Tibialis Anterior Tendon Reconstruction Using Augmented Half-Thickness Tendon Segment Transposition

Tibialis Anterior Tendon Reconstruction Utilizing Split Tendon Turn-down: A Case Report and Technique Guide

Tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) ruptures are rare, equating to less than 1% of all musculotendinous injuries. These injuries can be acute or atraumatic, with the latter often associated with chronic degenerative tendinopathy. Surgical repair is indicated when conservative measures fail in meeting functional demands. Direct end-to-end repair is the preferred method for TAT ruptures but may not be feasible with a large tendon defect. Various surgical techniques have been described to address this pathology, including allograft tendon interposition or extensor hallucis longus (EHL) transfer. The authors present a unique technique utilizing a minimal incision TAT turn-down with dermal matrix allograft augmentation, and, in addition, a case implementing this technique in a patient with a large insertional defect. The patient's postoperative course and outcomes were favorable, with improvements in pain, satisfaction, functional scores, and strength. The surgical technique offers versatility and can be adapted to different tendon defect sizes. It also allows for minimal-incision exposure, beneficial for patients with comorbidities or compromised skin integrity. In conclusion, the authors present a case report and surgical technique for the management of large-deficit, chronic TAT ruptures using split TAT turn-down. This technique provides a potential solution for cases where direct end-to-end repair is not feasible.Level of Evidence: Level V.

Tibialis Anterior Tendon Rupture Surgical Treatments and Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Tibialis anterior tendon ruptures are a rare condition with an often-delayed diagnosis due to transient pain and compensation of remaining anterior compartment tendons. Previous systematic reviews have limited their recommendations to surgical treatment over nonoperative cares given the relatively small sample size in the literature. This current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes amongst the various surgical techniques and define factors that may affect long term patients results. Twenty-six references (217 cases) were identified. Use of extensor tendon autograft (odds ratio [OR] 5.55; I²=46%), autograft repair through semitendinosus/gracilis/ plantaris/ Achilles tendon/ peroneus longus ([OR] 4.14; I²=71%), or direct repair ([OR] 3.59; I²=57%), provided the best postoperative outcomes, whereas allograft repair ([OR] .52; I²=77%),and ipsilateral split/ turn-down tibialis anterior tendon ([OR] .69; I²=71%), were associated with poorer outcomes. Ruptures fixed in the acute phase ([OR] 8.3; I²=26%), were associated with statistically significant better outcomes when compared to these ruptures fixed in the chronic phase ([OR] .52; I²=77%). Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that ruptures should be surgically repaired in the acute phase whenever possible and comparable outcomes can be achieved through extensor tendon autograft repair, autograft repair, and direct repair.

Management of Anterior Tibialis Tendon Ruptures

Anterior tibialis tendon ruptures, while relatively infrequent ruptures, are commonly identified in delayed fashion, which can lead to significant impairments in patient gait and function. Surgical treatment is typically required to restore ankle dorsiflexion function and proper gait. Depending on various patient-specific factors, tendon quality and excursion, and chronicity, a range of treatment options are available to manage these patients, from nonsurgical care to surgical treatment. Surgical options include direct repair, local tendon transfer, autograft tendon reconstruction, and allograft tendon reconstruction. Additional procedures may need to be considered. Despite the variety of described surgical procedures, limited evidence-based guidelines are available to direct surgeons in the most optimal treatment for their patients. In addition to the relevant anatomy, biomechanics, and pathoanatomy, the reconstructive armamentarium is detailed and reviewed here, along with outcomes and potential complications, to guide surgeons in the most appropriate treatment for their patients.

Management of tibialis anterior tendon rupture: Recommendations based on the literature review

Tibialis anterior tendon (TAT) rupture is a rare injury that commonly diagnosed late due to mild clinical signs and symptoms. Management of TAT rupture is a topic without a clear consensus in the literature. This current concept review tries to shed some light on the data and treatment. Our extensive literature review identified 81 case reports and case series from 1905 to 2018. Several reported management techniques with their advantages and disadvantages were analyzed and our treatment recommendations are given based on current available evidences. LEVELS OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Clinical applications of allografts in foot and ankle surgery

PURPOSE

The purpose of this review is to systematically analyse current literature on the use of allografts in the surgical treatment of foot and ankle disorders in adult patients. Based on this study, we propose evidence-based recommendations.

METHODS

The database for PubMed was searched for all published articles. No timeframe restrictions were applied. Clinical studies eligible for inclusion met the following criteria: performed on patients over 18 years old; subject to surgical treatment of foot and ankle disorders; with report on the outcome of the use of allografts; with a report and assessment of pain and function, or equivalent; minimum follow-up of 1 year was required. Two reviewers independently screened and selected studies for full-text analysis from title and abstract. 107 studies were included from 1113 records. Studies were grouped according to surgical indications into ten categories: musculoskeletal tumours (n = 16), chronic ankle instability (n = 15), ankle arthritis (n = 14), osteochondral lesions of the talus (n = 12), Achilles tendon defects (n = 11), other tendon defects (n = 9), fusions (n = 9), fractures (n = 8), hallux rigidus (n = 3) and other indications (n = 10).

RESULTS

Most studies displayed evidence level of IV (n = 57) and V (n = 39). There was one level I, one level II and nine level III studies. Most studies reported allografting as a good option (n = 99; 92.5%). Overall complication rate was 17% (n = 202).

CONCLUSIONS

Fair evidence (Grade B) was found in favour of the use of allografts in lateral ankle ligament reconstruction or treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fracture. Fair evidence (Grade B) was found against the use of allogeneic MSCs in tibiotalar fusions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.

Management of Isolated Anterior Tibial Tendon Rupture: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Rupture of the tibialis anterior tendon is a rare condition reported to occur most often spontaneously in patients >45 years of age. Diagnosis is often delayed due to transient pain at the time of rupture and the ability of the long extensors to compensate for the lost action of the tibialis anterior. Treatment has been proposed to be based on the activity level of the individual; however, no consensus has been reached on the optimal treatment modality for this rare condition. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to determine outcomes obtained with conservative and surgical management. Twenty-four references (155 cases) were identified. Conservative management (21 cases, 13.55%) was associated with poorer outcomes (odds ratio [OR] 0.68; I² = 61%) because of pain and functional limitations related to ankle dorsiflexory weakness. Surgical intervention (134 cases, 86.45%) had a better chance for good outcome (OR 8.40; I² = 63%). Use of an ipsilateral split/turn-down ipsilateral tibialis anterior tendon graft (OR 32.15; I² = 0%) semitendinous autograft (OR 15.25; I² = 44%), or direct repair (OR 12.57; I² = 0%) provided the best postoperative outcomes, whereas extensor hallucis longus autograft was associated with the worst (OR 0.27, I² = 34%). The most common postoperative finding was objective mild dorsiflexory weakness (4/5 muscle strength), which did not translate to subjective functional limitation. Good functional results were found to occur regardless of patient age at the time of intervention. Results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that surgical intervention provides better functional outcomes than conservative management. Use of an extensor hallucis longus autograft is not recommended if surgical intervention is performed.

Tibialis Anterior Reconstruction With Hamstring Autograft Using a Minimally Invasive Approach

BACKGROUND

Tibialis anterior tendon ruptures are rare and can cause significant dysfunction. Often, conservative measures are prescribed because of the morbidity of a tendon transfer as an operative solution. We present a novel reconstruction technique using hamstring autograft, which may obviate the need for local tendon transfer and long-term bracing.

METHODS

Patients who underwent tibialis anterior reconstruction with hamstring autograft between 2011 and 2015 were screened for inclusion. Eight were included. Functional outcomes were assessed pre-and-postoperatively using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), Visual Analog Pain Scale (VAS), and Short-Form-12 (SF-12) general health questionnaire. Isokinetic testing using a dynamometer (Biodex System 4 Pro) was performed at 60 and 120 degrees/s, respectively, for inversion/eversion and plantarflexion/dorsiflexion on both ankles at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively to determine peak torque, average power, and total work. Range of motion (ROM) testing was also performed, using a goniometer, at a minimum of 6 months postoperatively. Average follow-up was 17.3 (6.0-40.0) months for strength testing and ROM testing, and 18.5 (12.0-26.0) months for functional outcome scores.

RESULTS

Average postoperative functional scores improved for all tests. ROM was similar between the uninvolved and involved ankles for inversion/eversion and plantarflexion/dorsiflexion. Patients showed deficits in dorsiflexion strength in all measures tested and improvements in inversion strength. All patients were able to ambulate without a brace.

CONCLUSION

Use of a hamstring autograft for tibialis anterior reconstruction resulted in good clinical outcomes. This procedure successfully restored ankle ROM postoperatively and tendon strength in inversion and dorsiflexion, with most patients showing little deficit when comparing their involved and uninvolved sides.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, Case series.