A Midterm Review of Lesser Toe Arthrodesis With an Intramedullary Implant

Comparison of Lesser Toe Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Versus Resection Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Study

The goal of this study was to compare operative outcomes after lesser toe deformity correction with either proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthrodesis or PIP joint resection arthroplasty. A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed with 37 patients (48 toes) operated on with one of these two procedures. Evaluation of the numeric rating scale score, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, osseous consolidation, and clinical outcome was performed preoperatively and at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Both study groups showed significant improvement at 6 months postoperatively. Although osseous consolidation was significantly higher for the arthrodesis group (P=.001), this difference did not affect clinical outcomes, and at 6 months postoperatively, pain on the numeric rating scale was 0 (range, 0-7) for the arthroplasty group and 0 (range, 0-5) for the arthrodesis group (P=.669). The American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score was 83 (range, 39-95) and 80 (range, 59-95), respectively (P=.879). No difference was observed for signs of inflammation or axis correction. Even a direct comparison of toes with radiologically osseous fusion (n=16) with those without fusion (n=32) did not show any clinical differences. This randomized controlled study showed no clinical differences in outcome between PIP joint arthrodesis and PIP joint resection arthroplasty for correction of lesser toe deformities, with good to excellent outcomes for both groups. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(2):86-90.].

SmartToe, ToeGrip and buried k-wire versus percutaneous k-wire fixation for 2nd PIPJ arthrodesis: A comprehensive review of outcomes

BACKGROUND

Proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis is a reliable and repeatable method of surgical correction for the semi-rigid and rigid hammer toe deformity. In recent years the authors have noted a significant increase in the use of novel intramedullary devices in place of the traditional percutaneous Kirschner wires (k-wire). This paper set out to critically review three methods of internal fixation; ToeGrip implant, SmartToe implant and buried k-wire technique in comparison to the traditional method of percutaneous k-wire fixation during arthrodesis of the proximal interphalangeal joints (PIPJ) of the toes. The objectives were to review osseous fusion rates, infection, hardware complications, patient satisfaction, and the comparative cost of each modality.

RESULTS

In total 3878 outcomes were reviewed consisting of 3255 percutaneous k-wires, 347 SmartToe implants, 218 ToeGrip implants, and 58 buried k-wires. Overall Infection rates where low; SmartToe infection rates ranged between 1.2% and 5%, percutaneous k-wire fixation 0.3%-7% buried k-wire 3.3%. The SmartToe Implant had the highest hardware failure rate up to 20.7%, the lowest hardware failure occurred in percutaneous k-wire studies at 0.1%-4.3%, no evidence of hardware failure was associated in both ToeGrip and buried k-wire techniques. Percutaneous k-wire migration ranged between 4.4%-5.5% and 3.8%-10% for the SmartToe implant, all significantly lower than buried k-wire migration of 33%. The SmartToe implant demonstrated the highest mean osseous union rate 87.2%, 83% in ToeGrip studies, similar results between the buried k-wire and percutaneous k-wire studies 72% and 73% respectively. Individual unit costs for k-wires £0.37, ToeGrip implant £236.94 and SmartToe implants £331, demonstrating a 640 and 894 fold increase in cost when using implants in comparison to k-wires. Patient satisfaction was poorly reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous k-wire fixation remains a reliable and cost effective method of stabilisation during hammertoe correction in comparison to newer more costly implantable devices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV - critical literature review.

Lesser Digit Implants

Lesser digit deformities that require surgical intervention may be corrected by interphalangeal arthrodesis. The traditional fixation device used to stabilize an interphalangeal arthrodesis is a smooth Kirschner wire (K-wire). Its use, however, has been associated with risks. The K-wires are known to migrate and break, and there are increased risks of pin tract infection. Choices for digital implants include nonresorbable, resorbable, and allograft. There are more than 60 newer intramedullary fixation devices available for use in digital surgery. Intramedullary implants also have their own inherent risks. Further research into patient outcomes and cost-effectiveness of these new devices is still needed.