Evaluation and Management of Subchondral Calcium Phosphate Injection Technique to Treat Bone Marrow Lesion

Total Knee Conversion Rates and Functional Outcome After Calcium Phosphate Injection for Bone Marrow Lesions of the Knee

Untreated osteoarthritis (OA)-related bone marrow lesions (OA-BML) can hasten the progression of knee OA. Previous studies have shown that fluoroscopically guided intraosseous calcium-phosphate (CaP) injections of OA-BML during knee arthroscopy can lead to pain reduction, improved functionality, and prolonged time until conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent knee arthroscopy and CaP injection for OA-BML versus knee arthroscopy for non-OA-BML pathologies. Two-year follow-up data and patient-reported outcomes including knee injury and operative outcome scores, joint replacement scores (KOOS, JR) were available for 53 patients in the CaP group and 30 patients in the knee arthroscopy group. Results indicate that patients in the CaP group had less frequent conversion to TKA compared with patients in the knee arthroscopy group. Statistical analysis demonstrated a statistical difference between preoperative and postoperative KOOS, JR within the CaP group but not for the knee arthroscopy group. Two-year postoperative KOOS, JR for CaP patients was statistically greater than the 2-year postoperative KOOS, JR of knee arthroscopy patients. Results indicate greater improvement in functional outcomes with knee arthroscopy and CaP injection of OA-BML compared with knee arthroscopy alone for non-OA-BML diagnoses. The results of this retrospective study help to distinguish the benefits of knee arthroscopy accompanied by CaP intraosseous injection from that of knee arthroscopy alone.

The Combined Intraosseous Administration of Orthobiologics Outperformed Isolated Intra-articular Injections in Alleviating Pain and Cartilage Degeneration in a Rat Model of MIA-Induced Knee Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

Intra-articular (IA) platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injections have shown efficacy and safety in treating osteoarthritis (OA). However, the effectiveness and mechanisms of combined intraosseous (IO) administration of these orthobiologics have yet to be explored.

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect on pain, cartilage, synovium/infrapatellar fat pad (IFP), and subchondral bone in rat knee OA, comparing isolated IA with combined IA and IO (IA+IO) injections of PRP or BMAC. It was hypothesized that combined injections would be superior to sole IA injections.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

A total of 48 rats were divided into 6 groups: sham (only joint puncture during OA induction with IA+IO saline injection treatment) and 5 groups with OA induction, control (IA+IO saline injection), PRP (IA PRP+IO saline injection), BMAC IA (IA BMAC+IO saline injection), PRP IA+IO (IA+IO PRP injection), and BMAC IA+IO (IA+IO BMAC injection). OA was induced by IA injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA). Rats were administered different orthobiologics according to their grouping 3 weeks after the MIA injection. Pain changes were evaluated using the weightbearing ratio assay at weeks 3, 4, 5, 7, and 9 after OA induction. Rats were euthanized at week 9 for gross, radiological, histological, immunohistochemical, and immunofluorescence assessments of cartilage, synovium, and subchondral bone.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group, all orthobiologics injection groups had reduced joint pain. Compared with IA injection, IA+IO injections provided superior pain relief by suppressing calcitonin gene-related peptide and substance P in both the synovium/IFP and subchondral bone. IA+IO injections slowed the progression of subchondral bone lesions by inhibiting CD31hiEmcnhi vessel formation and excessive osteoclast and osteoblast turnover while preserving subchondral bone microarchitecture, slowing cartilage degeneration. However, IA+IO injections did not outperform isolated IA injections in reducing synovitis and synovium/IFP fibrosis. Compared with PRP, BMAC exhibited superior inhibition of pain-related mediators, but no significant differences were observed in synovitis suppression, infrapatellar fat pad fibrosis, and subchondral bone protection.

CONCLUSION

IA+IO injections of orthobiologics were more effective in relieving pain, slowing cartilage degeneration, and inhibiting abnormal vascularization and remodeling compared with isolated IA injections. BMAC showed superior pain relief in the synovium/IFP and subchondral bone compared with PRP. Further research is needed to optimize PRP and BMAC components for enhanced efficacy in OA management.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our findings contribute to advancing the understanding of pain relief mechanisms and support the endorsement of IO injection of orthobiologics for the treatment of OA and joint pain.

Complications Following Intraosseous Injections of Calcium Phosphate Bone Cement in Subchondroplasty

An alternative approach to the major problem of osteoarthritis that has begun to pique the interest of researchers focuses on the pathology of the subchondral bone, its constant cross-talk with the articular cartilage, and its interaction with the joint. The presence of bone marrow lesions, detectable on MRI scans, has proven to be a cause of pain as well as a predictor of the progression of degenerative changes. Subchondroplasty is a relatively new surgical procedure for the treatment of these lesions, in which injectable calcium phosphate bone cement is infused into the affected area percutaneously, under fluoroscopic guidance. In its use as a synthetic scaffold, calcium phosphate bone cement exhibits considerable osteoconductivity, bioabsorbability, and low toxicity, thus showing great potential for restoring subchondral biomechanical properties through structural remodeling. Although published results appear quite promising, there are certain complications that the surgeon should be aware of. We reviewed the published data regarding complications of the procedure, highlighting possible causes according to these data, and suggesting safety measures. Avascular necrosis of the talus is the most reported concern. Postsurgical pain, infection, and continuous wound drainage due to bone substitute material extravasation to the joint or soft tissue are also mentioned, necessitating further standardization of the procedure. There are no reports of permanent postoperative disability or fatal outcomes.

Calcium Phosphate Cements Combined with Blood as a Promising Tool for the Treatment of Bone Marrow Lesions

The solid phase of a commercial calcium phosphate (Graftys^® HBS) was combined with ovine or human blood stabilized either with sodium citrate or sodium heparin. The presence of blood delayed the setting reaction of the cement by ca. 7-15 h, depending on the nature of the blood and blood stabilizer. This phenomenon was found to be directly related to the particle size of the HBS solid phase, since prolonged grinding of the latter resulted in a shortened setting time (10-30 min). Even though ca. 10 h were necessary for the HBS blood composite to harden, its cohesion right after injection was improved when compared to the HBS reference as well as its injectability. A fibrin-based material was gradually formed in the HBS blood composite to end-up, after ca. 100 h, with a dense 3D organic network present in the intergranular space, thus affecting the microstructure of the composite. Indeed, SEM analyses of polished cross-sections showed areas of low mineral density (over 10-20 µm) spread in the whole volume of the HBS blood composite. Most importantly, when the two cement formulations were injected in the tibial subchondral cancellous bone in a bone marrow lesion ovine model, quantitative SEM analyses showed a highly significant difference between the HBS reference versus its analogue combined with blood. After a 4-month implantation, histological analyses clearly showed that the HBS blood composite underwent high resorption (remaining cement: ca. 13.1 ± 7.3%) and new bone formation (newly formed bone: 41.8 ± 14.7%). This was in sharp contrast with the case of the HBS reference for which a low resorption rate was observed (remaining cement: 79.0 ± 6.9%; newly formed bone: 8.6 ± 4.8%). This study suggested that the particular microstructure, induced by the use of blood as the HBS liquid phase, favored quicker colonization of the implant and acceleration of its replacement by newly formed bone. For this reason, the HBS blood composite might be worth considering as a potentially suitable material for subchondroplasty.

Carboplasty, a Simple Tibial Marrow Technique for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trial

Background

Carboplasty is a new minimally invasive technique for knee osteoarthritis (OA) that consists of injecting tibial marrow aspirate into the bone-cartilage interface as well as intra-articularly.

Purpose

To compare the clinical and imaging outcomes, as well as the safety, of carboplasty for symptomatic knee OA in a placebo-controlled trial.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

The authors conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare carboplasty with placebo for the treatment of symptomatic knee OA. Patients who had failed medical treatment and had bone edema on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to carboplasty or placebo. The primary outcome of the study was the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) for the knee at 1 year (scores range from 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating worse pain). Secondary outcomes were the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), treatment responder rate (based on achieving the minimal clinically important difference of the NPRS), MRI bone edema reduction, and treatment safety.

Results

In total, 50 patients (25 carboplasty vs 25 placebo) were enrolled and followed up with for an average of 18 months (range, 14-24 months). The average NPRS at baseline decreased from 7.1 ± 0.9 to 2.9 ± 2.1 (P < .001) at 1 year in the carboplasty group and from 7.7 ± 0.9 to 4.9 ± 2.2 (P < .001) in the placebo group. On average, patients after carboplasty improved 60% from their initial NPRS, and patients after placebo improved 37% (P = .003). Patients had a statistically significantly greater improvement from baseline in all KOOS subscales in the carboplasty group compared with the placebo group (P < .001). The responder rates were 96% for carboplasty and 76% for placebo (P = .098). Bone edema was reduced in 72% of patients in the carboplasty group and 44% of patients in the placebo group (P = .045). Neither group had adverse events related to treatment.

Conclusion

Carboplasty resulted in greater pain reduction, a significantly greater improvement in all KOOS subscales, and a similar safety profile compared with placebo in patients with symptomatic knee OA and bone edema.

Registration

ISRCTN69838191 (ISRCT Registry).

Combined subchondral and intra-articular injections of bone marrow aspirate concentrate provide stable results up to 24 months

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and imaging findings up to 24 months of follow-up in patients treated with combined subchondral and intra-articular bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) injections for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA).

METHODS

Thirty consecutive patients (19 males, 11 females) aged between 40 and 75 years (mean age 56.4 ± 8.1 years) with unilateral symptomatic knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence 2-3) were included in the study. Patients were treated with combined intra-articular and subchondral bone BMAC injections (total 9 ml) under fluoroscopic control. IKDC subjective score, VAS for pain, KOOS, and EQ-VAS were prospectively evaluated up to 24 months. Radiographs were performed at baseline and at 24 months after the procedure. MRI was evaluated with the WORMS score at baseline, 6-12 months, and 24 months of follow-up. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v.19.0 and for all tests p < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

No major complications and a 13% failure rate were reported. The IKDC subjective score remained stable from 62.6 ± 19.4 at 12 months to 63.4 ± 17.1 at 24 months (both p < 0.0005 compared to baseline, 40.5 ± 12.5). Similar improvements were reported for all KOOS subscales, while EQ-VAS did not report any significant improvement. VAS pain worsened from 3.0 ± 1.9 at 12 months to 4.4 ± 1.8 at the final follow-up (p = 0.0001), although remaining lower compared to the baseline value of 6.3 ± 1.8 (p = 0.002). The radiographic evaluation did not reveal signs of improvement or deterioration of the OA grade. The MRI findings showed a worsening in marginal osteophytes and synovitis, but a significant reduction of bone marrow edema at 24 months (p < 0.0005).

CONCLUSION

Combined intra-articular and subchondral BMAC injections provided clinical and imaging benefits up to 24 months for the treatment of symptomatic knee OA, with durable clinical results, a low failure rate, and a significant reduction of bone marrow edema.

Outcomes of Patellar Subchondroplasty Surgery: A Case Series

A select subset of patients can present with anterior knee pain in the setting of normal patellar tracking, no significant cartilage damage, and the presence of a bone marrow lesion (BML) involving the patella on advanced imaging. One novel treatment option for this condition is patellar subchondroplasty, where calcium phosphate is injected into the subchondral bone under fluoroscopic guidance. The purpose of this study is to report preliminary outcomes of patients who have undergone subchondroplasty of the patella. The surgical log of the senior author was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who had undergone patellar subchondroplasty from January 2014 to June 2019. Indications for surgery included the presence of retropatellar pain refractory to conservative management without significant arthritis with a related focal BML on magnetic resonance imaging. International Knee Documentation Committee, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Veterans Rand 12-item Health Survey (VR-12) were obtained preoperatively, at 6 months and at final follow-up. Eight patients (nine knees) who underwent patellar subchondroplasty with minimum 1-year follow-up participated in the study. On preoperative magnetic resonance imaging, patients had a mean BML that was 2 cm in diameter. Patients had a median Kellgren-Lawrence grade of 2 both preoperatively and at final radiographic follow-up (15.50 ± 20.52 months). No patient underwent subsequent surgery or conversion to arthroplasty. Compared with baseline, VR-12 mental (p = 0.046) and physical (p = 0.003), KOOS joint replacement (p = 0.024), KOOS pain (p = 0.033), and KOOS sports (p = 0.034) scores were significantly increased at final follow-up (24.00 ± 13.55 months). In addition, on a scale of 0 to 100, patient-reported satisfaction was 73.88 ± 33.90. This study introduces patellar subchondroplasty as a surgical treatment for patients with symptomatic BMLs of the patella without significant arthritis after failure of conservative management. Our results demonstrated good outcomes and patient satisfaction. In addition, no patients converted to patellofemoral or total knee arthroplasty. This study suggests that patellar subchondroplasty may be a reasonable treatment option in the correct patient population.

Avascular Necrosis of the Talus Following Subchondroplasty: A Case Report and Review of Literature

CASE

Avascular necrosis (AVN) of the talus in a 45-year-old female following subchondroplasty with calcium phosphate bone filler for treatment of anterolateral and posteromedial talar dome bone marrow lesions (BMLs). The patient subsequently presented as consultation, 18 months postoperatively, with AVN of the talus. After failing conservative management, the patient underwent a total ankle arthroplasty at 46 months after subchondroplasty with resolution of pain.

CONCLUSION

There are few studies that have reported on the safety of subchondroplasty of the talus. Given the tenuous blood supply to the talar body and poor patient outcomes associated with AVN, caution should be taken before extrapolating the generally positive results of subchondroplasty in the knee.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Single intra-articular injection with or without intra-osseous injections of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of osteoarthritis knee: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Subchondral bony structure damage plays an essential role in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis (OA) knee. An intra-articular injection cannot reach the damaged subchondral bony structure and treat its pathologies effectively. The objective of the study was to compare the clinical effects of single intra-articular injection with or without intra-osseous injections of PRP in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) knee.

METHODS

This was a single-blind, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial. Fifty patients, with OA knee (K&L grade III), with ages between 50 and 65 years, were randomly allocated into 'intra-osseous, intra-articular PRP' ('IO+IA-PRP') (n = 25) or 'intra-articular PRP' group ('IA-PRP') (n = 25). Patients in the 'IO+IA-PRP' group received 18 ml PRP injection, and the 'IA-PRP' group received 8 ml PRP injection. Intra-osseous injections were given at the tibial plateau (5 ml) and femoral condyle (5 ml), along with intra-articular knee injection (8 ml), under fluoroscopic guidance. Outcomes were measured using VAS-pain, the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS), and the treatment satisfaction scale. All patients (n = 50) were followed up till six months.

RESULTS

The mean age was 57.12(4.27) years and 57.00(4.96) years in the 'IO+IA-PRP' and 'IA-PRP' groups. Both groups showed significant improvement in pain relief (VAS pain) and KOOS parameters: pain, symptoms, ADL function, sport and recreation function, and quality of life. Compared to the 'IA-PRP' group, the 'IO+IA-PRP' group showed a greater reduction of VAS pain at six months. However, no significant difference was obtained in VAS pain-relief between these two groups (p = 0.422) at six months. Similarly, at 6 months, in inter-group comparison, except 'sport and recreation function' (p < 0.05), no significant differences were obtained in mean-scores of KOOS parameters: pain (p = 0.514); symptom (p = 0.148), ADL-function (p = 0.991), QoL-(p = 0.376). Patients in the 'IO+IA-PRP' group complained of significant 'injection-associated' adverse events and consumed a greater number of Acetaphenomen.

CONCLUSIONS

Both groups showed significant improvement following the intervention. Intra-osseous PRP injections did not provide any additional benefit over intra-articular PRP injection until six months regarding pain relief and functional improvement.

Knee Intraosseous Injections: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence of Different Treatment Alternatives

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the available clinical evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of knee intraosseous injections for the treatment of bone marrow lesions in patients affected by knee osteoarthritis.

DESIGN

A literature search was carried out on PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar databases in January 2020. The following inclusion criteria were adopted: (1) studies of any level of evidence, dealing with subchondral injection of bone substitute materials and/or biologic agents; (2) studies with minimum 5 patients treated; and (3) studies with at least 6 months' follow-up evaluation. All relevant data concerning clinical outcomes, adverse events, and rate of conversion to arthroplasty were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies were identified: 7 dealt with calcium phosphate administration, 3 with platelet-rich plasma, and 2 with bone marrow concentrate injection. Only 2 studies were randomized controlled trials, whereas 6 studies were prospective and the remaining 4 were retrospective. Studies included a total of 459 patients treated with intraosseous injections. Overall, only a few patients experienced adverse events and clinical improvement was documented in the majority of trial. The lack of any comparative evaluation versus subchondral drilling alone is the main limitation of the available evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

Knee intraosseous injections are a minimally invasive and safe procedure to address subchondral bone damage in osteoarthritic patients. They are able to provide beneficial effects at short-term evaluation. More high-quality evidence is needed to confirm their potential and to identify the best product to adopt in clinical practice.

Subchondral and intra-articular injections of bone marrow concentrate are a safe and effective treatment for knee osteoarthritis: a prospective, multi-center pilot study

PURPOSE

Subchondral bone is becoming a treatment target for knee OA patients, with promising early findings on the use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC). The aim of this prospective, multi-centric pilot study was to evaluate safety as well as clinical and MRI outcomes of a combined approach of intra-articular and subchondral BMAC injections.

METHODS

Thirty patients (19 men, 11 women, 56.4 ± 8.1 years) with symptomatic knee OA were treated with a combination of an intra-articular and two subchondral BMAC injections (femoral condyle and tibial plateau). Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1-3-6-12 months of follow-up with the IKDC subjective, VAS, KOOS, and EQ-VAS scores. The MRI evaluation was performed with the WORMS score.

RESULTS

No major complications were reported and only two patients were considered treatment failures, requiring a new injective or surgical treatment. The IKDC subjective score improved significantly from 40.5 ± 12.5 to 59.9 ± 16.1 at 3 months, 59.1 ± 12.2 at 6 months, and 62.6 ± 19.4 at 12 months (p < 0.0005). A similar improvement was reported for VAS pain and all KOOS subscales at all follow-ups, while EQ-VAS did not show any significant improvement. The MRI analysis showed a significant bone marrow edema reduction (p = 0.003), while the remaining WORMS parameters did not show any significant changes.

CONCLUSION

The pilot evaluation of this combined BMAC injective treatment showed safety and positive outcome up to 12 months of follow-up in patients with symptomatic knee OA associated with subchondral bone alterations. These findings suggest that targeting both subchondral bone and joint environment can provide promising results, and that BMAC can be a valid option for this combined approach to treat knee OA.

Safety and early results of Subchondroplasty® for the treatment of bone marrow lesions in osteoarthritis: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Subchondroplasty® is a novel minimally invasive procedure for painful subchondral bone marrow lesions (BMLs). The aim of this systematic review was to characterize the clinical outcomes of the Subchondroplasty® procedure, a novel minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of BMLs. The hypothesis tested was that patients experience improvements in pain and functional outcomes following the Subchondroplasty® procedure.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched from database inception to search date (June 10, 2020) for all clinical studies which discussed Subchondroplasty®. Two reviewers independently screened 45 unique results and 17 studies were included in the final analysis. Data were collected regarding patient demographics, indications, pain, functional scores, conversion to TKA, and complications of the procedure.

RESULTS

All but one study were level IV evidence; the mean MINORS score was 9 ± 2. There were 756 patients included, 45.1% were female, and the mean age was 54 years (range 20-85). Thirteen studies investigated the effect Subchondroplasty® to the knee, while four studied the impact on the foot and ankle. Median length of follow-up was 12 months. The most common indication for Subchondroplasty® was joint pain with corresponding BML. Major contraindications to Subchondroplasty® included severe OA, joint instability, and malalignment. Mean pain score on visual analogue scale (VAS) prior to Subchondroplasty® was 7.8 ± 0.6, but decreased to 3.4 ± 0.7 postoperatively. All studies investigating functional scores reported improvement following Subchondroplasty® (IKDC 31.7 ± 1.9-54.0 ± 4.2 and KOOS 38.1 ± 0.6-70.0 ± 4.1). There were consistently high levels of patient satisfaction; 87 ± 8% of patients would be willing to undergo the procedure again. Seven cases of complications were reported, most seriously osteomyelitis and avascular necrosis. Conversion to knee arthroplasty ranged from 12.5 to 30% with length of follow-up ranging from 10 months to 7 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Existing low-quality studies show Subchondroplasty® to benefit patients with BMLs through reduction in pain and improvement in function, along with a high degree of satisfaction following the procedure. The low short-to-medium term conversion rate to arthroplasty suggests that Subchondroplasty® may play a role in delaying more invasive and expensive procedures in patients with BMLs. Subchondroplasty® is a novel procedure that has promising initial findings, but requires further high-quality, comparative studies with long-term follow-up to better understand the outcomes of the procedure and impact clinical practice recommendations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Systematic Review of Level III and IV Studies, Level IV.

Knee subchondroplasty for management of subchondral bone cysts: a novel treatment method

Knee subchondroplasty (SCP) is one of the most novel minimally invasive methods for treating bone marrow lesions. The literature suggests that it is safe, with few complications and good outcomes. However, no studies have documented its usage for managing large subchondral bone cysts. This article outlines a case report and details the pearls and pitfalls of SCP in treating large subchondral bone cysts. Our patient underwent arthroscopic debridement with medial femoral condyle SCP. Mild posterior extravasation of synthetic bone substitute was observed on Postoperative Day 1, which was immediately rectified on revision arthroscopy. Gradual escalation of weight bearing and good pain relief were subsequently achieved, and the patient has remained complication-free after two years. No further extravasation were observed on repeat radiography. SCP is a feasible temporising measure that may help to delay the need for bone allograft or immediate knee arthroplasty in younger patients while retaining function and delaying loss of productivity.

Percutaneous Skeletal Fixation of Painful Subchondral Bone Marrow Edema of the Knee

Purpose

To investigate the change in patient-reported pain after percutaneous skeletal fixation (PSF) and to determine the success rate of PSF in the prevention of additional intervention for the treatment of painful subchondral bone marrow edema (SBME) of the knee over a 2-year postoperative period.

Methods

This was a retrospective, single-surgeon analysis of patients undergoing PSF for painful, atraumatic SBME of the knee confirmed on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging with a minimum 2-year follow-up. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, pain localized to the area of edema, failure of nonsurgical intervention (4 weeks of physical therapy and non-steroidal medication use), and absence of tricompartmental Kellgren–Lawrence grade 4 osteoarthritis. All patients underwent arthroscopy, followed by isolated PSF without additional chondral procedures. Pre- and postoperative visual analog scale scores were compared. The primary outcome measure of success was defined as a lack of additional intervention. This included viscosupplementation, corticosteroid injection, or conversion to arthroplasty.

Results

A total of 74 patients with a mean age of 47.2 years and average follow-up time of 38.9 months (range 24-61 months) were evaluated. Successful treatment was noted in 61 patients (82.4%). Of the 13 patients who did not respond to PSF, 5 (6.8%) had been converted to arthroplasty, 11 received viscosupplementation, and 8 required cortisone injections. The average visual analog scale score decreased from 7.55 preoperatively to 3.16 at 2-year follow-up (P < .001). The average body mass index of successfully treated patients (28.2) was significantly less than that of the patients experiencing failure (32.2) (P = .001).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing PSF for the treatment of painful SBME may expect a decrease in knee pain and low rates of additional intervention over a 2-year postoperative period.

Level of Evidence

Level IV; Therapeutic Case Series

Percutaneous Skeletal Fixation of Painful Subchondral Bone Marrow Edema Utilizing an Injectable, Synthetic, Biocompatible Hyaluronic Acid-Based Bone Graft Substitute

Subchondral bone marrow edema (SBME) represents a pathologic alteration of subchondral bone. A strong correlation exists between its presence and the progression of osteoarthritis. Very few treatment options exist between the spectrum of conservative management and the definitive treatment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Tactoset® is an injectable synthetic, biocompatible hyaluronic acid-based bone graft substitute that allows for a minimally invasive treatment for painful SBME via percutaneous skeletal fixation (PSF). We present the technique of PSF using Tactoset.

Talar Avascular Necrosis After Calcium Phosphate Injection Treatment of Talar Bone Marrow Lesions: A Report of 2 Cases

CASE

We report on 2 patients who developed avascular necrosis (AVN) of the talus and poor patient outcomes after undergoing calcium phosphate injection into talar dome bone marrow lesions.

CONCLUSION

Subchondroplasty, defined as calcium phosphate injection for the treatment of articular bone marrow edema, is a recently described procedure for use in the ankle joint. In our opinion, the limited available research is of poor quality and describes equivocal improvement in patient symptoms after this procedure. Given the debilitating outcomes and extensive AVN we observed in 2 patients, we strongly advise caution in the use of this procedure in the talus.

The Efficacy of Subchondroplasty for the Treatment of Knee Pain Associated with Bone Marrow Lesions

CONTEXT

Symptomatic bone marrow lesions on MRI in patients with knee osteoarthritis are strongly associated with progressive deterioration of the joint and an increased risk of progression requiring joint replacement surgery. This study evaluates the efficacy of knee arthroscopy with adjunctive subchondroplasty (i.e. cartilage stabilization) to improve self-rated visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, rate of conversion to arthroplasty, and patient satisfaction levels.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review and phone survey was performed on 12 patients who had undergone knee arthroscopy with adjunctive subchondroplasty for knee pain associated with chronic subchondral bone marrow lesions on MRI. Follow-up for the 12 patients was 36 months on average (range of 12 to 51 months), self-reported paired preoperative and postoperative VAS scores were analyzed in addition to rate of conversion to arthroplasty and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated statistically significant reductions in mean preoperative VAS scores versus six-week postoperative VAS scores from 7.58 to 1.83 (p < 0.001) in addition to significant reductions in mean preoperative VAS scores to final postoperative VAS scores from 7.58 to 1.60 (p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant association (p > 0.05) with patients' demographic and clinical data (e.g., age, height, weight, BMI, length of symptoms) and rate of revision to total arthroplasty after receiving the arthroscopic subchondroplasty procedure. Out of the 12 patients, two (16.7%) patients went on to conversion to total knee arthroplasty.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series, knee arthroscopy with adjunctive subchondroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis with symptomatic bone marrow lesions was associated with clinically significant improvements in VAS pain scores. Furthermore, patients who underwent subchondroplasty had a low rate (16.7%) of conversion to total knee arthroplasty at 36-month follow-up.

Effectiveness of intraosseous infiltration of autologous platelet-rich plasma in the area of the bone marrow edema in osteoarthritis of the knee joint

Osteoarthritis (OA) affects both elderly people, for whom it is one of the main causes of disability, and people of active working age and is an urgent clinical and social problem of resistance of pain syndrome to therapy. The disease is characterized by both destruction of intra-articular and paraarticular structures, such as subchondral bone. While OA is an important sign of pathological changes believe the bone marrow edema (BME). This work examines the effect of BME on development osteoarthritis, and therapeutic approaches to the management of patients with OA. The aim of the study was to develop a method of treatment of BME in OA of the knee joint by locally intraosseous injection of autologous thrombotic-rich plasma (PRP) into the edema zone. In this study 17 patients with the diagnosis: Osteoarthritis II-IV Grade. according to the classification of Kellgren–Lawrence, in which areas of local inflammation in the form of BME were detected on MRI in the subchondral zone in accordance with the international classification of WORMS (Whole Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score). The mean age of patients was 41,7 ± 14,3 years, 10 of them were women and 7 men. Patients were treated with autological platelet-rich plasma under x-ray control injected from extra-articular intraosseous access in the area of BME. Evaluation of effectiveness of treatment performed by VAS, WOMAC and KOOS scales, before the introduction of autoplasma, after 1 and 3 months after the start of treatment. Three months after the manipulation, there was a statistically significant decrease in the intensity of inflammatory syndrome: for WOMAC by 17.5%, for KOOS by 19.4% and for VAS by 33,1% (p < 0,01). Thus, the efficiency of intraosseous Infiltration of autologous platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of patients with OA, accompanied by edema of the bone marrow in the subchondral zone, was proved.

Surgical modalities for the management of bone marrow edema of the knee joint

Background

Bone marrow edema (BME) is a radiological term which can be found in many conditions with varied pathogenesis and histopathological images. It usually presents with pain in the affected joint and is diagnosed with MRI. Subchondroplasty (SCP) and core decompression (CD) are the surgical methods that are available to achieve pain relief and functional improvement. Both surgical methods have their own indications and are used depending on the patient's history. The aim of this literature review article is to discuss the surgical modalities for the management of bone marrow edema focusing on the knee joint. Such topic which analyzes both surgical methods for treatment of bone marrow edema of the knee joint has never been described in a review article before.

Materials and methods

For the purpose of our manuscript we thoroughly searched electronic databases such as Pubmed and Medline to acquire the appropriate material for our review paper. Only English articles were used in this review. In our study we included every article that had described the surgical management of BME of the knee by CD and SCP. In the discussion we included 18 studies (9 CD and 9 SCP) with a total number of patients equal to 397, while 206/397 had undergone surgical intervention (169 underwent SCP and 37 CD).

Results

Follow-up of 180 patients out of 206 were available for our review. A total number of 166 patients (92.2%) were successfully treated. Specifically, 29 (100%) patients were treated by CD and 137 (90.7%) by SCP. In a study, 10 patients who underwent SCP for BME secondary to advanced osteoarthritis (OA) yielded poor results. In other studies, pain persistency was observed in 2 patients, 1 patient had postoperative infection and another patient eventually underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA). 70% prevention of TKA was achieved by SCP in a study of 66 patients with BME secondary to advanced OA. Thus, a total number of 166 patients were considered as clinical success and 14 patients as clinical failure.

Conclusions

The included studies that have been published referred to the surgical methods of CD or SCP for the management of BME of the knee but none of that summarizes all current studies on both methods. Those studies seem that CD is a surgical technique that is proposed to perform in patients without findings of OA that usually fail to respond to conservative treatment. On the other hand, the option of SCP technique is carried out in patients with varied stage of OA associated with subchondral BME. Both methods aim to reduce the pain and to improve function in the setting of subchondral BME. Nevertheless it is not clear in literature which method is the best according to the criteria of the use. This literature review shows a lack of standardized guidelines with respect to diagnosis and surgical treatment.

Current concepts in intraosseous Platelet-Rich Plasma injections for knee osteoarthritis

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a degenerative process that slowly destroys the joints producing pain and loss of function, and diminishes the quality of life. Current treatments alleviate this symptomatology but do not stop the disease, being total knee arthroplasty the only definitive solution. Among the emerging treatments, Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) has shown promising results in the treatment of OA. However, to improve its effectiveness, it is necessary to approach this pathology targeting the whole joint, not only the cartilage, but including other tissues such as subchondral bone. The pathological processes that occur in the subchondral bone have influence of the cartilage loss, aggravating the disease. The combination of intraarticular infiltrations with intraosseous infiltrations regulates the biological processes of the tissues, reducing the inflammatory environment and modulating the overexpression of biomolecules that generate an aberrant cellular behavior. Although the first clinical results using this technique are promising, further research and developing adequate protocols are necessary to achieve good clinical results.