Posterolateral Approach to Posterior Malleolar Fractures: A Literature Review

Posterior Malleolus Fracture Fixation In Lateral Decubitus Position: Surgical Technique and Results in 60 Patients

The present study shows how posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) and distal fibular fractures were fixed using the posterolateral approach with the patient in lateral decubitus position, not previously described in the literature. This technique has been used in 60 consecutive patients (42 women and 18 men; mean age 54.7; range 21-92 years), 33 of which presented as fracture dislocations from March, 2021 to December, 2023. After PMFs fixation in lateral decubitus position, release of the sacral support allowed patients to be placed supine (without de-sterilizing the operative field), in order to proceed with medial malleolus or posteromedial fragment fixation. Fractures were classified according to the Lauge Hansen classification as SER4 (n = 50), PER4 (n = 7), SAD (n = 1), and PAB (n = 2). Fractures were classified according to Rammelt & Bartonicek, as type B (n = 40), C (n = 13), and D (n = 7). During the same period of time 14 fractures involving the PM, classified as type A, were treated with indirect fixation, whilst 6 geriatric and/or poor mobility patients with fracture dislocations were treated with retrograde hindfoot nail fixation. Follow-up period ranged from 4-36 months (mean = 14.4; SD = 8.8). Complications occurred in 5 patients (8.3%; 3 had delayed (medial) wound healing, one developed CRPS and one required implants removal and arthroscopy because of metal irritation and stiffness). No deep infections, thromboembolic events, fracture malreductions or malunions were recorded and all patients returned to the preinjury mobilization status. In conclusion, PM fracture fixation was feasible and safely performed with patients in lateral decubitus position.

Posterolateral approach for posterior malleolus fixation in ankle fractures: functional and radiological outcome based on Bartonicek classification

INTRODUCTION

Posterolateral approach has been advocated for the treatment of ankle fractures involving the posterior malleolus and satisfactory results were demonstrated in several studies. The Bartonicek classification based on 3-dimensional CT scanning was commonly used for treatment recommendation of posterior malleolar fracture (PMF). The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical effect of the posterolateral approach for the treatment of PMF and present outcomes of patients with different types of Bartonicek classification.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical outcomes of 72 patients with ankle fractures involving posterior malleolus (PM) from January 2016 to December 2018. Posterior malleolus fractures (PMFs) were all directly reduced and fixed by a posterolateral approach using lag screws and/or buttress plates. AOFAS score and VAS pain score were used as the primary functional outcome measures. The radiographic evaluation included the quality of the reduction and Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) osteoarthritis classification. According to the CT-based Bartonicek classification, all patients were classified into three groups: 42 type II, 18 type III and 12 type IV. Bartonicek type II patients were further divided into subtype IIa 19 cases, subtype IIb 16 cases and subtype IIc 7 cases. The radiological and functional outcomes were analyzed among different types and subtypes of Bartonicek classification.

RESULTS

Sixty-eight patients (94.5%) achieved good or excellent reduction of PMF after surgery. The mean AOFAS score was 81.35 ± 6.15 at 6 months and 90.56 ± 4.98 at the final follow-up, respectively. The VAS score was 6.62 ± 1.03 one week after surgery, and 1.20 ± 0.92 at the final follow-up. Radiological evaluation at the final follow-up showed that primary bone union was achieved in all patients and 65 patients (88.9%) got no (KL grade 0) or just doubtable (KL grade 1) post-traumatic osteoarthritis. AOFAS scores decreased significantly with the severity of Bartonicek classification at 6 month (p < 0.001) and final follow-up (p < 0.05), while there was no statistical difference of VAS pain score among different types of Bartonicek classification. Reduction quality and the presence of osteoarthritis was not correlated to Bartonicek classification either. Besides, AOFAS scores at the final follow-up were statistically different among three subtypes of Bartonicek type II fractures (p < 0.05), and Bartonicek subtype IIa fractures had the highest AOFAS scores as 93 ± 4.99. Presence and severity of osteoarthritis was lower in patients with subtype IIa PMF compared to other subtype groups, this finding was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The posterolateral approach could achieve good clinical outcomes in the treatment of posterior malleolus fracture. Patients with a Bartonicek type II fracture had a better functional outcome measured by the AOFAS score compared to other types. Bartonicek type IIa fractures got a higher AOFAS score and a lower incidence of osteoarthritis at the final follow-up than the other two subtypes. Classification of PMFs according to the Bartonicek classification was reliable.

The 2-Window Posterolateral vs Single-Window Approach for Ankle Fracture Fixation

BACKGROUND

The posterolateral approach to the ankle allows for reduction and fixation of the posterior and lateral malleoli through the same surgical incision. This can be accomplished via 1 or 2 surgical "windows." The purpose of this study is to compare outcomes including wound complications following direct fixation of unstable rotational ankle fracture through the posterolateral approach using either 1 or 2 surgical windows.

METHODS

One hundred sixty-four patients with bi- or trimalleolar ankle fractures treated using the single-window posterolateral approach (between the peroneal tendons and the flexor hallucis longus [FHL]) or the 2-window technique (between the peroneal tendons and the FHL for posterior malleolus fixation; lateral to the peroneal tendons for fibula fixation) were reviewed for demographics, radiographic details, and clinical outcomes. We were able to review these 164 at the 3-month follow-up and a subset of 104 at a minimum of 12-month follow-up.

RESULTS

One hundred eight ankles had the single-window approach; 56 had the 2-window approach. These 2 cohorts did not differ in demographic or injury characteristics. Ankles in the 2-window group experienced a greater number of early (3 months postsurgery) wound complications (32% vs 12%, P < .01). Two-window patients had more wound complications among ankles treated later than 1 week after injury (44% vs 16%, P < .01). There was no difference in surgical site infection, with low rates in both cohorts. Single-window patients had greater plantarflexion (35 ± 10 vs 30 ± 11 degrees, P = .025) and dorsiflexion after 12 months (21 ± 10 vs 16 ± 11 degrees, P = .021). We did not find a significant difference in nerve complications for these 2 cohorts.

CONCLUSION

In our study, we found the single-window posterolateral approach to be associated with fewer wound complications and better postoperative range of ankle motion when compared to the 2-window approach.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Fracture gap of the lateral malleolus via posterolateral approach: Improved visualization of the posterior malleolus fracture

The treatment of posterior malleolar fractures is a popular issue. Anatomic reduction of posterior malleolar fractures is critical for re-establishing the stability of the ankle mortise and ligamentous union after trauma. Inappropriate treatment ultimately leads to poorer functional outcomes and lower quality of life. Open reduction and internal fixation through a posterolateral approach are preferred over indirect reduction and anterior-posterior screw fixation. Although the posterolateral approach, which is more common and direct, provides good exposure to the fracture site, it has some limitations. In this report, we describe the posterolateral approach through the lateral ankle fracture gap for the treatment of posterior ankle fractures. Moreover, we discuss the indications, benefits, and limitations of this approach.