Early Clinically Relevant Improvement in Quality of Life and Clinical Outcomes 1 Year Postsurgery in Patients with Knee and Hip Joint Arthroplasties

Comparison of Pre- and Postoperative Motor-proprioceptive Abilities in Patients with Gonarthrosis

Both surgeons and patients want to achieve a high level of satisfaction and the best possible functional results within a short time after knee TEP surgery. By using a tool that digitally records various measurement parameters of balance and motor function preoperatively and postoperatively on a mobile basis and with little time expenditure, progressive results can be compared. Individual factors can thus be determined and these can influence the progress in regeneration and training progress perioperatively.In a prospective study, 100 patients before and 66 patients after installation of a cement-retained knee TEP were evaluated for the following parameters: balance, maximum strength, and power. All measurements were performed with the KMP measurement platform from MotoSana. The second measurements were performed in each case after a standardised follow-up treatment.It was shown that there are significant relationships between personal factors such as age, height, body weight and with baseline values and performance measures: maximum strength and power. Furthermore, it was shown that postoperative improvement could be achieved for the most part around balance support. All patients who previously had to hold on with one hand or both hands no longer needed support after surgery to maintain the single-leg stance for the specified time of 15 s. For a more detailed analysis of the balance parameters, the samples were adjusted and only the patients who did not hold on for support pre- and postoperatively were counted. In patients with low and medium initial stance, the sway area increased at the second measurement session, and in patients with large sway areas, it decreased, and the stance became more stable. In the area of maximum strength and power, patients with high baseline values still had higher values after AHB compared with the other patients, but lower values compared with their own baseline values.Patients who already had very good motor skills before surgery were able to achieve a greater increase in motor skills compared to the weaker group. However, all patients failed to reach their preoperative baseline values after completion of the AHB. Deficits in balance were still detectable in all groups. By using the presented force plate, measurement-based coordinated rehabilitation procedures are possible during and after completion of the AHB. Rehabilitation with individualised improvement of balance and motor function could be expected to prevent dissatisfaction after knee arthroplasty, e.g. due to muscular imbalance in femoropatellar pain syndromes.

Effect of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Patients with Total Knee Replacement: A Randomized Controlled Trial

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain, functionality, quality of life, and analgesic consumption in patients undergoing TKR.

DESIGN

A single center, randomized controlled trial.

METHODS

A total of 52 participants were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 26) and control (n = 26) groups. The intervention group was exposed to conventional TENS. Data were collected with a Patient Identification Form, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Quality of Life Scale (SF-36), and the Analgesic Tracking Form.

RESULTS

VAS and WOMAC scores significantly decreased in the intervention group, over time, while they increased in the control group. SF-36 scores significantly increased in the intervention group over time. It was determined that analgesic consumption was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

TENS significantly reduced pain and increased functionality and quality of life. Our findings suggest that TENS may be an effective adjunctive analgesic therapy in patients receiving TKR; however, more testing is needed in larger and more heterogeneous populations.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Nurses can provide effective postoperative pain control in patients undergoing TKR, increase functionality, accelerate the healing process, and improve their quality of life by using TENS, a non-pharmacological treatment method, in the perioperative period.

Association of physical activity with fatty infiltration of muscles after total hip arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the association between muscle density as an indicator of fatty infiltration of lower extremity muscles and physical activity (PA) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and identify the patient characteristics with high postoperative PA.

METHODS

This study included 62 female patients who underwent THA for unilateral hip osteoarthritis. Muscle density of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, iliopsoas, and quadriceps muscles was measured using computed tomography (CT). PA was assessed using University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scores. CT and UCLA activity score were obtained before and 1 year after THA. The patients were divided into two groups, sufficient (score ≥ 6) and insufficient (score < 6) activity groups, based on their level of PA as determined by their UCLA activity score 1 year after THA. The association of PA with the amount of changes in muscle density was examined with Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify postoperative factors determining PA at 1 year after THA.

RESULTS

Spearman's rank correlation coefficient showed a significantly positive association between recovery in PA and an increase in muscle density of the gluteus maximus, gluteus medius, iliopsoas, and quadriceps muscles. Additionally, logistic regression analysis confirmed that postoperative muscle densities of the gluteus maximus and quadriceps muscles were variables determining the PA 1 year after THA.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study indicated that the improvement of fatty infiltration in lower limb muscles, especially in the gluteus maximus and quadriceps, is likely to promote the increase in postoperative PA.

Cyclic cryotherapy with vitamin D facilitates early rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of cyclic cryotherapy and vitamin D administration on early rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as its efficacy remains unclear.

Methods

We divided 150 patients (three groups) who underwent TKA into those treated with or without cyclic cryotherapy and vitamin D.

Results

Compared with patients who did not receive cyclic cryotherapy, those who received postoperative cyclic cryotherapy and vitamin D supplementation had significantly higher American Knee Society Scores (AKSS) on postoperative day (POD) 7 and at 1 month postoperatively; higher visual analogue scale (VAS) values on POD1-3 and POD7; reduced thigh swelling on POD3 and POD7; increased range of motion (ROM) on POD3, POD7, and at 1 month postoperatively; and reduced postoperative length of stay (PLOS). However, no significant difference in patient satisfaction was observed between the patient groups. At 1 and 3 months postoperatively, patients administered cyclic cryotherapy and vitamin D had significantly higher AKSS, ROM, and vitamin D levels than those who did not receive vitamin D. No perioperative complications such as surgical site infection, skin frostbite, or vitamin D intoxication were observed.

Conclusion

Cyclic cryotherapy post-TKA had short-term advantages in terms of AKSS, VAS, thigh swelling, ROM, PLOS, and accelerated rehabilitation, but did not improve patient satisfaction. Cyclic cryotherapy combined with vitamin D improved AKSS and ROM at 1 and 3 months postoperatively.

Effect of anterior femoral cortical notch grade on postoperative function and complications during TKA surgery: A multicenter, retrospective study

Purpose

To explore the effect of AFN on knee function and complications in patients after TKA.

Methods

We evaluated 150 patients undergoing unilateral TKA, specifically including 102 patients with varying degrees of AFN after selection. They were divided into four groups based on AFN grade. About 48 patients did not produce AFN, 63 patients were grade I, 29 patients were grade II, and 10 patients were grade III. All patients were followed up for 24 months, and knee function, pain, complications, and other indicators were compared between the four groups. Correlation analysis and regression analysis were used to study the relationship between AFN and other indicators.

Results

Two cases of periprosthetic fractures (PPF) occurred in our study, with an incidence of 1.35%, which did not show a significant association with AFN. The changes in knee social score (ΔKSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (ΔWOMAC), and postoperative anterior knee pain visual analog scale (VAS) score were higher in patients with AFN than in those without. Particularly, grades II and III AFN demonstrated superior efficacy. Pearson's correlation analysis showed that AFN grade is positively correlated with both ΔKSS and ΔWOMAC (r = 0.44, P < 0.001), and AFN grade had a negative correlation with the anterior knee pain VAS (r = -0.250, P < 0.05). In linear regression analysis, AFN grade was positively correlated with both ΔKSS (β = 5.974, 95% CI: 3.968-7.981, P < 0.001) and ΔWOMAC (β = 6.356, 95% CI: 4.223-8.490, P < 0.001). Besides that, there was a negative correlation between AFN grade and anterior knee pain (β = 5.974, 95% CI: 3.968-7.981, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Patients with grade II and III AFN who underwent TKA exhibited better knee function and lower levels of anterior knee pain post-surgery.

Bone Quality Assessment Before Total Hip Arthroplasty: The Role of Densitometry

Background Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is effective in the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. Radiographic evaluation, standard in THA planning, is sufficient in examining hip anatomy, although it may not precisely assess bone quality. A routinely implemented method in bone quality assessment is densitometry. The technique allows for a measurement of bone mineral density (BMD). Methodology In the study, we included 26 participants who qualified for THA. All the patients were preoperatively examined with radiographs and densitometry of the affected hip. On the preoperative anteroposterior radiograph, we measured the canal-to-calcar isthmus ratio (CC ratio) and the cortical index (CI). Intraoperatively, during the THA procedure, we measured the thickness of the cortical bone and the diameter of the femoral neck in the line of neck resection. Results The examination with Pearson's correlation coefficient revealed that BMD significantly positively correlates with the intraoperatively measured diameter of the femoral neck (r = 0.5, P = 0.009), and with the measured thickness of the cortical bone (r = 0.47, P = 0.015), CI significantly positively correlates with the intraoperatively measured diameter of the femoral neck (r = 0.6, P = 0.001), and with the CC ratio (r = 0.44, P = 0.024), the intraoperatively measured diameter of the femoral neck significantly positively correlates with the intraoperatively measured thickness of the cortical bone (r = 0.59, P = 0.001). All of the other correlations were not statistically significant. Conclusions BMD measurements can be used in THA planning as they positively correlate with intraoperative measurements. The radiological parameters (CC ratio and CI) may not be as precise in bone quality assessment.

Post-total joint arthroplasty opioid prescribing practices vary widely and are not associated with opioid refill: an observational cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Optimized health system approaches to improving guideline-congruent care require evaluation of multilevel factors associated with prescribing practices and outcomes after total knee and hip arthroplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Electronic health data from patients who underwent a total knee or hip arthroplasty between January 2016-January 2020 in the Military Health System Data were retrospectively analyzed. A generalized linear mixed-effects model (GLMM) examined the relationship between fixed covariates, random effects, and the primary outcome (30-day opioid prescription refill).

RESULTS

In the sample (N = 9151, 65% knee, 35% hip), the median discharge morphine equivalent dose was 660 mg [450, 892] and varied across hospitals and several factors (e.g., joint, race and ethnicity, mental and chronic pain conditions, etc.). Probability of an opioid refill was higher in patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty, were white, had a chronic pain or mental health condition, had a lower age, and received a presurgical opioid prescription (all p < 0.01). Sex assigned in the medical record, hospital duration, discharge non-opioid prescription receipt, discharge morphine equivalent dose, and receipt of an opioid-only discharge prescription were not significantly associated with opioid refill.

CONCLUSION

In the present study, several patient-, care-, and hospital-level factors were associated with an increased probability of an opioid prescription refill within 30 days after arthroplasty. Future work is needed to identify optimal approaches to reduce unwarranted and inequitable healthcare variation within a patient-centered framework.

Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is intended to detect a change in a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) large enough for a patient to appreciate. Their growing use in orthopaedic research stems from the necessity to identify a metric, other than the p value, to better assess the effect size of an outcome. Yet, given that MCIDs are population-specific and that there are multiple calculation methods, there is concern about inconsistencies. Given the increasing use of MCIDs in total hip arthroplasty (THA) research, a systematic review of calculated MCID values and their respective ranges, as well as an assessment of their applications, is important to guide and encourage their use as a critical measure of effect size in THA outcomes research.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We systematically reviewed MCID calculations and reporting in current THA research to answer the following: (1) What are the most-reported PROM MCIDs in THA, and what is their range of values? (2) What proportion of studies report anchor-based versus distribution-based MCID values? (3) What are the most common methods by which anchor-based MCID values are derived? (4) What are the most common derivation methods for distribution-based MCID values? (5) How do the reported medians and corresponding ranges compare between calculation methods for each PROM?

METHODS

The EMBASE, MEDLINE, and PubMed databases were systematically reviewed from inception through March 2022 for THA studies reporting an MCID value for any PROMs. Two independent authors reviewed articles for inclusion. All articles calculating new PROM MCID scores after primary THA were included for data extraction and analysis. MCID values for each PROM, MCID calculation method, number of patients, and study demographics were extracted from each article. In total, 30 articles were included. There were 45 unique PROMs for which 242 MCIDs were reported. These studies had a total of 1,000,874 patients with a median age of 64 years and median BMI of 28.7 kg/m 2 . Women made up 55% of patients in the total study population, and the median follow-up period was 12 months (range 0 to 77 months). The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate using the modified Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies criteria for comparative studies (the mean score for comparative papers in this review was 18 of 24, with higher scores representing better study quality) and noncomparative studies (for these, the mean score was 10 of a possible 16 points, with higher scores representing higher study quality). Calculated values were classified as anchor-based, distribution-based, or not reported. MCID values for each PROM, MCID calculation method, number of patients, and study demographics were extracted from each study. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were compared for each unique PROM using a Wilcoxon rank sum test, given the non-normal distribution of values.

RESULTS

The Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and the Hip Injury and Osteoarthritis Score (HOOS) Pain and Quality of Life subscore MCIDs were the most frequently reported, comprising 12% (29 of 242), 8% (20 of 242), and 8% (20 of 242), respectively. The EuroQol VAS (EQ-VAS) was the next-most frequently reported (7% [17 of 242]) followed by the EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) (7% [16 of 242]). The median anchor-based value for the OHS was 9 (IQR 8 to 11), while the median distribution-based value was 6 (IQR 5 to 6). The median anchor-based MCID values for HOOS Pain and Quality of Life were 33 (IQR 28 to 35) and 25 (14 to 27), respectively; the median distribution-based values were 10 (IQR 9 to 10) and 13 (IQR 10 to 14), respectively. Thirty percent (nine of 30) of studies used an anchor-based method to calculate a new MCID, while 40% (12 of 30) used a distribution-based technique. Thirty percent of studies (nine of 30) calculated MCID values using both methods. For studies reporting an anchor-based calculation method, a question assessing pain relief, satisfaction, or quality of life on a five-point Likert scale was the most commonly used anchor (30% [eight of 27]), followed by a receiver operating characteristic curve estimation (22% [six of 27]). For studies using distribution-based calculations, the most common method was one-half the standard deviation of the difference between preoperative and postoperative PROM scores (46% [12 of 26]). Most reported median MCID values (nine of 14) did not differ by calculation method for each unique PROM (p > 0.05). The OHS, HOOS JR, and HOOS Function, Symptoms, and Activities of Daily Living subscores all varied by calculation method, because each anchor-based value was larger than its respective distribution-based value.

CONCLUSION

We found that MCIDs do not vary very much by calculation method across most outcome measurement tools. Additionally, there are consistencies in MCID calculation methods, because most authors used an anchor question with a Likert scale for the anchor-based approach or used one-half the standard deviation of preoperative and postoperative PROM score differences for the distribution-based approach. For some of the most frequently reported MCIDs, however, anchor-based values tend to be larger than distribution-based values for their respective PROMs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

We recommend using a 9-point increase as the MCID for the OHS, consistent with the median reported anchor-based value derived from several high-quality studies with large patient groups that used anchor-based approaches for MCID calculations, which we believe are most appropriate for most applications in clinical research. Likewise, we recommend using the anchor-based 33-point and 25-point MCIDs for the HOOS Pain and Quality of Life subscores, respectively. We encourage using anchor-based MCID values of WOMAC Pain, Function, and Stiffness subscores, which were 29, 26, and 30, respectively.

Posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty exhibits small kinematic changes in the first postoperative year

PURPOSE

Fluoroscopic knee kinematics have historically been quantified at least 1 year after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to longitudinally assess knee kinematics at 6-12 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after TKA to determine if earlier evaluation may be justified.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients participated after undergoing TKA with a posterior cruciate ligament-retaining fixed-bearing prosthesis. Fluoroscopic examinations of lunge, kneel, and step-up activities were performed at 12 ± 4 weeks (V1), 7 ± 2 months (V2), and 13 ± 2 months (V3) postoperatively. Images were analyzed using a three-dimensional to two-dimensional image registration technique. Maximum flexion poses for lunging and kneeling were compared between visits with repeated-measures statistical tests. For the step-up activity, mixed-effects linear models were constructed for condylar anteroposterior (AP) contact points and tibial internal rotation throughout flexion. Estimated marginal means of fitted values were plotted with 95% confidence intervals and used to compare mean kinematics between visits.

RESULTS

There were no significant changes in maximum lunging flexion over time (p = 0.405), though significant increases in maximum kneeling flexion were observed between V1 (106 ± 8°) and V2 (110 ± 9°) (p = 0.006), and V1 and V3 (113 ± 9°) (p = 0.0003). While statistical differences were calculated for lunging medial condyle AP translation and kneeling tibial internal rotation, absolute differences in condylar AP contact locations were less than ~ 2 mm between all visits during both movements. For the step-up activity, tibial internal rotation increased with flexion, and there were pair-wise significant differences at all flexion angles between V1-V2 (p < 0.001) and V1-V3 (p < 0.001). Anterior medial condylar translation was observed with flexion, with pair-wise significant differences present for V1-V3 (p = 0.005) and V2-V3 (p < 0.001). The lateral condyle exhibited initial posterior translation followed by anterior translation with increasing flexion, with pair-wise differences between all visits (p < 0.005 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Though statistical differences were observed between visits for all activities, variations in estimated mean condylar positions were within ~ 2 mm from ~ 12 weeks to 1 year. Considering measurement error averages approximately 1 mm for sagittal plane translations, these results indicate that knee kinematics during kneel, lunge, and step-up activities may be sustained from as early as 12 weeks after TKA.

There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are frequently used to assess the impact of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on patients. However, mere statistical comparison of PROMs is not sufficient to assess the value of TKA to the patient, especially given the risk profile of arthroplasty. Evaluation of treatment effect sizes is important to support the use of an intervention; this is often quantified with the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). MCIDs are unique to specific PROMs, as they vary by calculation methodology and study population. Therefore, a systematic review of calculated MCID values, their respective ranges, and assessment of their applications is important to guide and encourage their use as a critical measure of effect size in TKA outcomes research.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

In this systematic review of MCID calculations and reporting in primary TKA, we asked: (1) What are the most frequently reported PROM MCIDs and their reported ranges in TKA? (2) What proportion of studies report distribution- versus anchor-based MCID values? (3) What are the most common methods by which these MCID values are derived for anchor-based values? (4) What are the most common derivation methods for distribution-based values? (5) How do the reported medians and corresponding interquartile ranges (IQR) compare between calculation methods for each PROM?

METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was conducted using the PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases from inception through March 2022 for TKA articles reporting an MCID value for any PROMs. Two independent reviewers screened articles for eligibility, including any article that calculated new MCID values for PROMs after primary TKA, and extracted these data for analysis. Overall, 576 articles were identified, 38 of which were included in the final analysis. These studies had a total of 710,128 patients with a median age of 67.7 years and median BMI of 30.9 kg/m 2 . Women made up more than 50% of patients in most studies, and the median follow-up period was 17 months (range 0.25 to 72 months). The overall risk of bias was assessed as moderate using the Jadad criteria for one randomized controlled trial (3 of 5 ideal global score) and the modified Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies criteria for comparative studies (mean 17.2 ± 1.8) and noncomparative studies (mean 9.6 ± 1.3). There were 49 unique PROMs for which 233 MCIDs were reported. Calculated values were classified as anchor-based, distribution-based, or not reported. MCID values for each PROM, MCID calculation method, number of patients, and study demographics were extracted from each study. Anchor-based and distribution-based MCIDs were compared for each unique PROM using a Wilcoxon rank sum test given non-normal distribution of values.

RESULTS

The WOMAC Function and Pain subscores were the most frequently reported MCID value, comprising 9% (22 of 233) and 9% (22 of 233), respectively. The composite Oxford Knee Score (OKS) was the next most frequently reported (9% [21 of 233]), followed by the WOMAC composite score (6% [13 of 233]). The median anchor-based values for WOMAC Function and Pain subscores were 23 (IQR 16 to 33) and 25 (IQR 14 to 31), while the median distribution-based values were 11 (IQR 10.8 to 11) and 22 (IQR 17 to 23), respectively. The median anchor-based MCID value for the OKS was 6 (IQR 4 to 7), while the distribution-based value was 7 (IQR 5 to 10). Thirty-nine percent (15 of 38) used an anchor-based method to calculate a new MCID, while 32% (12 of 38) used a distribution-based technique. Twenty-nine percent of studies (11 of 38) calculated MCID values using both methods. For studies reporting an anchor-based calculation method, a question assessing patient satisfaction, pain relief, or quality of life along a five-point Likert scale was the most commonly used anchor (40% [16 of 40]), followed by a receiver operating characteristic curve estimation (25% [10 of 40]). For studies using distribution-based calculations, all articles used a measure of study population variance in their derivation of the MCID, with the most common method reported as one-half the standard deviation of the difference between preoperative and postoperative PROM scores (45% [14 of 31]). Most reported median MCID values (15 of 19) did not differ by calculation method for each unique PROM (p > 0.05) apart from the WOMAC Function component score and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain and Activities of Daily Living subscores.

CONCLUSION

Despite variability of MCIDs for each PROM, there is consistency in the methodology by which MCID values have been derived in published studies. Additionally, there is a consensus about MCID values regardless of calculation method across most of the PROMs we evaluated.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Given their importance to treatment selection and patient safety, authors and journals should report MCID values with greater consistency. We recommend using a 7-point increase as the MCID for the OKS, consistent with the median reported anchor-based value derived from several high-quality studies with large patient groups that used anchor-based approaches for MCID calculation, which we believe are most appropriate for most applications in clinical research. Likewise, we recommend using a 10-point to 15-point increase for the MCID of composite WOMAC, as the median value was 12 (IQR 10 to 17) with no difference between calculation methods. We recommend use of median reported values for WOMAC function and pain subscores: 21 (IQR 15 to 33) and 23 (IQR 13 to 29), respectively.

A digital application and augmented physician rounds reduce postoperative pain and opioid consumption after primary total knee replacement (TKR): a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Severe postoperative pain not only is a considerable burden for patients but also leads to overprescription of opioids, resulting in considerable health concerns. The remarkable development of new technologies in the health care system provides novel treatment opportunities in this area and could exploit the additional placebo effect, provide added value for patients, and at the same time support hospital staff. We aimed to test the pain- and opioid intake-reducing effects of enhanced postoperative pain management by boosting pain medication by using a technical application and/or augmented physician rounds.

METHODS

In a four-arm, randomized clinical trial, 96 patients (24 patients per group) scheduled for a total knee replacement (TKR) were randomized into four groups for four postoperative days: an "application" group (APP) with information via an iPad-based application; a "doctor" group (DOC) with augmented physician rounds; a combination group (APP+DOC), which received both interventions; and a "treatment as usual" group (TAU) as a baseline with no additional intervention besides the standard care which consists of standardized medication, regular physician rounds, and physiotherapy. Postoperative pain and opioid requirements pre- and postoperatively until hospital discharge were recorded.

RESULTS

The difference between post- and preoperative pain was significantly different between the groups (P=.02, partial η2=.10). APP+DOC experienced greater postoperative pain relief than DOC (mean: 2.3 vs. 0.7, 95% CI: 0.08-3.09; P=.04) and TAU (mean 2.3 vs. 0.1; 95% CI: 0.69-3.71; P=.005), respectively, the difference compared to APP (mean 2.3 vs. 1.7; 95% CI -1.98-1.76) was not significant. Opioid consumption differed significantly between groups (P=.01, partial η2=.12). APP+DOC (72.9 mg) and DOC (75.4 mg) consumed less oxycodone than APP (83.3 mg) and TAU (87.9 mg; 95% CI: 2.9-22.1; P=.003). APP+DOC consumed significantly less oxycodone than DOC (d=0.2-0.4). There were no significant group differences in NSAID and Morphine sulfate consumption. Patients in APP+DOC were more satisfied with their treatment than patients in TAU (P=.03, partial η2=.09).

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of an innovative digital app, which implements open drug administration and augmented physician rounds that support the doctor-patient relationship can significantly improve postoperative pain management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee of the ethical commission of the German Psychological Society (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Psychologie; DGPs). The study was registered at DRKS.de (identifier: DRKS00009554).

One-Year Readmissions Following Total Joint Arthroplasty May Be Associated With Failure to Achieve the Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical, Mental, and Physical-Short Form-10a

The primary aims of our study were to determine if hospital readmissions within one year following primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA) and their relative timing influence patients' ability to achieve the two-year Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) physical, PROMIS mental, and PROMIS Physical-Function-Short-Form-10a (SF-10a) minimal clinically important difference (MCID). This is a retrospective study conducted using data from a multi-institutional, arthroplasty registry. Only patients with paired patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) assessments (preoperatively and two years postoperatively) were included. Five separate readmission cohorts were formed: (1) any-cause readmission within one year, (2) any-cause readmission within 90 days, (3) non-index-surgery-related readmission within 90 days, (4) index-surgery-related readmission within one year, and (5) index-surgery-related readmission within 90 days. A propensity score match was used to match each of the patients to one of the 972 patients (1:1 basis) in the non-readmission group. The association between failure to achieve each of the three two-year MCIDs and Readmission status was analyzed using logistic regression. We found that all readmissions within one year and index-surgery-related readmissions within one year resulted in an increased risk of failure to achieve the two-year MCID across all three collected PROMs. Index surgery-related readmissions within 90 days (OR 3.24; 95% CI 1.05-11.05; p=0.048) sustained significantly different rates of two-year PROMIS physical MCID achievement compared to matched controls. Postoperative complications requiring readmission, particularly those related to the joint arthroplasty and those within 90 days of index surgery, significantly impact the ability to achieve the two-year MCID of PROMs.

No increased risk of cancer associated with metal-on-metal or ceramic-on-ceramic procedures compared to other bearing surfaces in patients with total hip arthroplasty: A nationwide linked registry cohort analysis of 167,837 patients

OBJECTIVES

Studies have identified increased cancer risk among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to the general population. However, evidence of all-cause and site-specific cancer risk associated with different bearing surfaces has varied, with previous studies having short latency periods with respect to use of modern Metal-on-Metal (MoM) bearings. Using the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR) linked to Australasian Association of Cancer Registries data, our aim was to evaluate risk of all-cause and site-specific cancer according to bearing surfaces in patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis and whether risk increased with MoM bearings.

METHODS

Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by comparing number of observed cancer cases to expected number based on incidence rate in the Australian population. All-cause and site-specific cancer rates were calculated for all conventional stemmed THA (csTHA) and resurfacing THA (rsTHA) procedures performed for osteoarthritis. Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare cancer rates for MoM, ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and resurfacing procedures with a comparison group comprising metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) or ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) procedures.

RESULTS

There were 156,516 patients with csTHA procedures and 11,321 with rsTHA procedures for osteoarthritis performed between 1999 and 2012. Incidence of all-cause cancer was significantly higher for csTHA (SIR 1.24, 95% CI 1.22-1.26) and rsTHA (SIR 1.74, 95% CI 1.39-2.04) compared to the Australian population. For csTHA, there was no significant difference in all-site cancer rates for MoM (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.01, 95%CI 0.96-1.07) or CoC (HR 0.98, 95%CI 0.94-1.02) compared to MoP and CoP bearings. Significantly increased risk of melanoma, non-Hodgkins lymphoma, myeloma, leukaemia, prostate, colon, bladder and kidney cancer was found for csTHA and, prostate cancer, melanoma for rsTHA procedures when compared to the Australian population, although risk was not significantly different across bearing surfaces.

CONCLUSIONS

csTHA and rsTHA procedures were associated with increased cancer incidence compared to the Australian population. However, no excess risk was observed for MoM or CoC procedures compared to other bearing surfaces.

Preoperative Factors and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty: Multivariable Prediction Modeling

BACKGROUND

Although total hip arthroplasty (THA) has been established as a cost-effective intervention, some patients experience ongoing pain and dissatisfaction. There is interest in predicting postoperative outcomes based on preoperative data, but the relative contribution of different preoperative factors is unclear. The study's aim was to develop multivariable prediction models for the assessment of patient-reported outcomes.

METHOD

Registry data on 1412 patients undergoing THA for osteoarthritis at two hospitals between 2013 and 2018 was used. Potential predictors included age, sex, body mass index, spoken language, education level, previous THA, American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, lower back pain, depression/anxiety, other lower limb arthritis, number of other comorbidities, the preoperative expectation of pain and function, EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS) and preoperative OHS. Radiographic scores were also used: joint space narrowing (JSN), osteophytes, sclerosis, and an overall grade based on the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) classification. Outcomes assessed were the patient-rated improvement, satisfaction, and OHS at six months.

RESULTS

JSN or overall KL scores were the most important predictors (P < .001) for all outcomes, with better radiographic scores associated with worse outcomes. Other predictors associated with poorer outcomes were lower back pain and lower expectation (predicting poor improvement), lower education and higher ASA (predicting lower satisfaction) and younger age, female sex, non-English speakers, lower preoperative EQ-VAS, lower education, back pain, and anxiety/depression (predicting lower OHS).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative radiological scores are an important predictor of patient-reported outcomes at six months postoperatively. Understanding the relative strengths and significance of different factors in predicting outcomes will help the clinician and patient decision-making for THA.

MRI for an Acute Secondary Site Complication in Post-arthroplasty Management: Narrative Review of Safety Concerns for an Implanted Hip and Knee Joint

Arthroplasty in the elderly may present with acute or late-onset complications unrelated to an implanted arthroplasty joint. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation of an acute onset complication in the immediate post-arthroplasty scenario presents safety concerns. An arthroplasty surgeon's dilemma relates to the loosening, heating, or migration of implanted hip or knee joints.

We present a representational case scenario for discussion. A hip arthroplasty patient presenting with hemiplegia in the immediate postoperative period necessitated an MRI evaluation for the brain with an additional angiogram. A knee arthroplasty patient presenting with lower limb weakness in the immediate postoperative period necessitated an MRI evaluation of the brain. Loosening of surgical metallic clips used for wound closure and the instability or loosening of recently implanted hip and knee joints pose significant safety concerns for the arthroplasty surgeon. The confirmatory diagnosis of the secondary site complication in the acute post-arthroplasty perioperative period, however, allowed the allied super-specialist to plan the management protocol.

A review of the literature suggests that the use of nonferromagnetic elements in implanted joints with the use of cement or the press-fit method of implantation during arthroplasty has high safety margins. The staples used for wound closure have significant strength to hold the wound without any disruption or dehiscence during the MRI imaging. The metallic artifacts associated with an implanted joint do not interfere in the evaluation of the secondary site MRI.

MRI can be safely done in a well-fixed joint of non-ferromagnetic elements. The review of literature also suggests that MRI can be done even in the presence of skin staples for the assessment of an acute secondary site complication in a post-arthroplasty patient. The risk-to-benefit ratio though needs to be applied for imaging a secondary site.

The role of the lower extremity functional scale in predicting surgical outcomes for total joint arthroplasty patients

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between lower extremity functional scale (LEFS) scores with postoperative functional outcomes for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients and to investigate the utility of this tool to create an individualized plan of care perioperatively.

Methods

Patients undergoing primary TJA at a single institution from 2016 to 2019 was retrospectively reviewed by a univariate analysis in terms of patient characteristics and outcomes across LEFS quartiles. Multivariate regression models were constructed to evaluate the association between the LEFS quartile and outcomes after controlling for confounding factors.

Results

A total of 1389 patients were included. All patients had a documented LEFS pre- and postoperatively with the last value documented at least 60 days to a maximum of 1 year after surgery. The following cutoffs for LEFS quartiles were observed: quartile 1 preoperative LEFS ≤27, quartile 2 ranges from 28 to 35, quartile 3 ranges from 36 to 43, and quartile 4 ≥ 44. Patients with a higher comorbidity burden and ASA score were more likely to have a lower LEFS. Higher levels of preoperative function were significantly associated with shorter LOS and higher rates of same day discharge, independent ambulation, mobility and activity scores, and rates of discharge home.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that LEFS is a useful tool for aiding clinical resource allocation decisions, and incorporation of the measure into existing predictive models may improve their accuracy.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s42836-021-00106-3.

Patients' perceived walking abilities, daily-life gait behavior and gait quality before and 3 months after total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Functional outcome and patients' daily-life activities after total knee arthroplasty are becoming more important with a younger and more active patient population. In addition to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), trunk-based accelerometry has shown to be a promising method for evaluating gait function after total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate daily-life perceived walking abilities, gait behavior and gait quality before and 3 months after total knee arthroplasty, using PROMs and trunk-based accelerometry.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 38 patients completed questionnaires including the Oxford Knee Score and modified Gait Efficacy Scale before and 3 months after primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty. At both time points, they wore a tri-axial accelerometer at the lower back for seven consecutive days and nights. Gait behavior was calculated using gait quantity and walking speed, and multiple gait quality parameters were calculated.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were seen after 3 months in the Oxford Knee Score [median (interquartile range) 29 (10) vs 39 (8), p < 0.001] and modified Gait Efficacy Scale [median (interquartile range) 67 (24) vs 79 (25), p = 0.001]. No significant changes were observed in gait behavior (quantity and speed) or gait quality variables.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the significant improvements in patients' perception of their walking abilities and PROMs, patients did not show improvements in gait behavior and gait quality. This implies that after 3 months patients' perceived functional abilities after total knee arthroplasty do not necessarily represent their actual daily-life quantity and quality of gait, and that more focus is needed on postoperative rehabilitation to improve gait and functional behavior.

A clinical prediction rule for predicting a delay in quality of life recovery at 1 month after total knee arthroplasty: A decision tree model

BACKGROUND

There is no clinical prediction rule for predicting the prognosis of quality of life after total knee arthroplasty and for assessing its accuracy. The study aimed to develop and assess a clinical prediction rule to predict decline in quality of life at 1 month after total knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

This study included 116 patients with total knee arthroplasty in Japan. Potential predictors such as sociodemographic factors, medical information, and motor functions were measured. Quality of life was measured using the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure at 1 day before surgery and 1 month after total knee arthroplasty. The classification and regression tree methodology was used for developing a clinical prediction rule.

RESULTS

The Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure score pre-total knee arthroplasty (≦34.0 or >34.0) was the best single discriminator. Among those with the Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure score pre-total knee arthroplasty ≦34.0, the next best predictor was knee flexor muscle strength on the affected side (≦0.45 or >0.45 N m/kg). Among those with knee flexor muscle strength on the affected side >0.45, the next predictor was knee flexion range of motion on the affected side (≦132.5°or >132.5°). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of the model was 0.805 (95% confidence interval, 0.701-0.909).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, 4 variables were selected as the significant predictor. However, the results of knee flexor muscle strength and knee flexion range of motion were paradoxical. This result suggests that it should be careful to perform surgery to the patients with good preoperative knee function. The clinical prediction rule was developed for predicting quality of life decline 1 month after total knee arthroplasty, and the accuracy was moderate. This clinical prediction rule can be used for screening of patients with total knee arthroplasty.

Marital Relationship and Quality of Life in Couples Following Hip Replacement Surgery

For the majority of patients with osteoarthritis, total hip (THA) arthroplasty results in a significant reduction in pain, emotional distress, and disability and a significant improvement in their quality of life. Little is known about how these recovery-related changes impact the spouse or the marital relationship. Methods: Twenty-nine couples whose spouse underwent a THA (29 THA) participated in a semi-structured retrospective interview designed for this study. They were each asked to recall the level of pain before and after surgery and to provide a numerical rating score for questions pertaining to the level of disability in seven different activities of daily living. Couples were also asked to list in order of importance the five ways in which the surgery affected their overall quality of life. Results: The spouses estimated their partner’s pain, both pre- and postoperatively, to be significantly higher level than the patient’s perception. The spouses perceived a greater improvement in family/home responsibilities, recreation and social activities, and in their occupation than that noted by the partner. After the arthroplasty, the spouses indicated that their lives had improved with respect to doing more activities/leisure (72%), because their partner had less suffering (59%), they had more independence/less caregiving (55%), it improved their marital relationship (52%), they had a better social/family life (28%), and they were able to travel (28%). Conclusions: This study indicates that THA result in a significant improvement in quality of life not only for the patients, but also for their spouses.

Impact of sarcopenia on rehabilitation outcomes after total knee replacement in older adults with knee osteoarthritis

Introduction:

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is associated with an increased risk of sarcopenia, and aging-related muscle deterioration continues after total knee replacement (TKR). Low skeletal muscle mass index may influence postoperative rehabilitation outcomes. Through this study, we aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative sarcopenia on clinical outcomes after postoperative rehabilitation in older Asian adults.

Methods:

A total of 190 older adults (39 men, 151 women) were enrolled from two previous trials and were classified as having no sarcopenia, class I sarcopenia, or class II sarcopenia according to definitions provided by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP). All patients were retrospectively analyzed before (T₀) and after (T₁) TKR rehabilitation and 10 months after surgery (T₂). The outcome measures included the timed up-and-go test (TUGT), gait speed (GS), timed chair rise (TCR), and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain and physical difficulty (WOMAC-PF). With patient characteristics and T₀ scores as covariates, an analysis of variance was performed to identify intergroup differences in changes of all outcome measures at T₁ and T₂.

Results:

According to the definitions of both the AWGS and EWGSOP, patients with class I and class II sarcopenia exhibited minor changes in TUGT, GS, TCR, and WOMAC-PF at T₁ and T₂ (all p < 0.05), compared with those without sarcopenia. For patients classified as having sarcopenia based on AWGS and EWGSOP definitions, no significant intergroup differences in WOMAC pain score was observed at T₁ or T₂ (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions:

Sarcopenia independently had negative impacts on the treatment effects of rehabilitation on physical mobility but not on pain outcome after TKR in older adults with KOA.

Complications to 6 months following total hip or knee arthroplasty: observations from an Australian clinical outcomes registry

Background

Total hip and total knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) are increasing in incidence annually. While these procedures are effective in improving pain and function, there is a risk of complications.

Methods

Using data from an arthroplasty registry, we described complication rates including reasons for reoperation and readmission from the acute period to six months following THA and TKA in an Australian context. Data collection at 6 months was conducted via telephone interview, and included patient-reported complications such as joint stiffness, swelling and paraesthesia. We used logistic regression to identify risk factors for complications.

Results

In the 8444 procedures included for analysis, major complications were reported by 9.5 and 14.4% of THA and TKA patients, respectively, whilst minor complications were reported by 34.0 and 46.6% of THA and TKA patients, respectively. Overall complications rates were 39.7 and 53.6% for THA and TKA patients, respectively. In THA patients, factors associated with increased risk for complications included increased BMI, previous THA and bilateral surgery, whereas in TKA patient factors were heart disease, neurological disease, and pre-operative back pain and arthritis in a separate joint. Female gender and previous TKA were identified as protective factors for minor complications in TKA patients.

Conclusion

We found moderate rates of major and high rates of minor postoperative complications following THA and TKA in Australia and have identified several patient factors associated with these complications. Efforts should be focused on identifying patients with higher risk and optimising pre- and post-operative care to reduce the rates of these complications.

Sex-Modified Effects of Depression, Low Back Pain, and Comorbidities on Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVE

The influence of sex on post-total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes has been variable in the literature. Though sex is often reported as an averaged effect, we undertook this study to investigate whether sex modified the influence of presurgery characteristics on post-TKA knee pain.

METHODS

This was a prospective study with data derived from 477 TKA osteoarthritis patients (279 women, 198 men). Questionnaires were completed presurgery and at 3 months postsurgery. The association between 3-month post-TKA knee pain and presurgery covariates (body mass index, comorbidity count, symptomatic joint count, low back pain, knee pain, and depressive symptoms) was assessed by linear regression. Sex-specific effects were evaluated using interactions.

RESULTS

Women had significantly worse presurgery knee pain, joint count, and depressive symptoms, and worse postsurgery knee pain, than men. With simple covariate adjustment, no sex effect on pain was found. However, sex was found to moderate the effects of comorbidities (worse for women [P = 0.013]), presence of low back pain (worse for men [P = 0.003]), and depressive symptoms (worse for men [P < 0.001]) on postsurgery pain. Worse presurgery pain was associated with worse postsurgery pain similarly for women and men.

CONCLUSION

The influence of some patient factors on early post-TKA pain cannot be assumed to be the same for women and men; average effects may mask underlying associations. Results suggest a need to consider sex differences in understanding TKA outcomes, which may have important implications for prognostic tool development in TKA.

Outcomes of Patients With Cirrhosis Undergoing Orthopedic Procedures: An Analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample

INTRODUCTION

The population of patients with cirrhosis is growing and shifting toward a more elderly demographic and thus are at risk of developing orthopedic complications. There is lack of data on safety of orthopedic procedures in this population.

METHODS

We performed an analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2005 to 2011 for patients undergoing hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, and spinal laminectomy/fusion, stratified by presence of cirrhosis. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality and secondary endpoints included length of stay (LOS) and costs.

RESULTS

There were 693,610 inpatient stays for orthopedic procedures conducted during the study period, with 3014 (0.43%) patients coded as having cirrhosis. Patients with cirrhosis had a lower median age (62 vs. 66 y; P<0.001) and were more likely to be male (52.3% vs. 41.1%; P<0.001). The inpatient mortality rate was significantly higher in patients with cirrhosis (2.4% vs. 0.4%; P<0.001) as was median LOS (4 vs. 3 d; P<0.001) and mean costs ($19,321 vs. $18,833; P<0.001). Patients with decompensated cirrhosis (vs. compensated cirrhosis) had significantly higher inpatient mortality rates (5.8% vs. 1.1%; P<0.001) with higher LOS and costs (P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, cirrhosis was associated with an increased risk of mortality (odds ratio, 4.22; 95% confidence interval, 2.92-6.10). Hospital cirrhosis volume was inversely associated with mortality, while hospital orthopedic procedure volumes had an inconsistent impact on outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient orthopedic procedures in patients with cirrhosis result in high postoperative mortality, LOS, and costs. Careful patient selection is warranted to optimize cirrhosis patient postoperative outcomes.