Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation versus Microfracture for Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Emerging technology has a brilliant future: the CRISPR-Cas system for senescence, inflammation, and cartilage repair in osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis (OA), known as one of the most common types of aseptic inflammation of the musculoskeletal system, is characterized by chronic pain and whole-joint lesions. With cellular and molecular changes including senescence, inflammatory alterations, and subsequent cartilage defects, OA eventually leads to a series of adverse outcomes such as pain and disability. CRISPR-Cas-related technology has been proposed and explored as a gene therapy, offering potential gene-editing tools that are in the spotlight. Considering the genetic and multigene regulatory mechanisms of OA, we systematically review current studies on CRISPR-Cas technology for improving OA in terms of senescence, inflammation, and cartilage damage and summarize various strategies for delivering CRISPR products, hoping to provide a new perspective for the treatment of OA by taking advantage of CRISPR technology.

Autologous Costal Chondral/Osteochondral Transplantation and Costa-Derived Chondrocyte Implantation for Articular Cartilage Repair: Basic Science and Clinical Applications

There has been increasing application of autologous costal chondral/osteochondral transplantation (ACCT/ACOT) and costa-derived chondrocyte implantation (ACCI) for articular cartilage repair over the past three decades. This review presents the major evidence on the properties of costal cartilage and bone and their qualifications as grafts for articular cartilage repair, the major clinical applications, and the risks and strategies for costal chondral/osteochondral graft(s) harvest. First, costal cartilage has many specific properties that help restore the articular surface. Costa, which can provide abundant cartilage and cylindrical corticocancellous bone, preserves permanent chondrocyte and is the largest source of hyaline cartilage. Second, in the past three decades, autologous costal cartilage-derived grafts, including cartilage, osteochondral graft(s), and chondrocyte, have expanded their indications in trauma and orthopaedic therapy from small to large joints, from the upper to lower limbs, and from non-weight-bearing to weight-bearing joints. Third, the rate of donor-site complications of ACCT or ACOT is low, acceptable, and controllable, and some skills and accumulated experience can help reduce the risks of ACCT and ACOT. Costal cartilage-derived autografting is a promising technique and could be an ideal option for articular chondral lesions with or without subchondral cysts. More high-quality clinical studies are urgently needed to help us further understand the clinical value of such technologies.

Costal Chondrocyte-Derived Pellet-Type Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Microfracture for the Treatment of Articular Cartilage Defects: A 5-Year Follow-up of a Prospective Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND

Costal chondrocyte-derived pellet-type autologous chondrocyte implantation (CCP-ACI) has been introduced as a new therapeutic option for the treatment of articular cartilage defects. We had previously conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing CCP-ACI versus microfracture at 1 year postoperatively.

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of CCP-ACI versus microfracture for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the knee at 5 years postoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 2.

METHODS

This study describes the mean 5-year follow-up of a previously published prospective clinical trial. The previous prospective trial compared the results of CCP-ACI versus microfracture until 1 year of follow-up. Of the 30 patients who were included in the previous study, 25 were followed up for 5 years. Patients were evaluated based on clinical outcome scores (Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and visual analog scale for pain), magnetic resonance imaging findings, and rates of treatment failure at last follow-up.

RESULTS

The MOCART (Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue) score in the CCP-ACI group was significantly higher than that in the microfracture group at 5 years (62.3 vs 26.7, respectively; P < .0001). The Lysholm score and KOOS score in the CCP-ACI group were significantly higher than those in the microfracture group at 5 years (84.5 vs 64.9, respectively, and 390.9 vs 303.0, respectively; P = .023 and P = .017, respectively). There was 1 case of treatment failure that occurred in the microfracture group.

CONCLUSION

The present randomized controlled trial indicated that the results of both procedures clinically and statistically significantly improved at 1 and 5 years' follow-up in treating cartilage defects, but the results of CCP-ACI were superior to those of microfracture. Magnetic resonance imaging conducted at 1 year and 5 years after CCP-ACI revealed statistically significant superior structural integration with native cartilage tissue compared with microfracture.

REGISTRATION

NCT03545269 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Costal chondrocyte-derived pellet-type scaffold-free autologous chondrocyte implantation provided acceptable mid-term outcomes in osteochondral defects with up to 10-mm depth

PURPOSE

To evaluate clinical, radiographic, and magnetic resonance (MR) results of costal chondrocyte-derived pellet-type scaffold-free autologous chondrocyte implantation (CCP-ACI) in osteochondral defects (ODs) up to 10-mm depth during 5 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Ten patients with CCP-ACI performed in ODs with depth up to 10 mm were retrospectively analyzed. The minimum follow-up period was 5 years. The median age was 36.5 (range 20-55) years. The median size and the depth of the OD lesion were 4.25 cm2 (range 2-6) and 7.0 mm (6-9), respectively. Clinically, the International Knee Documentation Committee, Lysholm, and visual analog scale pain scores were evaluated. Radiographically, the hip‒knee‒ankle (HKA) angle and the Kellgren‒Lawrence (K‒L) grade were assessed. On MR imaging, the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) 2.0 score and the defect depth were evaluated.

RESULTS

All average clinical scores improved significantly by 1, 2, and 5 years postoperatively. The average HKA angle and the proportion of K‒L grade did not change significantly within 5 years. The median total MOCART scores were 50 (range 45-65), 50 (35-90), 57.5 (40-90), and 65 (50-85) at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively, respectively (p = 0.001), with significant improvement at 2 years compared to that at 6 months postoperatively. The signal intensity of the repair tissue and subchondral change significantly improved from 10 (range 10-10) to 12.5 (10-15) (p = 0.036), and from 10 (10-10) to 17.5 (0-20) (p = 0.017), respectively. Significant improvements were seen at 5 years postoperatively for the former and at 2 years postoperatively for the latter. The average depths on MR imaging were 6.7, 6.7, 6.8, 6.6, and 6.6 mm preoperatively and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years postoperatively with no significant changes (n.s).

CONCLUSION

CCP-ACI provided acceptable mid-term outcomes in ODs up to 10-mm in depth without bone grafting despite of no scaffold. The procedure can be one of minimally invasive treatment options for ODs without scaffold-related problems.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Knee Cartilage Lesion Management-Current Trends in Clinical Practice

Many patients, particularly those aged above 40, experience knee joint pain, which hampers both sports activities and daily living. Treating isolated chondral and osteochondral defects in the knee poses a significant clinical challenge, particularly in younger patients who are not typically recommended partial or total knee arthroplasty as alternatives. Several surgical approaches have been developed to address focal cartilage defects. The treatment strategies are characterized as palliation (e.g., chondroplasty and debridement), repair (e.g., drilling and microfracture), or restoration (e.g., autologous chondrocyte implantation, osteochondral autograft, and osteochondral allograft). This review offers an overview of the commonly employed clinical methods for treating articular cartilage defects, with a specific focus on the clinical trials conducted in the last decade. Our study reveals that, currently, no single technology fully meets the essential requirements for effective cartilage healing while remaining easily applicable during surgical procedures. Nevertheless, numerous methods are available, and the choice of treatment should consider factors such as the location and size of the cartilage lesion, patient preferences, and whether it is chondral or osteochondral in nature. Promising directions for the future include tissue engineering, stem cell therapies, and the development of pre-formed scaffolds from hyaline cartilage, offering hope for improved outcomes.

Particulated Costal Hyaline Cartilage Allograft With Subchondral Drilling Improves Joint Space Width and Second-Look Macroscopic Articular Cartilage Scores Compared With Subchondral Drilling Alone in Medial Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy

PURPOSE

To compare the articular cartilage regeneration based on second-look arthroscopy in patients who underwent medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) combined with particulated costal hyaline cartilage allograft (PCHCA) implantation with those who underwent MOWHTO and subchondral drilling (SD). Moreover, we compared the clinical and radiographic outcomes between the groups.

METHODS

From January 2014 to November 2020, patients with full-thickness cartilage defect on the medial femoral condyle who underwent MOWHTO combined with PCHCA (group A) or SD (group B) were reviewed. Fifty-one knees were matched after propensity score matching. The status of regenerated cartilage was classified according to the International Cartilage Repair Society-Cartilage Repair Assessment (ICRS-CRA) grading system and Koshino staging system, based on second-look arthroscopic findings. Clinically, the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and range of motion were compared. Radiographically, we compared the differences in the minimum joint space width (JSW) and change in JSW.

RESULTS

The average age was 55.5 years (range, 42-64 years), and the average follow-up period was 27.1 months (range, 24-48 months). Group A showed a significantly better cartilage status than group B based on the ICRS-CRA grading system and Koshino staging system (P < .001 and <.001, respectively). There were no significant differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes between groups. In group A, the minimum JSW at the last follow-up was significantly increased than that before surgery (P = .013), and a significantly greater increase in JSW was observed in group A (P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

When performed with MOWHTO, the combination of SD and PCHCA was associated with superior articular cartilage regeneration on the ICRS-CRA grading and Koshino staging on second-look arthroscopy performed at a minimum of 2 years follow-up than SD alone. However, there was no difference in clinical outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Particulated Costal Allocartilage With Microfracture Versus Microfracture Alone for Knee Cartilage Defects: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Participant- and Rater-Blinded Study

Background

Microfracture is the first-line treatment for cartilage defects; however, the suboptimal quality of the repaired cartilage remains an issue.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The aim of this first in-human study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of a combination of particulated costal allocartilage and microfracture versus microfracture alone in treating knee cartilage defects. We hypothesized that the particulated costal allocartilage with microfracture would result in superior cartilage repair quality and better clinical outcomes at 48 weeks postoperatively.

Study Design

Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.

Methods

Patients with cartilage defects were allocated randomly to the treatment group (particulated costal allocartilage with microfracture) and control group (microfracture alone). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes of cartilage repair (the primary outcome measure) were evaluated at the 48-week follow-up using the Magnetic Resonance Observation of Cartilage Repair Tissue (MOCART) score. Patient-reported clinical outcomes (visual analog scale [VAS] pain score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS], and International Knee Documentation Committee score) and adverse events were evaluated at 12, 24, and 48 weeks postoperatively.

Results

Overall, 88 patients were included (44 patients each in the treatment and control groups). The total MOCART score at 48 weeks postoperatively was significantly higher in the treatment group than in the control group (P < .001). Among the 9 MOCART variables, 6 were significantly superior in the treatment versus the control group: degree of repair and defect filling (P < .001), integration to the border zone (P < .001), surface (P = .006), structure (P = .011), signal intensity of the repair tissue (P < .001), and subchondral lamina (P = .005). There were significant between-group differences in KOOS-Pain (P = .014), KOOS-Activities of Daily Living (P = .010), KOOS-Sports (P = .029), and KOOS-Symptoms (P = .039) at 12 weeks postoperatively and in VAS pain (P = .012) and KOOS-Pain (P = .005) at 24 weeks postoperatively. At 48 weeks postoperatively, clinical outcomes were comparable between the groups.

Conclusion

Microfracture augmented with particulated costal allocartilage resulted in superior cartilage repair quality compared with microfracture alone in terms of MRI evaluation of the knee joint cartilage defect at the 48-week follow-up. Functional outcomes were favorable for both treatments at final follow-up.

Registration

KCT0004936 (Clinical Research Information Service [CRiS] of the Republic of Korea).

Strategies to Convert Cells into Hyaline Cartilage: Magic Spells for Adult Stem Cells

Damaged hyaline cartilage gradually decreases joint function and growing pain significantly reduces the quality of a patient's life. The clinically approved procedure of autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) for treating knee cartilage lesions has several limits, including the absence of healthy articular cartilage tissues for cell isolation and difficulties related to the chondrocyte expansion in vitro. Today, various ACI modifications are being developed using autologous chondrocytes from alternative sources, such as the auricles, nose and ribs. Adult stem cells from different tissues are also of great interest due to their less traumatic material extraction and their innate abilities of active proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation. According to the different adult stem cell types and their origin, various strategies have been proposed for stem cell expansion and initiation of their chondrogenic differentiation. The current review presents the diversity in developing applied techniques based on autologous adult stem cell differentiation to hyaline cartilage tissue and targeted to articular cartilage damage therapy.

Co-culture pellet of human Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells and rat costal chondrocytes as a candidate for articular cartilage regeneration: in vitro and in vivo study

BACKGROUND

Seeding cells are key factors in cell-based cartilage tissue regeneration. Monoculture of either chondrocyte or mesenchymal stem cells has several limitations. In recent years, co-culture strategies have provided potential solutions. In this study, directly co-cultured rat costal chondrocytes (CCs) and human Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem (hWJMSCs) cells were evaluated as a candidate to regenerate articular cartilage.

METHODS

Rat CCs are directly co-cultured with hWJMSCs in a pellet model at different ratios (3:1, 1:1, 1:3) for 21 days. The monoculture pellets were used as controls. RT-qPCR, biochemical assays, histological staining and evaluations were performed to analyze the chondrogenic differentiation of each group. The 1:1 ratio co-culture pellet group together with monoculture controls were implanted into the osteochondral defects made on the femoral grooves of the rats for 4, 8, 12 weeks. Then, macroscopic and histological evaluations were performed.

RESULTS

Compared to rat CCs pellet group, 3:1 and 1:1 ratio group demonstrated similar extracellular matrix production but less hypertrophy intendency. Immunochemistry staining found the consistent results. RT-PCR analysis indicated that chondrogenesis was promoted in co-cultured rat CCs, while expressions of hypertrophic genes were inhibited. However, hWJMSCs showed only slightly improved in chondrogenesis but not significantly different in hypertrophic expressions. In vivo experiments showed that all the pellets filled the defects but co-culture pellets demonstrated reduced hypertrophy, better surrounding cartilage integration and appropriate subchondral bone remodeling.

CONCLUSION

Co-culture of rat CCs and hWJMSCs demonstrated stable chondrogenic phenotype and decreased hypertrophic intendency in both vitro and vivo. These results suggest this co-culture combination as a promising candidate in articular cartilage regeneration.

Past, present, and future of cartilage restoration: from localized defect to arthritis

BACKGROUND

Osteoarthritis, one of the most common joint diseases, is characterized by the loss of joint function due to articular cartilage destruction. Herein, we review current and previous research involving the clinical applications of arthritis therapy and suggest potential therapeutic options for osteoarthritis in the future.

PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE TREATMENT

The arthroscopic cartilage regeneration procedure or realignment osteotomy has been performed as a joint-conserving procedure in cases where conservative treatment for damaged articular cartilage and early osteoarthritis failed. If cartilage regeneration is ineffective or if the joint damage progresses, arthroplasty is the main treatment option. The need for biological arthritis treatment has expanded as the healthy lifespan of the global population has increased. Accordingly, minimally invasive surgical treatment has been developed for the treatment of damaged cartilage and early osteoarthritis. However, patients generally prefer to avoid all types of surgery, including minimally invasive surgery. Therefore, in the future, the treatment of osteoarthritis will likely involve injection or medication.

CONCLUSION

Currently, arthritis management primarily involves the surgical application of therapeutic agents to the joints. However, nonsurgical or prophylactic methods are expected to become mainstream arthritis therapies in the future.

Anti-hypertrophic effect of synovium-derived stromal cells on costal chondrocytes promotes cartilage repairs

Background

Costal chondrocytes (CCs), as a promising donor cell source for cell-based therapy for cartilage repair, have strong tendency of hypertrophy and calcification, which limited CCs from further application in cartilage regenerative medicine. Synovium-derived stromal cells (SDSCs), have shown their beneficial effect for chondrocytes to maintain phenotype. This study aims to investigate whether SDSCs could help CCs to maintain chondrogenic phenotype and suppress hypertrophic differentiation in cartilage repairs.

Methods

CCs were directly cocultured with SDSCs in pellet or indirectly cocultured using a conditioned medium in vitro for 3 weeks. Cartilage matrix formation and hypertrophic differentiation of CCs were analyzed by RT-PCR, biochemical assays, and histological staining. Cocultured pellets were implanted into the osteochondral defects made on the femoral groove of the rats. Then, macroscopic and histological evaluations were performed.

Results

Pellets formed by CCs alone and CCs cocultured with SDSCs reveal equal cartilage matrix deposition. However, the gene expression of type X collagen was significantly downregulated in cocultured pellets. Immunohistochemistry analysis revealed suppressed expression of type X collagen in cocultured pellets, indicating SDSCs may suppress hypertrophic differentiation of chondrocytes. Further in indirect coculture experiment, SDSCs suppressed type X collagen expression as well and promoted the proliferation of CCs, indicating SDSCs may influence CCs by paracrine mechanism. The pellets implanted in the osteochondral defects showed good restoration effects, whereas the grafts constructed with CCs and SDSCs showed lower type X expression levels.

Conclusion

These results suggest that SDSCs may maintain the phenotype of CCs and prevent the hypertrophic differentiation of CCs in cartilage repair.

The Translational Potential of this Article: CCs is a promising donor cell source for cell-based therapy for cartilage repair. Based on our study, cocultured with SDSCs weakened the tendency of hypertrophy and calcification of CCs, which provide a potential usage of SDSCs in CCs-based cartilage repair therapy to suppress newly formed cartilage calcification and improve clinical outcomes.

The Fragility of Statistical Significance in Cartilage Restoration of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to utilize fragility analysis to assess the robustness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the management of articular cartilage defects of the knee. We hypothesize that the cartilage restorative literature will be fragile with the reversal of only a few outcome events required to change statistical significance.

DESIGN

RCTs from 11 orthopedic journals indexed on PubMed from 2000 to 2020 reporting dichotomous outcome measures relating to the management of articular cartilage defects of the knee were included. The Fragility Index (FI) for each outcome was calculated through the iterative reversal of a single outcome event until significance was reversed. The Fragility Quotient (FQ) was calculated by dividing each FI by study sample size. Additional statistical analysis was performed to provide median FI and FQ across subgroups.

RESULTS

Nineteen RCTs containing 60 dichotomous outcomes were included for analysis. The FI and FQ of all outcomes was 4 (IQR 2-7) and 0.067 (IQR 0.034-0.096), respectively. The average number of patients lost to follow-up (LTF) was 3.9 patients with 15.8% of the included studies reporting LTF greater than or equal to 4, the FI of all included outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The orthopedic literature evaluating articular cartilage defects of the knee is fragile as the reversal of relatively few outcome events may alter the significance of statistical findings. We therefore recommend comprehensive fragility analysis and triple reporting of the P value, FI, and FQ to aid in the interpretation and contextualization of clinical findings reported in the cartilage restoration literature.