1
|
Kelly A, Marks BE, Stalvey MS. Endocrine Complications of Cystic Fibrosis. Clin Chest Med 2022; 43:773-789. [PMID: 36344080 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2022.06.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Endocrine comorbidities have become increasingly important medical considerations as improving cystic fibrosis (CF) care increases life expectancy. Although the underlying pathophysiology of CF-related diabetes remains elusive, the use of novel technologies and therapeutics seeks to improve both CF-related outcomes and quality of life. Improvements in the overall health of those with CF have tempered concerns about pubertal delay and short stature; however, other comorbidities such as hypogonadism and bone disease are increasingly recognized. Following the introduction of highly effective modulator therapies there are many lessons to be learned about their long-term impact on endocrine comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Kelly
- Division of Endocrinology & Diabetes, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Room 14363, Roberts Building for Pediatric Research, 2716 South Street, Philadelphia, PA 19146, USA
| | - Brynn E Marks
- Division of Endocrinology & Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Room 7547, The Hub for Clinical Collaboration, 3501 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Michael S Stalvey
- Department of Pediatrics, UAB Gregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Children's of Alabama, CPPII M30, 1600 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35233-1711, USA; Department of Medicine, UAB Gregory Fleming James Cystic Fibrosis Research Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Children's of Alabama, CPPII M30, 1600 7th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35233-1711, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pinsker JE, Dassau E, Deshpande S, Raghinaru D, Buckingham BA, Kudva YC, Laffel LM, Levy CJ, Church MM, Desrochers H, Ekhlaspour L, Kaur RJ, Levister C, Shi D, Lum JW, Kollman C, Doyle FJ. Outpatient Randomized Crossover Comparison of Zone Model Predictive Control Automated Insulin Delivery with Weekly Data Driven Adaptation Versus Sensor-Augmented Pump: Results from the International Diabetes Closed-Loop Trial 4. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:635-642. [PMID: 35549708 PMCID: PMC9422791 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2022.0084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have proven effective in increasing time-in-range during both clinical trials and real-world use. Further improvements in outcomes for single-hormone (insulin only) AID may be limited by suboptimal insulin delivery settings. Methods: Adults (≥18 years of age) with type 1 diabetes were randomized to either sensor-augmented pump (SAP) (inclusive of predictive low-glucose suspend) or adaptive zone model predictive control AID for 13 weeks, then crossed over to the other arm. Each week, the AID insulin delivery settings were sequentially and automatically updated by an adaptation system running on the study phone. Primary outcome was sensor glucose time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL, with noninferiority in percent time below 54 mg/dL as a hierarchical outcome. Results: Thirty-five participants completed the trial (mean age 39 ± 16 years, HbA1c at enrollment 6.9% ± 1.0%). Mean time-in-range 70-180 mg/dL was 66% with SAP versus 69% with AID (mean adjusted difference +2% [95% confidence interval: -1% to +6%], P = 0.22). Median time <70 mg/dL improved from 3.0% with SAP to 1.6% with AID (-1.5% [-2.4% to -0.5%], P = 0.002). The adaptation system decreased initial basal rates by a median of 4% (-8%, 16%) and increased initial carbohydrate ratios by a median of 45% (32%, 59%) after 13 weeks. Conclusions: Automated adaptation of insulin delivery settings with AID use did not significantly improve time-in-range in this very well-controlled population. Additional study and further refinement of the adaptation system are needed, especially in populations with differing degrees of baseline glycemic control, who may show larger benefits from adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Eyal Dassau
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sunil Deshpande
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Dan Raghinaru
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Bruce A. Buckingham
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lori M. Laffel
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Carol J. Levy
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mei Mei Church
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Hannah Desrochers
- Research Division, Joslin Diabetes Center and Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Laya Ekhlaspour
- Division of Pediatric Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ravinder Jeet Kaur
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Camilla Levister
- Division of Endocrinology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Dawei Shi
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | - John W. Lum
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Craig Kollman
- Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Francis J. Doyle
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Xu NY, Nguyen KT, DuBord AY, Pickup J, Sherr JL, Teymourian H, Cengiz E, Ginsberg BH, Cobelli C, Ahn D, Bellazzi R, Bequette BW, Gandrud Pickett L, Parks L, Spanakis EK, Masharani U, Akturk HK, Melish JS, Kim S, Kang GE, Klonoff DC. Diabetes Technology Meeting 2021. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2022; 16:1016-1056. [PMID: 35499170 PMCID: PMC9264449 DOI: 10.1177/19322968221090279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Diabetes Technology Society hosted its annual Diabetes Technology Meeting on November 4 to November 6, 2021. This meeting brought together speakers to discuss various developments within the field of diabetes technology. Meeting topics included blood glucose monitoring, continuous glucose monitoring, novel sensors, direct-to-consumer telehealth, metrics for glycemia, software for diabetes, regulation of diabetes technology, diabetes data science, artificial pancreas, novel insulins, insulin delivery, skin trauma, metabesity, precision diabetes, diversity in diabetes technology, use of diabetes technology in pregnancy, and green diabetes. A live demonstration on a mobile app to monitor diabetic foot wounds was presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Y. Xu
- Diabetes Technology Society,
Burlingame, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Eda Cengiz
- University of California, San
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - David Ahn
- Mary & Dick Allen Diabetes Center
at Hoag, Newport Beach, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Linda Parks
- University of California, San
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Elias K. Spanakis
- Baltimore VA Medical Center,
Baltimore, MD, USA
- University of Maryland, Baltimore,
MD, USA
| | - Umesh Masharani
- University of California, San
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Halis K. Akturk
- Barbara Davis Center for Diabetes,
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | | | - Sarah Kim
- University of California, San
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Gu Eon Kang
- The University of Texas at Dallas,
Richardson, TX, USA
| | - David C. Klonoff
- Diabetes Research Institute,
Mills-Peninsula Medical Center, San Mateo, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kaur RJ, Deshpande S, Pinsker JE, Gilliam WP, McCrady-Spitzer S, Zaniletti I, Desjardins D, Church MM, Doyle III FJ, Kremers WK, Dassau E, Kudva YC. Outpatient Randomized Crossover Automated Insulin Delivery Versus Conventional Therapy with Induced Stress Challenges. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:338-349. [PMID: 35049354 PMCID: PMC9271334 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have not been evaluated in the context of psychological and pharmacological stress in type 1 diabetes. Our objective was to determine glycemic control and insulin use with Zone Model Predictive Control (zone-MPC) AID system enhanced for states of persistent hyperglycemia versus sensor-augmented pump (SAP) during outpatient use, including in-clinic induced stress. Materials and Methods: Randomized, crossover, 2-week trial of zone-MPC AID versus SAP in 14 adults with type 1 diabetes. In each arm, each participant was studied in-clinic with psychological stress induction (Trier Social Stress Test [TSST] and Socially Evaluated Cold Pressor Test [SECPT]), followed by pharmacological stress induction with oral hydrocortisone (total four sessions per participant). The main outcomes were 2-week continuous glucose monitor percent time in range (TIR) 70-180 mg/dL, and glucose and insulin outcomes during and overnight following stress induction. Results: During psychological stress, AID decreased glycemic variability percentage by 13.4% (P = 0.009). During pharmacological stress, including the following overnight, there were no differences in glucose outcomes and total insulin between AID and physician-assisted SAP. However, with AID total user-requested insulin was lower by 6.9 U (P = 0.01) for pharmacological stress. Stress induction was validated by changes in heart rate and salivary cortisol levels. During the 2-week AID use, TIR was 74.4% (vs. SAP 63.1%, P = 0.001) and overnight TIR was 78.3% (vs. SAP 63.1%, P = 0.004). There were no adverse events. Conclusions: Zone-MPC AID can reduce glycemic variability and the need for user-requested insulin during pharmacological stress and can improve overall glycemic outcomes. Clinical Trial Identifier NCT04142229.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravinder Jeet Kaur
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Sunil Deshpande
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | | | | | - Shelly McCrady-Spitzer
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Isabella Zaniletti
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Donna Desjardins
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mei Mei Church
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Francis J. Doyle III
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Walter K. Kremers
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Eyal Dassau
- Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
| | - Yogish C. Kudva
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
- Address correspondence to: Yogish C. Kudva, MBBS, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester MN 55902, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pinsker JE, Church MM, Brown SA, Voelmle MK, Bode BW, Narron B, Huyett LM, Lee JB, O'Connor J, Benjamin E, Dumais B, Ly TT. Clinical Evaluation of a Novel CGM-Informed Bolus Calculator with Automatic Glucose Trend Adjustment. Diabetes Technol Ther 2022; 24:18-25. [PMID: 34491825 PMCID: PMC8783627 DOI: 10.1089/dia.2021.0140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Background: Expert opinion guidelines and limited data from clinical trials recommend adjustment to bolus insulin doses based on continuous glucose monitor (CGM) trend data, yet minimal evidence exists to support this approach. We performed a clinical evaluation of a novel CGM-informed bolus calculator (CIBC) with automatic insulin bolus dose adjustment based on CGM trend used with sensor-augmented pump therapy. Materials and Methods: In this multicenter, outpatient study, participants 6-70 years of age with type 1 diabetes (T1D) used the Omnipod® 5 System in Manual Mode, first for 7 days without a connected CGM (standard bolus calculator, SBC, phase 1) and then for 7 days with a connected CGM using the CIBC (CIBC phase 2). The integrated bolus calculator used stored pump settings plus user-estimated meal size and/or either a manually entered capillary glucose value (SBC phase) or an imported current CGM value and trend (CIBC phase) to recommend a bolus amount. The CIBC automatically increased or decreased the suggested bolus amount based on the CGM trend. Results: Twenty-five participants, (mean ± standard deviation) 27 ± 15 years of age, with T1D duration 12 ± 9 years and A1C 7.0% ± 0.9% completed the study. There were significantly fewer sensor readings <70 mg/dL 4 h postbolus with the CIBC compared to the SBC (2.1% ± 2.0% vs. 2.8 ± 2.7, P = 0.03), while percent of sensor readings >180 and 70-180 mg/dL remained the same. There was no difference in insulin use or number of boluses given between the two phases. Conclusion: The CIBC was safe when used with the Omnipod 5 System in Manual Mode, with fewer hypoglycemic readings in the postbolus period compared to the SBC. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04320069).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan E. Pinsker
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Mei Mei Church
- Sansum Diabetes Research Institute, Santa Barbara, California, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Sue A. Brown
- Division of Endocrinology, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Mary K. Voelmle
- Division of Endocrinology, Center for Diabetes Technology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Bruce W. Bode
- Atlanta Diabetes Associates, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Brooke Narron
- Atlanta Diabetes Associates, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Lauren M. Huyett
- Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Joon Bok Lee
- Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Jason O'Connor
- Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Eric Benjamin
- Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Bonnie Dumais
- Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
| | - Trang T. Ly
- Insulet Corporation, Acton, Massachusetts, USA
- Results of this study were presented in abstract form at the 14th International Conference on Advanced Technologies & Treatments for Diabetes, June 2021
- Address correspondence to: Trang T. Ly, MBBS, FRACP, PhD, Insulet Corporation, 100 Nagog Park, Acton, MA 01720, USA
| |
Collapse
|