Confidence to Return to Play After ACL Reconstruction: An Evaluation of Quadriceps Strength Symmetry and Injury Mechanism in Male Athletes

Effect of Time and Sex on Post-Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Psychological Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Scores

CONTEXT

Low scores on psychological patient-reported outcomes measures, including the Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) and Injury-Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport (I-PRRS), after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) have been associated with a maladaptive psychological response to injury and poor prognosis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of time post-ACLR and sex on ACL-RSI and I-PRRS scores and generate normative reference curves.

DESIGN

Case series.

SETTING

Outpatient sports medicine and orthopaedic clinic.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 507 patients (age at ACLR, 17.9 ± 3.0 years) who had undergone primary ACLR and completed ACL-RSI or I-PRRS assessments ≥1 times (n = 796) between 0 and 1 year post-ACLR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

An honest broker provided anonymous data from our institution's knee-injury clinical database. Generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape and generalized least-squares analyses were used to assess the effect of time post-ACLR and sex on ACL-RSI and I-PRRS scores.

RESULTS

The ACL-RSI and I-PRRS scores increased over time post-ACLR. Males had higher scores than females until approximately 5 months post-ACLR, with scores converging thereafter.

CONCLUSIONS

Males reported higher ACL-RSI and I-PRRS scores than females in the initial stages of rehabilitation, but scores converged between sexes at times associated with return to play post-ACLR. Normative reference curves can be used to objectively appraise ACL-RSI and I-PRRS scores at any time post-ACLR. This may lead to timely recognition of patients with a maladaptive psychological response to injury and a higher likelihood of a poor prognosis, optimizing ACLR outcomes.

Knee flexor strength at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon can be predicted from that at 3 months

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify factors influencing persistent muscle weakness in knee flexor strength after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using the hamstring tendon and establish a clear cut-off value at 3 months postoperatively for the limb symmetry index (LSI) to exceed 90% at 6 months postoperatively.

METHODS

One hundred forty-eight patients undergoing ACL reconstruction were included and categorised into two groups based on knee flexor strength at 6 months postoperatively: patients with LSI of 90% or greater (achieved group: n = 114) and patients with LSI less than 85% (nonachieved group: n = 34). Items with significant differences between the two groups (preoperative waiting period, LSI to body weight ratio of knee flexor and extensor strength at 3 months postoperatively and peak torque angle of knee flexor muscle) were included in the multiple logistic regression analysis. Additionally, a receiver operating characteristic curve was used to calculate the cut-off value of the LSI at 3 months postoperatively, which was required to achieve the LSI criteria for knee flexor strength 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Multiple logistic regression analysis extracted the preoperative waiting period and LSI for knee flexor strength at 3 months postoperatively. The cut-off value at 3 months postoperatively was 76.9% (area under the curve value, 0.82; sensitivity, 0.76; and specificity, 0.81) of the LSI.

CONCLUSION

The LSI of at least 76.9% for knee flexor strength at 3 months after ACL reconstruction was an indicator for achieving the 6 months postoperatively. This is a criterion to aim for, considering the stress on the graft and the regeneration process of the semitendinosus tendon.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Are Psychological Variables and Time Since Surgery Related to Rotator Cuff Strength and Functional Performance in Cadets After Shoulder Stabilization Surgery?

BACKGROUND

Traumatic shoulder instability is a common injury in the general population and the military. Surgical stabilization surgery reduces recurrence rates compared with nonsurgical management. Time since surgery is generally the primary measure of return to sport. There is a gap in knowledge on psychological variables and time since surgery and their relationship to rotator cuff strength and functional performance.

HYPOTHESIS

It was hypothesized that, after shoulder stabilization surgery, psychological factors and time since surgery will be associated positively with objective physical performance tests, that physical performance will differ significantly between postsurgery cadets and healthy controls, and that surgical stabilization of the nondominant arm will demonstrate greater range of motion deficits than surgical intervention on the dominant arm.

STUDY DESIGN

Case-control study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

METHODS

The 52 participants (26 postsurgical [6-24 months after surgery] and 26 healthy controls) were all military cadets. Outcome measures were patient-reported outcomes, range of motion, isometric strength, and functional performance.

RESULTS

No significant relationships existed between time since surgery and psychological factors to rotator cuff strength or functional performance. Significant differences were found between groups in self-reported outcomes, including the Shoulder Instability Return to Sport After Injury scale, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Numeric Pain Rating Scale, quickDASH, flexion and external rotation (ER), and ER limb symmetry. Those who received dominant-sided shoulder surgery demonstrated a greater mean active range of motion deficit than those who received nondominant-sided surgery. Both groups demonstrated a significant loss in ER, but dominant-sided surgical participants also demonstrated significant flexion loss.

CONCLUSION

Time since surgery and psychological variables did not demonstrate a relationship to rotator cuff strength and functional performance. Significant differences existed between the stabilization surgical participants and healthy controls in all patient-reported outcomes. Surgical participants with dominant-sided shoulder surgery demonstrated a greater mean motion deficit when compared with those who received nondominant-sided surgery.

Leaf spring exercise: A safe quadriceps strengthening exercise after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Leg extensions should be avoided in the early stages after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction because the force exerted by the quadriceps muscle leads to anterior tibial displacement. To allow for safe quadriceps training in the knee extension range during this period, we devised the leaf spring exercise, which involves placing subjects in the prone position with their knee slightly flexed and instructing them to perform maximum isometric quadriceps contractions while supporting the proximal region of the lower leg's anterior surface and immobilizing the femur's posterior surface to prevent lifting. The current study aimed to examine the safety of Leaf spring exercise by determining the femur-tibia relationship using ultrasound imaging.

METHODS

This controlled laboratory study included patients with unilateral anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees (8 men and 8 women; age, 24.2 ± 8.3 years) who were instructed to perform Leaf spring exercise of both lower limbs. We measured the femur-tibia-step-off, which indicates the distance between the last point of the medial and lateral condyles of the femur and posterior margin of the tibial plateau, as a parameter to evaluate anterior tibial displacement via ultrasound diagnostic device. Further, peak torque of the quadriceps muscle was calculated using force measurement device.

FINDINGS

No difference in anterior tibial displacement and peak torque was observed between the uninjured and injured sides during Leaf spring exercise.

INTERPRETATION

Leaf spring exercise may add some strain on the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament; hence, it can be considered a safe quadriceps exercise in the knee extension range.

The Influence of Psychosocial Factors on Patients Undergoing Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

CONTEXT

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries greatly impact patients in terms of future performance, reduced physical activity and athletic participation, and overall economic burden. Decades of research have investigated how to improve ACL reconstruction (ACLR) outcomes. Recently, there has been growing interest to understand the effects of psychosocial factors on patient outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical review.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A search of the PubMed database was performed in March 2023. Articles were reviewed by at least 2 authors to determine relevance. We highlighted publications of the past 5 years while incorporating previous pertinent studies.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 5.

RESULTS

There is no standardization of psychosocial factors regarding ACLR. As such, there is a lack of consensus regarding which psychosocial measures to use and when. There is a need for clarification of the complex relationship between psychosocial factors and physical function. Despite this, psychosocial factors have the potential to help predict patients who are more likely to return to sport: (1) desire/motivation to return; (2) lower levels of kinesiophobia; (3) higher levels of self-efficacy, confidence, and subjective knee function; (4) risk acceptance; and (5) social support. However, there are no standardized interventions to improve psychosocial factors after ACLR.

CONCLUSION

Psychosocial factors affect outcomes after ACLR. However, the interplay between psychosocial factors and physical function is complex. There is emerging evidence that testing and interventions may improve ACLR outcomes. There is a lack of standardized interventions to determine or improve psychosocial factors after ACLR. Further research is needed to identify psychosocial factors and to develop standardized interventions for clinicians to implement to improve clinical outcomes.

Ecological and Specific Evidence-Based Safe Return To Play After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction In Soccer Players: A New International Paradigm

Existing return to play (RTP) assessments have not demonstrated the ability to decrease risk of subsequent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury after reconstruction (ACLR). RTP criteria are standardized and do not simulate the physical and cognitive activity required by the practice of sport. Most RTP criteria do not include an ecological approach. There are scientific algorithms as the "5 factor maximum model" that can identify risk profiles and help reduce the risk of a second anterior cruciate ligament injury. Nevertheless, these algorithms remain too standardized and do not include the situations experienced in games by soccer players. This is why it is important to integrate ecological situations specific to the environment of soccer players in order to evaluate players under conditions closest to their sporting activity, especially with high cognitive load. One should identify high risk players under two conditions: Clinical analyses commonly include assessments such as isokinetic testing, functional tests (hop tests, vertical force-velocity, profile), running, clinical assessments (range of motion and graft laxity), proprioception and balance (Star Excursion Balance Test modified, Y-Balance, stabilometry) and psychological parameters (kinesophobia, quality of life and fear of re-injury). Field testing usually includes game simulation, evaluation under dual-task conditions, fatigue and workload analysis, deceleration, timed-agility-test and horizontal force-velocity profiles. Although it seems important to evaluate strength, psychological variables and aerobic and anaerobic capacities, evaluation of neuromotor control in standard and ecological situations may be helpful for reducing the risk of injury after ACLR. This proposal for RTP testing after ACLR is supported by the scientific literature and attempts to approximate the physical and cognitive loads during a soccer match. Future scientific investigation will be required to demonstrate the validity of this approach.

Level of Evidence

5.

Quadriceps strength symmetry predicts vertical ground reaction force symmetry during running in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether quadriceps strength symmetry can predict peak vertical ground reaction force (vGRF) running force symmetry in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction (ACLR). We also sought to determine a cutoff for quadriceps strength symmetry to identify patients at risk for vGRF running asymmetry.

DESIGN

Retrospective cross-sectional.

SETTING

Clinical facility.

METHODS

Bilateral quadriceps strength and vGRF data during running were obtained from 79 patients 26-30 weeks post ACLR. Linear regression was used to determine if quadriceps strength symmetry predicted peak vGRF running force symmetry. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis was used to determine the cutoff value for quadriceps strength symmetry to identify patients at risk for vGRF running asymmetry.

RESULTS

Increased quadriceps strength symmetry predicted increased vGRF running symmetry (R2 = 0.20). CART analysis revealed that patients with quadriceps strength symmetry less than or equal to 88% were at highest risk for vGRF running asymmetry (R2 = 26%).

CONCLUSION

Greater quadriceps strength symmetry is predictive of greater vGRF running force symmetry in patients who have undergone ACLR. This finding highlights the need for clinicians to consider the degree of quadriceps strength symmetry before initiating a return to running program.