Metatarsal Osteotomies for Treating Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers: A Meta-analysis

[Minimally invasive offloading osteotomy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcer: Analysis of 25 patients]

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes mellitus and its complications are one of the main burdensome health problems at the present time. The diabetic foot is one of the most characteristic complications.

MATERIAL, METHODS AND OBJECTIVE

The objective of this work is to describe the results and complications obtained in a series of 25 cases of diabetic foot treated by minimally invasive offloading osteotomies.

RESULTS

Of the total number of interventions, 18 were performed on refractory ulcers with prior conservative treatment, for a mean (±SD) duration of 29.28±18.42 months. The mean follow-up period was 26.46±4.89 months. Weighted pooled rates of response to treatment were as follows: 100% for ulcer healing (with a mean healing time of 22.41±7.01 days), 5.56% for ulcer recurrence, and 16.67% for ulcer transfer. In 7cases, a preventive intervention was performed on areas with pre-ulcerative lesions. Of the total number of cases, only 3presented mild infection in the intervention area.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive offloading osteotomy is a technically simple intervention, which presents a high success rate with minimal complications in our series.

Interphalangeal Resection Arthroplasty for the Prevention and Treatment of Diabetic Deformities and Ulcers of the Toes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are serious complications that induce a high risk of lower extremity amputations and mortality. Compared with the standard of care, few reports analyzed the outcome of surgical treatment mainly for diabetic toe deformities and ulcers. The aim of this study is to collate evidence on the outcomes of interphalangeal resection arthroplasty (IP-RA) in preventing and treating diabetic toe ulcers distal to the metatarsophalangeal joint.

Methods

A search strategy has been developed including electronic databases from inception. Only ulcers distal to the metatarsophalangeal joints were included. Noninfected and infected ulcers were also included at any toe location (dorsal/side/plantar). Outcomes were defined as healing rate, time to heal, ulcer recurrence, ulcer transfer, postintervention infection, wound dehiscence, and additional surgeries including amputation. Proportional meta-analysis was conducted for frequency outcomes.

Results

Six observational studies comprising 217 patients with 244 IP-RA procedures were included. The mean follow-up period was 23.4 ± 8.2 months. Weighted frequencies were as follows: healing rate (93.6%), ulcer recurrence frequency (4.3%), ulcer transfer frequency (15.4%), postoperative infection (10.5%), wound dehiscence (17.8%), revision surgery (5%), and amputation rate (3.4%). The mean healing time was 4.3 ± 1.8 weeks.

Conclusion

This review suggests that IP-RA is effective in preventing and treating diabetic toe deformities and ulcers with a modest rate of complications for this specific and often challenging clinical presentation.

Effectiveness of offloading interventions for people with diabetes-related foot ulcers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Offloading treatment is crucial to heal diabetes-related foot ulcers (DFU). This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of offloading interventions for people with DFU.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane databases, and trials registries for all studies relating to offloading interventions in people with DFU to address 14 clinical question comparisons. Outcomes included ulcers healed, plantar pressure, weight-bearing activity, adherence, new lesions, falls, infections, amputations, quality of life, costs, cost-effectiveness, balance, and sustained healing. Included controlled studies were independently assessed for risk of bias and had key data extracted. Meta-analyses were performed when outcome data from studies could be pooled. Evidence statements were developed using the GRADE approach when outcome data existed.

RESULTS

From 19,923 studies screened, 194 eligible studies were identified (47 controlled, 147 non-controlled), 35 meta-analyses performed, and 128 evidence statements developed. We found non-removable offloading devices likely increase ulcers healed compared to removable offloading devices (risk ratio [RR] 1.24, 95% CI 1.09-1.41; N = 14, n = 1083), and may increase adherence, cost-effectiveness and decrease infections, but may increase new lesions. Removable knee-high offloading devices may make little difference to ulcers healed compared to removable ankle-high offloading devices (RR 1.00, 0.86-1.16; N = 6, n = 439), but may decrease plantar pressure and adherence. Any offloading device may increase ulcers healed (RR 1.39, 0.89-2.18; N = 5, n = 235) and cost-effectiveness compared to therapeutic footwear and may decrease plantar pressure and infections. Digital flexor tenotomies with offloading devices likely increase ulcers healed (RR 2.43, 1.05-5.59; N = 1, n = 16) and sustained healing compared to devices alone, and may decrease plantar pressure and infections, but may increase new transfer lesions. Achilles tendon lengthening with offloading devices likely increase ulcers healed (RR 1.10, 0.97-1.27; N = 1, n = 64) and sustained healing compared to devices alone, but likely increase new heel ulcers.

CONCLUSIONS

Non-removable offloading devices are likely superior to all other offloading interventions to heal most plantar DFU. Digital flexor tenotomies and Achilles tendon lengthening in combination with offloading devices are likely superior for some specific plantar DFU locations. Otherwise, any offloading device is probably superior to therapeutic footwear and other non-surgical offloading interventions to heal most plantar DFU. However, all these interventions have low-to-moderate certainty of evidence supporting their outcomes and more high-quality trials are needed to improve our certainty for the effectiveness of most offloading interventions.

Surgical Options for Diabetic Toe Ulcers and Osteomyelitis Technical Tips and a Decision-Making Algorithm

INTRODUCTION

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) reflect a pivotal event that could lead to serious complications such as amputation and death. Although conservative surgery was reported to have better outcomes when compared to nonsurgical standard of care of forefoot wounds, the surgical management of diabetic toe ulcers (DTUs) is hardly researched.

METHODS

The aim of this study is to describe the types and techniques of surgical procedures that could be needed when managing DTU. The proposed surgical techniques were based on their outcomes following an evidence-based search of the literature.

RESULTS

Six major types of procedures could be used to treat DTUs; (1) interphalangeal joint resection arthroplasty, (2) phalangectomy or internal pedal amputation, (3) distal Syme amputation, (4) percutaneous toe flexor tenotomy, (5) toe fillet flap, and (6) toe amputation. Details on technical tips are described.

CONCLUSION

Based on the location, ulcer grade of the ulcer and the status of the surrounding soft tissue, a surgical decision-making algorithm is proposed to assist surgeons when managing such prevalent conditions.Levels of Evidence: Level V: Expert review.

Incidence rate and risk factors of surgical wound infection in general surgery patients: A cross-sectional study

Hospital-acquired infections (HAIs) are considered a major challenge in health care systems. One of the main HAIs, playing an important role in increased morbidity and mortality, is surgical wound infection. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the incidence rate and risk factors of surgical wound infection in general surgery patients. This cross-sectional study was performed on 506 patients undergoing general surgery at Razi hospital in Rasht from 2019 to 2020. Bacterial isolates, antibiotic susceptibility pattern, antibiotic administration, and its type, operation duration and shift, the urgency of surgery, people involved in changing dressings, length of hospitalisation, and levels of haemoglobin, albumin, and white blood cells after surgery were assessed. The frequency of surgical wound infection and its association with patient characteristics and laboratory results were evaluated. The SPSS software package (version 16.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used to analyse the data. Quantitative and qualitative variables were presented using mean (standard deviation) and number (percentage). The Shapiro-Wilk test was used to evaluate the normality of the data in this study. The data did not have a normal distribution. Hence, χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used to evaluate the relationship between variables. Surgical wound infection occurred in 4.7% (24 cases) of patients with a mean age of 59.34 (SD = 14.61) years. Preoperative (>3 days) and postoperative (>7 days) hospitalisation, history of immunodeficiency (P < 0.001), and interns responsible for changing dressings (P = 0.021) were associated with surgical wound infection incidence. About 9.5% and 4.4% of surgical wound infection cases were significantly associated with pre- and postoperative antibiotic use. Gram-positive cocci were the most prevalent strains isolated from 24 surgical wound infection cases (15/24, 62.5%). Among these, Staphylococcus aureus was the predominant species, followed by coagulase-negative staphylococci. In addition, the most common Gram-negative isolates identified were Escherichia coli bacteria. Overall, administration of antibiotics, emergency surgery, surgery duration, and levels of white blood cells and creatinine were identified as surgical wound infection-associated risk factors. Identifying important risk factors could help control or prevent surgical wound infections.

Basic haematological tests as inflammatory performance markers of patients treated either by conservative surgery or minor amputation for infected diabetic foot ulcers

Basic inflammatory markers have been extensively studied to differentiate between non-infected and infected diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Very rarely, basic haematological tests such as white cell count (WCC) and platelet counts were used as performance markers for DFU infection severity. The aim is to investigate these biomarkers in patients with DFU treated exclusively with surgery. In this retrospective comparative study, we included 154 procedures comparing a conservative surgery group (n = 66 for infected DFU) and a minor amputation group (n = 88 for infected DFU with osteomyelitis). Outcomes were set as the preoperative values of: WCC, neutrophils (N), lymphocytes (L), Monocytes (M), Platelets (P), red cell distribution width (RDW) and the ratios N/L, L/M and P/L. Area under curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was calculated based on the diagnosis of minor amputation as a positive result. Cutoff point values with the highest sensitivity and specificity were obtained for each outcome. The highest AUC values were for WCC (0.68), neutrophils (0.68), platelets (0.7) and P/L ratio (0.69) with corresponding cut-off values of 10,650/mm3 , 76%, 234,000/mcL and 265, respectively. The highest sensitivity was for the platelet count (81.5%) while the highest specificity was for L/M (89%) and P/L ratios (87%). Postoperative values showed similar results. Simple routine blood tests could serve as inflammatory performance markers to help predict the severity of infection in patients treated surgically for infected DFU.

Analysis of systemic risk factors between diabetic/vascular patients having primary lower limb amputations and re-amputations

Background: Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) are known to be predisposed to many complications in the lower extremities such as neuropathy, peripheral artery disease (PAD) and infection. Diabetic foot ulcers are complications of diabetes that can lead to lower extremity amputations, re-amputations and high mortality rates.Purpose: The aim of this study is to evaluate the risk factors associated with higher re-amputation rates in diabetic foot disease.Research Design: This is a mono-centric retrospective comparative study.Study Sample: the study included 136 patients, with a total of 193 procedures (111 primary amputations and 82 re-amputations) between 2011 and 2021.Data Analysis: The t-student test and Spearman correlation were used to look for mean differences and any relevant association, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was computed to look for independent variables.Results: Twenty-two (27%) and 60 (50%) of those who had major and minor amputations, respectively, had a re-amputation (p = 0.006). Besides diabetes (89%), the commonest risk factor associated with amputation was hypertension (86.7%), be it for primary amputation or re-amputation, followed by peripheral (PAD) and coronary artery diseases. Only three risk factors showed independent correlation with re-amputation; chronic kidney disease (r = 15%, p = 0.03), smoking (r = 15%, p = 0.03), and simultaneous presence of DM + PAD (r = 13.7%, p = 0.05).Conclusions: Factors that were significantly correlated with increased re-amputation rates have a clear pathologic pathway that affects vascularity and wound healing. Further studies should be aimed at developing a clear scoring system that can be used to stratify patient for re-amputation risk, and to better predict the results according to the severity of diabetes.

A Novel Classification for Diabetic Foot Ulcers of the First Ray

OBJECTIVE

Diabetic foot ulcers of the first ray result from several distinct biomechanical mechanisms related to anatomical deformities, which must be addressed if surgical offloading is contemplated. The objective of this study was to create a classification of the anatomical deformities of first-ray ulcers that could lead to better standardization of treatment and reporting.

METHODS

The authors performed a file review of patients with diabetic neuropathy diagnosed with first-ray ulcers over a period of 3 years in an outpatient setting. Anatomical deformities were diagnosed clinically and reported with ulcer location. The primary classification was the metatarsophalangeal joint, the interphalangeal joint, and the distal phalanx.

RESULTS

Records for 59 patients (mean age, 62 years) with University of Texas A1 and A2 ulcers were reviewed. Mean ulcer duration was 2 months. The more common deformities were hallux valgus (41%), hallux valgus interphalangeus (14%), and hallux malleus (20%), and these were primarily associated with metatarsophalangeal, interphalangeal joint, and tip-of-toe ulcers, respectively (P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

By classifying ulcer locations, the relevant corrective surgery may be chosen. Although some prophylactic procedures may be safe and effective, prophylactic hallux valgus correction in the diabetic foot requires further study.

Comparative analysis of bone consolidation chronology in claw toes operated through minimal invasive osteotomies in diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients

Objective

To compare bone healing time in osteotomies performed in claw toes correction through minimal invasive surgery in diabetic vs. non-diabetic patients. The relation between the patient's ages and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Surgery Society (AOFAS) functional scores before and after surgery was also analyze in the two types of patients.

Method

A series of 45 women, 23 of them suffering from Diabetes Mellitus, were operated to correct claw toes. The surgery was always performed through minimal invasive digital osteotomies. After the intervention, bone healing was controlled by a fluoroscopic weekly follow-up until a complete bone consolidation was reached. Bone healing time was compared in in two groups of patients, diabetic and non-diabetic. All patients were evaluated with AOFAS scale 48 h before and 90 days after the intervention.

Results

The time of bone healing ranged from 24 to 40 days after the surgery and took shorter time of consolidation in non-diabetic patients although the Mann Withney U test did not show statistically significant differences (p = 0,409, effect size (ES) = 0,14 [-0.20 to 0.45]) between both groups. A statistically significant association (r = 0.71, R ²= 50%, p < 0.001) was found between the healing days and the day of medical discharge, also between the ages of the patients and the medial discharge (r = 0.36, R ²= 13%, p < 0.001). However, no statistically significant associations were found between pre-intervention glycemia and days of bone consolidation, neither in medical discharge (r = 0.07, p = 0.646 y r = 0.07, p = 0.648, respectively). AOFAS test scores and the diabetes status showed statistically significant differences, both in the main effect of Diabetes (F_[1,41]= 9.41, p = 0.004) as in the interaction between diabetes and age (F_[1,41]= 9.17, p = 0.004).

Conclusions

The bone healing time in claw toes operated through minimal invasive osteotomy surgery is not influenced by the presence of diabetes. The consolidation speed and the improvement in AOFAS functional scale score post-surgery in diabetic and elder patients was related to duration of the medical discharge.

Distal Metatarsal Osteotomies for Chronic Plantar Diabetic Foot Ulcers

In more than 30 years of scientific literature (1986-2021), the few published studies on the management of CPDFUs by DMOs showed satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes. Although these reports were all case series, their data suggest that DMOs, performed at a different level of the distal metatarsal bones, are an effective surgical treatment option for achieving rapid healing of CPDFUs and preventing their recurrence after balancing the pressures in diabetic forefeet. Hence, DMOs can be a valid alternative treatment method also for CPDFUs with chronic infection, ulcers penetrating deep structures, and even ulcers with osteomyelitis at the metatarsophalangeal level.

Evidence-based conservative limb preserving surgery for the diabetic foot complications: A systematic review of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Limb preserving surgery for the treatment of diabetic foot complications (DFC) has been shown to yield excellent results and better outcomes when compared to non-surgical standard of care. The quality of the articles reporting the results of limb preserving surgery in treating DFC is quite low. The aim of this study was to evaluate the published systematic reviews and meta-analyses that looked at the efficacy of limb preserving surgery in treating DFC.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar were searched for all systematic reviews and meta-analyses on limb preserving surgery in DFC. The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews was used to appraise studies' quality.

RESULTS

22 systematic reviews and meta-analyses with a total of 10,559 patients met the inclusion criteria. Five reviews reported on surgical treatment of diabetic Charcot, 5 reviews on bony procedures and 12 reviews on soft tissue procedures for treating DFU. The results of each review were reported. The vast majority of the studies were of Level IV of evidence. The mean JBI score was 9.82.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an underuse of the available limb preserving operations for the treatment of DFC despite excellent results and variety of procedures available in the literature, especially for Charcot neuroarthropathy and diabetic foot and toe ulcers.

The internal pedal amputation as a salvage procedure in diabetic and ischemic foot infection. A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Osteomyelitis of the diabetic foot is a very challenging condition and amputation is often indicated. In some cases where the infection is localized and the surrounding soft tissue is mildly involved, an internal pedal amputation (IPA) based on resection and limited excision of the infected bone have been suggested as a viable option. This systematic review aims to look for the effectiveness of this technique in treating selected cases of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using multiple electronic databases from inception. Eight studies met the inclusion criteria; one retrospective comparative study, six retrospective observational studies and one prospective observational study.

RESULTS

Based on a pooled sample of 545 patients followed over a mean period of 27.7 ± 15.2 months, the weighted results were as follows: (a) healing rate was 87.7% (95% CI = 0.757-0.959), (b) time for healing was 7.1 ± 2.9 weeks, (c) wound infection rate was 5.6% (95% CI = 0.030-0.089), (d) wound dehiscence rate was 8% (95% CI = 0.010-0.204), (e) ulcer recurrence rate was of 10% (95% CI = 0.037-0.188), and (f) amputation rate was 2.8% (95% CI = 0.001-0.085) whilst all were minor amputations.

CONCLUSION

The findings support the selection of toe/ray sparing surgery via IPA as a viable surgical option for selected cases of focal osteomyelitis secondary to diabetic foot infection. The results would indicate that when the ulcer size could be adequately reduced, removing the infected bone while preserving the soft tissue envelope could yield high chance of success with few serious complications.

A Systematic Review on the Outcomes of the Fillet Flap in Treating Diabetic and Ischemic Forefoot Ulcers

Background

Diabetic and ischemic foot ulcers are difficult to heal, and the mastering of numerous treatment methods is imperative to achieve healing. One of these methods is the fillet toe flap used to cover specific diabetic wounds of the forefoot associated with toe osteomyelitis. Instead of amputating the infected toe, phalanges are removed while keeping the viable surrounding soft tissue.

Methods

A systematic review was performed searching electronic databases up to October 2019 to identify relevant articles reporting the outcomes of the fillet flap in forefoot ulcers of patients with diabetes or peripheral artery disease. All study designs were included. The healing rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were the time to heal, ulcer recurrence, and complication rates of such infection, partial necrosis, and total necrosis.

Results

The 8 studies that met the inclusion criteria were all case series or case reports, with a total of 28 patients including 29 flaps. The mean healing rate was 92.8% (2/29); in both cases, total necrosis was due to infection (7.2%). No ulcer recurrence or partial necrosis was noted.

Conclusions

Though having limited indications, the fillet flap illustrates the full optimization of the available resources for wound coverage. The consistent presence of an axial vessel makes the fillet flap a reliable local flap to be used in specific circumstances where the loss of a toe is unavoidable. Further research is needed with large prospective controlled trials to support the findings of the review.

The level of evidence of the publications on conservative surgery for the treatment of diabetic forefoot ulcers: A scoping review

OBJECTIVE

The diabetic foot disease is one of the most serious complications of diabetes causing high rates of amputations, premature deaths and healthcare cost. While standard non-surgical care is the mainstay of treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU), many reports demonstrated that conservative surgery particularly in the forefoot, compared better in terms of clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, the quality of surgical articles dealing with diabetic ulcers of the forefoot is thought to be average. This paper aimed to quantify the level of evidence of the DFU surgical papers published in the literature.

LITERATURE SURVEY

PubMed was searched from inception till Feb 2020. All study designs but case reports were accepted for inclusion. Two outcomes were searched for: a) study design and b) level of evidence. The level of evidence of the studies was based on the classification developed by the Oxford Center for Evidence-based Medicine.

RESULTS

In total, 90 articles were included for analysis. Only 6 studies (6.7%) had a Level 1 level of evidence. One study had a Level 2 (1.1%) and 13 studies (14.4%) a Level 3. The majority of the included studies had a Level 4 of level of evidence with 70 studies (77.8%) being case-series.

CONCLUSION

It is surprising that a disease with such enormous health-related and financial burden did not generate enough interest among surgeons to invest more into high quality research. The findings should incite surgeons to get more involved in the treatment of forefoot diabetic wound and infection. Large comparative prospective high quality trials to assess the available surgical methods are needed.

Effect of Mini-invasive Floating Metatarsal Osteotomy on Plantar Pressure in Patients With Diabetic Plantar Metatarsal Head Ulcers

BACKGROUND

Distal metatarsal osteotomy has been used to alleviate plantar pressure caused by anatomic deformities. This study's purpose was to examine the effect of minimally invasive floating metatarsal osteotomy on plantar pressure in patients with diabetic metatarsal head ulcers.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective case series of prospectively collected data on 32 patients with diabetes complicated by plantar metatarsal head ulcers without ischemia. Peak plantar pressure and pressure time integrals were examined using the Tekscan MatScan prior to surgery and 6 months following minimally invasive floating metatarsal osteotomy. Patients were followed for complications for at least 1 year.

RESULTS

Peak plantar pressure at the level of the osteotomized metatarsal head decreased from 338.1 to 225.4 kPa (P < .0001). The pressure time integral decreased from 82.4 to 65.0 kPa·s (P < .0001). All ulcers healed within a mean of 3.7 ± 4.2 weeks. There was 1 recurrence (under a hypertrophic callus of the osteotomy) during a median follow-up of 18.3 months (range, 12.2-27). Following surgery, adjacent sites showed increased plantar pressure and 4 patients developed transfer lesions (under an adjacent metatarsal head); all were managed successfully. There was 1 serious adverse event related to surgery (operative site infection) that resolved with antibiotics.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that the minimally invasive floating metatarsal osteotomy successfully reduced local plantar pressure and that the method was safe and effective, both in treatment and prevention of recurrence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective case series of prospectively collected data.

A Meta-Analysis of the Outcomes of Metatarsal Head Resection for the Treatment of Neuropathic Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Significance: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are associated with high morbidity, mortality, and health costs. Standard care (SC) associated with nonsurgical offloading is the mainstay treatment for DFUs, but it has high recurrence and infection rates. Metatarsal head resection (MHR) has been proposed as an effective surgical offloading technique for the treatment of plantar neuropathic DFUs, but with no evidence synthesis yet. Recent Advances: Based on PRISMA guidelines, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess the efficacy of MHR. Four electronic databases were searched for. Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria with a total of 477 patients (494 feet and 593 neuropathic forefoot ulcers). The studies included three retrospective comparative studies and eight case series. Critical Issues: Meta-analytical results of comparative studies on recent noninfected DFUs showed MHR having significantly better rates of healing, time to healing, ulcer recurrence, and infection than SC. Failure to heal, recurrence, and infection rates were 4 times higher in the SC group than in the MHR group, and the amputation rate was two times higher in the SC group than in the MHR group. The outcomes of the meta-analysis of case series on chronic and recalcitrant ulcers treated with MHR were similar. Future Directions: Considering the natural history of DFUs treated conservatively and the satisfactory outcomes with a significantly low complication rate of MHR, physicians should consider the use of MHR more often and include this technique in the early management of DFUs. Scope and Significance: DFU impose great public health burden around the globe. Standard of care using in-office debridement and topical agents is the usual mainstay of treatment. However, such conservative care is known to result in high rates of ulcer recurrence and complications. In this systematic review, we quantitatively investigate the outcomes of a surgical off-loading technique, the MHR in the treatment of chronic plantar neuropathic wounds. Translational Relevance: Many biochemical factors are implicated in the complex process of wound healing. In the case of diabetic neuropathic ulcers of the forefoot, additional mechanical factors induced by the presence of diabetic neuropathy lead to high pressure loads of the metatarsal heads on the plantar skin. With time, such chronic loads could favor ulcer formation. Removal of the causal mechanical factor could alleviate the pressure and allow wound healing. Clinical Relevance: Neuropathic plantar ulcers are difficult-to-heal wounds and chronicity is associated to frequent hospitalizations, higher rates of amputation, and mortality. Early removal of the indirect causal agent, the resection of the metatarsal head, after failure of a well-conducted conservative standard of care could be a needed solution for wound healing and consequently a potential for reducing complications and costs.

Surgery Versus Nonsurgical Methods in Treating Neuropathic Plantar Forefoot Ulcers: A Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

The treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is usually based on local debridement, topical agents, and nonsurgical off-loading. When compared with nonsurgical methods, a number of articles reported better results with surgery. The aim of this meta-analysis was to collate quantitative evidence on the outcomes of surgery versus nonsurgical treatment (NST) of DFUs. Databases were searched from inception to September 2019. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to appraise studies' quality. Nine studies were included totalizing 436 ulcers (216 treated with surgery and 220 DFUs with NST). The primary outcome was the healing rate. The secondary outcomes were time to heal, recurrence rate, transfer rate, infection rate, and amputation/revision surgery rate. The risk differences (RDs) between the healing rates following surgery and NST for infected and noninfected ulcers were 17% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.012-0.328, P = .03) and 19.2% (95% CI = 0.050-0.334, P = .008), respectively, in favor of surgery. The amputation/revision surgery rate was significantly better following surgery for both types of ulcers. Noninfected ulcers demonstrated significantly lesser time to heal, recurrence, and infection rates following surgery. This meta-analysis demonstrated that surgery was superior to NST in treating infected and noninfected neuropathic plantar wounds.

Surgical Offloading Techniques Should be Used More Often and Earlier in Treating Forefoot Diabetic Ulcers: An Evidence-Based Review

Conservative treatment is the basis for diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) management, whereas surgical treatment is usually reserved for patients with failed, recurrent, or nonresponsive infected wounds. However, many reports demonstrated good to excellent results following surgery. Evidence synthesis on surgical offloading techniques and clear guidelines regarding the timing of surgery are lacking. The present study aimed to investigate the evidence behind surgical offloading techniques and propose a cutoff time for surgical indication following failed conservative treatment of neuropathic diabetic forefoot ulcers. Electronic databases were searched from inception to identify the best evidence level articles related to non-vascular surgical treatment of DFUs, such as metatarsal head resection, resection arthroplasty, metatarsal osteotomy, Achilles tendon lengthening, gastrocnemius recession, and flexor tenotomy, that have been employed for managing DFUs. Based on the highest level of evidence available, surgery was found to generate better values than standard conservative care for all outcomes except for the transfer rate. In particular, surgical bony offloading procedures demonstrated significantly better outcomes than standard conservative nonsurgical care in terms of higher healing rates, shorter healing durations, and lower recurrence rates. Moreover, 96% of DFUs healed in <1 month following surgical bony offloading, whereas 68% of ulcers healed within 3 months after standard care. The findings could challenge the classical guidelines of DFU management. This evidence-based review indicates that surgical offloading could be used more often and be proposed earlier during the course of ulcer management. The results imply that a period of 12 weeks could be considered a reasonable cutoff value to consider surgical treatment for patients with nonhealing DFUs.