Retrospective analysis of mini-open repair versus open repair for acute Achilles tendon ruptures

The ALR-RSI score can be used to evaluate psychological readiness to return to sport after acute Achilles tendon tear

PURPOSE

The return to sport is one of the main goals following Achilles tendon tear repair. Several psychological factors influence the return to sport after a sports injury. The traditional tools to assess the return to sport do not take into account psychological factors. The ankle ligament reconstruction-return to sport injury (ALR-RSI), validated for ankle instability, is a score to evaluate psychological readiness to return to sport. The goal of this study was to validate the ALR-RSI score for the assessment of the readiness to return to sport after Achilles tendon repair.

METHODS

The ALR-RSI score, adapted from the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport injury (ACL-RSI) score used following knee ligament reconstruction, was validated according to the international COSMIN methodology. Patients operated for Achilles tendon repair responded to the questionnaire during the rehabilitation period. The EFAS, FAAM and VISA-A scores were used as reference questionnaires.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients were included. The ALR-RSI score was strongly (r > 0.5) correlated to the EFAS score: r = 0.68 [0.50-0.80] the FAMM sport score: r = 0.7 [0.52-0.84] the FAAM AVQ score (r = 0.6 [0.35-0.78]), and the VISA-A score (r = 0.54 [0.26-0.76]). The discriminant validity was good with the ALR-RSI, which was significantly lower in the patients that did not return to sport: 60.7 (40-81.4) compared to those that did: 83.2 (64.3-100) p = 0.001. Reproducibility was excellent with an intra-class correlation coefficient ρ of 0.99 [097-1.00]. The internal consistency was excellent (alpha coefficient = 0.95).

CONCLUSION

The ALR-RSI score provides a valid, reproducible assessment of the psychological readiness to return to sport in patients who undergo surgical Achilles tendon suture repair.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Rerupture and wound complications following Achilles tendon repair: A systematic review

Despite the relatively high frequency of Achilles ruptures, there is no general consensus on the optimal treatment method. A general trend toward more patients being treated nonoperatively has emerged recently with the advent of functional rehabilitation. However, much of the recent data on this subject has been highly variable. This systematic review focused on Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) treatment outcomes, with a focus on rerupture and complication rates. This systematic review specifically focused on articles regarding ATR treatment that also included rerupture and complication rates. Treatments were divided into three categories: open minimally invasive, open standard, and nonoperative. Bivariate analyses were performed to compare complication and rerupture rates among pairs of treatment options, as well as between early weight bearing versus immobilization. There was significantly higher complications for minimally invasive compared to nonoperative treatment (risk ratio [RR] = 4.4154; p < 0.05), lower complication rates for minimally invasive compared to open treatment (RR = 0.3231; p < 0.05), and higher complications for open standard compared to nonoperative treatment (RR = 5.6350; p < 0.001). There were significantly lower rerupture rates in minimally invasive compared to nonoperative treatment (RR = 0.4085; p < 0.001), a significantly lower rerupture rate in nonoperative treatment compared to open treatment (RR = 0.2282; p < 0.001), and no significant difference in rerupture rates when comparing minimally invasive to open standard treatment. We found that operative treatment is associated with fewer reruptures and more complications than a nonoperative approach. Minimally invasive surgery appears to be associated with a lower rate of complications than open operative treatment.

Comparison Study of Mini-Incision Versus Original Open Technique of the Half-Mini-Bunnell Achilles Tendon Repair

Mini-incision surgical procedures in our institution have been developed by decreasing the total skin incision length from the original mini half-Bunnell tendon repair technique. We hypothesized that the mini-incision, or minimum invasive Achilles tendon repair technique, would promote the tendon healing process leading to better outcomes and a reduced complication rate compared to the conventional open repair. The study sought to determine the more optimal method by comparing 44 mini-incision sutures to the 99 sutures in the original open Achilles tendon repairs. The mean skin incision length of the mini-incision surgery was 2.9 (range 2.5-3.0) cm and the original repair was 4.2 (range 3.5-7.0) cm. The mean surgery time was 60.0 minutes in the mini-incision repair and 68.1 minutes in the original one (p = .0003). The mean achievement time of bilateral heel-rise, starting jogging, single-legged heel-rise movement and the time to return-to-play was not significantly different between the 2 groups. Achilles Tendon Rupture Score was not significantly different from 3 to 9 months after surgery. Re-injury rate was 1/44 (2.3%) in mini-incision and 4/99 (4.0%) in conventional open repair (p = .36). No patients in either group developed any postoperative infections nor deep vein thrombosis complications. Although the mini-incision half-mini-Bunnell suture was showed equivalent clinical results to the original open repair, the technique is recommended in terms of curtailment of the surgery time without increase of complication ratio.

Post-operative MRI and US appearance of the Achilles tendons

The Achilles tendon is one of the most commonly ruptured tendons in the human body. Minimally invasive and open surgical repairs are commonly undertaken to manage acute Achilles ruptures. This article describes the postoperative imaging findings and their evolution after surgery. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging provide crucial information regarding the morphology, structure, vascularization and mobility of the Achilles tendon on the surrounding planes. Morphologically, a repaired tendon is physiologically larger and wider than an intact one, with a loss of its fibrillary structure; the presence of surgical material in the context of the tendon is normal after the rupture has been repaired. After surgery, the tendon is more vascularized in power-Doppler imaging. Elastography and diffusion tensor Imaging are innovative tools which allow for the visualization of microstructural abnormalities not apprehensible using conventional imaging techniques. A treated Achilles tendon is unlikely to regain a normal imaging appearance, and the health care professional must distinguish between postoperative findings and actual pathological features. In this context, clinical examination still reigns supreme.

Strength Measurement After Achilles Tendon Repair

The goal of treatment after Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) is to restore appropriate tension to the tendon, so that normal baseline strength and functional soft-tissue length can be achieved. The assessment of plantarflexion strength has shown widespread variability. The purpose of this study is to document variations in strength assessment after the treatment of ATR in the literature. A comprehensive literature review was performed. In total, 2758 articles were found on Achilles tendon rupture and Achilles tendon strength measurement. The full text of articles including strength as a functional outcome measurement in the abstract were assessed. All objective strength measurements performed were reviewed and recorded for comparison. One-hundred articles were included in our study. In 78 articles, a dynamometer was used to measure strength, whereas in 22 articles, an endurance test (n=14) or formal gait assessment (n=8) was applied. When a dynamometer was used, there was wide variability in the various methods used including the incorporation of both isokinetic (n = 65) and isometric (n = 29) exercises utilizing varying degrees of knee flexion and patient testing position. Furthermore, the number of measurements at certain angular velocities varied. This study illustrates that no general consensus exists regarding an optimal method for measuring strength after ATR. The variability creates difficulty and challenges medical professionals' ability to formulate consistent conclusions when determining functional performance outcomes. A more uniform way of measuring strength after ATR may allow for better comparisons between studies in the literature, potentially leading to a better understanding of strength. Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level II.

Outcomes of Limited Open Achilles Repair Using Modified Ring Forceps

Background

The optimal treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures remains controversial. When surgical repair is undertaken, the reported rate of infections and wound-healing complications ranges from 2% to 5%. Meta-analyses have demonstrated that minimally invasive approaches have equivalent rerupture rates, a significantly lower risk of superficial infections, and higher patient satisfaction rates compared with traditional open Achilles repair techniques.

Purpose

To review the clinical outcomes of acute, limited open Achilles tendon repair using modified ring forceps and to analyze functional results using foot and ankle-specific outcome measures.

Study Design

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Methods

The clinical records of 32 consecutive patients (mean age, 44 years) with 33 acute Achilles tendon ruptures were retrospectively reviewed. All patients underwent limited open repair with modified ring forceps through a 2- to 3-cm midline incision. Suture placement into the tendon stumps was guided using a pair of ring forceps bent 30°. Three No. 2 nonabsorbable sutures were placed in the proximal and distal segments, the tendon ends were reapproximated, and the sutures were tied to secure the tendon. Outcomes from a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) were assessed.

Results

At final follow-up (mean, 42.1 months [range, 6-90 months]), 31 of 32 patients (33 Achilles tendons) reported no pain in their Achilles, with a mean Achilles VAS score of 0.7 ± 4.2 of 100. The mean postoperative VISA-A score was 82.3 ± 19.5 of 100. The mean FAAM activities of daily living and sports subscores were 96.5% ± 5.2% and 85.1% ± 21.2%, respectively. Regarding current functional level, 19 of 33 tendons (57.6%) were rated as "normal," 10 (30.3%) as "nearly normal," and 4 (12.1%) as "abnormal"; none were rated as "severely abnormal." There was 1 case (3.0%) of a superficial infection; there were no cases of deep infections, sural neuritis, or reruptures. The cost of the modified ring forceps technique is 5.3 to 12.1 times less than commercially available devices.

Conclusion

Limited open Achilles repair with modified ring forceps provides an economical repair with excellent pain relief, favorable functional outcomes, and a very low complication rate at midterm follow-up.

Is Achillon repair safe and reliable in delayed presentation Achilles tendon rupture? A five-year follow-up

BACKGROUND

To assess the outcome of delayed repair of ruptured Achilles tendon using the Achillon mini-open technique.

METHODS

A review of all patients who underwent delayed repair (>10 days post injury) of ruptured Achilles tendon with mini invasive technique was compared to acute repairs carried out at the same unit. Leppilahti Score and Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score (ATRS) were utilised. Complication rates including re-rupture were also reviewed.

RESULTS

14 patients were identified as having delayed repair (11-31 days). The mean follow-up period was 71 months (range: 58-92). There were no statistically significant difference in the Leppilahti Score and ATRS compared to patients treated acutely (<10 days post injury) in the same time period. 79% of patients with delayed repair reported good to excellent, comparable to 80% of patients having undergone acute repair.

CONCLUSIONS

For those patients who would benefit from surgical repair, a mini-open technique using the Achillon suture-passing device remains a safe and reliable option for delayed presentation of 11-31 days.

Outcome after operative treatment for chronic versus acute Achilles tendon rupture - A comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

This study compared outcomes after treatment of acute Achilles tendon (AT) rupture via percutaneous suturing, with those after chronic AT rupture treated via open reconstruction.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 30 patients who underwent either percutaneous suturing for acute AT rupture (group AR, n=16) or open reconstruction for chronic AT rupture (group CR, n=14). Function was evaluated by calf muscle circumference, and endurance through isokinetic measurement and single-leg heel-rise test. Score evaluation included AT Total Rupture Score, Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles questionnaire, and visual analogue scale pain score. Postoperative tendon thickness was measured using ultrasonography and MRI.

RESULTS

Follow-up was conducted 4.97±1.79 years postoperatively. The groups were similar in age and body mass index. There was no significant difference between groups in calf circumference, isokinetic measurement, heel-rise test, and score evaluation. There was significantly less mediolateral tendon thickening in group AR compared with group CR on ultrasonography (p=0.01) and MRI (p=0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Open reconstruction for chronic AT rupture may result in comparable clinical and functional outcomes, but a thicker tendon compared with percutaneous suturing after acute AT rupture.

Mini open versus open repair techniques in Achilles tendon rupture: clinical and isokinetic evaluation

Background

The aim of the study was to compare the mini-open to the classic open repair techniques for Achilles tendon ruptures.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated at a minimum of 2 years follow-up 32 subcutaneous Achilles tendon ruptures; 17 underwent mini-open surgery (Group A) and 15 the open technique (Group B).

Results

No difference in Achilles Tendon Total Rupture Score and in modified Leppillahti score was observed. With respect to the contralateral side the width of the operated Achilles tendon was 4.07 mm thicker in Group A and 7.67 mm in Group B (p<.05); the calf circumference reduction was respectively 10 mm and 23.75 mm (p<.05). Iso-kinetic peak force measurement of the calf muscle strength showed a loss of 8.21% in Group A versus 17.25% in Group B (p <.05). The mean Patient Satisfaction Score was 96.76 in Group A and 88.67 in Group B (p<.01); respectively 82.3% vs 66.7% of patients were able to return to previous levels of sporting activity. There were two post-operative complications in Group B and one in Group A.

Conclusion

Mini-open technique minimizes the risk of complications, leads to an improved tendon healing process and functional recovery with higher patient satisfaction.

Level of evidence

IV.

Comparison of Semi-Invasive "Internal Splinting" and Open Suturing Techniques in Achilles Tendon Rupture Surgery

The goal of the present study was to evaluate the semi-invasive "internal splinting" (SIIS) method for repair of Achilles tendon rupture relative to open repair with Krakow sutures. Efficacy was evaluated based on the clinical and functional outcomes, postoperative magnetic resonance imaging measurements, isokinetic results, and surgical complication rates. Functional measurements included the Thermann and American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle scores, bilateral ankle dorsiflexion, and plantar flexion measurements. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to compare the bilateral length and thickness of each Achilles tendon. The isokinetic outcomes were evaluated using a Biodex System 3 dynamometer. Of the 45 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 24 were treated by SIIS and 21 by the open Krackow suture technique. The mean follow-up time for all patients was 43.7 (range 6 to 116) months. In the SIIS group, patients returned to normal daily activities after 7.2 (range 6 to 8) weeks compared with 14.3 (range 12 to 15) weeks in the open surgery group. The AOFAS ankle scores were 93.5 (range 82 to 100) points in the open repair group and 96.2 (range 86 to 100) points in the SIIS group. The Thermann scores were 80.4 (range 53 to 91) points for the open repair group and 87.9 (range 81 to 100) points for the SIIS method. The mean Achilles length on the operated side measured using magnetic resonance imaging was 175.06 (range 110 to 224) mm and 177.76 (range 149 to 214) mm for the open surgery and SIIS groups, respectively. Sensory impairment in the territory of the sural nerve was identified in 1 patient immediately after SIIS surgery, although this defect had completely resolved within 12 months. SIIS yielded better outcomes relative to the open surgery group according to the isokinetic measurements. Taken together, these data indicate the SIIS method for Achilles tendon ruptures performed better in terms of both functional and objective outcomes compared with open surgery.

Return to play post-Achilles tendon rupture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of rate and measures of return to play

AIM

This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to identify return to play (RTP) rates following Achilles tendon rupture and evaluate what measures are used to determine RTP.

DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. Studies were assessed for risk of bias and grouped based on repeatability of their measure of RTP determination.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched to identify potentially relevant articles.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies reporting RTP/sport/sport activity in acute, closed Achilles tendon rupture were included.

RESULTS

108 studies encompassing 6506 patients were included for review. 85 studies included a measure for determining RTP. The rate of RTP in all studies was 80% (95% CI 75% to 85%). Studies with measures describing determination of RTP reported lower rates than studies without metrics described, with rates being significantly different between groups (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

80 per cent of patients returned to play following Achilles tendon rupture; however, the RTP rates are dependent on the quality of the method used to measure RTP. To further understand RTP after Achilles tendon rupture, a standardised, reliable and valid method is required.

Achilles tendon ruptures

The incidence of acute Achilles tendon ruptures is on the rise. This is thought to be due to the increasing number of middle-aged persons participating in athletic and/or strenuous activity. Ruptures of the Achilles tendon can be severely debilitating, with deficits seen years after the initial incident. Also, these injuries can have substantial socioeconomic impacts regardless of the treatment selected. Debate continues over the optimal treatment of Achilles tendon ruptures, especially the argument whether to treat patients nonoperatively or surgically. Newer evidence shows that functional rehabilitation, including early weight-bearing, should be an integral part of successful treatment of acute Achilles ruptures. Further research is needed to further investigate the ideal treatment and rehabilitation protocols.

Performance outcomes after repair of complete achilles tendon ruptures in national basketball association players

BACKGROUND

A complete rupture of the Achilles tendon is a devastating injury. Variables affecting return to competition and performance changes for National Basketball Association (NBA) players are not readily evident.

HYPOTHESIS

Players in the NBA who ruptured their Achilles tendons and who underwent surgical repair would have more experience in the league, and the performance of those who were able to return to competition would be decreased when compared with their performance before injury and with their control-matched peers.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Data for 18 basketball players with Achilles tendon repair over a 23-year period (1988-2011) were obtained from injury reports, press releases, and player profiles. Variables included age, body mass index (BMI), player position, and number of years playing in the league. Individual season statistics were obtained, and the NBA player efficiency rating (PER) was calculated for 2 seasons before and after injury. Controls were matched by playing position, number of seasons played, and performance statistics. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to assess the effect of each factor.

RESULTS

At the time of injury, the average age was 29.7 years, average BMI was 25.6, and average playing experience was 7.6 years. Seven players never returned to play an NBA game, whereas 11 players returned to play 1 season, with 8 of those players returning for ≥2 seasons. Players who returned missed an average of 55.9 games. The PER was reduced by 4.57 (P = .003) in the first season and by 4.38 (P = .010) in the second season. When compared with controls, players demonstrated a significant decline in the PER the first season (P = .038) and second season (P = .081) after their return.

CONCLUSION

The NBA players who returned to play after repair of complete Achilles tendon ruptures showed a significant decrease in playing time and performance. Thirty-nine percent of players never returned to play.