Should CT Angiography be a Routine Component of Acute Stroke Imaging?

Can the second phase of contrast-enhanced MRA of the neck provide additional information in the acute stroke setting?

BACKGROUND

Double-concentration magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contrast agents are frequently used in contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) of the head and neck. To avoid mistiming the peak concentration of intraluminal contrast (due to shorter duration of peak), a second acquisition is sometimes performed.

PURPOSE

To evaluate additional information from the second acquisition of CE-MRA and compare the collateral scoring to the hypoperfusion index obtained on MR perfusion, and to investigate presence of pseudo-occlusion using the second phase of CE-MRA.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted. CE-MRA of the brain/neck, dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion scan (in majority) and subsequent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) were evaluated in patients with previous acute internal carotid artery (ICA)/middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion. Evaluation of CE-MRA/MR perfusion and DSA was performed by three experienced neuroradiologists and one neurointerventionist, respectively.

RESULTS

The site of ICA occlusion was seen to be distal to the site noted on early arterial phase (pseudo-occlusion of ICA) in 28.5% of patients. A significant negative correlation was seen between a higher HIR and collateral score.

CONCLUSION

Evaluation of second phase CE-MRA can provide valuable information that may be otherwise lost if only the early arterial phase is evaluated.

Post-ASPECTS and Post-PC-ASPECTS Predict the Outcome of Anterior and Posterior Ischemic Stroke Following Thrombectomy

Purpose

In this study, we aimed to determine whether post-Alberta Stroke Project Early CT Changes Score (post-ASPECTS) in anterior stroke and post-(posterior circulation) PC-ASPECTS in posterior stroke on CT can predict post-endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) functional outcomes among patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after EVT.

Patients and Methods

A total of 247 consecutive patients aged 18 and over receiving EVT for LVO-related AIS were recruited into a prospective database. The data was retrospectively analyzed between March 2019 and February 2022 from two comprehensive tertiary care stroke centers: Foshan Sanshui District People's Hospital and First People's Hospital of Foshan in China. Patient parameters included EVT within 24 hr of symptom onset, premorbid modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤2, presence of distal and terminal cerebral blood vessel occlusion, and subsequent 24-72-hr post-stroke onset CT scan. Univariate comparisons were performed using the Fisher's exact test or χ2 test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables. Logistic regression analysis was performed to further analyze for adjusting for confounding factors. A p-value of ≤0.05 was statistically significant.

Results

Overall, 236 individuals with 196 anterior circulation ischemic strokes and 40 posterior strokes of basilar artery occlusion were examined. Post-ASPECTS in anterior stroke and post-pc-ASPECTS as strong positive markers of favorable outcome at 90 days post-EVT; and lower rates of inpatient mortality/hospice discharge, 90-day mortality, and 90-day poor outcome were observed. Moreover, patients in the post-ASPECTS ≥ 7 cohort experienced shorter door-to-recanalization time (DRT), puncture-to-recanalization time (PRT), and last known normal-to-puncture time (LKNPT).

Conclusion

Post-ASPECTS ≥7 in anterior circulation AIS and post-pc-ASPECTS ≥7 in posterior circulation can serve as strong prognostic markers of functional outcome after EVT.

High-Performance Automated Anterior Circulation CT Angiographic Clot Detection in Acute Stroke: A Multireader Comparison

Background Identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO) is critical to the management of acute ischemic stroke and prerequisite to endovascular therapy in recent trials. Increasing volumes and data complexity compel the development of fast, reliable, and automated tools for LVO detection to facilitate acute imaging triage. Purpose To investigate the performance of an anterior circulation LVO detection platform in a large mixed sample of individuals with and without LVO at cerebrovascular CT angiography (CTA). Materials and Methods In this retrospective analysis, CTA data from recent cerebrovascular trials (CRISP [ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01622517] and DASH) were enriched with local repositories from 11 worldwide sites to balance demographic and technical variables in LVO-positive and LVO-negative examinations. CTA findings were reviewed independently by two neuroradiologists from different institutions for intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 LVO; these observers were blinded to all clinical variables and outcomes. An automated analysis platform was developed and tested for prediction of LVO presence and location relative to reader consensus. Discordance between readers with respect to LVO presence or location was adjudicated by a blinded tertiary reader at a third institution. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristics were assessed by an independent statistician, and subgroup analyses were conducted. Prespecified performance thresholds were set at a lower bound of the 95% CI of sensitivity and specificity of 0.8 or greater at mean times to notification of less than 3.5 minutes. Results A total of 217 study participants (mean age, 64 years ± 16 [standard deviation]; 116 men; 109 with positive findings of LVO) were evaluated. Prespecified performance thresholds were exceeded (sensitivity, 105 of 109 [96%; 95% CI: 91, 99]; specificity, 106 of 108 [98%; 95% CI: 94, 100]). Sensitivity and specificity estimates across age, sex, location, and vendor subgroups exceeded 90%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 99% (95% CI: 97, 100). Mean processing and notification time was 3 minutes 18 seconds. Conclusion The results confirm the feasibility of fast automated high-performance detection of intracranial internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery M1 occlusions. © RSNA, 2021 See also the editorial by Kloska in this issue.

Optimizing Patient Selection for Interhospital Transfer and Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Real-World Data From a Supraregional, Hub-and-Spoke Neurovascular Network in Germany

Background: Interhospital transfer for endovascular treatment (EVT) within neurovascular networks might result in transfer of patients who will not undergo EVT (futile transfer). Limited evidence exists on factors associated with the primary patient selection for interhospital transfer from primary stroke centers (PSCs) to comprehensive stroke centers (CSCs), or EVT-workflow parameters that may render a transfer futile.

Methods: A prospective, registry-based study was performed between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018, at a hub-and-spoke neurovascular network in southwest Germany, comprising 12 referring PSCs and one designated CSC providing round-the-clock EVT at the University Hospital Tübingen. Patients with acute ischemic stroke due to suspected large artery occlusion (LAO) were included upon emergency interhospital transfer inquiry (ITI).

Results: ITI was made for 154 patients, 91 (59%) of whom were transferred to the CSC. Non-transferred patients (41%) had significantly higher premorbid modified Rankin scale scores (mRS) compared to transferred patients [median (IQR): 2 (1–3) vs. 0 (0–1), p < 0.001]. Interhospital transfer was denied due to: distal vessel occlusion (44.4%), or non-verifiable LAO (33.3%) in computed tomography angiography (CTA) upon teleconsultation by CSC neuroradiologists; limited Stroke-Unit or ventilation capacity (9.5%), or limited neuroradiological capacity at the CSC (12.7%). The CT-to-ITI interval was significantly longer in patients denied interhospital transfer [median (IQR): 43 (29–56) min] compared to transferred patients [29 (15–55), p = 0.029]. No further differences in EVT-workflow, and no differences in the 3-month mRS outcomes were noted between non-transferred and transferred patients [median (IQR): 2 (0–5) vs. 3 (1–4), p = 0.189]. After transfer to the CSC, 44 (48%) patients underwent EVT. The Alberta stroke program early CT score [ORadj (95% CI): 1.786 (1.573–2.028), p < 0.001] and the CT-to-ITI interval [0.994 (0.991–0.998), p = 0.001] were significant predictors of the likelihood of EVT performance.

Conclusion: Our findings show that hub-and-spoke neurovascular network infrastructures efficiently enable access to EVT to patients with AIS due to LAO, who are primarily admitted to PSCs without on-site EVT availability. As in real-world settings optimal allocation of EVT resources is warranted, teleconsultation by experienced endovascular interventionists and prompt interhospital-transfer-inquiries are crucial to reduce the futile transfer rates and optimize patient selection for EVT within neurovascular networks.

Radiological Eye Deviation as a Predictor of Large Vessel Occlusion in Acute Ischaemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Detection of large vessel occlusion (LVO) is required for endovascular therapy in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) but CT angiography (CTA) is not always performed at primary stroke centers. Eye deviation on CT brain has been associated with improved stroke detection, but comparisons with angiographic status have been limited. This study sought to determine if radiological eye deviation was associated with LVO.

METHODS

All AIS patients given intravenous thrombolysis who had acute CTA performed in 2 stroke units were reviewed over 2013-2015 for the presence of LVO. Eye deviation was determined by 2 clinicians blinded to LVO status. Logistic regression was performed to determine which factors predicated LVO.

RESULTS

Total 195 AIS patients with acute CTA were identified; 124 (64%) had LVO. Median age was 72 (IQR 64-82) years, median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was 12 (IQR 7-14). LVO patients had a higher NIHSS (15 versus 7, p < .01) and were more likely to have eye deviation on CT brain (71% versus 22.5%, p < .01). Logistic regression confirmed NIHSS score and eye deviation were associated with LVO, with odds ratios of 1.15 (per point) and 5.13 respectively. NIHSS less than equal to 11 gave greatest sensitivity (78.5%) and specificity (76.1%) for LVO with a positive predictive value of 84.7%. Eye deviation was similar with sensitivity 71%, specificity 77.5%, and 84.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Eye deviation on CT brain is strongly associated with LVO. Presence of eye deviation on CT should alert clinicians to probability of LVO and for formal angiographic testing if not already performed.