The Effect of Pitch Variation and Diameter Variation on Screw Pullout

Evaluation of the Relationship of Screw Pullout and Plate Fracutre in Fixation of Mandible Condyle Fractures: A Mechanistic Study

BACKGROUND

The mandible is the most injured part of the facial skeleton, and 25-40% of mandibular fractures involve the condyle process. The aim of this study is to answer the question of the relationship between screw pullout and/or plate fracture during osteosynthesis.

METHODS

We tested polyurethane models of mandibles whose condylar process was cut (simulating a fracture) and fused using plates and screws.

RESULTS

A total of 672 plates were tested. A total of 25.6% of them were fractured during the test, with most being fractures of the base of the condyle. More screws (81.97%) are pulled out from the ramus than from the condyle-69.15%.

CONCLUSIONS

The gold standard in the osteosynthesis of condylar fractures is two straight plates. Other than these, there is no one-size-fits-all plate for every type of fracture. Plates fixed with fewer screws (smaller plates used in higher-lying fractures) are more likely to result in screw pullout. On the other hand, in plates fixed with more screws, plate fracture is more common.

A Systematic Review of Intramedullary Fixation in Midfoot Charcot Neuroarthropathy

Charcot neuroarthropathy can cause severe deformity of the midfoot, and intramedullary use of beams and bolts has been utilized as a method of definitive stabilization. This systematic review evaluated the outcomes of intramedullary beaming in patients with Charcot neuroarthropathy and determined the methodological quality of the studies. Four online databases were searched: PubMed, MEDLINE (Clarivate Analytics), CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health) and Web of Science (Clarivate Analytics). To assess the methodological quality of the studies, the Coleman Methodology Score was used. The data was pooled into 2 outcomes groups for comparison: (1) Studies that reported on the outcomes of Charcot specific implants (study group). (2) Studies that reported on the outcomes using non-Charcot specific implants (control group). After screening, 16 studies were included. Compared to our control group, our study group had significantly higher rates of overall hardware complications, hardware migration, surgical site infection, reoperation, and nonunion. The study group had significantly lower rates of limb salvage compared to the control group. Our study and control groups did not differ in the rates of hardware breakage, wound healing complications, or mortality. The limb salvage rate was 92% and 97% of patients were still alive at a mean follow-up of 25 months. The mean Coleman Methodology Score indicated the quality of the studies was poor and consistent with methodologic limitations. The quality of published studies on intramedullary implants for Charcot reconstruction is low. Complications when utilizing intramedullary fixation for Charcot reconstruction are high, whether or not Charcot specific implants are used.

Biomechanical comparison of the undercut thread design versus conventional buttress thread for the lag screw of the dynamic hip screw system

Objective: To compare the fixation stability of the lag screw with a undercut thread design for the dynamic hip screw (DHS) system versus the lag screw with the conventional buttress thread. Methods: The lag screws with the undercut thread (a flat crest feature, a tip-facing undercut feature) and buttress thread were both manufactured. Fixation stability was investigated using cyclic compressive biomechanical testing on custom osteoporotic femoral head sawbone. The forces required for the same vertical displacement in the two types of lag screw were collected to evaluate the resistance to migration. Varus angle was measured on X-ray images to assess the ability in preventing varus collapse. Finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to analyze the stress and strain distribution at the bone-screw interface of the two types of lag screws. Results: The biomechanical test demonstrated that the force required to achieve the same vertical displacement of the lag screw with the undercut thread was significantly larger than the lag screw with conventional buttress thread (p < 0.05). The average varus angles generated by the undercut and buttress threads were 3.38 ± 0.51° and 5.76 ± 0.38°, respectively (p < 0.05). The FEA revealed that the region of high-stress concentration in the bone surrounding the undercut thread was smaller than that surrounding the buttress thread. Conclusion: The proposed DHS system lag screw with the undercut thread had higher migration resistance and superior fixation stability than the lag screw with the conventional buttress thread.

Fixation stability comparison of bone screws based on thread design: buttress thread, triangle thread, and square thread

Background

The influence of thread profile on the fixation stability of bone screws remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the fixation stability of screws with different thread profiles under several loading conditions.

Methods

Bone screws that differed in thread profile (buttress, triangle, and square thread) only were made of stainless steel. Their fixation stabilities were evaluated individually by the axial pullout test and lateral migration test, besides, they were also evaluated in pairs together with a dynamic compression plate and a locking plate in polyurethane foam blocks under cyclic craniocaudal and torsional loadings.

Results

The triangle-threaded and square-threaded screws had the highest pullout forces and lateral migration resistance. When being applied to a dynamic compression plate, higher forces and more cycles were required for both triangle- and square-threaded screws to reach the same displacement under cyclic craniocaudal loading. On the other hand, the triangle-threaded screws required a higher torque and more cycles to reach the same angular displacement under cyclic torsional loading. When being applied to a locking plate, the square-threaded screws needed higher load, torque, and more cycles to reach the same displacement under both cyclic craniocaudal and torsion loadings.

Conclusions

The triangle-threaded screws had superior pullout strength, while square-threaded screws demonstrated the highest lateral migration resistance. Moreover, dynamic compression plate fixation with triangle- and square-threaded screws achieved more favorable fixation stability under craniocaudal loading, while triangle-threaded screws demonstrated superior fixation stability under torsional loading. Locking plate fixation with a square-threaded screw achieved better fixation stability under both loading types.

Relation between diameter of a lateral screw and pull-out strength in distal clavicle fracture in plates with different geometry: A cadaveric biomechanical study

Plate fixation has recently gained popularity among the various surgical methods used to treat Neer type II distal clavicle fractures. The use of a low-profile distal clavicle locking plate is logically considered a better option when there is no significant difference in the fixation strength between insertions of 3.5- and 2.7-mm diameter screws. Therefore, the purpose of this biomechanical study was to investigate any differences in fixation strength among varying sizes of screws that are used to treat distal clavicle fractures. The study was performed with 20 paired shoulder girdles from 10 fresh frozen cadavers. To create a type IIA fracture of Neer classification, osteotomy was performed perpendicularly to the longitudinal axis of the clavicle at the medial end point of the conoid ligament. Two custom-made fixtures designed to be attached to both upper and lower sides of the Instron were fabricated for the evaluation. The mean maximum pull-out strength for fixation using 3.5-mm diameter screws was 241.9 ± 67.8 N, whereas the mean pull-out strength in fixation with 2.7-mm diameter screws was 228.1 ± 63.0 N. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Distal fragment fixation with distal clavicle locking plates using two 2.7-mm diameter screws showed comparable biomechanical pull-out strength at the time-zero setting to fixations with a hook plate using two 3.5-mm diameter screws. Therefore, the fixation of the distal fragment with a low-profile plate and 2.7-mm screws may be preferred as an alternative option if the distal fragment of the fractured clavicle is not extremely small.

Biomechanical Performance of Charcot-Specific Implants

Over the past 2 decades, an increased number of diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy reconstructions have been performed. Despite advances in implant technology, arthrodesis complication rates remain high. This study examined the biomechanical properties (4-point bending, cantilever bending, and thread pullout resistance) of intramedullary implants designed for midfoot reconstruction. Large implants included A1 (7.4 mm cannulated stainless steel beam), B1 (6.5 mm solid titanium bolt), and C1 (7.0 mm cannulated titanium beam). Smaller implants included A2 (5.4 mm cannulated stainless steel beam) and C2 (5.0 mm solid titanium bolt). Four-point bending testing compared flexural properties of the body of the implants. Cantilever-bending testing was performed with the maximum bending moment being applied off the main thread of the implant to assess the thread portion. Thread pullout strength was tested by fixing the implants to a Sawbone block on a platform, and the distal portion of the implant in a clamp connected to loading actuator. Implant A1 demonstrated higher stiffness, force to failure, and fatigue compared to implants B1 and C1 (p < .05). Pullout strength of implant A1 was higher than implant B1 (p < .05). Thread fatigue strength of implant A1 was higher than implant C1 (p < .05). Implant A2 demonstrated higher stiffness, force to failure, tip fatigue strength, and thread pullout strength compared to implant C2 (p < .05), while implant C2 demonstrated higher body fatigue failure than implant A2 (p < .05). Alteration of beam/bolt parameters influences the biomechanical performance of implants used in Charcot reconstruction. Greater stiffness resists deformation, providing improved stability. Greater static failure load and fatigue limit improves the implant's ability to withstand higher and repetitive loads before failing This study should stimulate further clinical research to determine if these biomechanical properties translate into reduced implant failure rates and improved clinical outcomes in patients with diabetic Charcot neuroarthropathy.

Can barb thread design improve the pullout strength of bone screws?

AIMS

To draw a comparison of the pullout strengths of buttress thread, barb thread, and reverse buttress thread bone screws.

METHODS

Buttress thread, barb thread, and reverse buttress thread bone screws were inserted into synthetic cancellous bone blocks. Five screw-block constructs per group were tested to failure in an axial pullout test. The pullout strengths were calculated and compared. A finite element analysis (FEA) was performed to explore the underlying failure mechanisms. FEA models of the three different screw-bone constructs were developed. A pullout force of 250 N was applied to the screw head with a fixed bone model. The compressive and tensile strain contours of the midsagittal plane of the three bone models were plotted and compared.

RESULTS

The barb thread demonstrated the lowest pullout strength (mean 176.16 N (SD 3.10)) among the three thread types. It formed a considerably larger region with high tensile strains and a slightly smaller region with high compressive strains within the surrounding bone structure. The reverse buttress thread demonstrated the highest pullout strength (mean 254.69 N (SD 4.15)) among the three types of thread. It formed a considerably larger region with high compressive strains and a slightly smaller region with high tensile strains within the surrounding bone structure.

CONCLUSION

Bone screws with a reverse buttress thread design will significantly increase the pullout strength. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2021;10(2):105-112.

Bone and Cartilage Interfaces With Orthopedic Implants: A Literature Review

The interface between a surgical implant and tissue consists of a complex and dynamic environment characterized by mechanical and biological interactions between the implant and surrounding tissue. The implantation process leads to injury which needs to heal over time and the rapidity of this process as well as the property of restored tissue impact directly the strength of the interface. Bleeding is the first and most relevant step of the healing process because blood provides growth factors and cellular material necessary for tissue repair. Integration of the implants placed in poorly vascularized tissue such as articular cartilage is, therefore, more challenging than compared with the implants placed in well-vascularized tissues such as bone. Bleeding is followed by the establishment of a provisional matrix that is gradually transformed into the native tissue. The ultimate goal of implantation is to obtain a complete integration between the implant and tissue resulting in long-term stability. The stability of the implant has been defined as primary (mechanical) and secondary (biological integration) stability. Successful integration of an implant within the tissue depends on both stabilities and is vital for short- and long-term surgical outcomes. Advances in research aim to improve implant integration resulting in enhanced implant and tissue interface. Numerous methods have been employed to improve the process of modifying both stability types. This review provides a comprehensive discussion of current knowledge regarding implant-tissue interfaces within bone and cartilage as well as novel approaches to strengthen the implant-tissue interface. Furthermore, it gives an insight into the current state-of-art biomechanical testing of the stability of the implants. Current knowledge reveals that the design of the implants closely mimicking the native structure is more likely to become well integrated. The literature provides however several other techniques such as coating with a bioactive compound that will stimulate the integration and successful outcome for the patient.

Cross-elements to enhance fixation in osteoporotic bone with application to proximal humeral locking plates: a biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Proximal humeral fractures occur predominantly in elderly, osteoporotic individuals, especially women, with surgery performed in one-fifth. Proximal humeral locking plates are the gold standard operative treatment; however, complications are frequent, partially because of poor screw purchase in osteoporotic bone. A new method uses threaded posts through which threaded cross-elements orthogonally pass to create a 3-dimensional scaffold for bone engagement. We examined the pullout characteristics of the posts with (1 or 2) or without the cross-elements and tested 2 types of 3.5-mm cortical locking screws for comparison.

METHODS

Low-density closed-cell polyurethane foam served as a model osteoporotic bone substrate. Following implantation in the substrate, the devices were axially loaded by a mechanical test system. Quantities of interest included failure mode, peak load, displacement to peak load, initial stiffness, and work expended.

RESULTS

The post groups outperformed the 3.5-mm screw groups, as expected. Relative to posts with no cross-elements, 1 and 2 cross-elements increased the peak load by 29% and 87% and increased the work to peak load by 126% and 343%, respectively. After reaching peak load, 1 and 2 cross-elements increased the work-resistance to further displacement by 158% and 330%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Cross-elements significantly increased the ability of the threaded posts to resist axial displacement from a model osteoporotic bone substrate. This suggests that posts, used in conjunction with cross-elements, have the potential to enhance the stability of proximal humeral locking plates in osteoporotic bone.