Tocilizumab in refractory Caucasian Takayasu's arteritis: a multicenter study of 54 patients and literature review

The effectiveness of tocilizumab and its comparison with tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibitors for Takayasu Arteritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) refractory to conventional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is commonly treated with biologic DMARDs such as tocilizumab or tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors (TNFi). The 2021 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) recommendations preferred TNFi to tocilizumab. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the evidence base for tocilizumab in TAK by updating a previous systematic review on DMARDs in TAK through searches on MEDLINE, Pubmed Central, Scopus, major international Rheumatology conference abstracts, and clinical trial databases from January 2021 to November 2022. Thirty-five studies involving 1082 TAK [one randomized controlled trial (RCT), eleven controlled and twenty-one uncontrolled studies, most of moderate to high quality] had evaluated tocilizumab in TAK. The RCT of tocilizumab versus placebo failed to meet its primary end-point of superiority of tocilizumab on an intention-to-treat analysis (hazard ratio 0.41, 95%CI 0.15-1.10) but successfully met the secondary end-point of superiority on per-protocol analysis (hazard ratio 0.34, 95%CI 0.11-1.00). A meta-analysis of six studies identified similar rates of clinical remission [risk ratio (RR) tocilizumab vs TNFi 1.03, 95%CI 0.91-1.17)], angiographic stabilization (RR 1.00, 95%CI 0.72-1.40) or adverse events (RR 0.84, 95%CI 0.54-1.31) with tocilizumab or TNFi. A meta-analysis of three studies identified superior clinical response (RR 1.55, 95%CI 1.15-2.10) and adverse effect profile (RR 0.45, 95%CI 0.25-0.80) with tocilizumab than cyclophosphamide. Pooled data from uncontrolled studies identified clinical response in 85%(95%CI 79-91%) and angiographic stabilization in 82% (95%CI 68-94%). Our study suggests similar evidence for treating TAK with tocilizumab or TNFi, contrary to the ACR 2021 recommendations.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature on tocilizumab in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis

Objective

To present the pooled quantitative evidence of baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of tocilizumab (TCZ) in patients with refractory Takayasu arteritis (TAK).

Methods

A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis was performed on all available studies retrieved from the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases, using TCZ in patients with refractory TAK. We applied the commands metan and metaprop_one in Stata Software to pool overall estimates of continuous data and binomial data, respectively. A random-effects model was recruited for analysis.

Results

Nineteen studies with 466 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The mean age at implementation of TCZ was 34.32 years. Female sex and Numano Type V were the most prominent baseline characteristics. During the 12-month follow-up when receiving TCZ treatment, pooled CRP was 1.17 mg/L (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.18-2.52), pooled ESR was 3.54 mm/h (95% CI 0.51-6.58), and pooled glucocorticoid dose was 6.26 mg/d (95% CI 4.24-8.27). Approximately 76% (95% CI 58-87%) of patients achieved a decrease in glucocorticoid dosage. Meanwhile, patients with TAK had a remission rate of 79% (95% CI 69-86%), a relapse rate of 17% (95% CI 5-45%), an imaging progress rate of 16% (95% CI 9-27%), and a retention rate of 68% (95% CI 50-82%). Adverse events occurred in 16% (95% CI 5-39%) of patients, and infection was the most common adverse event, with a rate of 12% (95% CI 5-28%).

Conclusion

TCZ treatment can provide favorable outcomes in terms of inflammatory markers, steroid-sparing effects, clinical response, drug retention and minimizing adverse effects for patients with refractory TAK.

Tocilizumab for faster and safer remission of Takayasu's arteritis

Purpose

Takayasu's arteritis (TAK) is a large-vessel vasculitis. Glucocorticoids (GCs) combined with cyclophosphamide (CTX) is a common treatment option, but their efficacy is limited. The aim of this retrospective study was to study the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) in the treatment of TAK.

Patients and methods

A total of 63 patients with TAK were divided into two groups according to different treatment strategies: 31 patients in the TCZ group and 32 patients in the CTX group. After 6 months of treatment, disease activity and side effects were evaluated and were compared between the two groups.

Results

After 3 months of treatment, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) score (p = 0.005), Indian Takayasu Clinical Activity Score (ITAS) 2010 (p = 0.043), and the Indian Takayasu Activity Score with the Acute-Phase Response (ITAS.A; p = 0.036) were lower in patients treated with TCZ compared with those treated with CTX. In the TCZ group, the proportion of patients with NIH scores ⩽1 reached 50% after 1 month, 90% after 3 months, and 96% after 6 months of treatment, whereas in the CTX group, these proportion were 36%, 30%, and 78%, respectively. Thus, TCZ treatment of TAK is accompanied with a faster remission rate than CTX treatment. Moreover, the total cumulative incidence of adverse events was lower in the TCZ group than in the CTX group (p = 0.035).

Conclusion

TCZ was faster and safer in alleviating TAK.

Development of severe colitis in Takayasu arteritis treated with tocilizumab

Relapse of Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is frequent, and the use of biologics is required in refractory cases. Tocilizumab (TCZ), a biological agent used in TAK, is known to increase the incidence of diverticulitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Adverse events of TCZ in TAK have been poorly recognised. This study aimed to investigate the occurrence of severe colitis among patients with TAK receiving TCZ. We enrolled 116 patients with TAK who met the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology and visited our department between 2018 and 2020. The occurrence of severe colitis and its clinical characteristics were retrospectively evaluated. TCZ was introduced in 34 of 116 patients (29.3%). Severe colitis that required hospitalisation was observed in three of the 34 patients receiving TCZ (8.8%). All patients were female and had Numano type V artery lesions, and the ascending colon was commonly affected. Wide lesions that reached the sigmoid colon, colonic perforation, bacteraemia, or positive stool cultures were observed in some patients. All patients received antibiotics and intestinal rest, and TCZ was resumed in one patient. IL-6 plays a physiological role in the intestine, including recovery from ischaemic damage. In addition to infectious aetiology, blocking the physiological roles of IL-6 by TCZ is considered important for the development of colitis in TAK. Severe colitis is an important adverse event in patients with TAK who receive TCZ. The risk of bloodstream infection associated with colitis should be recognised, especially in patients who have undergone vascular surgery. Key Points • Severe colitis was observed in 8.8% of patients with TAK receiving tocilizumab • Patients had type V artery lesions and ascending colon involvement and were under long-term use of corticosteroids • Inhibition of the physiological roles of IL-6 in the intestinal tract might also be involved.