Management of Zygomatic Arch Fractures by Intraoral Open Reduction and Transbuccal Fixation: A Technical Note

Role of Intraoperative Imaging in Improving Closed Reduction of Zygomatic Arch Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The use of intraoperative imaging (IOI) to improve the reduction adequacy of zygomatic arch (ZMA) fractures has been reported, but few systematic reviews have examined this topic. The aim of this review was to investigate and compare the value of IOI with conventional methods without IOI (N-IOI) for the closed reduction of ZMA fractures.

METHODS

Electronic retrieval of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and citation search until December 2, 2022, was used to identify controlled clinical trials that employed IOI for improving adequacy in closed reduction of ZMA fractures. The predictor variable was the use of IOI-yes/no (IOI vs N-IOI). The covariates included imaging technique (ultrasound, C-arm, and cone beam computed tomography) and ZMA fracture type (M-shape fracture, mechanistic force in 1 direction; variable fracture, mechanistic force in 2 directions). The primary outcome variables were the reduction adequacy of ZMA fractures (the remaining cortical step and dislocation angle) compared with the ideal mirrored position. Weighted or mean differences, risk ratios, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated, where P >.05 and I2＜50% fixed effect model was adopted, and a vice versa random effect model was adopted.

RESULTS

A total of 1250 studies were identified, of which 6 studies with 259 participants were included. The meta-analysis results indicated that compared with N-IOI, IOI yielded fewer cortical steps (-1.76 [-2.42, 1.10], P ＜.00001, fixed model) and dislocation angles (-5.60 [-8.08, 3.12], P＜.00001, fixed model) in patients with variable ZMA fractures, while no significant difference was detected in the M-shape ZMA fracture (-0.72, [-2.93, 1.48], P = .52; -1.48, [-3.51, 0.55], P = .15). Although there was no significant difference in postoperative correction (0.35, [0.06, 2.01] P = .24, fixed model), all secondary revision cases occurred in the N-IOI group. Descriptive analysis showed that IOI yielded better symmetry and appearance satisfaction.

CONCLUSION

IOI improved the adequacy of the procedure and led to a better postoperative appearance, especially for patients with variable ZMA fractures. Furthermore, the use of IOI avoided the risk of secondary surgery. In future studies, researchers should standardize the scale and outcomes to facilitate the intuitive evaluation of reduction adequacy.

A Novel Method to Rehabilitate Post-mucormycosis Maxillectomy Defect by Using Patient-Specific Zygoma Implant

Aim

During second wave of COVID pandemic, India faced heavy surge of mucormycosis. Treatment option for these patients included either total or partial maxillectomy with primary closure. Rehabilitation of these patients became challenging because of their age and size of defect. The purpose of the present study is to present a new digital technique for the fabrication of patient-specific zygoma implants (PSI) and to report on its survival and complication rates.

Material and Methods

Total 21 patients who had undergone either partial or total maxillectomy after mucormycosis and who were disease-free clinically and radiographically for 6 or more months post-resection were rehabilitated using patient-specific zygoma implant. CT scan was obtained for all patients post-maxillectomy for evaluation of existing bone condition. Exocad software was used for virtual surgical planning of zygoma implant considering surgical and prosthetic technicality to achieve goal of maximum functionality and sustainability.

Result

All the patients were followed up after 15, 30, 45 and 90 days and there after every month for evaluation of soft tissue healing, infection, dehiscence, loosening of prosthesis, eating efficiency and aesthetic. Follow-up period for all 15 patients was in the range of 6-12 months.

Conclusion

In case of post-mucor maxillectomy patients, use of PSI offers the advantages of minimal bone augmentation, reduction in time required to restore lost function, and reduced financial burden of multiple procedures. Therefore, PSI may represent a valid alternative treatment for the prosthetic restoration of post-mucor maxillectomy patients.