Quality of Life Evaluation After Trans-Nasal Endoscopic Surgery for Skull Base Tumors

Effect of endoscopic endonasal skull base approaches on olfactory function and facial development in children

INTRODUCTION

Endoscopic approaches for skull base pathologies are increasingly being performed, and the subsequent complications, especially in the long term, have also been partially clarified. However, there is no information on the effects of endoscopic endonasal skull base surgeries (EESBS) in children on odor and facial development in parallel with long-term development. We conducted this study to investigate postoperative olfactory function and facial development in pediatric patients who underwent skull base surgery using the endoscopic endonasal method.

METHODS

We evaluated the smell test, sinonasal symptoms, and facial development of pediatric patients who underwent endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery after long-term follow-up. Odor was evaluated using the "Sniffin' Sticks" test kit, which assessed the T (odor threshold), D (odor discrimination), and I (odor identification) parameters. Sinonasal symptoms were evaluated using the SNOT-22 (sinus-nose outcome test) questionnaire. SNA (sella-nasion-A point), SNB (sella-nasion-B point), and ANB (A point-nasion-B point) angles were calculated from maxillofacial tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) to evaluate facial development. Data were compared with those of the healthy control group.

RESULTS

We included 30 patients comprising 19 (63.3%) boys and 11 (36.7%) girls, with no age difference between case and control groups. The mean follow-up period was 7 years. Odor test data, cephalometric measurements, and SNOT-22 analysis results showed no statistically significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

To our knowledge, this is a comprehensive study with the longest follow-up period in terms of evaluation of facial development after EESBS in children to analyze odor using the Sniffin' Sticks test kit and the quality of life using SNOT-22. Olfactory function, facial development, and quality of life remained unaffected after long-term follow-up after EESBS  in children. Although this surgical approach is minimally invasive, we recommend considering the possibility of complications, and the procedure should be performed by an experienced surgical team with adequate equipment.

Endoscopic trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery does not impact postoperative nasal quality of life

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective longitudinal study was to assess both subjective quality of life using questionnaires and objective examination of nasal function with regard to olfaction, nasal air flow and mucociliary clearance in patients after minimally invasive, turbinate-preserving endoscopic transnasal trans-sphenoidal pituitary surgery.

METHODS

Patients undergoing endoscopic transnasal pituitary surgery were recruited prospectively and examined during three study visits, preoperatively and 3 and 6 months postoperatively. We examined nasal function using sniffin' sticks test, rhinomanometry, saccharin transit time test, and endoscopic and radiological scores. In addition, the influence on subjective quality of life and mental health was recorded using the Sinonasal-Outcome-Test-20 (SNOT-20) and the Hospital-Anxiety-and-Depression-Scale (HADS).

RESULTS

20 patients undergoing endoscopic pituitary tumor resections were included. No significant changes in olfaction or mucociliary clearance were noted. Nasal air flow showed a tendency to increase in the postoperative course lacking significance. Both the endoscopy and the radiological scores showed a significant deterioration, especially after 3 months, with a trend towards improvement over time. However, neither the SNOT-20 nor the HADS showed significant changes compared to baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

Our concept of minimally invasive endoscopic tumor resections on the pituitary gland with preservation of nasal turbinates shows low morbidity for the patient. Despite objectifiable surgery-associated changes in the nose, nasal physiology in terms of smell, airflow and mucociliary clearance can be preserved and the subjective quality of life of our patients remains stable.

Effects of Endoscopic Sinus Surgery on Olfactory Function

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the effects of endoscopic sinus surgery and endonasal approaches to the skull base on olfaction.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advancements in endonasal endoscopic approaches to the sinuses and skull base allow for direct treatment of a variety of sinonasal and skull base diseases. However, these extended approaches will often require manipulation of normal anatomical structures and the olfactory neuroepithelium. Depending on the planned procedure and extent of disease, the prognosis of olfactory perception can vary significantly among patients. Endoscopic sinonasal surgical procedures may impact olfaction. Optimizing olfactory function requires proper surgical techniques, gentle handling of tissue, and perioperative care. Surgeons must discuss objectives and manage patient expectations. Routine olfactory assessment is crucial in surgical work-up and follow-up. Preserving anatomical structures while addressing the obstruction of the olfactory cleft helps to prevent decreased olfactory threshold. However, smell identification and discrimination do not always correlate with sinonasal anatomy.

Functioning Endocrine Outcome after Endoscopic Endonasal Transsellar Approach for Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

The endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) is a well-established technique for the treatment of pituitary neuroendocrine tumor Preservation of normal gland tissue is crucial to retain effective neuroendocrine pituitary function. The aim of this paper is to analyze pituitary endocrine secretion after EEA for pituitary neuroendocrine tumor to identify potential predictors of functioning gland recovery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent an exclusive EEA for pituitary neuroendocrine tumors between October 2014 and November 2019 were reviewed. Patients were divided into groups according to postoperative pituitary function (Group 1, unchanged; group 2, recovering; group 3, worsening).

RESULTS

Among the 45 patients enrolled, 15 presented a silent tumor and showed no hormonal impairment, and 30 patients presented pituitary dysfunction. A total of 19 patients (42.2%) were included in group 1, 12 (26.7%) patients showed pituitary function recovery after surgery (group 2), and 14 patients (31.1%) exhibited the onset of new pituitary deficiency postoperatively (group 3). Younger patients and those with functioning tumor were more likely to have complete pituitary hormonal recovery (p = 0.0297 and p = 0.007, respectively). No predictors of functional gland worsening were identified.

CONCLUSION

EEA for pituitary neuroendocrine tumor is a reliable and safe technique regarding postoperative hormonal function. Preserving pituitary function after tumor resection should be a primary goal in a minimally invasive approach.

Quality of Life Considerations in Endoscopic Endonasal Management of Anterior Cranial Base Tumors

Considering quality of life (QOL) is critical when discussing treatment options for patients undergoing endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (EESBS) for cancers at the base of the skull. Several questionnaires have been developed and validated in the last 20 years to explore QOL in this patient population, including the Anterior Skull Base Questionnaire, Skull Base Inventory, EESBS Questionnaire, and the Sino-Nasal Outcome Test for Neurosurgery. The Sino-Nasal Outcomes Test-22 and Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 are other tools that have been used to measure sinonasal QOL in anterior cranial base surgery. In addition to pathology-related perturbations in QOL endoscopic surgical options (transsellar approaches, anterior cranial base surgery, and various reconstructive techniques) all have unique morbidities and QOL implications that should be considered. Finally, we look ahead to new and emerging techniques and tools aimed to help preserve and improve QOL for patients with anterior cranial base malignancies.

Quality of life outcomes after transnasal endoscopic pituitary surgery using the Glasgow Benefit Inventory

PURPOSE

This study assesses postoperative quality-of-life outcomes via the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI) in patients undergoing transnasal endoscopic pituitary surgery for pituitary adenoma.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study in a UK tertiary referral centre. 145 patients who had undergone transnasal endoscopic pituitary surgery for pituitary adenoma over a 6-year period at one institution completed the GBI with at least 3 months' follow up. Patients with prior radiotherapy were excluded. The GBI is a patient-reported outcome measure that assesses post-intervention outcomes in three domains: 'general' functioning, 'social support' and 'physical' functioning. Pre- and post-operative visual loss scores were additionally assessed via a 1-5 Likert scale. GBI scores were assessed alongside these visual loss scores, clinical and surgical parameters and demographics.

RESULTS

Mean age was 59.5 years (range 20-87 years) and mean follow up was 36 months. A total of 46 of 145 (31.7%) patients had secreting tumours. The most common primary symptom was visual loss. Mean total score for all patients was positive (+8.4); with 'general' domain score the most positive (+10.5). All patient groups had overall positive, 'general' and 'social support' domain scores. Patients with Cushing's disease reported significantly higher mean total scores (+29.6) than all other groups. Acromegaly (+7.9) and non-functioning adenoma (NFA) groups (+5.2) reported lower mean total scores. 'Physical' domain mean scores were negative for acromegaly and NFA groups. There was statistical significance between a pre- to post-operative improvement in visual score and mean total GBI score (p = 0.02) and mean 'general' domain GBI score (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings can aid preoperative counselling of patients undergoing this surgery. Those with NFA and no anticipated improvement to visual loss symptoms may be advised of possible worsened physical outcomes and of the option to delay the surgery until symptoms are present.

One-and-a-half nostril versus binostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach to the pituitary adenomas: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Background

Binostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (BETA) is the most used approach for sellar lesions nowadays, while its damage to the nasal structures may cause nasal discomfort and affect nasal functions including respiration and olfaction. With the purpose to improve the post-operative sinonasal quality of life (QoL), we introduced the one-and-a-half nostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach (OETA) in 2016 which preserved more natural structures and registered a prospective randomized controlled trial (ChiCTR-IOR-16008222) to compare the two approaches regarding the surgical outcomes and complications.

Methods

Sixty patients with pituitary adenomas were recruited and randomly assigned to the OETA group and the BETA group between April 2016 and May 2017 in Jinling Hospital. The tumor resection rate, endocrinal and visual outcomes, and surgical complications between the OETA and BETA groups were analyzed. Besides, the questionnaire Anterior Skull Base Nasal Inventory-12 (ASK Nasal-12) was used to evaluate patients’ sinonasal QoL at seven time points (pre-operative; 2-weeks, 1-month, 3-months, 6-months, 12-months, and long-term post-operatively). The Sniffin’ Sticks were used to assess patients’ olfactory function objectively in a long term. Each patient was followed for at least 12 months post-operatively.

Results

There was no significant difference in tumor resection rate, hormonal and visual outcomes, and surgical complications between the two groups. Regarding the ASK Nasal-12, patients in the OETA group complained less about dried nasal material at 2 weeks after surgery (P = 0.017). One month after surgery, the OETA group had better olfaction function (P = 0.019) compared with the BETA group. However, there was no significant difference in early and long-term postoperative sinonasal QoL between the two approaches according to the entire ASK Nasal-12 metric. The results of the Sniffin’ Sticks showed that the two groups had a similar olfactory performance at long-time follow-up.

Conclusion

In this single tertiary center trial, the results showed that the OETA achieved the same surgical outcomes and post-operative sinonasal QoL as the BETA.

Clinical Trial Registration

http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=13852, identifier: ChiCTR-IOR-16008222

The Selective Role of Open and Endoscopic Approaches for Sinonasal Malignant Tumours

Endoscopic endonasal surgery has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of selected cases of sinonasal cancers. However, in cases of locally advanced neoplasms, as well as recurrences, the most appropriate approach is still debated. The present review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge on the utility of open approaches to resect sinonasal malignant tumours. Published comparative studies and meta-analyses suggest comparable oncological results with lower morbidity for the endoscopic approaches, but selection biases cannot be excluded. After a critical analysis of the available literature, it can be concluded that endoscopic surgery for selected lesions allows for oncologically safe resections with decreased morbidity. However, when endoscopic endonasal surgery is contraindicated and definitive chemoradiotherapy is not appropriate, craniofacial and transfacial approaches remain the best therapeutic option.