interstitial lung disease and absence of combination with methotrexate allow identification of D2TRA. In addition, the inclusion as 'early-D2TRA' of patients failing two TNF inhibitors in the EULAR definition of D2TRA would facilitate the rapid identification of D2TRA patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Hecquet
- Department of Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Department of Rheumatology, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
| | - Alice Combier
- Department of Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Alexia Steelandt
- Department of Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Marion Pons
- Department of Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Anna Molto
- Department of Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Yannick Allanore
- Department of Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Avouac
- Department of Rheumatology, Cochin Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dua AB, Ford K, Fiore S, Pappas DA, Janak JC, Blachley T, Roberts-Toler C, Emeanuru K, Kremer JM, Kivitz A. Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis After Switching Between Interleukin-6-Receptor Inhibitors and Janus Kinase Inhibitors: Findings from an Observational Study. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:1753-1768. [PMID: 37906399 PMCID: PMC10654323 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-023-00609-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/02/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This observational study evaluated response in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who switched from an interleukin-6 receptor inhibitor (IL-6Ri) to a Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi) and vice versa. METHODS Adult patients with RA, who initiated IL-6Ri or JAKi (following discontinuation of JAKi or IL-6Ri, respectively) during/after December 2012 and had a 6-month follow-up visit were enrolled. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at baseline and the follow-up visit. Continuous outcomes included Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), pain, fatigue, tender joint count, swollen joint count, Physician Global Assessment (MDGA), Patient Global Assessment (PtGA), and morning stiffness duration. Categorical outcomes included the proportion of patients achieving CDAI low disease activity (LDA), remission, and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for HAQ, pain, fatigue, MDGA, and PtGA. Continuous outcomes were summarized as mean changes from baseline, and categorical outcomes as response rates. Differences in the outcome measures between groups were evaluated using linear and logistic regression models. RESULTS Between IL-6Ri (n = 100) and JAKi initiators (n = 129), no significant differences were noted for continuous outcomes. Within both groups, a significant proportion of patients achieved LDA, remission, and MCIDs for other measures, although the odds of achieving LDA were higher among IL-6Ri (vs. JAKi) initiators with moderate-to-severe disease (adjusted odds ratio: 3.30 [1.01, 10.78]). CONCLUSIONS Patients with RA can achieve improvement in response when switching between IL-6Ri and JAKi. Although both therapies affect the IL-6 pathway, there are distinct mechanisms of action, which likely contribute to their clinical improvement, when reciprocally switched as follow-on treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anisha B Dua
- Division of Rheumatology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Kerri Ford
- Medical Affairs, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Dimitrios A Pappas
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
- Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
- Corrona Research Foundation, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Joel M Kremer
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Center for Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Alan Kivitz
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research, Duncansville, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bergman M, Chen N, Thielen R, Zueger P. One-Year Medication Adherence and Persistence in Rheumatoid Arthritis in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Analysis of Upadacitinib, Adalimumab, Baricitinib, and Tofacitinib. Adv Ther 2023; 40:4493-4503. [PMID: 37542646 PMCID: PMC10499920 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02619-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study evaluated 12 months adherence and persistence among Janus kinase inhibitors (upadacitinib, baricitinib, tofacitinib) and adalimumab, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi), in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS This retrospective analysis used administrative claims data from the Merative™ MarketScan® Research Databases (2018-2022). Eligible adults had ≥ 1 RA diagnosis before the index date, ≥ 1 pharmacy claim for index medication, and ≥ 12 months of continuous insurance enrollment pre- and post-index. Adherence to treatment [defined as proportion of days covered (PDC) ≥ 80%], risk of treatment discontinuation, and mean time to discontinuation were assessed during the 12 months follow-up. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR), adjusted hazard ratios (aHR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. RESULTS In total, 6317 patients were included (683 upadacitinib, 3732 adalimumab, 132 baricitinib, 1770 tofacitinib). Compared with upadacitinib, patients initiating adalimumab [aOR (95% CI): 0.82 (0.69, 0.96)], baricitinib [0.46 (0.31, 0.68)], and tofacitinib [0.74 (0.62, 0.88)] were significantly less likely to achieve PDC ≥ 80%. Risk of treatment discontinuation was significantly higher in patients treated with adalimumab [aHR (95% CI): 1.14 (1.01, 1.29)], baricitinib [1.48 (1.16, 1.90)], and tofacitinib [1.22 (1.07, 1.38)] compared with upadacitinib. Mean time to discontinuation was 256 (upadacitinib), 249 (adalimumab), 221 (baricitinib), and 239 (tofacitinib) days. Similar results were observed in patients with prior TNFi use. CONCLUSIONS Patients with RA, regardless of recent TNFi experience, initiating upadacitinib were significantly more likely to be adherent and less likely to discontinue therapy compared to adalimumab, baricitinib, and tofacitinib in the first 12 months of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Bergman
- College of Medicine, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Naijun Chen
- AbbVie Inc., 26525 N Riverwoods Blvd., Mettawa, North Chicago, IL, 60045, USA
| | - Richard Thielen
- AbbVie Inc., 26525 N Riverwoods Blvd., Mettawa, North Chicago, IL, 60045, USA
| | - Patrick Zueger
- AbbVie Inc., 26525 N Riverwoods Blvd., Mettawa, North Chicago, IL, 60045, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sparks JA, Harrold LR, Simon TA, Wittstock K, Kelly S, Lozenski K, Khaychuk V, Michaud K. Comparative effectiveness of treatments for rheumatoid arthritis in clinical practice: A systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2023; 62:152249. [PMID: 37573754 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess real-world comparative effectiveness studies of biologic (b) and targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) through a systematic review. METHODS We searched Medline for journal articles (2001-2021) and Embase® for abstracts presented at the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology and American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 2020 and 2021 annual meetings on non-randomized studies comparing the effectiveness of b/tsDMARDs using ACR-recommended disease activity measures, measures of functional status, and patient-reported outcomes (HAQ, PROMIS PF, patient pain, Patient and Physician Global Assessment of disease activity). Methodological heterogeneity between studies precluded meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions-I tool. RESULTS Of 1283 records screened, 68 were selected for data extraction, of which 1 was excluded due to critical risk of bias. Most studies were multicenter observational cohort/registry studies (n = 60) and were published between 2011 and 2021 (n = 60). Mean or median reported RA duration was between 6 and 15 years. Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (46 studies), Clinical Disease Activity Index (37 studies), and Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (32 studies) were the most common outcomes used in clinical practice, with regional differences identified. The most common comparison was between tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFis) and non-TNFi bDMARDs (35 studies). There were no evident differences between b/tsDMARDs in clinical effectiveness. CONCLUSION This systematic review summarizing real-world evidence from a very large number of global studies found there are many effective options for the treatment of RA, but relatively less evidence to support the use of any one b/tsDMARD or drug class over another. Treatment for patients with RA should be tailored to suit individual clinical profiles. Further research is needed to identify whether specific patient subgroups may benefit from specific drug classes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey A Sparks
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leslie R Harrold
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA; University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kaleb Michaud
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA; FORWARD, The National Databank for Rheumatic Diseases, Wichita, KS, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Taylor PC, Laedermann C, Alten R, Feist E, Choy E, Haladyj E, De La Torre I, Richette P, Finckh A, Tanaka Y. A JAK Inhibitor for Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis: The Baricitinib Experience. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4527. [PMID: 37445562 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 06/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1/JAK2 inhibitor, is approved as monotherapy or in combination with methotrexate for treating adults with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and provides improvements in clinical signs, symptoms and patient-reported outcomes. Currently, baricitinib is approved for treating RA in more than 75 countries. In several pivotal Phase II and III RA trials (RA-BALANCE, RA-BEGIN, RA-BEAM, RA-BUILD, RA-BEACON, RA-BEYOND), up to seven years of baricitinib treatment was well tolerated and provided rapid and sustained efficacy, which was confirmed in real-world settings. Safety signals for another JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, have emerged, as observed in the post-marketing Phase IIIb/IV trial Oral Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial (ORAL) Surveillance; safety signals were subsequently highlighted in a retrospective study of baricitinib and consequently new recommendations and warnings and precautions for all JAK inhibitors have been issued. Ongoing studies to further characterise and clarify the benefit:risk of JAK inhibitors include registries and controlled trials. This capstone review summarises clinical and real-world data outlining the benefit:risk profile of baricitinib, confirming that the improved disease activity and physical function of patients with RA treated with this JAK inhibitor observed in clinical trials is translated into effectiveness in clinical practice, with a low rate of discontinuations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter C Taylor
- Botnar Research Centre, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology, and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LD, UK
| | | | - Rieke Alten
- Internal Medicine II, Rheumatology, SCHLOSSPARK-KLINIK, University Medicine Berlin, 14059 Berlin, Germany
| | - Eugen Feist
- Department of Rheumatology, Helios Clinic Vogelsang-Gommern, Cooperation Partner of the Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39245 Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Ernest Choy
- Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK
| | - Ewa Haladyj
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA
| | | | - Pascal Richette
- Service de Rhumatologie, Hôpital Lariboisière, 75010 Paris, France
- Inserm, UMR-S 1132, Bioscar, Université de Paris, 75010 Paris, France
| | - Axel Finckh
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Geneva University Hospitals, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Yoshiya Tanaka
- First Department of Internal Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu 807-0804, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pombo-Suárez M, Seoane-Mato D, Díaz-González F, Sánchez-Alonso F, Sánchez-Jareño M, Cea-Calvo L, Castrejón I. Four-years retention rate of golimumab administered after discontinuation of non-TNF inhibitors in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Adv Rheumatol 2023; 63:25. [PMID: 37287051 DOI: 10.1186/s42358-023-00296-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with rheumatic diseases, the use of biological (b) or targeted synthetic (ts) disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) after discontinuation of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) is known to be effective. However, data on the use of TNFi after discontinuation of non-TNFi bDMARDs or tsDMARDs (non-TNFi) are scarce. This study assessed the 4-years golimumab retention in patients with rheumatic diseases when used after discontinuation of non-TNFi. METHODS Adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA; n = 72), psoriatic arthritis (PsA; n = 30) or axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA; n = 23) who initiated golimumab after discontinuation of non-TNFi from the Spanish registry of biological drugs (BIOBADASER) were analyzed retrospectively. The retention rate (drug survival or persistence) of golimumab up to 4 years was evaluated. RESULTS The golimumab retention rate was 60.7% (51.4-68.8) at year 1, 45.9% (36.0-55.2) at year 2, 39.9% (29.8-49.7) at year 3 and 33.4% (23.0-44.2) at year 4. Retention rates did not differ significantly whether golimumab was used as second, third, or fourth/subsequent line of therapy (p log-rank = 0.462). Golimumab retention rates were higher in axSpA or PsA patients than in RA patients (p log-rank = 0.002). When golimumab was administered as third or fourth/subsequent line, the 4-years retention rate after discontinuation of non-TNFi was similar to that after discontinuation of TNFi. CONCLUSION In patients who discontinued non-TNFi, most of whom received golimumab as third/subsequent line of therapy, one-third of patients remained on golimumab at year 4. Retention rates were higher in patients with axSpA and PsA than in those with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Pombo-Suárez
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Rúa da Choupana, S/N, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
| | - Daniel Seoane-Mato
- Clinical Research Unit, Spanish Society of Rheumatology (SER), Madrid, Spain
| | - Federico Díaz-González
- Department of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dermatology and Psychiatry, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
- Instituto de Tecnologías Biomédicas (ITB), Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Isabel Castrejón
- Department of Rheumatology, Gregorio Marañón University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sebba A, Bingham CO, Bykerk VP, Fiore S, Ford K, Janak JC, Pappas DA, Blachley T, Dave SS, Kremer JM, Yu M, Choy E. Comparative effectiveness of TNF inhibitor vs IL-6 receptor inhibitor as monotherapy or combination therapy with methotrexate in biologic-experienced patients with rheumatoid arthritis: An analysis from the CorEvitas RA Registry. Clin Rheumatol 2023:10.1007/s10067-023-06588-7. [PMID: 37060528 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06588-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 02/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in biologic-naïve rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with high disease activity and inadequate response/intolerance to methotrexate have shown interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptor inhibitors (IL-6Ri) to be superior to tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi) as monotherapy. This observational study aimed to compare the effectiveness of TNFi vs IL-6Ri as mono- or combination therapy in biologic/targeted synthetic (b/ts) -experienced RA patients with moderate/high disease activity. METHODS Eligible b/ts-experienced patients from the CorEvitas RA registry were categorized as TNFi and IL-6Ri initiators, with subgroups initiating as mono- or combination therapy. Mixed-effects regression models evaluated the impact of treatment on Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), patient-reported outcomes, and disproportionate pain (DP). Unadjusted and covariate-adjusted effects were reported. RESULTS Patients initiating IL-6Ri (n = 286) vs TNFi monotherapy (n = 737) were older, had a longer RA history and higher baseline CDAI, and were more likely to initiate as third-line therapy; IL-6Ri (n = 401) vs TNFi (n = 1315) combination therapy initiators had higher baseline CDAI and were more likely to initiate as third-line therapy. No significant differences were noted in the outcomes between TNFi and IL-6Ri initiators (as mono- or combination therapy). CONCLUSION This observational study showed no significant differences in outcomes among b/ts-experienced TNFi vs IL-6Ri initiators, as either mono- or combination therapy. These findings were in contrast with the previous RCTs in biologic-naïve patients and could be explained by the differences in the patient characteristics included in this study. Further studies are needed to help understand the reasons for this discrepancy in the real-world b/ts-experienced population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Sebba
- Rheumatology, Arthritis Associates, Palm Harbor, FL, USA.
| | - Clifton O Bingham
- Division of Rheumatology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Vivian P Bykerk
- Inflammatory Arthritis Center, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Kerri Ford
- Medical Affairs, Sanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Dimitrios A Pappas
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
- Division of Rheumatology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Joel M Kremer
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Center for Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Miao Yu
- CorEvitas, LLC, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Ernest Choy
- CREATE Centre, Division of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Wales, UK
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alten R, Burmester GR, Matucci-Cerinic M, Salmon JH, Lopez-Romero P, Fakhouri W, de la Torre I, Zaremba-Pechmann L, Holzkämper T, Fautrel B. The RA-BE-REAL Multinational, Prospective, Observational Study in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Receiving Baricitinib, Targeted Synthetic, or Biologic Disease-Modifying Therapies: a 6-Month Interim Analysis. Rheumatol Ther 2023; 10:73-93. [PMID: 36227530 PMCID: PMC9557042 DOI: 10.1007/s40744-022-00500-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION RA-BE-REAL has the overall aim of defining a profile of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) starting baricitinib or any other targeted synthetic (ts) or any biologic (b) disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) for the first time, and the primary objective of estimating time until discontinuation from any cause (excluding sustained response) of the initial treatment. METHODS RA-BE-REAL is an ongoing, prospective, observational, 36-month study in patients with RA initiating treatment with baricitinib (cohort A) or any other tsDMARD or any bDMARD (cohort B) for the first time. The primary objective is to assess the time until treatment discontinuation from any cause (excluding sustained response) at 24 months, (i.e., the rate of discontinuation of initial baricitinib or ts/bDMARD). Patient profiles of each cohort are described and compared. Post-baseline data are descriptively analyzed. This manuscript presents baseline and interim (6-month) outcomes for European patients with RA participating in the global RA-BE-REAL study. RESULTS Data from 1074 patients (cohort A: 509; cohort B: 565) were analyzed. For cohorts A and B, respectively, the 6-month cumulative incidence (95% confidence interval) of treatment discontinuation was 16.5 (12.9-21.1) and 23.3 (19.1-28.2), and the proportions of patients achieving remission were 25.6% and 18.5%. At baseline, mean patient age was 59.1 and 57.0 years (p = 0.010) and mean disease duration was 10.0 and 8.9 years (p = 0.047), respectively. The proportions of patients exposed to ts/bDMARDs at any time before study entry were 51.9% and 39.1%, and the proportions of patients initiated on monotherapy were 50.9% and 31.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION In real-world settings, patients with RA initiating treatment with baricitinib were older and had longer disease duration than those initiating treatment with any other tsDMARD or any bDMARD. Initial descriptive data regarding treatment discontinuation (including reasons for discontinuation), effectiveness, and treatment patterns will be enriched as the study progresses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rieke Alten
- Department of Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, Schlosspark-Klinik, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Gerd R Burmester
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marco Matucci-Cerinic
- Unit of Immunology, Rheumatology, Allergy and Rare Diseases (UnIRAR), IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology AOUC, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Jean-Hugues Salmon
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Reims Champagne-Ardenne, UR 3797, 51095, Reims, France
- Rheumatology Department, Maison Blanche Hospital, Reims University Hospitals, 51092, Reims, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Bruno Fautrel
- Department of Rheumatology, Pitie Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University-Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
- PEPITES Team, Pierre Louis Institute of Epidemiology and Public Health, INSERM UMRS, 11376, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Malange KF, Navia-Pelaez JM, Dias EV, Lemes JBP, Choi SH, Dos Santos GG, Yaksh TL, Corr M. Macrophages and glial cells: Innate immune drivers of inflammatory arthritic pain perception from peripheral joints to the central nervous system. FRONTIERS IN PAIN RESEARCH 2022; 3:1018800. [PMID: 36387416 PMCID: PMC9644179 DOI: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1018800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 07/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Millions of people suffer from arthritis worldwide, consistently struggling with daily activities due to debilitating pain evoked by this disease. Perhaps the most intensively investigated type of inflammatory arthritis is rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where, despite considerable advances in research and clinical management, gaps regarding the neuroimmune interactions that guide inflammation and chronic pain in this disease remain to be clarified. The pain and inflammation associated with arthritis are not isolated to the joints, and inflammatory mechanisms induced by different immune and glial cells in other tissues may affect the development of chronic pain that results from the disease. This review aims to provide an overview of the state-of-the-art research on the roles that innate immune, and glial cells play in the onset and maintenance of arthritis-associated pain, reviewing nociceptive pathways from the joint through the dorsal root ganglion, spinal circuits, and different structures in the brain. We will focus on the cellular mechanisms related to neuroinflammation and pain, and treatments targeting these mechanisms from the periphery and the CNS. A comprehensive understanding of the role these cells play in peripheral inflammation and initiation of pain and the central pathways in the spinal cord and brain will facilitate identifying new targets and pathways to aide in developing therapeutic strategies to treat joint pain associated with RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaue Franco Malange
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | | | - Elayne Vieira Dias
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | - Soo-Ho Choi
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | | | - Tony L. Yaksh
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Maripat Corr
- Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Barešić M, Smiljanić Tomičević L, Anić B, Mayer M. Successful IL-17A inhibitor cycling in psoriatic arthritis patient: a case report and a literature review. Rheumatol Int 2022. [PMID: 35022831 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-05065-1/tables/1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/26/2023]
Abstract
Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis with heterogeneous disease presentation. The most affected clinical domain of the disease determines the therapeutic approach. We report the case of a 34-year-old man with all six crucial domains of psoriatic arthritis (psoriasis, peripheral arthritis, axial skeletal manifestations, dactylitis, nail changes, and enthesitis) treated unsuccessfully with conventional synthetic DMARDs, NSAID's, and steroids as well as topical treatment and phototherapy. With golimumab as the first line of bDMARD partial remission was achieved. After 24 months the treatment was switched to secukinumab due to secondary inefficacy. The psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis relapsed after 21 months of treatment with secukinumab. The patient was cycled to ixekizumab with an excellent result. IL-17A inhibitor cycling may be a successful treatment option in some difficult to treat psoriatic arthritis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marko Barešić
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ljiljana Smiljanić Tomičević
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Branimir Anić
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Miroslav Mayer
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Center Zagreb, University of Zagreb, Kišpatićeva 12, 10000, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Successful IL-17A inhibitor cycling in psoriatic arthritis patient: a case report and a literature review. Rheumatol Int 2022; 42:365-370. [PMID: 35022831 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-021-05065-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Psoriatic arthritis is an inflammatory arthritis with heterogeneous disease presentation. The most affected clinical domain of the disease determines the therapeutic approach. We report the case of a 34-year-old man with all six crucial domains of psoriatic arthritis (psoriasis, peripheral arthritis, axial skeletal manifestations, dactylitis, nail changes, and enthesitis) treated unsuccessfully with conventional synthetic DMARDs, NSAID's, and steroids as well as topical treatment and phototherapy. With golimumab as the first line of bDMARD partial remission was achieved. After 24 months the treatment was switched to secukinumab due to secondary inefficacy. The psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis relapsed after 21 months of treatment with secukinumab. The patient was cycled to ixekizumab with an excellent result. IL-17A inhibitor cycling may be a successful treatment option in some difficult to treat psoriatic arthritis patients.
Collapse
|