Fibular Rod Osteosynthesis in Ankle Fractures With Compromised Soft Tissue

Current Trends in the Surgical Treatment of Fibular Fractures: A National Database Study of Intramedullary vs. Plate Fixation Practice Patterns, Complications, and Cost

Existing primary evidence comparing fibular intramedullary fixation (IMF) with traditional plate fixation (PF) for the treatment of distal fibular fractures remains limited by modest sample sizes. Using a large national database, this study aims to compare use rates, fracture patterns, patient characteristics, time to surgery, complication rates, and cost between fibular IMF and PF within the United States. Adults treated with fibular IMF or PF between October 2015 and October 2021 were identified within the PearlDiver Database. The ratio of IMF-treated to PF-treated patients was tracked temporally to compare use rates. Fracture patterns were determined using fracture diagnoses within one-month preceding surgery. Further comparisons of IMF- and PF-treated groups only included patients with at least 12 months of follow-up, and patients with upper tibia or tibia shaft fractures were excluded. An analysis of cohorts matched at a 1 : 4 (IMF: PF) ratio to control for risk factors was performed to compare time to surgery, complication rates (infection, nonunion, malunion, revision, hardware removal, pulmonary embolism, and deep vein thrombosis), and cost. 39329 patients (2294 IMF and 37035 PF) were identified. IMF use trended upwards relative to PF use over time. Tibia and fibula shaft fractures were the most common injuries in IMF patients versus bimalleolar and trimalleolar fractures in PF patients. A higher proportion of IMF patients had open fractures. IMF patients were younger, with higher mean ECI, fewer female patients, and higher rates of CKD. Percutaneous approaches were more common among IMF patients. There were no significant differences in time to surgery or complication rates. IMF was less costly. The popularity of IMF trended upwards across the study period. IMF was used more commonly in injuries involving higher energy trauma and soft tissue disruption. Overall, IMF patients were younger with more comorbidities. When used in similar populations, IMF appears to be a cost-effective alternative to PF.

Intramedullary Fixation Versus Plate Fixation of Distal Fibular Fractures: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to provide an update of the recent literature comparing clinical outcomes of surgically treated fibular fractures using intramedullary nailing (IMN) with open reduction and internal plate fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

A literature search reporting clinical outcomes after IMN or ORIF of the distal fibula was conducted on PubMed. Inclusion criteria consisted of original studies; studies focusing on clinical outcomes after IMN or IMN and ORIF published before May 11, 2022; studies with at least 5 patients; and studies reporting union rates, complication rates, and patient-reported outcomes such as American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) and Olerud-Molander scores.

RESULTS

Of 2,394 studies identified, a total of 29 studies (4 LOE-I, 2 LOE-II, 6 LOE-III, 17 LOE-IV) were included consisting of 1,850 IMN patients and 514 plate patients. The pooled mean age of IMN patients was 58 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 54 to 62, I2 = 42%) versus 57 years (95% CI, 53 to 62, I2 = 49%) in ORIF. Union rates for IMN patients revealed a 99% union rate (95% CI, 0.98 to 1.00, I2 = 20%) versus 97% union rate for ORIF patients (95% CI, 0.94 to 0.99, I2 = 0%). Studies that compared IMN with ORIF revealed no difference in union rates (risk ratio [RR] = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.96 to 1.02, I2 = 0%). IMN patients showed a 15% complication rate (95% CI, 0.09 to 0.23, I2 = 89%), whereas plate patients had a complication rate of 30% (95% CI, 0.18 to 0.46, I2 = 63%). When comparing studies with both treatments, IMN patients had a significantly lower risk of complications (RR = 0.49, 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.82, I2 = 50%). The IMN group trended toward a higher mean AOFAS and Olerud-Molander score than the plate group by 4.53 (95% CI, -14.58 to 23.65, I2 = 85%) and 3.54 (95% CI, -2.32 to 9.41, I2 = 76%) points, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Current literature reveals near equivalence in union rates and a markedly lower risk of complications when comparing IMN with plate fixation. While IMN patients had higher AOFAS and Olerud-Molander scores, these differences were not statistically significant. Notably, subgroup analyses indicated that rates of symptomatic implant and removal of implant were comparable between IMN and ORIF, which may indicate that wound-related complications were reduced in the minimally invasive IMN technique. While the high cost of IMN implants remains a barrier to their widespread adoption, the long-term benefits of reducing complications, specifically associated with wound complications in high-risk populations, may greatly improve quality of care for patients with distal fibula fractures. Additional research and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted to fully assess the long-term benefits and economic feasibility of using IMN fixation for distal fibula fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV.

Higher complication rate after nail compared with plate fixation of ankle fractures in patients aged 60 years or older: a prospective, randomized controlled trial

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the functional and radiological outcomes and the complication rate after nail and plate fixation of unstable fractures of the ankle in elderly patients.

METHODS

In this multicentre study, 120 patients aged ≥ 60 years with an acute unstable AO/OTA type 44-B fracture of the ankle were randomized to fixation with either a nail or a plate and followed for 24 months after surgery. The primary outcome measure was the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score. Secondary outcome measures were the Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire, the Olerud and Molander Ankle score, the EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire, a visual analogue score for pain, complications, the quality of reduction of the fracture, nonunion, and the development of osteoarthritis.

RESULTS

At 24 months, the median AOFAS score was equivalent in the two groups (nail 90 (interquartile range (IQR) 82 to 100), plate 95 (IQR 87 to 100), p = 0.478). There were statistically more complications and secondary operations after nail than plate fixation (p = 0.024 and p = 0.028, respectively). There were no other significant differences in the outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The functional outcome after nail and plate fixation was equivalent; however, the complication rate and number of secondary operations was significantly higher after nail fixation. These results suggest that plate fixation should usually be the treatment of choice for unstable ankle fractures in the elderly.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):72-81.