1
|
Long B, Marcolini E, Gottlieb M. Emergency medicine updates: Transient ischemic attack. Am J Emerg Med 2024; 83:82-90. [PMID: 38986211 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2024] [Revised: 06/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a condition commonly evaluated for in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, it is important for emergency clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of this disease. OBJECTIVE This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning TIA for the emergency clinician. DISCUSSION TIA is a harbinger of ischemic stroke and can result from a variety of pathologic causes. While prior definitions incorporated symptoms resolving within 24 h, modern definitions recommend a tissue-based definition utilizing advanced imaging to evaluate for neurologic injury and the etiology. In the ED, emergent evaluation includes assessing for current signs and symptoms of neurologic dysfunction, appropriate imaging to investigate for minor stroke or stroke risk, and arranging appropriate disposition and follow up to mitigate risk of subsequent ischemic stroke. Imaging should include evaluation of great vessels and intracranial arteries, as well as advanced cerebral imaging to evaluate for minor or subclinical stroke. Non-contrast computed tomography (CT) has limited utility for this situation; it can rule out hemorrhage or a large mass causing symptoms but should not be relied on for any definitive diagnosis. Noninvasive imaging of the cervical vessels can also be used (CT angiography or Doppler ultrasound). Treatment includes antithrombotic medications if there are no contraindications. Dual antiplatelet therapy may reduce the risk of recurrent ischemic events in higher risk patients, while anticoagulation is recommended in patients with a cardioembolic source. A variety of scoring systems or tools are available that seek to predict stroke risk after a TIA. The Canadian TIA risk score appears to have the best diagnostic accuracy. However, these scores should not be used in isolation. Disposition may include admission, management in an ED-based observation unit with rapid diagnostic protocol, or expedited follow-up in a specialty clinic. CONCLUSIONS An understanding of literature updates concerning TIA can improve the ED care of patients with TIA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brit Long
- SAUSHEC, Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Evie Marcolini
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wechsler PM, Pandya A, Parikh NS, Razzak JA, White H, Navi BB, Kamel H, Liberman AL. Cost-Effectiveness of Increased Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke. J Am Heart Assoc 2024; 13:e032808. [PMID: 38533952 PMCID: PMC11179775 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.032808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rates of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after high-risk transient ischemic attack or minor ischemic stroke (TIAMIS) are suboptimal. We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis to characterize the parameters of a quality improvement (QI) intervention designed to increase DAPT use after TIAMIS. METHODS AND RESULTS We constructed a decision tree model that compared current national rates of DAPT use after TIAMIS with rates after implementing a theoretical QI intervention designed to increase appropriate DAPT use. The base case assumed that a QI intervention increased the rate of DAPT use to 65% from 45%. Costs (payer and societal) and outcomes (stroke, myocardial infarction, major bleed, or death) were modeled using a lifetime horizon. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio <$100 000 per quality-adjusted life year was considered cost-effective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. From the payer perspective, a QI intervention was associated with $9657 in lifetime cost savings and 0.18 more quality-adjusted life years compared with current national treatment rates. A QI intervention was cost-effective in 73% of probabilistic sensitivity analysis iterations. Results were similar from the societal perspective. The maximum acceptable, initial, 1-time payer cost of a QI intervention was $28 032 per patient. A QI intervention that increased DAPT use to at least 51% was cost-effective in the base case. CONCLUSIONS Increasing DAPT use after TIAMIS with a QI intervention is cost-effective over a wide range of costs and proportion of patients with TIAMIS treated with DAPT after implementation of a QI intervention. Our results support the development of future interventions focused on increasing DAPT use after TIAMIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M. Wechsler
- Department of Neurology, Clinical and Translational Neuroscience UnitFeil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNY
| | - Ankur Pandya
- Department of Health Policy and ManagementHarvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMA
| | - Neal S. Parikh
- Department of Neurology, Clinical and Translational Neuroscience UnitFeil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNY
| | - Junaid A. Razzak
- Department of Emergency MedicineWeill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNY
| | - Halina White
- Department of Neurology, Clinical and Translational Neuroscience UnitFeil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNY
| | - Babak B. Navi
- Department of Neurology, Clinical and Translational Neuroscience UnitFeil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNY
| | - Hooman Kamel
- Department of Neurology, Clinical and Translational Neuroscience UnitFeil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNY
| | - Ava L. Liberman
- Department of Neurology, Clinical and Translational Neuroscience UnitFeil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, Weill Cornell MedicineNew YorkNY
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Roy A, Sreekrishnan A, Camargo Faye E, Silverman S, Zachrison KS, Harriott AM, Matiello M, Manzano GS, Prasanna M, Nedelcu S, Singhal AB. Safety and Feasibility of an Emergency Department-to-Outpatient Pathway for Patients With TIA and Nondisabling Stroke. Neurol Clin Pract 2023; 13:e200209. [PMID: 37829551 PMCID: PMC10567120 DOI: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000200209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives Evaluation of transient ischemic attack/nondisabling ischemic strokes (TIA/NDS) in the emergency department (ED) contributes to capacity issues and increasing health care expenditures, especially high-cost duplicative imaging. Methods As an institutional quality improvement project, we developed a novel pathway to evaluate patients with TIA/NDS in the ED using a core set of laboratory tests and CT-based neuroimaging. Patients identified as 'low risk' through a safety checklist were discharged and scheduled for prompt outpatient tests and stroke clinic follow-up. In this prespecified analysis designed to assess feasibility and safety, we abstracted data from patients consecutively enrolled in the first 6 months. Results We compared data from 106 patients with TIA/NDS enrolled in the new pathway from April through September 2020 (age 67.9 years, 45% female), against 55 unmatched historical controls with TIA encountered from April 2016 through March 2017 (age 68.3 years, 47% female). Both groups had similar median NIHSS scores (pathway and control 0) and ABCD2 scores (pathway and control 3). Pathway-enrolled patients had a 44% decrease in mean ED length of stay (pathway 13.7 hours, control 24.4 hours, p < 0.001) and decreased utilization of ED MRI-based imaging (pathway 63%, control 91%, p < 0.001) and duplicative ED CT plus MRI-based brain and/or vascular imaging (pathway 35%, control 53%, p = 0.04). Among pathway-enrolled patients, 89% were evaluated in our stroke clinic within a median of 5 business days; only 5.5% were lost to follow-up. Both groups had similar 90-day rates of ED revisits (pathway 21%, control 18%, p = 0.84) and recurrent TIA/ischemic stroke (pathway 1%, control 2%, p = 1.0). Recurrent ischemic events among pathway-enrolled patients were attributed to errors in following the safety checklist before discharge. Discussion Our TIA/NDS pathway, implemented during the initial outbreak of COVID-19, seems feasible and safe, with significant positive impact on ED throughput and ED-based high-cost duplicative imaging. The safety checklist and option of virtual telehealth follow-up are novel features. Broader adoption of such pathways has important implications for value-based health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Roy
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Anirudh Sreekrishnan
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Erica Camargo Faye
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Scott Silverman
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Kori S Zachrison
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Andrea M Harriott
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Marcelo Matiello
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Giovanna S Manzano
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Mrinalini Prasanna
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Simona Nedelcu
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Aneesh B Singhal
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shahjouei S, Seyedmirzaei H, Abedi V, Zand R. Transient Ischemic Attack Outpatient Clinic: Past Journey and Future Adventure. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4511. [PMID: 37445546 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
A transient ischemic attack (TIA), a constellation of temporary neurological symptoms, precedes stroke in one-fifth of patients. Thus far, many clinical models have been introduced to optimize the quality, time to treatment, and cost of acute TIA care, either in an inpatient or outpatient setting. In this article, we aim to review the characteristics and outcomes of outpatient TIA clinics across the globe. In addition, we discussed the main challenges for outpatient management of TIA, including triage and diagnosis, and the system dynamics of the clinics. We further reviewed the potential developments in TIA care, such as telemedicine, predictive analytics, personalized medicine, and advanced imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shima Shahjouei
- Department of Neurology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State Health, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
- Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Translational Medicine, Barrow Neurological Institute, St. Joseph Hospital, Phoenix, AZ 85013, USA
| | - Homa Seyedmirzaei
- School of Medicine, Children's Medical Center Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Dr. Qarib St., Tehran 14155-34793, Iran
- Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Research Program (INRP), Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Keshavarz Blvd., Tehran 14166-34793, Iran
| | - Vida Abedi
- Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| | - Ramin Zand
- Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, PA 17033, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Low-to-Moderate Risk Transient Ischemic Attack Patients Can Be Safely Discharged From the Emergency Department to a Nurse Practitioner-Led Clinic. J Neurosci Nurs 2022; 54:231-236. [PMID: 36179660 DOI: 10.1097/jnn.0000000000000677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Unnecessary admissions fuel rising healthcare costs and take away resources from higher acuity patients without evidence of increased safety. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to determine whether the care diversion for transient ischemic attack (TIA), from inpatient to a nurse practitioner (NP)-led specialty clinic, resulted in no increase in stroke incidence at 90 days. METHODS: The sample included all adults presenting to the emergency department with TIA at a low-to-moderate risk for stroke. Risks were defined by the ABCD2 score and noninvasive vessel imaging. Patients who met the criteria were discharged and evaluated by a stroke NP at the TIA clinic within 7 days. These patients were compared with those who were admitted before clinic launch. Medical record reviews were conducted to determine stroke incidence at 90 days post TIA. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate clinical variables, and Fisher exact test was used to assess difference in stroke rates. Patient satisfaction score was collected using the existing institutional survey. RESULTS: Eighty-one participants were included, 40 in the clinic group and 41 in the admission group. The mean ages in the clinic and admission groups were 72.8 and 75.2 years, respectively (P = .37). Women comprised 45% of patients in the clinic group, compared with 51.2% in the admission group (P = .58). The mean ABCD2 scores were 4.08 and 3.95 in the clinic and admission groups, respectively (P = .63). The median clinic follow-up time was 6 days. There was no stroke incidence in the clinic group and 1 in the admission group within 90 days post TIA. Patient satisfaction score metrics for the NP exceeded the institutional benchmark of 90%. CONCLUSION: Referral to an NP-led clinic in patients with low- to moderate-risk TIA was equally safe as hospital admission.
Collapse
|
6
|
Wechsler PM, Parikh NS, Heier LA, Ruiz E, Fink ME, Navi BB, White H. Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: A Rapid Outpatient Model for the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. Neurohospitalist 2022; 12:38-47. [PMID: 34950385 PMCID: PMC8689541 DOI: 10.1177/19418744211000508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
The grim circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic have highlighted the need to refine and adapt stroke systems of care. Patients' care-seeking behaviors have changed due to perceived risks of in-hospital treatment during the pandemic. In response to these challenges, we optimized a recently implemented, novel outpatient approach for the evaluation and management of minor stroke and transient ischemic attack, entitled RESCUE-TIA. This modified approach incorporated telemedicine visits and remote testing, and proved valuable during the pandemic. In this review article, we provide the evidence-based rationale for our approach, describe its operationalization, and provide data from our initial experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul M. Wechsler
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Neal S. Parikh
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Linda A. Heier
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Evelyn Ruiz
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Matthew E. Fink
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Babak B. Navi
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Halina White
- Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA,Halina White, Department of Neurology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 520 E 70th St, Starr 607, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| |
Collapse
|