1
|
Jathanakodi S, Both C, Brueckmann I, Rose L, Nasseri N, Raynauld JP, Narula N. Patient Experience with the SensoReady ® Autoinjector Pen versus a Comparator Device: Results from a Canadian Patient Survey in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Crohn´s Disease. Patient Prefer Adherence 2024; 18:1107-1118. [PMID: 38854477 PMCID: PMC11162628 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s455791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Medication delivery device design impacts treatment satisfaction, adherence, and compliance in patients receiving biologics. This survey assessed autoinjector attributes that are important to patients, and assessed patient perceptions and preferences between an adalimumab biosimilar autoinjector (Hyrimoz® SensoReady® Pen [SDZ-ADL pen]) and the reference adalimumab autoinjector (Humira® Pen [ref-ADL pen]) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or Crohn's disease (CD) in Canada. Patients and Methods In this survey, adult patients were recruited for web-assisted telephone interviews. Patients had ≥ 3 months' experience with the ref-ADL pen and 1-12 months' experience with the SDZ-ADL pen. Results The survey included 120 patients with RA (n = 32) or CD (n = 88). Mean experience with the ref-ADL pen was 7 years for RA or 5 years for CD vs 9 months with the SDZ-ADL pen. The most important autoinjector attributes were the ability to use the pen independently and the ease and simplicity of self-injection. When comparing the two autoinjectors, patients significantly preferred the SDZ-ADL pen over the ref-ADL pen for nearly every attribute evaluated, with the greatest differences reported for visual and audible feedback mechanisms, ease of self-injection, and ability to use the device independently. Overall, 82% of patients preferred the SDZ-ADL pen over the ref-ADL pen, with buttonless activation and less injection pain being the main drivers for this preference. Conclusion Patients with RA or CD indicated a preference for the SDZ-ADL pen over the ref-ADL pen, independent of the duration of use of the pen. The preference for a biosimilar device within 1 year of switching provides reassurance of rapid patient acceptance of biosimilars and may simplify the switching process. These results confirm the importance of ensuring autoinjector design supports independent self-administration of medication and align with previous data showing high patient satisfaction with the SDZ-ADL pen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jean-Pierre Raynauld
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Montreal Institute of Rheumatology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Neeraj Narula
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, and Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sen R, Riofrio M, Singh JA. A narrative review of the comparative safety of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs used for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2024; 23:687-714. [PMID: 38695151 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2348575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) have improved the outcomes of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). DMARDs are classified into three categories: conventional synthetic DMARDs, biological DMARDs (including biosimilars), and targeted synthetic DMARDs. DMARDs, by way of their effect on the immune system, are associated with increased risk of adverse events, including infections, malignancies, cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal perforations, and other less common events. AREAS COVERED In this narrative literature review performed with searches of the PubMed database from 1 January 2010 through 1 January 2023, we compare the risk of safety events between DMARDs using data from both randomized clinical trials and observational studies. EXPERT OPINION DMARD use in RA is associated with higher rates of serious infections, tuberculosis reactivation, opportunistic infections, and possibly malignancies. Specific biologic DMARDs and higher doses are associated with elevated risks of various adverse events (gastrointestinal perforations, thromboembolism, serious infection). Shared decision-making is paramount when choosing a treatment regimen for patients based on their own comorbidities. JAKi are the newest class of medications used for RA with robust safety data provided in clinical trials. However, more real-world evidence and phase-IV pharmacovigilance data are needed to better understand comparative safety profile of DMARDs in RA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rouhin Sen
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Medicine/Rheumatology Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Maria Riofrio
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - Jasvinder A Singh
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, The University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
- Medicine/Rheumatology Birmingham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC), Birmingham, AL, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, UAB School of Public Health, Birmingham, AL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kay J, Cross RK, Feldman SR, Park Y, Hanauer SB. Review of Adalimumab Biosimilar SB5 in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases. Adv Ther 2024; 41:509-533. [PMID: 38110655 PMCID: PMC10838831 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02737-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
SB5 is an approved biosimilar of adalimumab, a recombinant monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antibody. The approval of SB5 was based on the comparison with reference adalimumab in analytical studies, pharmacokinetic (PK) and immunogenicity assessments, and randomized controlled trials. Efficacy data was primarily obtained in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, and extended to include additional indications such as psoriasis, Crohn's disease, or ulcerative colitis by extrapolation. Following its approval, additional post-marketing data have been collected comparing SB5 with reference adalimumab. This review summarizes the clinical data on SB5 from randomized controlled trials and provides a comprehensive overview of the available post-approval data. In "real-world" settings, SB5 was as effective as its reference product across different indications and countries, treatment persistence was well maintained throughout studies, and no new safety concerns were identified. In both controlled and "real-world" settings, switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 was not associated with altered efficacy or clinical complications. In post-approval studies, the quality of SB5 was consistent over time, independent of the batch and process changes, and the SB5 autoinjector was preferred over other autoinjectors by both healthcare professionals and patients. Taken together, these data support the use of SB5 whenever reference adalimumab is appropriate and demonstrate that switching from reference adalimumab to SB5 is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kay
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA, 01605, USA
| | - Raymond K Cross
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 685 West Baltimore Street, Suite 8-00, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
| | - Steven R Feldman
- Department of Dermatology, Center for Dermatology Research, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101, USA
| | | | - Stephen B Hanauer
- Department of Medicine (Gastroenterology and Hepatology), Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Müller-Ladner U, Dignass A, Gaffney K, Jadon D, Matucci-Cerinic M, Lobaton T, Carron P, Gisbert JP, Pande I, Utzinger M, Addison J. The PROPER Study: A 48-Week, Pan-European, Real-World Study of Biosimilar SB5 Following Transition from Reference Adalimumab in Patients with Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease. BioDrugs 2023; 37:873-889. [PMID: 37632666 PMCID: PMC10581927 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00616-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The non-interventional PROPER study generated real-world evidence on clinical outcomes following transition in routine practice from reference adalimumab to the EMA-approved SB5 biosimilar adalimumab in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory disease. METHODS Adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Crohn's disease (CD), or ulcerative colitis (UC) were enrolled at 63 sites across Europe. Eligible patients received ≥ 16 weeks of routine treatment with reference adalimumab before transitioning to SB5, and were followed for 48 weeks post-transition. The primary objective was to evaluate candidate predictors (clinically relevant baseline variables with incidence ≥ 15% by indication cohort) associated with persistence on SB5 at 48 weeks post-initiation. Key primary outcome measures were persistence on SB5 (estimated by Kaplan-Meier methodology) and clinical characteristics and disease activity scores at the time of transition to SB5 treatment (baseline). RESULTS A total of 955 eligible patients were enrolled (RA, n = 207; axSpA, n = 127; PsA, n = 162; CD, n = 447; UC, n = 12), of whom 932 (97.6%) completed follow-up and 722 (75.6%) were still receiving SB5 at week 48. Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% confidence interval, CI) of persistence on SB5 at week 48 for RA, axSpA, PsA, and CD were 0.86 (0.80-0.90), 0.80 (0.71-0.86), 0.81 (0.74-0.86), and 0.72 (0.67-0.76), respectively. The single candidate predictor associated with probability of SB5 discontinuation before week 48 was female sex [RA, axSpA, and CD cohorts; HR (95% CI): 3.53 (1.07-11.67), 2.38 (1.11-5.14), and 2.21 (1.54-3.18), respectively]. Disease activity scores remained largely unchanged throughout the study, with proportions by cohort in remission at baseline versus week 48 being 59.2% versus 57.2%, 81.0% versus 78.0%, 94.7% versus 93.7%, and 84.0% versus 85.1% for patients with RA, axSpA, PsA, and CD, respectively. Similarly, the SB5 dosing regimen remained unchanged for the majority of patients from baseline to week 48, the most common regimen being 40 mg every 2 weeks. In total, 232 patients (24.3%) reported at least one adverse drug reaction, and most events were mild; eight patients (3.9%) in the RA cohort experienced nine serious adverse events (SAEs; two possibly related to SB5); eight patients (4.9%) in the PsA cohort experienced nine SAEs (one possibly related to SB5); 22 patients (4.9%) in the CD cohort experienced 27 SAEs (four possibly related to SB5); and no SAEs were observed in the UC cohort. CONCLUSIONS With the exception of female sex in RA, axSpA, and CD, none of the candidate predictors were associated with SB5 discontinuation. Persistence on SB5 was high, treatment effectiveness was maintained, and no safety signals were detected. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04089514.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulf Müller-Ladner
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Campus Kerckhoff, Benekestr. 2-8, 61231, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
| | - Axel Dignass
- Department of Medicine I, Agaplesion Markus Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Karl Gaffney
- Rheumatology Department, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Deepak Jadon
- Rheumatology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marco Matucci-Cerinic
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
- UNIRAR, Hospital San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Triana Lobaton
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Philippe Carron
- Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
- Molecular Immunology and Inflammation Unit, Center for Inflammation Research, VIB-UGent, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Unit, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Ira Pande
- Department of Rheumatology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Redeker I, Moustakis S, Tsiami S, Baraliakos X, Andreica I, Buehring B, Braun J, Kiltz U. Treatment with adalimumab in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases: a study of treatment trajectories on a patient level in routine care. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis 2023; 15:1759720X231197087. [PMID: 37694183 PMCID: PMC10492472 DOI: 10.1177/1759720x231197087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Previous experiences with non-medical switching of adalimumab (ADA) in patients with chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD) come mainly from phase III extension of randomised clinical trials and little from routine care. Objectives To analyse treatment trajectories over 2 years in patients with CIRD conducting a non-medical switch from originator to biosimilar ADA. Design A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted with data from a third-level rheumatology centre in Germany. CIRD patients on originator ADA who switched to ADA biosimilar from October 2018 onwards were identified and followed until September 2020. Methods Patients' characteristics were compared between the four a priori defined treatment trajectories 'continued biosimilar ADA therapy', 'back-switch to originator ADA therapy', 'switch to another biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapy' and 'stopped bDMARD therapy/death/drop out'. Factors associated with continuing biosimilar ADA therapy were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression analyses. Results A total of 121 CIRD patients were included. Most patients (66.9%) continued therapy with biosimilar ADA over 2 years, with a treatment retention rate of 73.1%. Whereas 21 patients (17.4%) switched back to originator ADA, mainly due to adverse events, and 8 patients (6.6%) switched to a different bDMARD, mainly due to lack of effect. The estimated risk of withdrawal was lower for longer prior duration on originator ADA [hazard ratio (HR): 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69-0.97] and higher for higher C-reactive protein levels at baseline (HR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.00-1.39). Male patients, older patients and those for whom originator ADA was their first bDMARD tended to have a lower risk of withdrawal. Conclusion Our results indicated that three of four patients continue biosimilar ADA over 2 years with lower risks of withdrawal for male sex, older age, longer prior duration on originator ADA and originator ADA as first bDMARD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imke Redeker
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | - Stefan Moustakis
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | - Styliani Tsiami
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | - Xenofon Baraliakos
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | - Ioana Andreica
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne, Germany
| | - Bjoern Buehring
- Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany Krankenhaus St. Josef, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | | - Uta Kiltz
- Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Claudiusstraße 45, Herne 44649, Germany Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gisbert JP, Gaffney K, Young D, Ebbers HC, Girolomoni G. Current evidence on the use of the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 (Imraldi TM): a multidisciplinary perspective. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2021; 22:109-121. [PMID: 34918591 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2012146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review provides an overview of data from trials and real-world studies available for SB5 (ImraldiTM) across three main therapeutic areas: rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology. AREAS COVERED A literature search for publications on data for SB5 efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity was undertaken. EXPERT OPINION Evidence derived from clinical studies suggest that the biosimilar SB5 is a safe and effective alternative to reference adalimumab. Considering that patients suffering from immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis often require long-term biologic treatment, biosimilar medicines (such as SB5) can reduce healthcare costs while increasing access to effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Karl Gaffney
- Rheumatology Department, Norfolk and Norwich Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - David Young
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Giampiero Girolomoni
- Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|