Increased plasma soluble CD40 ligand concentration in pelvic inflammatory disease

BACKGROUND

The role of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L) in pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) remains unclear. We sought to determine whether sCD40L was an efficient serum marker as with WBC and CRP in PID patients.

METHODS

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to measure the plasma levels of sCD40L before and after routine protocol treatments in sixty-four PID patients and seventy healthy controls.

RESULTS

The level of plasma sCD40L (pg/ml) was significantly elevated in PID patients (1632.83±270.91) compared to that in normal controls (700.33±58.77; p=0.001) and decreased significantly as compared to that in the same patients (928.77±177.25; p=0.0001) after they received treatment. The concentration of sCD40L was significantly correlated with the level of plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) in the blood (r=0.202, p=0.01, n=134). When the cutoff level of plasma sCD40L levels was determined to be 1612.26pg/ml based on ROC, the sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve of plasma sCD40L level for predicting PID were 0.26, 0.97, and 0.58 (95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.68), respectively, while the adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with their 95% CI of plasma sCD40L for PID risk was 7.09 (95% CI=1.14-43.87, p=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

The expression of plasma sCD40L was increased in patients with PID and detection of plasma sCD40L could be useful for the diagnosis of PID.

In prehypertension leukocytosis is associated with body mass index but not with blood pressure or incident hypertension

BACKGROUND

Previous studies reported increased white blood cell counts (WBCCs), an inflammatory marker, in hypertension, prehypertension and metabolic syndrome. Evidence suggests that inflammation precedes blood pressure (BP) elevation and may contribute to incident hypertension. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) may reduce inflammation. We analyzed WBCC trends in TRial Of Preventing HYpertension (TROPHY) to determine if this inflammatory marker predicted incident hypertension in prehypertensive individuals and whether randomized assignment to the ARB candesartan (391 individuals) for 2 years, lowered WBCC compared with placebo-treated controls (381 individuals).

METHODS

A new analysis of TROPHY trial data.

RESULTS

In the total population, baseline BMI correlated with WBCC (r = 0.185, P < 0.0001), neutrophils (r = 0.135, P < 0.001) and lymphocytes (r = 0.204, P < 0.0001). Baseline triglycerides also correlated significantly with inflammatory markers. Despite a wide range of home BP (HBP) values, HBP did not correlate with baseline WBCC counts. After 2 years, candesartan decreased placebo corrected HBP by -5.5/-2.5 mmHg, (P < 0.0001), but WBCC, neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were not different in placebo and in candesartan groups. Baseline WBCC, neutrophils and lymphocyte counts did not predict incident hypertension in the placebo group.

CONCLUSION

In TROPHY, candesartan lowered BP but did not alter WBCC. Baseline WBCC did not predict incident hypertension. Our findings do not support the hypothesis that inflammation contributes to incident hypertension or that ARB treatment suppresses inflammation. The significant independent association of WBCC with baseline BMI and triglycerides is consistent with the evidence that obesity and insulin resistance are associated with inflammation. The findings highlight the importance of effective lifestyle modification in prehypertension to reduce inflammatory cardio-metabolic risk and suppress transition to hypertension.

Pelvic inflammatory disease: identifying research gaps--proceedings of a workshop sponsored by Department of Health and Human Services/National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, November 3-4, 2011

In November 2011, the National Institutes of Health convened a workshop of basic researchers, epidemiologists, and clinical experts in pelvic inflammatory disease to identify research gaps hindering advances in diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. This article summarizes the presentations, discussions, and conclusions of this group and highlights significant controversies that reveal aspects of pelvic inflammatory disease research that would most greatly benefit from the application of newer molecular, immunologic, and radiologic techniques. Multiple limitations to performing new clinical trials exist; however, emerging data from ongoing clinical trials will add to the current body of knowledge regarding prevention and treatment strategies. In addition, use of established health care databases could serve as a valuable tool for performance of unbiased epidemiologic outcome studies.